「anchore」の検索結果

Guide a researcher step by step into an unfamiliar research field, or decode a paper, abstract, figure caption, or referee comment they cannot parse. Builds understanding in rungs (motivation, vocabulary, core framework, methods, frontier), anchored to what the user already knows, with a checkpoint before each advance. Use when the user says they are new to a field, asks what a research area or method is, says an explanation was too technical, asks to be walked through something step by step, asks for a reading path, or supplies dense research text. Trigger even when the user only names an unfamiliar field or pastes an abstract without asking to be taught. Do not trigger for a one-line summary, a short overview request, or a direct factual answer; do not use it for translation, editing, search, debugging, or specialist questions inside the user's own field. Also trigger in other languages, including Chinese such as 入门, 一步一步讲, 看不懂, 这篇论文讲什么, 帮我理解这个领域.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a whole deliverable (talk, course module, paper, chapter, or referee report) against its manifest without rewriting it. Runs a deterministic gate for build, citations, numbers, facts, and leaks and stops on failure, then runs a finder over each section and a strong-model pass over the whole work, and adjudicates into checks/<date>/findings.json and report.md with anchored findings, severities, and honest NOT CHECKED coverage within a dollar budget. Use when asked to lint or review the whole talk, module, or paper, for a pre-ship review, or for the night shift. Revision stays serial and author-led.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, reverse-engineer, or update living feature specs following the spec-anchored methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits and scores Claude Projects using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics and detects seven structural anti-patterns. When global layer info is provided, adds cross-layer alignment findings. Use when user says "audit my project," "review my custom instructions," "score my project," "evaluate my Claude project," "improve my system prompt," "what's wrong with my project," "why is my project underperforming." Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "my project doesn't work right," "Claude is inconsistent in my project," "my Project used to work and now doesn't." Also use when the user pastes Custom Instructions asking why output is poor or generic. Do NOT use when the user's primary request is a global-layer audit (use rootnode-global-audit if available), single-prompt evaluation (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available), or Memory-only optimization (use rootnode-memory-optimization if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits and optimizes the five global Claude layers (User Preferences, Styles, Global Memory, Skills, MCP Connectors) using the Global Layer Scorecard (six dimensions, anchored 1-5 rubrics). Detects eight cross-layer failure modes and produces evolutionary recommendations (Promotion, Demotion, Codification, Skill Extraction). Use when user says "audit my global setup," "optimize my preferences," "review my Claude configuration," "check my cross-project setup," "are my preferences working," "clean up my global memory," or "what should be in my preferences vs my project." Also use when a user has 3+ Projects and wants to improve their shared foundation. Do NOT use for single-Project audits, Project Memory optimization, or full-stack audits (use rootnode-project-audit, rootnode-memory-optimization, or rootnode-full-stack-audit respectively, if available). Run on Opus 5 or Sonnet 5 at `high` effort (both defaults); depth reduces on legacy models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates and scores Claude prompts and system prompts using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics. Trigger on: "review my prompt," "score this prompt," "rate my prompt," "evaluate this prompt," "improve my prompt," "what's wrong with my prompt." Also trigger on: "why isn't my prompt working," "my prompt produces bad output," "help me fix this prompt," "is this prompt any good." Scorecard covers Objective Clarity, Context Specificity, Reasoning Fit, Output Precision, Behavioral Calibration, and Architectural Efficiency, plus a five-question Output Evaluation Rubric for assessing actual output. Also use when the user pastes a system prompt and asks for feedback. Activate whenever structured quality assessment of a single prompt is the primary need. Do NOT use for project-level audits involving Custom Instructions architecture, knowledge file organization, or multi-file Project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Continuous self-reflection routine combining Schön (reflection-in-action / reflection-on-action) and Mezirow (content / process / premise) levels, anchored on KAMI values (val-002 глубина, val-007 честность перед собой, принцип 1 правда, принцип 2 нулевая толерантность к бреду). Triggers FIRE DURING THE TURN, not at end. Use when: (1) about to make a 2nd+ patch attempt at the same problem, (2) user pushes back with "стоп / нет / опять / так, ещё раз / не то / пиздёж", (3) noticing self drifting into "I think that..." without evidence, (4) about to report "готово", (5) copying a pattern from one place to another, (6) task took >2× expected time. Embeds scientific method (explicit hypotheses + falsifiability + prediction-first + alternatives) as substrate for premise-level reflection, not as ceremony.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

把一个目标/主题/文章/截图/数据转成有观点、有节奏、有视觉约束的单文件 HTML 演示（网页 PPT、科技战报、产品拆解、行业观察、路演/发布会 deck、社媒可传播长图）。**7 套各锚定公认设计体系的视觉人格**——技术崇高派 Technical Sublime（工程冷光·技术战报/算力）/ 构成主义 Constructivism（宣言/号召）/ 信息·数据设计（Tufte·数据/图表）/ 判断震慑极简 Luxury（高端品牌/判断）/ De Stijl 新造型（标准/秩序）/ 编辑主义 Editorial（衬线·深度观察）/ 演示禅 Zen（暗墨·思想/品牌 keynote）——用户可指定，否则按内容自动判选并透明告知。token + validator 机检（P0/P1/P2）+ 32 维审计**机器强制设计一致性**；反伪造（不造数据/logo/截图/来源·示意标注）；字体本地子集；图按角色路由（默认 CSS/SVG·要图先探测生图环境）。Generates single-file HTML decks with 7 design-system-anchored visual personas, a semantic layout grammar, locked design tokens, evidence-grading, machine validation (P0/P1/P2 + 32-dimension audit), an anti-fabrication discipline, and image-generation environment detection. Use when the user wants a presentation / deck / slides / 网页 PPT / 战报 / 产品拆解 / 行业观察 / 路演 / 发布会 / 社媒长图, or asks to turn an article / screenshot / dataset into slides. Do NOT use for large data-table training material, strict legal/medical/financial compliance documents, multi-author collaborative PPT editing, plain-text summaries, requests to replicate a brand's official keynote visuals, or any request to fabricate realistic-looking data / fake logos / fake screenshots / fake sources.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a report or article needs to be split into individual claims before it is graded, cited or used as evidence — the user asks "what does this report actually claim?", "split this into claims", "separate the facts from the judgements", or another skill needs a claim list. Turns one document into five to twelve atomic claims, each typed (observation, attribution, assessment, actor claim, victim disclosure) and anchored to the verbatim sentence it rests on, so every extraction can be checked against the source. Preserves the source's own hedging. Does not grade. Invoked by /quality-of-information-check; its output feeds /ach, /key-assumptions-check, /intelligence-writing, /writing-assessments and /threat-actor-profiling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search, screen, deeply read, synthesize, and publish recent research papers for a user-specified topic, window, count, quality/attention balance, and language. Use for evidence-anchored literature digests, cross-paper comparisons, original-language excerpts, Chinese explanations, guided Feishu setup, or Feishu research reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search a named company's careers board, or resolve a natural-language query into a company list and search each. Extract job descriptions, score pool-anchored and channel-conditional fit against the user's profile, run a contrarian gate before tiers are finalized, and create role folders with assessments. Updates the job search tracker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a seven-agent adversarial pipeline against a resume and cover letter before submission. Produces channel-conditional verdicts anchored to the realistic applicant pool, separates materials quality from submission expected value, and ends with a contrarian pass that can overturn the verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-mortem analysis of a PhysicsIntern workspace run (Claude Code, Pi, Codex, or OpenCode host). Reconstructs the trajectory from the session record — JSONL file(s) for Claude/Pi/Codex, the SQLite store for OpenCode — audits methodology adherence against the workspace's own CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md and skill/agent prompts, checks commit discipline and flag dispositions, and assesses substantive quality. Produces a thorough evidence-anchored markdown report. Use after a workspace has been worked on to identify what went well, where the methodology slipped, and what prompts to improve.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run multi-source web research with adversarial verification and produce a cited report: decomposes the question into 3-6 distinct queries (broad, specific, comparative, recency-anchored), searches and ranks sources by authority, recency, and specificity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build Salesforce-anchored personas and journey maps where every persona ties to a Permission Set Group, primary record types, list views, dashboards, automation, and a measured mobile/desktop posture, and journeys walk each task end-to-end with friction tags that drive UX decisions. NOT for stakeholder authority / RACI (use admin/stakeholder-raci-for-sf-projects), NOT for system-side process flows (use admin/process-flow-as-is-to-be), NOT for Lightning page design itself (use admin/lightning-app-builder-advanced or the lightning-record-page-auditor agent), NOT for pure design / UX research disconnected from org artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts filing-ready U.S. amicus curiae briefs with rule-anchored compliance, additive thesis selection, record-safe fact handling, and verified authority control. Trigger when asked to draft an amicus or friend-of-the-court brief, prepare FRAP 29/32 or Supreme Court Rule 37 amicus filings, draft consent/leave or disclosure language, or handle amicus procedural requirements at any stage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the witness-anchored ruLake cache — search, verify, explain, or refresh. Returns ranked results plus a decision_trace block with cost, latency, witness match, and substrates used.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handles batch effects in bulk RNA-seq via design-matrix inclusion (the correct path for DE), ComBat/ComBat-seq for visualization, SVA for unknown latent factors, RUVSeq for negative-control-gene-anchored unwanted variation, and limma::removeBatchEffect for plotting only. Encodes the Nygaard 2016 cardinal sin against testing on a batch-corrected matrix, the choice between SVA/RUVg/RUVs/RUVr, the confounding non-identifiability problem, the single-cell boundary (Harmony/MNN are NOT for bulk), and the Goh 2017 harmonization critique. Use when designing a DE analysis with batch structure, troubleshooting batch-dominated PCA, choosing ComBat vs ComBat-seq, handling unknown batch via SVA, integrating across studies, or deciding when (rarely) to subtract batch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes CRISPR drug-modifier (chemogenomic) screens with drugZ (Colic et al. 2019 Genome Med), a bidirectional Z-score method that identifies synthetic-lethal sensitizing genes and resistance-conferring suppressor genes from vehicle vs drug comparisons. Covers vehicle-anchored design (not Day-0), the bidirectional Z math giving greater sensitivity to small-effect hits than MAGeCK / STARS / edgeR / RIGER on drug screens, per-gene sumZ and normZ, synth (sensitizer) vs supp (suppressor) FDR, multi-dose handling, integration with control sgRNAs, and comparison with MAGeCK MLE with dose covariate. Use when running a drug-modifier CRISPR screen, identifying sensitizing or resistance genes for a drug candidate, choosing drugZ vs MAGeCK MLE for chemogenomic analysis, troubleshooting low-effect drug screens where MAGeCK lacks sensitivity, or designing a drug-screen layout (vehicle vs drug arms).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project gene annotations across genomes using TOGA (Kirilenko 2023 whole-genome-alignment chain-based projection with intactness classification), CESAR 2.0 (Sharma, Schwede & Hiller 2017 codon-aware exon projection), LiftOff (Shumate & Salzberg 2021 reference-based annotation transfer), Liftover (UCSC), GeMoMa (Keilwagen 2019 evidence-based projection), and Comparative Annotation Toolkit (CAT). Use when transferring annotations from a well-annotated reference to query genome(s), classifying gene-loss vs gene-intact across many genomes at scale, building Zoonomia-style comparative annotations across hundreds of mammals or birds (Kirilenko 2023), detecting pseudogenization, projecting alternative isoforms, or selecting between WGA-anchored (TOGA) vs ortholog-based (LiftOff) annotation transfer strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect, date, and contextualize whole-genome duplication (WGD / paleopolyploidy) events using wgd v2 (Chen et al 2024), KsRates (Sensalari 2022 substitution-rate-corrected Ks dating), DupGen_finder (Qiao 2019), MAPS (Li 2018 phylogenomic), POInT (Conant 2008 ordered-block), SLEDGe (2024 ML-based), Whale.jl (Bayesian DL+WGD), and synteny-anchored paranome construction. Use when identifying ancient polyploidy from Ks distributions and synteny block analysis, positioning WGD events relative to speciation, distinguishing tandem from segmental from WGD duplications, dating the 2R/3R vertebrate / fish / salmonid WGDs, building paranome and Ks-age mixture models, applying KsRates substitution-rate correction across lineages, or testing alternative biased-fractionation / dosage-balance models post-WGD.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build whole-genome alignments using Progressive Cactus (Armstrong 2020 reference-free clade-level WGA), Minigraph-Cactus (Hickey 2024 pangenome-aware), LASTZ chain/net (UCSC pipeline), MUMmer4 (Marçais 2018 pairwise), minimap2 -x asm5/10/20 (Li 2018 fast pairwise), AnchorWave (Song 2022 WGD-aware), and Mauve / progressiveMauve (bacterial). Operates the HAL toolkit (Hickey 2013) for downstream extraction including halSynteny, halLiftover, halBranchMutations, and hal2maf. Use when constructing multi-species alignments for comparative-annotation projection (TOGA), synteny detection, conservation analyses (phyloP / PhastCons), or pangenome graph construction; selecting between reference-free (Cactus) and reference-anchored (LASTZ chains/nets) approaches; tuning sensitivity for closely vs distantly related genomes; or producing HAL files for genome-wide downstream tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect syntenic blocks and structural rearrangements between genomes using MCScanX (Wang 2012), JCVI/MCScan (Tang 2008 Python), GENESPACE (Lovell 2022) for orthology-anchored riparian visualization, SyRI for structural variation, AnchorWave for sequence-level synteny, i-ADHoRe 3.0 for highly diverged species, SynNet for synteny networks, and ntSynt for multi-genome macrosynteny. Use when identifying collinear gene blocks across species, distinguishing macrosynteny from microsynteny, detecting inversions/translocations/duplications, anchoring orthology in WGD lineages, producing publication riparian plots, computing synteny block age via Ks (cross-references whole-genome-duplication), or running synteny-aware ortholog inference in polyploids.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Read-only reviewer for agent-flow. Judges one diff against the acceptance criteria, AGENTS.md rules, protected paths and risk boundaries; returns a JSON verdict with line-anchored findings. Use when launched with AGENT_FLOW_ROLE=reviewer or asked for an agent-flow review of a diff.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。