「checkpoint」の検索結果

Performs zero-shot time-series forecasting with Google's TimesFM, including regular-grid CSV preparation, quantile forecasts, XReg covariates, and held-out evaluation. Uses the Apache-licensed TimesFM 2.5 checkpoint by default and documents the distinct TimesFM 3.0 multivariate API and weight-license requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds and validates PyHealth clinical machine-learning pipelines for EHR, signals, imaging, and medical codes. Use for PyHealth dataset loading, MIMIC-III/IV, eICU or OMOP prediction tasks, patient-level evaluation, mortality/readmission/length-of-stay modeling, medication recommendation, sleep staging, Trainer checkpoints, and ICD/ATC/NDC/RxNorm mapping.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Version-aware guidance for PufferLib reinforcement-learning environments, vectorization, policies, PuffeRL training, evaluation, and safe checkpoint review. Covers the native 5.0 build and environment API, published 3.0.0 Gymnasium/PettingZoo adaptation, and a pinned historical 4.0 profile.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an agent, harness, gateway, MCP workflow, or multi-step automation claims completion and the available traces, checkpoints, approvals, tool calls, or deployment records must be judged without trusting self-reported success.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when asked to ship a SaaS MVP, audit application security, build an AI agent, run browser QA, or design a domain model with multiple skills and verified checkpoints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drain acc's deliberation queue — open/waiting brain_frames checkpointed by headless runs — via acc_act(runtime="continue").

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when an agent workflow needs deterministic recovery evidence for sandbox, MCP/tool, worker, checkpoint, memory, or orchestration failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Masterclass lecturing — one continuous explanation carried by slides, with dense pages, long narration that builds an argument across several real cases, and checkpoints that are rare and deliberate. Use when the ask is a lecture, a masterclass, a systematic walkthrough of a subject, 「大师课」「系统讲解」「讲透」, or any topic whose payoff is understanding rather than practice; also use when the user names this style. Not for hands-on training (that is `workshop-style`) and not for a course whose point is manipulating a mechanism (that is `deep-interactive`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Export a promoted fine-tuned model in the right deployment format — merged safetensors, LoRA-only, GGUF with imatrix, or FP8. Use after a checkpoint passes promotion, when choosing a quantization format for a target device, or when an exported model fails its smoke test.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when implementing tasks according to Conductor's TDD workflow, handling phase checkpoints, managing git commits for tasks, or understanding the verification protocol.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shipyard's governed delivery pipeline — converge the mission, synthesize a durable spec, decompose vertical-slice tickets with blocking edges, run the frontier in parallel via team, close with verification, and report with a full decision log. Two entry gates — the yard gate (drydock audit) and the fog gate (an effort whose destination is unclear is routed to /ask-navigator before this pipeline starts). Humans own the checkpoints where there is no unique answer or the error cost is severe; agents continuously run everything repeatable and acceptable-by-evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when quantizing a diffusion DiT with NVIDIA ModelOpt and making the resulting FP8 or NVFP4 checkpoint loadable, verifiable, and benchmarkable in SGLang Diffusion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify poisoned training data and backdoored ML models across the pipeline using IBM's Adversarial Robustness Toolbox (activation clustering, spectral signatures, trigger reconstruction), Cleanlab for label-quality issues, and supply-chain checks like weight-hash verification and safetensors enforcement. Use before training or deploying on third-party/user-contributed data or downloaded checkpoints, during ML supply-chain reviews, or when investigating model misbehavior tied to specific inputs (suspected backdoor trigger).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in LangGraph - the production-grade framework for building stateful, multi-actor AI applications. Covers graph construction, state management, cycles and branches, persistence with checkpointers, human-in-the-loop patterns, and the ReAct agent pattern. Used in production at LinkedIn, Uber, and 400+ companies. This is LangChain's recommended approach for building agents. Use when: langgraph, langchain agent, stateful agent, agent graph, react agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides PyTorch-native distributed LLM pretraining using torchtitan with 4D parallelism (FSDP2, TP, PP, CP). Use when pretraining Llama 3.1, DeepSeek V3, or custom models at scale from 8 to 512+ GPUs with Float8, torch.compile, and distributed checkpointing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent autonomous startup system for Claude Code. Triggers on "Loki Mode". Orchestrates 100+ specialized agents across engineering, QA, DevOps, security, data/ML, business operations, marketing, HR, and customer success. Takes PRD to fully deployed, revenue-generating product with zero human intervention. Features Task tool for subagent dispatch, parallel code review with 3 specialized reviewers, severity-based issue triage, distributed task queue with dead letter handling, automatic deployment to cloud providers, A/B testing, customer feedback loops, incident response, circuit breakers, and self-healing. Handles rate limits via distributed state checkpoints and auto-resume with exponential backoff. Requires --dangerously-skip-permissions flag.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pixel-perfect Figma to React conversion using coderio. Generates production-ready code (TypeScript, Vite, TailwindCSS V4) with high visual fidelity. Features robust error handling, checkpoint recovery, and streamlined execution via helper script.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unified Minions skill for both deterministic shell jobs and LLM subagent orchestration. Replaces the older `gbrain-jobs` routing intent. Use when: submitting gbrain jobs, shell/background tasks, spawning subagents, checking progress, steering running work, pausing/resuming, parallel fan-out. One durable, observable, steerable queue interface. Also carries the durable-execution doctrine for any operation expected to exceed ~2 minutes: capability ladder, deadman checks that verify the result was reported, and content-addressed stage checkpoints for expensive pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

为 FastGPT 新增、修改或审查自动系统升级脚本及其注册信息。涉及系统迁移、升级任务、启动迁移、migration registry、checkpoint、全量重跑、阻塞升级、进度或失败数据时使用；普通业务更新和未接入自动升级框架的一次性手工清洗不使用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a task the owner keeps doing by hand into a named, reusable skill they can trigger by name or put on a schedule. Watches them do it once or listens to them describe it, works out what varies and what stays fixed, writes the skill with approval checkpoints in the right places, registers it with the router, and shares it with the team. This is how a business gets a workflow nobody shipped for them. Use this whenever the owner describes something repetitive they wish were automatic — including phrasings like "I do this every week," "can you remember how to do this," "make this a thing I can just ask for," "build me an agent," "automate this for me," "turn this into a workflow," or "I want this to happen every Monday." Reach for it when they describe a routine, even without asking for automation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

/cs:post-mortem <decision> — Honest retrospective on an executed decision, scored against original assumptions and dissent. Closes the strategic sprint loop. Use when a decision hits its 90-day review checkpoint or its kill criteria trigger — e.g. scoring last quarter's pricing change against its pre-committed success metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

/cs:soc2-audit-prep <scope> — SOC 2 Type II readiness 6-question forcing interrogation. Observation-period focused. Use before Type II observation begins, mid-period checkpoint, or pre-field-test month-10 readiness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Milestone progress review — completeness, quality metrics, risk, go/no-go recommendation. At checkpoints or before a deadline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when modifying an existing PEFT method (its forward method, parameters/buffers, state_dict handling, or config defaults) to ensure that existing checkpoints keep working.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。