「classic」の検索結果

使用 Classic 预设流程完成单个 change 的轻量调整。在用户明确调用 /comet-tweak、选择 tweak，或恢复 workflow: tweak 时使用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the Classic preset for a lightweight adjustment within one change. Use when the user explicitly invokes /comet-tweak, selects tweak, or resumes workflow: tweak.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

在隔离范围内，通过所属 Native 或 Classic workflow、匹配风险的测试、生成 Runtime 检查和谨慎交付，实施已确认的 Comet GitHub Issue 或 review 阻塞项。用户明确要求修复已验证的 Issue 或 PR 问题时使用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or upgrade a Comet Classic workflow Skill via Comet Creator. Not for general Skill authoring, cleanup, or review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

使用 Classic 预设流程修复局部缺陷。在用户明确调用 /comet-hotfix、选择 hotfix，或恢复 workflow: hotfix 时使用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the Classic preset to repair a localized defect. Use when the user explicitly invokes /comet-hotfix, selects hotfix, or resumes workflow: hotfix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classic block-game inspired design with playful colors, bold display fonts, and compact, high-energy layouts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Foundry IQ knowledge bases. WHEN: make local or Blob documents searchable; create/diagnose KBs; triage unsupported connectors or multi-source KB creation/reconfiguration; connect existing KB to agents (including multi-source KBs); create/reuse a Search service; retrieve from an existing knowledge base with citations; no brand words needed. Read its procedure before query/target questions. NOT: other KB providers, repository-file search, classic Azure AI Search index/query/app work, generic agent creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cell segmentation from multiplexed tissue images. Covers deep learning (Cellpose, Mesmer) and classical approaches for nuclear and whole-cell segmentation. Use when extracting single-cell data from IMC or MIBI images after preprocessing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sets up CloudWatch observability for the first time - Omni (CloudWatch Application Observability) and classic CloudWatch. Omni: creating a Space or Domain; access grants (who has access, at what level) and access profiles bounding async alerts, integrations, or agents; instrumenting an app or AI agent with the plain ADOT SDK so traces reach Omni (Python/Node/Java/.NET on EC2/ECS/EKS/Lambda), incl. no-image-rebuild and .NET CoreCLR vars; ingesting Azure telemetry via the CloudWatch agent on an Azure VM or AKS; connecting Slack to a Space; whether GitHub or a custom MCP tool server (HTTP/stdio; API key, bearer, OAuth2) can be connected. CloudWatch: onboarding a service to Application Signals - ADOT auto-instrumentation, the amazon-cloudwatch-observability add-on, monitored service, reporting telemetry, ServiceEvents, CI/CD git/deployment metadata, Terraform/manifest edits. For using what is set up - queries, dashboards, alarms, Omni alerts, X-Ray, synthetics, Dynamic Instrumentation - use aws-observability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds, configures, debugs, and optimizes AWS observability - operator-symptom questions and detecting Omni vs classic CloudWatch. CloudWatch on an already-reporting service: Log Insights, metric/composite/anomaly alarms, custom metrics/EMF, dashboards, X-Ray/ADOT tracing, canaries, CloudTrail, Dynamic Instrumentation (live breakpoints/snapshots), the Application Signals service map, and fleet health views. CloudWatch Omni on an existing Space: SQL over logs and traces, PromQL over metrics, Omni dashboards, Omni alerts, context graph for root cause, programmatic/IaC access (API/SDK/CLI/CloudFormation), driving Omni from a coding agent or skills, and evaluating AI agent quality from traces - on-demand and online scoring of live traffic, readback, custom evaluators. For first-time setup - creating an Omni Space, granting access, ingestion, or ADOT instrumentation for Application Signals (ServiceEvents, CI/CD metadata) or Omni - use setting-up-cloudwatch-observability. Not for app logging or threat detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI citation readiness audit as part of SEO, covering classic Google search and AI search surfaces together. Use whenever the user wants their content to rank or be cited in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Copilot, You.com, Google AI Overviews, or Google AI Mode. AI citation optimization audit scoring blog posts for major answer surfaces. Evaluates evidence-backed citability, purpose clarity, entity clarity, structured data, and AI crawler accessibility. Suggests evidence-backed explanations and a 0-100 AI Citation Readiness score. Use when user says "geo", "ai citation", "ai optimization", "citation audit", "aeo", "perplexity optimization", "chatgpt citation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI citation readiness audit as part of SEO, covering classic Google search and AI search surfaces together. Use whenever the user wants their content to rank or be cited in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Copilot, You.com, Google AI Overviews, or Google AI Mode. AI citation optimization audit scoring blog posts for major answer surfaces. Evaluates passage-level citability, Q&A formatting, entity clarity, structured data, and AI crawler accessibility. Generates citation capsules and a 0-100 AI Citation Readiness score. Use when user says "geo", "ai citation", "ai optimization", "citation audit", "aeo", "perplexity optimization", "chatgpt citation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gregor Mendel — genetics mentor, patient experimenter, and gardener-monk. Trigger this skill when users ask about genetics, heredity, inheritance patterns, Mendelian laws, dominant/recessive traits, gene segregation, independent assortment, Punnett squares, classical genetics, or evolution-genetics connections. Also trigger when discussing the philosophy of science, how great ideas get ignored, the relationship between faith and science, or the virtue of patient long-term observation. Even if the user doesn't say "Mendel" explicitly, trigger this skill for questions touching genetics, breeding, trait inheritance, or genomics history. Part of the AIPOCH Science Mentor Skill Hub.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when evaluating A-share short-term technical setups through Tang Nengtong's classic TA lens: volume-price relationships, moving average systems, breakout signals, and short-term momentum entry/exit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automated Planning utilities for loading PDDL domains and problems, generating plans using classical planners, validating plans, and saving plan outputs. Supports standard PDDL parsing, plan synthesis, and correctness verification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare and implement eviction policies (LRU, LFU, FIFO, S3FIFO, ARC) for bounded-capacity caches. Use when choosing or implementing an eviction policy for a buffer pool, page cache, CDN edge, or LLM KV cache, or when writing a replay simulator that supports multiple policies. Clarifies recency vs frequency semantics, queue topology, saturating counters, ghost buffers, and the second-chance rule that distinguishes modern FIFO-family policies from classic LRU.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain and match against a library of classic dynamic programming patterns. Provides pattern matching, template code generation, variant detection, and problem-to-pattern mapping for DP problems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Foundry IQ knowledge bases. WHEN: make local or Blob documents searchable; create/diagnose KBs; triage unsupported connectors or multi-source KB creation/reconfiguration; connect existing KB to agents (including multi-source KBs); create/reuse a Search service; retrieve from an existing knowledge base with citations; no brand words needed. Read its procedure before query/target questions. NOT: other KB providers, repository-file search, classic Azure AI Search index/query/app work, generic agent creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Combined codebase health dashboard that scores a project across all four quality dimensions — PR quality, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — in a single pass, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants an overall quality assessment, asks "how healthy is this codebase?", "run all the checks", "I need a health score before the release", or wants to onboard a new team with a quality overview. Do NOT trigger for: server health checks, HTTP health endpoints, Kubernetes liveness/readiness probes, database health, or application uptime. Also do not trigger when the user specifically requests only one dimension — use the corresponding focused skill instead (brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PR code review that surfaces decay risks, design smells, and maintainability issues with concrete Symptom → Source → Consequence → Remedy findings, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to review code, check a PR, shares a diff or pastes code asking "does this look right?" / "any issues here?" / "ready to merge?", or asks for feedback on a function, class, or file. Also triggers when user mentions: code smells / refactoring / clean architecture / DDD / SOLID principles / Hyrum's Law / deep modules / tactical programming / conceptual integrity / Brooks's Law / Mythical Man-Month / second system effect. Do NOT trigger for: questions about how to write code from scratch, language syntax questions, or framework/tool questions where no existing code is shared.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-sweep mode: runs a unified analysis across all quality dimensions — code decay, architecture, tech debt, and test quality — then applies fixes directly to the codebase. Safe changes are auto-applied; risky changes are confirmed before execution. Drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user wants to "fix everything", "sweep the codebase", "auto-fix all issues", "clean up the whole project", or asks for a single command that both diagnoses and remediates quality problems. Do NOT trigger for: read-only audits or health reports where the user only wants findings without code changes; single-dimension reviews (use the focused skill instead: brooks-review / brooks-audit / brooks-debt / brooks-test); server health checks, HTTP /health endpoints, Kubernetes probes, database health, or application uptime.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Test quality review drawing on twelve classic engineering books — with primary focus on xUnit Test Patterns, The Art of Unit Testing, How Google Tests Software, and Working Effectively with Legacy Code — that diagnoses structural problems in an existing test suite: brittleness, mock abuse, coverage illusions, slow execution, poor readability. Triggers when: user asks about test quality, shares test files for review, or expresses frustration: "tests keep breaking whenever I change anything", "our tests take forever", "tests pass but bugs still reach production", or "we have too many mocks". Do NOT trigger for: writing new tests from scratch (use the regular test-writing workflow) or testing framework/syntax questions — this skill reviews an existing suite for structural quality problems, not individual test authoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architecture audit that maps module dependencies, checks layering integrity, and flags structural decay across a codebase, drawing on twelve classic engineering books. Triggers when: user asks to audit architecture, review folder/module structure, check for circular imports, understand how the codebase is organized, or asks "does this follow clean architecture?" or "why does everything depend on everything?". Also triggers for onboarding requests: "explain this codebase to a new developer" or "give me a codebase tour" (use onboarding mode). Do NOT trigger for: PR-level code review (use brooks-review) or line-level refactoring questions — this skill analyzes structural/module-level concerns, not individual functions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。