「code mode」の検索結果

Runs several language models as independent coders on one labeling or discovery task and treats disagreement as data. Covers diverse panel assembly, independent voting, consensus rules, Cohen’s and Fleiss kappa, Krippendorff’s alpha, correlated-error limits on validity claims, human validation, and reporting. Use when the user asks about a council, panel, ensemble, or jury of models, how to combine model labels, or what kappa or alpha to report for model coders. Single-model codebook and validation work goes to text-classification, per-item confidence to llm-calibration-logprobs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hand off code review to OpenAI Codex CLI. Use when asked to "review code with codex", "codex review", "get a second opinion on code", "review my changes", "review this PR", or when you want AI-powered code review from a different model perspective.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Claude API (platform.claude.com) のモデル・SDK リファレンス。 モデル選択基準・model ID とバージョン・Fable 5 / Mythos 5 / Opus 5 / Sonnet 5 の新機能・移行ガイド、 pricing・model deprecation・用語集を含む。 公式 SDK 7 言語（Python / TypeScript / Java / Go / Ruby / C# / PHP）、 Claude API 用 CLI（`ant`、Claude Code CLI とは別）の quickstart / authentication / scripting、 middleware、OpenAI SDK 互換レイヤー、Apple Foundation Models 連携を含む。

[BETA] Detect, review, and fix code-quality and correctness issues in an AEM as a Cloud Service project — locally, with no external services or network calls. Use whenever a user wants to check, review, assess, audit, scan, modernize, upgrade, or fix AEM Java, Sling Models, OSGi, or Maven code — for example: "check my Sling Models are implemented correctly", "review my @Inject usage", "are my Maven dependencies up to date", "scan this AEM project for issues", "modernize my Sling Models", or "fix code-quality problems". Name the files to assess, or ask it to scan the repo; it detects issues, plans, and — only when you ask — applies surgical edits on a branch or in place, then verifies with mvn compile. It recognises the intent and handles each issue type itself, reporting anything it cannot yet fix. This skill is in beta. Verify all outputs before applying them to production projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenClawにモデル提供サービスを追加し、実際の応答まで確認するスキル。認証情報は環境変数やファイルへの参照で扱い、設定の検証と結果報告も進めます。

• OpenClawにモデルを追加したいとき
• 認証情報を参照形式で設定したいとき
• モデルの実際の応答を確認したいとき

複数の視点でまとめた重要な意思決定の草案に、Codexによる外部批評を一度追加します。結論の弱点や見落とし、反対意見の扱いを確認するスキルです。

• 判断が難しい重要な草案の検討
• 草案にない失敗の可能性の確認
• 強い反対意見の見落としの確認

Claude Codeの利用ログからトークン使用量と推定費用を集計し、モデル・セッション・日付別に確認します。予算との比較やCSV出力にも使えます。

• 今日と昨日の支出を比較したいとき
• モデル・セッション別の費用確認
• 予算と支出を比較したいとき

AIが修正したコードで同じ不具合が再発しないよう、APIの必須項目や処理分岐を自動テストで確認し、テストとビルドを先に行うレビュー手順を整えるスキル。

• バグ修正後に再発防止テストを足したいとき
• API応答の必須項目を確認したいとき
• テスト用と本番用の応答を見直したいとき

実際の開発課題で複数のコーディングエージェントを比較するスキル。成功率、取得可能なAPI費用、所要時間、繰り返し実行の安定性を測り、選定や更新後の評価に使えます。

• 実際の開発課題でエージェントを比較
• 新しいツールやモデルの導入前評価
• エージェント更新後の性能確認

Merge multiple fine-tuned models using mergekit to combine capabilities without retraining. Use when creating specialized models by blending domain-specific expertise (math + coding + chat), improving performance beyond single models, or experimenting rapidly with model variants. Covers SLERP, TIES-Merging, DARE, Task Arithmetic, linear merging, and production deployment strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connects to and performs inference with Google Cloud Agent Platform GenAI models, including First-Party Gemini models and Third-Party OpenMaaS models (Llama, DeepSeek, Qwen, etc.). Use when asked to perform inference, ask a model a question, run a test prompt, execute chat completions, or generate code for calling Gemini or OpenMaaS models, authenticate with GenAI SDK, OpenAI SDK, or legacy Agent Platform SDK, configure base URLs and global/regional endpoints, or troubleshoot 429 Resource Exhausted (DSQ), 400 User Validation, or 404 Not Found errors. Don't use for deploying models to endpoints or for running model evaluations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive OpenAI's Codex CLI (`codex exec`) as a non-interactive coding sub-agent from inside Claude Code. Load WHENEVER you want to delegate a coding/analysis/refactor task to Codex, get a second opinion / adversarial review from another model, fan out parallel agents across files or worktrees, or run a long mechanical job while you stay the planner. Covers the exact `codex exec` flags, sandbox tiers, output capture, JSON/schema modes, session resume, parallel fan-out, and the mandatory "delegate → capture → independently verify, never trust the self-report" supervision loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Repository-grounded threat modeling that enumerates trust boundaries, assets, attacker capabilities, abuse paths, and mitigations, and writes a concise Markdown threat model. Trigger only when the user explicitly asks to threat model a codebase or path, enumerate threats/abuse paths, or perform AppSec threat modeling. Do not trigger for general architecture summaries, code review, or non-security design work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scans a codebase for security vulnerabilities using CodeQL's interprocedural data flow and taint tracking analysis. Triggers on "run codeql", "codeql scan", "build codeql database", "SAST scan", "taint analysis", "dataflow analysis", or "find vulnerabilities in this repo". Covers Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Go, Java/Kotlin, C/C++, C#, Ruby, and Swift. Supports "run all" (security-and-quality + security-experimental) and "important only" (high-precision) scan modes, and creates data extension models for project-specific sources and sinks. For fast single-file pattern matching, or when no build is available for a compiled language, use the semgrep skill; to parse SARIF that already exists rather than produce it, use the sarif-parsing skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the Weave router locally in docker compose and drive it with `codex exec` to reproduce and verify routing/translation/marker behavior for Codex's Responses API path. Use when verifying a router fix end-to-end for Codex, reproducing a prod Codex routing bug, confirming routing-marker / force-model / subscription-passthrough behavior, or testing a `/force-model` route — without touching the user's global Codex config.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when integrating legacy code, custom code, or C/C++ code into Simulink via C Function blocks. Configure Simulink C Function blocks programmatically using the SymbolSpec API. TRIGGER when the user: - Asks about calling or wrapping C/C++ code or libraries in Simulink - Wants to create, configure, or use a C Function block - Mentions integrating custom code, legacy code, or external C/C++ into a model - Asks to integrate a C++ class into a Simulink model or test bench - Mentions inputs/outputs/parameters for a C++ algorithm block

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calls ChIP-seq peaks with MACS3, MACS2, HOMER, or SPP across narrow (TF) and broad (histone) modes. Handles input control matching, fragment-size modeling vs --nomodel, effective genome size, ENCODE-style IDR vs naive overlap, hyper-ChIPable artifacts, and aligner-specific shifts. Use when calling peaks from ChIP-seq alignments, choosing between narrow vs broad mode for a histone mark, deciding model vs nomodel for low-depth data, applying ENCODE pseudoreplicate IDR, or reconciling MACS vs HOMER vs SPP results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill for Node.js backend AI via @cloudbase/node-sdk (>=3.16.0) — cloud functions, CloudRun, Express/Koa/NestJS, serverless APIs, scheduled jobs, LLM proxies, agent orchestration. The only SDK supporting image generation (ai.createImageModel + generateImage). Text via ai.createModel with groups cloudbase, hunyuan-exp, or custom-*; model ids (e.g. deepseek-v4-flash, glm-5, kimi-k2.6) go in the `model` field of generateText/streamText. MUST run two-step preflight before code — see body. NOT for browser/Web (use ai-model-web) or Mini Program (use ai-model-wechat).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Break down Claude Code usage by model family (Opus / Sonnet / Haiku) from the Agent Monitor dashboard — each family's share of tokens, share of cost, and the spots where an expensive model is doing cheap work. Pulls per-model token and cost splits from /api/pricing/cost, current rates from /api/pricing, fleet token totals from /api/analytics, and per-session model assignment from /api/sessions. Use when deciding model routing or whether to downshift work to a cheaper tier.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess compliance with the EU General-Purpose AI (GPAI) Code of Practice under the AI Act (Regulation (EU) 2024/1689). Use when asked to determine GPAI model provider obligations, assess Code of Practice compliance, evaluate transparency or copyright requirements for GPAI models, check systemic risk obligations, build a GPAI compliance roadmap, or prepare for AI Office requests. Covers all three Code chapters (Transparency, Copyright, Safety & Security), the 12 commitments and their measures, systemic risk classification (Article 51), provider obligations (Articles 53 and 55), open-source exemptions, enforcement timeline, Commission/AI Office supervision, and DACH-specific overlays such as BSI cybersecurity and works council implications. Triggers on phrases like "GPAI compliance", "Code of Practice assessment", "GPAI model obligations", "systemic risk evaluation", "AI Act transparency requirements", "GPAI copyright policy", "general-purpose AI compliance".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze a codebase and produce a structured threat model at .turbo/threat-model.md covering assets, trust boundaries, attack surfaces with existing mitigations, attacker stories, and calibrated severity. Use when the user asks to "create a threat model", "threat model", "threat model this codebase", "security analysis", "analyze the attack surface", "what are the threats", or "identify security risks".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CUMCM 国赛、MCM/ICM 美赛与电工杯数学建模竞赛的端到端协作工作流。Use when a user explicitly works on one of these modeling contests or asks to run/review a modeling-competition paper from problem selection through modeling, solving, robustness, writing, compliance, and final submission review. Provides 10 stages, persistent decision state, competition-specific rules/templates, deterministic scoring helpers, numbered decisions, and Codex/Claude Code handoff. Do not trigger for generic model selection, ordinary data analysis, or non-competition paper review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When handing work to the Codex CLI earns its cost, and how to size the run: second-model review, bounded implementation hand-offs, sandbox permissions, model and reasoning effort. Use when the user asks for Codex or `codex exec`, when a change is complex or high-stakes enough that an independent reviewer would change the outcome, or when a delegated run needs its model, effort, or permissions chosen. For agents other than Codex itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in integrating Claude Code with CI/CD pipelines. Covers headless mode for non-interactive execution, GitHub Actions and GitLab CI/CD integration, automated code review, issue triage, and PR workflows. Essential for teams wanting AI-powered automation in their development pipelines. Use when "claude code CI/CD, headless mode, GitHub Actions claude, GitLab CI claude, automated code review, PR automation, issue triage, claude-code, cicd, automation, github-actions, gitlab, headless, pipeline, devops" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。