「complete」の検索結果

Archive a completed change in the experimental workflow. Use when the user wants to finalize and archive a change after implementation is complete.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a completed Shell scenario planning exercise needs to be converted into a TikTok script. Triggers when user says "make a tiktok", "tiktok script", "generate tiktok", or "content from scenario". Requires a completed scenario with narratives, findings, and worldview integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finding validation gate - 7-Question triage adapted for FIND schema. Run before moving any FIND from Research to Completed. One NO = keep in Research. All YES = move to Completed, then run /evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds traceability matrices connecting requirements to design documents to source code implementation, tracking the complete development lifecycle. Use when you need to verify implementation completeness, ensure all requirements are implemented in code, generate compliance documentation, audit requirement coverage, identify orphaned code, or create traceability reports for stakeholders. Supports parsing requirements from Markdown, Word, and PDFs; extracting design from architecture docs and API specs; and scanning source code for implementations. Outputs to Markdown tables, Excel/CSV, and HTML visualizations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively enhance user requirements into clear, complete, actionable specifications through analysis and clarification. Use when: (1) Users provide initial requirements that need refinement, (2) Requirements are vague, incomplete, or ambiguous, (3) Creating formal specifications from informal descriptions, (4) Identifying missing constraints, edge cases, or acceptance criteria, (5) Clarifying assumptions and implicit dependencies, or (6) Preparing requirements for design, implementation, or verification. Operates interactively: analyze → ask clarifying questions → refine based on responses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates complete modules and components from interface contracts and specifications. Use when Claude needs to build larger software components, implement interfaces, create service layers, or generate complete modules with multiple related classes. Supports Python (with type hints and protocols) and Java (with interfaces and abstract classes). Trigger when users request "implement this interface", "generate a module for", "create a service layer", "build a component that implements", or provide interface definitions that need implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teach any topic deeply from first principles and build evidence-based paths toward exceptional capability. Use when a user asks to understand, explain, learn, or deep-dive into a topic; asks why or how something works, why it matters, how alternatives compare, or what different perspectives reveal; requests current paradigms, a complete roadmap or curriculum, deliberate practice and feedback, or a top-1%-level mastery plan. Answer explanation questions completely before offering a curriculum; route explicit mastery goals to an adaptive practice and proof-of-capability system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic quality check for a completed rebuttal document before submission. Use after Stage 3 document compilation or after Stage 5 final remarks writing to verify completeness, tone, factual accuracy, and structural integrity. Catches common rebuttal errors before they reach reviewers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial verification of research theses — cross-run/cross-thesis contradiction via the entity index, pre-mortem (Klarman/Kahneman: assume the loss already happened, reverse the path), inversion (Munger: invert, always invert), and wrong_if falsifiability review. ≈50-finding cap sorted by severity; content-derived finding IDs; incremental scoping with three backstops; lifecycle hooks at pillar-complete / thesis-complete / pre-reduction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Weekly clinical-trial status diff — the 11-category change report over the stored weekly snapshots (spec 055 FR-B03). Surfaces exactly what changed on the trial registry for your coverage: New / Suspended / Withdrawn / Terminated / Recruiting / Recruitment-Complete / Completed / Ahead / Delayed / Upsized / Downsized, every row carrying previous and new values, with risk flags on Terminated and Downsized and re-timing flags on Ahead and Delayed. The stored-previous-value discipline makes each week's diff reproducible.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess genome assembly quality using QUAST for contiguity metrics and BUSCO for completeness. Essential for evaluating assembly success and comparing assemblers. Use when evaluating assembly completeness and quality.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply requirement quality principles when generating or validating feature specifications. Enforces feature completeness, scenario structure, AC verifiability, feature independence, and implementation slice quality. Use when writing feature specs, validating existing requirements, or when the user mentions 'validate this spec', 'check this feature', 'requirement quality', 'is this spec complete', or 'requirement-quality'. This skill governs the craft of writing individual feature specifications — not technical design (see design-blueprint), not implementation (see code-forge).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when prompting a learner to complete hands-on MATLAB coding exercises, guided practice, debugging drills, code tracing, small MATLAB projects, or MATLAB-script assessment during tutoring. Use when the tutor should create a complete runnable MATLAB script, execute it through MATLAB tools, compare the produced outputs with expected outputs, and evaluate MATLAB programming style.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert patterns for Algolia search implementation, indexing strategies, React InstantSearch, and relevance tuningUse when "adding search to, algolia, instantsearch, search api, search functionality, typeahead, autocomplete search, faceted search, search index, search as you type, algolia, search, instantsearch, indexing, relevance, faceted-search, autocomplete" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Continue is an open-source AI code assistant for VS Code, JetBrains and the terminal (the cn CLI) that works with any LLM: Claude, GPT, Gemini, Ollama and other local models. Use when a user asks to configure Continue with config.yaml, add chat or tab autocomplete models, write rules or custom prompts, connect MCP servers, run cn headless in scripts, or migrate from config.json. Continue was acquired by Cursor in June 2026: the release from that month is final and the Hub is offline, so the skill covers local, self-configured use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keeps specification documents and code in agreement. Audit mode finds every divergence when an implementation is claimed complete; sync mode detects spec drift in staged changes and updates the spec after user approval, so each commit is a reconciled snapshot of spec, tests, and code. Use when an implementation is claimed complete against a spec, before committing changes that may drift from the spec, or after approving decisions that must flow back into it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's baseline comparisons are COMPLETE, FAIR, and SIGNIFICANT: a required recent SOTA baseline is missing while 'best/SOTA' is claimed (HP-MISSING-BASELINE); a baseline is undertuned / given less compute-tuning-data, run at a mismatched config, or the equal-budget ablation-as-baseline is absent (HP-WEAK-BASELINE); 'outperforms' is asserted over overlapping error bars or with no variance/seeds (HP-SIG-OVERLAP); and a cross-row 'improves over baseline by X%' is arithmetically wrong (HP-DELTA-ERROR, cross-row form only). A versioned per-domain baseline profile + a live leaderboard/recency search are assembled by the EXECUTOR as structured facts; a fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per dimension) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Works at L0 (stated comparisons) and deepens at L2 (configs/result files). A completeness question it cannot settle internally becomes needs_external_check, never a guessed missing baseline. Emits baseline-comparison-audit.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "baseline audit", "missing baselines", "is the comparison fair", "weak baseline", "baseline 误报", "SOTA earned?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

App Store Optimization (ASO) Skill workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Complete App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching, optimizing, and tracking mobile app performance on Apple App Store and Google Play Store and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

App Store Optimization (ASO) Skill workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Complete App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching, optimizing, and tracking mobile app performance on Apple App Store and Google Play Store and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

App Store Optimization (ASO) Skill workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Complete App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching, optimizing, and tracking mobile app performance on Apple App Store and Google Play Store and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

App Store Optimization (ASO) Skill workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Complete App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching, optimizing, and tracking mobile app performance on Apple App Store and Google Play Store and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits any API documentation site by crawling every endpoint page and scoring each one across 5 checks: description quality, OpenAPI spec presence, body param descriptions, response codes, and response schema completeness. Produces a polished interactive HTML report with a summary scorecard, site-wide pattern analysis, ranked top issues, and per-endpoint findings with specific fix guidance. Trigger this skill whenever a user provides a documentation URL and asks to audit, review, analyse, or check their API docs. Also trigger for: "do the same audit for X", "audit docs.company.com", "check the API docs at X", "run the API docs audit on X", "review the docs for Y API", or pastes a URL alongside words like audit, review, crawl, check, analyse, quality, completeness, or gaps. Always use this skill — do not attempt the audit without following this structured crawl-score-report workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits any SDK documentation site and produces a fully scored, downloadable HTML report. Use this skill whenever a user provides a documentation URL and asks to audit, review, analyse, score, or check the quality of SDK docs. Also trigger for phrases like "audit the SDK docs at X", "check if the docs at X are complete", "review this SDK documentation", "how good are these docs", "run an SDK audit on X", or any time a user pastes a URL alongside words like audit, review, crawl, check, analyse, quality, completeness, or gaps. ALWAYS use this skill — do not attempt the audit without following this structured crawl → analyse → cross-reference → report workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform clarified user requests into structured delegation prompts optimized for specialist agents (cto-architect, strategic-cto-mentor, cv-ml-architect). Use after clarification is complete, before routing to specialist agents. Ensures agents receive complete context for effective work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。