249 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Review dimensions for acceptance test quality - happy path bias, GWT compliance, business language purity, coverage completeness, walking skeleton user-centricity, priority validation, observable behavior assertions, traceability coverage, and walking skeleton boundary proof
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PM Studio command center. Use for a quick overview of available commands and document inventory. Use when someone says "pmstudio", "show commands", "what can I generate", or "project status". Do NOT use for detailed completeness audits — use /pmstudio-nfr instead. Shows document coverage dashboard and recommends which /pmstudio-* command to run next.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain Operately translations when adding or changing user-visible copy, fixing missing translations, or adding a supported language. Covers shared Gettext/i18next catalogs, glossaries, generation, and completeness checks; excludes translating user-authored content or general prose outside the product.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Summarizes GitHub PR, GitLab MR, or Azure DevOps PR metadata, review threads, changed files, and template completeness. Use during review-ticket or code-review workflows when PR/MR context exists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Standardizes the creation and evaluation of high-density Agent Skills (Claude, Cursor, Windsurf). Ensures skills achieve high Activation (specificity/completeness) and Implementation (conciseness/actionability) scores. Use when: writing or auditing SKILL.md, improving trigger accuracy, or refactoring skills to reduce redundancy and maximize token ROI.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review test code for quality, design, and completeness after implementing a feature or fixing a bug. Use when the user asks to "review my tests", "check my test quality", "are these tests good enough", "review testing", or after completing a feature implementation that includes tests. Also use when tests feel brittle, flaky, or superficial. Cross-references production code to find coverage gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits internal (dev/) and external (docs/) documentation completeness for a feature, subject, or set of existing docs, maps changes indicated by the user, across Infrahub's documentation layers, reports gaps, and optionally applies the fixes. TRIGGER when: the user wants to audit or check documentation coverage, find doc gaps after a feature branch, or verify docs are still current for a subject or specific files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: authoring new documentation from scratch → use the add-docs flow; only linting/formatting Markdown → run `uv run invoke docs.lint`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code comment accuracy verification, documentation completeness assessment, comment rot detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit one research Workspace for declared Unit outputs and Pipeline target Artifacts, writing `output/CONTRACT_REPORT.md`; use for mid-Run coverage snapshots or final delivery completeness, not deep provenance integrity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-delivery quality assurance for analysis work. Use when reviewing analysis before sharing with stakeholders, checking for completeness, validating assumptions, or ensuring clarity of recommendations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive SEO/GEO/AEO analysis toolkit for optimizing content visibility across traditional search engines (Google, Bing), AI platforms (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude, Gemini, Grokipedia), answer engines (Google AI Overviews, Bing Copilot, featured snippets), voice assistants (Google Assistant, Siri, Alexa), and social media (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, WhatsApp, Instagram). Analyzes HTML/Markdown/JSX files for metadata completeness, schema markup, keyword optimization, entity extraction, and generates multi-format audit reports with platform-specific recommendations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enhancement-overlay SOP for adding sparse (BM25 / keyword) retrieval alongside dense (embedding) retrieval. Activate when a calling agent is building, reviewing, or debugging a retrieval pipeline whose corpus contains exact-match tokens — identifiers, error codes, SKUs, API/function names, proper nouns, citations, rare jargon — that pure dense embedding silently misses. Encodes the single decision rule (**hybrid is traffic-driven, not theoretical: add sparse only when the query share that depends on exact tokens is non-trivial**), the wiring of QueryFusionRetriever-style fusion (RRF vs alpha-weighted), and per-query-type alpha tuning. Frame the work as recovering lexical identity that dense pooling destroys, not as "add keyword search for completeness". Cross-links [[llamaindex]].
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate or review mathematical-modeling competition AI tool usage statements and the anonymous AI工具使用详情.pdf. Use when users provide real AI usage records, or when checking a paper, statement, details PDF, code, and AI records for completeness, anonymity, and consistency.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Jewish and Hebrew wisdom - Order before creation, Kabbalah Tree of Life, Gematria navigation, Talmudic argument as collision, Tzimtzum incompleteness
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate consistency across SEED Design component documentation layers (design guidelines in ./docs/content/docs/components, Rootage specs in ./packages/rootage/components, and React docs in ./docs/content/react/components). Use when auditing documentation completeness, before releases, or validating new component docs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check, clean, verify, and improve IEEE citations, references, BibTeX entries, citation positioning, related-work logic, DOI metadata, venue names, and reference formatting using routed citation and metadata guidance. Use when preparing IEEE manuscripts, fixing bibliography errors, verifying reference completeness, improving related work, checking whether citations support claims, or identifying missing classic/recent baselines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Check BIM model consistency: naming conventions, parameter completeness, spatial relationships, and data integrity across model elements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess construction data quality using completeness, accuracy, consistency, timeliness, and validity metrics. Automated validation with regex patterns, thresholds, and reporting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage as-built documentation for project closeout. Track drawing markups, coordinate updates, and verify completeness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate comprehensive BIM model validation reports. Check data quality, completeness, and compliance with standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track as-built documentation and record drawings. Monitor submission status, manage revisions, and ensure completeness for handover.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establishes ongoing RoPA maintenance processes including update triggers, change management integration, version control, stakeholder review cycles, and completeness verification procedures. Activate for RoPA updates, record maintenance, change management, version history, review scheduling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides the audit of Records of Processing Activities (RoPA) against GDPR Article 30 requirements for both controllers and processors. Activate when verifying RoPA completeness, validating mandatory fields, or preparing for supervisory authority inspections. Keywords: RoPA, Article 30, records audit, processing activities, controller records, processor records.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Learning designer quality check for Canvas LMS courses. Audits module structure, content completeness, publishing state, date consistency, and rubric coverage. Use when asked to "QC a course", "is this course ready", "pre-semester check", or "quality review".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。