「constraints」の検索結果

Comprehensive PostgreSQL-specific table design reference covering data types, indexing, constraints, performance patterns, and advanced features

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge and utilities for creating animated GIFs optimized for Slack. Provides constraints, validation tools, and animation concepts. Use when users request animated GIFs for Slack like "make me a GIF of X doing Y for Slack."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reference skill for Zoom WebSockets. Use after routing to a low-latency event workflow when persistent connections, faster event delivery, or security constraints make WebSockets preferable to webhooks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or evaluate an architecture decision record (ADR). Use when choosing between technologies (e.g., Kafka vs SQS), documenting a design decision with trade-offs and consequences, reviewing a system design proposal, or designing a new component from requirements and constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write contextual commits that capture intent, decisions, and constraints alongside code changes. Use when committing code, finishing a task, or when the user asks to commit. Extends Conventional Commits with structured action lines in the commit body that preserve WHY code was written, not just WHAT changed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing or rebalancing direct vs. partner-led channel economics — computing fully-loaded cost-to-serve per channel, channel ROI with cash / LTV / marginal lenses, and optimal channel mix subject to constraints. For Head of Commercial, RevOps, and VP Sales doing quarterly channel review when pipeline is mixed (e.g., 60% direct + 40% partner-led) and nobody actually knows which channel makes money after CAC, support load, partner discount, deal-velocity differences, retention differential, and overhead allocation are all loaded in. Outputs cost to serve, channel ROI verdicts (DOUBLE-DOWN / MAINTAIN / DEFUND / EXIT), a sensitivity-tested channel-mix recommendation, and the diminishing-returns inflection (e.g., 'which channel actually makes money — direct or partner?').

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when running an annual SaaS audit, doing category-level spend review, or rationalizing the supplier base — when the user needs a spend audit, spend categorization (UNSPSC-aligned with Pareto breakdown and industry profiles), purchasing-cycle analysis (bottleneck categories per Goldratt's Theory of Constraints), or risk-balanced supplier consolidation that refuses single-source recommendations for tier-1 categories without a documented break-glass plan. Triggers on "spend audit", "SaaS audit", "spend categorization", "supplier rationalization", "supplier consolidation", "category strategy", "duplicate SaaS", "renewal cluster".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a BizOps lead, COO, or process-improvement owner needs to document an end-to-end business process (procurement, employee onboarding, incident handoff, customer-onboarding, claims adjudication) in BPMN-style notation, measure cycle times by stage, surface where work spends most of its time waiting vs. being worked, and quantify the gap between processing time and total elapsed time. Pairs Lean / Six Sigma / Theory-of-Constraints canon with deterministic stdlib-only Python tools to produce a process map, a ranked bottleneck list (with severity + root-cause hypothesis), and a cycle-time analysis (P50, P90, value-add ratio, Little's-Law throughput). Distinct from sales-pipeline, system-reliability (SLO), and strategic-OKR work — this is tactical process documentation for internal operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate realistic dummy datasets for testing with customizable columns, constraints, and output formats (CSV, JSON, SQL, Python script). Use when creating test data, building mock datasets, or generating sample data for development and demos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Judge a supplied subject against the project's evidence and constraints. Use when assessing an external-adoption question, a holistic take on a document, or a supplied approach set. Use for an oracle panel to consult other models and reconcile their opinions. Use ce-explain for understanding and ce-doc-review for findings review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improves GKE workload reliability, using PDBs, health probes, and topology spread constraints. Use when configuring GKE workload reliability, setting up PDBs, or configuring GKE health probes (liveness, readiness, startup). Don't use for generating K8s YAML manifests (use gke-manifest-generation) or disaster recovery and cluster backups (use gke-backup-dr).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses Google Ads account performance issues such as conversion loss (value or volume), low lead flow/volume, and lost impression share (opportunities) due to ad rank, bids, or budgets. Use when troubleshooting sudden performance drops, analyzing campaign impression share metrics, investigating low lead flow, or searching for bidding and budget constraints. Don't use for setting up new campaigns, uploading conversion events directly, or general Google Mobile Ads SDK integration issues (use gma-android-integrate instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The hard rules for editing `@kortix/sdk` (packages/sdk) — a PUBLISHED npm package with constraints no other package in this repo has: TDD is mandatory (failing test first, gates run and pasted every turn, explicit shippable YES/NO/NOT YET); exported names INCLUDING types are a public API contract and renaming one is a breaking change; the `version` field is inert and must never be hand-bumped; adding an export requires three synchronized edits; and a static import-graph tripwire enforces the framework-free core. Load WHENEVER you add, edit, rename, move, export, test, or delete anything under packages/sdk, or touch its streaming/transport layer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Workflow 5: orchestrate a text-only resubmit of a polished paper to a different venue under hard constraints (no new experiments, no bib edits, no framework changes, never overwrite prior submissions). Use when user says "resubmit pipeline", "重投流程", "port paper to <new venue>", "resubmit to <venue>", "tighten paper for resubmission", or has a rejected/withdrawn paper to move to a different top venue under tight time budget.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ambient Memori long-term memory for Claude Code via local Bash. MUST TRIGGER on essentially every non-trivial user turn: run recall before drafting any substantive response, whether or not the user mentioned memory, a prior session, or past work. The default is to check memory first; do not wait to be asked. Always fire before external lookups (WebSearch/WebFetch) and before answering any question about preferences, prior decisions, constraints, project history, status, past work, or any non-trivial coding/research task. Skip only for trivial acknowledgements/closings, purely self-contained turns where prior context cannot possibly help, or when the user explicitly opts out. Use Advanced Augmentation after drafting the final response for every non-trivial turn, as the last memory step. Use recall.summary only for broad session summaries/orientation, compaction after context loss, feedback for memory quality, quota for limits, and signup only when explicitly requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Toolkit for creating animated GIFs optimized for Slack, with validators for size constraints and composable animation primitives. This skill applies when users request animated GIFs or emoji animations for Slack from descriptions like "make me a GIF for Slack of X doing Y".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI demos and GPU compute with Gradio Spaces and Hugging Face Spaces ZeroGPU. Use when writing or reviewing code that uses `@spaces.GPU`, configuring `python_version` or `requirements.txt` for a ZeroGPU Space, or handling ZeroGPU-specific code constraints — pickle-based process isolation, `gr.State` semantics across the worker boundary, no `torch.compile` (use AoTI instead), CUDA wheel-only builds (no `nvcc` at build or runtime), large vs xlarge sizing, and dynamic duration callables. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user mentions ZeroGPU, `@spaces.GPU`, or the `spaces` Python package, or hits ZeroGPU-specific code errors like `PicklingError` across the worker boundary, `illegal duration`, or `flash-attn` wheel-build failures — even when the user does not explicitly ask for ZeroGPU coding guidance. Trigger on `import spaces` or `@spaces.GPU` in code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and review paid-media budgets, bidding, pacing, marginal return, forecasts, CPA, ROAS, MER, LTV:CAC, constraints, and allocation across supported platforms. Use for ad budget allocation, media budget, bidding strategy, scaling, spend pacing, budget forecast, ROAS target, or investment tradeoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and draft or explicitly apply paid-ad optimizations using evidence, financial constraints, experiments, and capability-gated adapters. Use for campaign optimization, budget reallocation, bid changes, pausing or archiving ads, requests to delete campaigns, search-term or negative-keyword actions, creative rotation, or improving CPA and ROAS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reliable fallback technique for writing large file contents when write_file and shell_agent both fail with 'unknown error' due to payload size limits — uses run_shell with a Python heredoc to bypass tool constraints.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reliable fallback technique for writing large file contents when write_file and shell_agent both fail with 'unknown error' due to payload size limits — uses run_shell with a Python heredoc to bypass tool constraints, with an explicit mkdir -p step to ensure the target directory exists before writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MANDATORY prerequisite — load this skill BEFORE every `generate_diagram` tool call. NEVER call `generate_diagram` directly without loading this skill first. Trigger whenever the user asks to create, generate, draw, render, sketch, or build a diagram — flowchart, architecture diagram, sequence diagram, ERD or entity-relationship diagram, state diagram or state machine, gantt chart, or timeline. Also trigger when the user mentions Mermaid syntax or wants a system architecture, decision tree, dependency graph, API call flow, auth handshake, schema, or pipeline visualized in FigJam. Routes to type-specific guidance, sets universal Mermaid constraints, and tells you when to use a different diagram type or skip the tool entirely (mindmaps, pie charts, class diagrams, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, reviewing, or debugging how an agent's context window gets filled, pruned, or shared — choosing what loads at boot versus on demand, sizing an install or an always-loaded file, fixing an agent that drifts, repeats itself, or forgets constraints mid-task, planning compaction or summarization, deciding single-agent versus subagents, engineering handoffs between agents, or picking a tool loadout. NOT for rewording a prompt's tone, choosing which model to pin, or debugging business logic — those are adjacent moments this skill does not serve. Historical 2024–2025 snapshot; not normative for present-day frontier models — see the Status section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan customer discovery interviews with the right goal, segment, constraints, and method. Use when preparing interviews for problem validation, churn research, or new product ideas.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。