「cyber」の検索結果

Governance, risk, and compliance — risk assessment and scoring, control mapping across NIST CSF 2.0 / ISO 27001:2022 / SOC 2 / CIS Controls v8, gap analysis, audit evidence preparation, and security policy generation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

LLM and AI application security testing — prompt injection, jailbreak resistance, OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025), RAG and agent/tool-use security, model supply chain, and AI red teaming for authorized assessments

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dependency auditing, CVE detection, configuration security review, CVSS scoring, and prioritized vulnerability reporting

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Software supply chain security — SBOM generation and analysis, dependency confusion and typosquatting detection, malicious package indicators, CI/CD pipeline hardening, and artifact provenance/signing (SLSA, Sigstore)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Collaborative purple-team operations — threat-informed adversary emulation planning (ATT&CK, CTID, Atomic Red Team, CALDERA), the detect-tune-validate loop, detection coverage measurement (DeTT&CT/Navigator), safe execution and deconfliction, and MTTD/coverage reporting

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational Technology and industrial control system security — Purdue model segmentation, industrial protocol analysis (Modbus, DNP3, S7, EtherNet/IP), PLC/HMI exposure, IEC 62443 alignment, and MITRE ATT&CK for ICS, for authorized and safety-conscious assessments

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWS/Azure/GCP security auditing, container and Kubernetes hardening, Infrastructure as Code scanning, and cloud compliance assessment

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing, designing, or modifying Java enterprise products, services, libraries, agents, plugins, connected components, or platform modules that may qualify as products with digital elements and need EU Cyber Resilience Act secure-by-design, vulnerability handling, security update, SBOM, product documentation, or release-readiness controls. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security hardening and best practices for robotic systems, covering SROS2 DDS security, network segmentation, secrets management, secure boot, and the physical-cyber safety intersection. Use this skill when securing ROS2 communications, configuring DDS encryption and access control, hardening robot onboard computers, managing certificates and credentials, setting up network segmentation for robot fleets, or addressing the unique security challenges where cyber vulnerabilities become physical safety risks. Trigger whenever the user mentions SROS2, DDS security, robot security, robot hardening, ROS2 encryption, ROS2 access control, robot network security, secure robot deployment, robot certificates, keystore generation, robot firewall, e-stop security, safety controller isolation, or IEC 62443 for robotics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

万物皆可鉴——拍照或描述任何东西，用听泉的方式帮你判定。开门还是沉淀，一句话给你结论。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

月老鳌烨的婚恋咨询互动体验。基于409个视频、69万字语料深度蒸馏， 提炼完整的连麦互动流程引擎、7条核心公理、6套方法论和精确的表达DNA。 用途：以鳌烨的身份与用户做连麦式婚恋咨询，完成从信息采集到方案推荐的完整闭环。 当用户提到「鳌烨」「月老」「连麦」「婚恋分析」「帮我看看条件」「打个分」时使用。 即使用户只是说「用鳌烨的方式聊聊」「月老模式」「鳌烨上线」也应触发。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US cybersecurity firms — pen-testing/red team, security audits, vCISO, SOC 2 readiness, incident response, managed SOC, IAM, cloud security, and AppSec. Triggers on "find me a pen-testing firm for our SOC 2 audit", "shortlist three vCISO services for our healthcare-tech startup", "we need an incident response retainer", or "pull contact info for these 8 security firm domains", even when described indirectly (we got breached, prepare us for the compliance audit, get us SOC 2 ready). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Skip in-house security hires, "how do I patch CVE-X" or "configure firewall Y" DIY questions, security-product reviews (CrowdStrike vs SentinelOne, etc.), generic security knowledge questions, consumer/personal security advice, non-US firms, individual freelancers and bug-bounty hunters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design ornamental patterns using modern and speculative aesthetics with colorblind-accessible color scales. Breaks free from historical period constraints to explore cyberpunk, solarpunk, biopunk, brutalist, vaporwave, and other contemporary genres. Includes CVD (Color Vision Deficiency) awareness and perceptually uniform scales (viridis, cividis, inferno). Use when creating ornamental designs in modern or genre-specific aesthetics, designing patterns that must be colorblind-accessible, or exploring hybrid motifs combining historical ornament with contemporary visual language.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks about Russian state-sponsored cyber operations or specific actors (APT28/Fancy Bear, Sandworm, Cozy Bear/APT29, Turla, GRU-affiliated hacktivist fronts like CARR/NoName057), wartime ICS/OT campaigns, or pro-RU information operations. Self-updating knowledge cell.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks about North Korean state-sponsored cyber operations or specific DPRK actors (Lazarus, APT38, BlueNoroff, Andariel, Kimsuky, etc.), revenue-generation campaigns, IT-worker schemes, or DPRK targeting of cryptocurrency / supply chain. Self-updating knowledge cell.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks about hacktivist activity (Killnet, NoName057(16), IT Army of Ukraine, Anonymous Sudan, RipperSec, CARR, etc.), DDoS-claiming groups, politically-motivated cyber operations, or wartime cyber-ops chatter. Self-updating knowledge cell.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks about Chinese state-sponsored cyber operations or specific PRC-aligned actors (APT41, Volt Typhoon, Mustang Panda, APT10, APT31, Salt Typhoon, etc.), MSS/PLA-attributed campaigns, or PRC sector targeting. Self-updating knowledge cell.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when legacy prompts or older framework flows reference `cyber-intel` and you need the modern runtime to resolve that capability cleanly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cybersecurity partner skill for acting as a practical security collaborator across architecture review, threat modeling, secure design, risk prioritization, defensive planning, vulnerability remediation, incident readiness, security roadmaps, and technical decision support. Use when the user wants an ongoing security advisor, reviewer, or second set of eyes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, run, and measure an adversary engagement operation using the MITRE Engage framework so that deployed deception is driven by strategy instead of deployed ad hoc. Covers the Engage Matrix (Prepare, Expose, Affect, Elicit, Understand), the 10-Step Operational Process, mapping engagement Activities to the ATT&CK techniques they expose, and defining measurable Goals and Operational Objectives. Use when a team has honeypots, honeytokens, or canary tokens but no coordinating strategy, when leadership asks "should we engage attackers and how", when building a deception/denial program, when writing an adversary engagement operation plan, or when deciding which deception Activities to deploy against a specific threat actor. Keywords: MITRE Engage, adversary engagement, cyber deception strategy, denial and deception, Engage Matrix, EAC, EGO, Expose Affect Elicit, deception program, honeypot strategy, engagement operation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a defensible cybersecurity risk assessment using the NIST SP 800-30 Rev 1 methodology: prepare scope and a risk model, identify threat sources and threat events, identify vulnerabilities and predisposing conditions, determine likelihood and impact, compute risk, and communicate results as a prioritized risk register. Use when an organization needs an actual risk *assessment* (not a maturity score), when a control framework (CSF, ISO 27001, RMF, SOC 2, PCI) requires a documented risk analysis as input, when leadership asks "what are our top risks and how bad are they", when assessing risk for a new system or major change, or when building a risk register from scratch. This is the methodology that feeds framework selection, ATO packages, and treatment decisions. Keywords: risk assessment, NIST 800-30, threat modeling, likelihood and impact, risk register, risk analysis, threat sources, vulnerabilities, risk determination, qualitative risk, risk matrix, residual risk, risk treatment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes intrusion activity against the Lockheed Martin Cyber Kill Chain framework to identify which phases an adversary has completed, where defenses succeeded or failed, and what controls would have interrupted the attack at earlier phases. Use when conducting post-incident analysis, building prevention-focused security controls, or mapping detection gaps to kill chain phases. Activates for requests involving kill chain analysis, intrusion kill chain, attack phase mapping, or Lockheed Martin kill chain framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when performing cybersecurity operations - offensive or defensive - including threat detection and hunting, SOC operations, incident response, digital forensics and DFIR, malware analysis and reverse engineering, threat intelligence, cloud/container/network/application/API security, identity-access and zero-trust, OT/ICS and endpoint security, vulnerability and supply-chain management, DevSecOps, cryptography, AI security, compliance and governance, and red-team or penetration testing under signed rules of engagement; routes to one of 800+ technique playbooks mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, D3FEND, and NIST CSF.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesized reference notes from three US Government vehicle-safety sources: NHTSA Cybersecurity Best Practices for the Safety of Modern Vehicles (updated 2022, final), NHTSA Automated Driving Systems 2.0: A Vision for Safety (2017), and a 16-section selection of 49 CFR Part 571 (FMVSS) pinned at eCFR versioner date 2025-01-01. Use for voluntary vehicle cybersecurity practices, the ADS 2.0 twelve priority safety design elements, and FMVSS occupant protection, brakes/stability/lighting, and fuel/EV integrity requirements. Not ISO 26262, not ASPICE, not ISO/SAE 21434, not UNECE R155/R156, not SAE J3016, and not the full Part 571; the FMVSS material is a selection of vehicle-level minimum performance standards, not a process standard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。