「decisions」の検索結果

Collecting and synthesizing user feedback across channels (support tickets, NPS, in-app feedback, sales calls, social mentions, customer councils) into a continuous signal that informs product decisions. The triage discipline that distinguishes loudest-voice (whoever complains most wins) from averaged-noise (every signal weighted equally) from triaged-synthesis (signal weighted by source quality, frequency, and decision relevance). Triggers on user feedback, customer feedback aggregation, NPS, support ticket analysis, customer councils, feedback synthesis, voice of customer, feedback triage, in-app feedback. Also triggers when feedback channels overflow with volume that does not produce decisions, when the loudest-voice problem is steering roadmap, or when continuous feedback streams need synthesis discipline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The Jobs-to-be-Done framework as applied product methodology. Job statements, struggling moments, hire and fire criteria, the difference between feature-thinking and job-thinking. Honest about where JTBD adds clarity (discovery, prioritization, positioning) and where it becomes performative ritual (job-statement workshops that do not drive decisions, persona-theater disguised as JTBD). Triggers on jobs-to-be-done, JTBD, job statements, struggling moments, hire criteria, fire criteria, switch triggers, functional emotional social jobs, outcome-driven innovation. Also triggers when a team is over-relying on feature-request lists or persona archetypes that do not drive product decisions, when a positioning conversation needs the framing JTBD provides, or when discovery is producing outputs that do not connect to product strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turning research artifacts into actionable PM insight. Customer interviews, user research notes, support ticket reviews, sales call transcripts, survey data, in-app feedback, all synthesized into the decisions they are meant to inform. The discipline of moving from raw discovery data to clear product direction without losing signal in the synthesis or fabricating insight that was not actually there. Triggers on research synthesis, customer interview synthesis, user research analysis, discovery readout, research insights, sales call analysis, support ticket analysis, qualitative data analysis. Also triggers when a team has done research but cannot turn it into decisions, when synthesis is producing pretty decks but no roadmap movement, or when an upcoming PM decision needs to be grounded in research already conducted.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, manage, and optimize a domain portfolio. Use this skill for DNS architecture decisions, redirect strategies, registrar choice, parking unused domains, multi-site setups, and domain consolidation or split planning. Triggers on DNS, domain, registrar, redirect, parking, subdomain, apex, www vs non-www, multi-site, portfolio, hreflang setup, domain migration. Also triggers when planning a new site that needs domain decisions made before launch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fully automated review pipeline: CEO, Design, and Eng reviews with auto-decisions using 6 principles (completeness, boil lakes, pragmatic, DRY, explicit over clever, bias toward action). Only pauses for premise confirmation. Classifies decisions as Mechanical (silent) or Taste (surfaced at final gate).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Notion expert for product management workflows. Use for database design for PRDs/OKRs/Roadmaps/Decisions, property and view design, page architecture, Notion REST API, and sync with Jira, Linear, and GitHub.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technical leadership guidance for engineering teams, architecture decisions, and technology strategy. Use when assessing technical debt, scaling engineering teams, evaluating technologies, or making architecture decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executive leadership guidance for strategic decisions, org development, and stakeholder management. Use when planning strategy, preparing board presentations, managing investors, or making executive decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search and cite French case law and statutes with the LibreJustice MCP tools. Use whenever the user asks about French or European court decisions (Cour de cassation, Conseil d'État, cours d'appel, TJ/TA, CNDA, Conseil constitutionnel, CNIL, CEDH, CJUE), needs authorities for a brief, requête, référé or consultation, wants to check how courts rule on an issue, needs counts of decisions on a point, or asks what a code article says at a given date, even if they never mention LibreJustice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Your team's shared, AI-ready knowledge base — people, companies, meetings, SOPs, and decisions structured so an agent can answer on your team's behalf. Team-scope sibling to second-brain. Modes — capture, compile (wiki pages + INDEX.md), query (trust-weighted, saved to outputs/), review (verify / deprecate / supersede stale captures), lint, connect, search. Structured raw dirs (people/, companies/, meetings/, sops/, decisions/, customer-language/, sales-objections/). Every capture stamps author, timestamp, and trust status. Optional sync from call transcripts, Slack/email exports, CRM. Vault at ${COMPANY_BRAIN_VAULT:-$HOME/Documents/CompanyBrain}/. Triggers on "/company-brain," "/cb," "capture this into the team brain," "log this meeting," "save this SOP," "compile the company wiki," "query the team brain," "what does the team know about X," "review the company brain," "lint the company brain," "who's the internal expert on X."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before compaction Loopkit extracts decisions into claude-decisions.json (machine-readable). Read it alongside claude-progress.txt at session start — prose is for humans, JSON is for the loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user says 'cognee store', 'push to cognee', 'save to graph', 'remember this' or 'log this decision', or when session decisions must be stored. Writes entities, decisions and events over POST /api/v1/remember.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a phase has unresolved decisions before planning and no CONTEXT.md exists. Asks adaptive questions on the phase's gray areas and writes {phase_num}-CONTEXT.md with locked decisions; --auto, --chain, --power change the questioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user says brain, project knowledge, what do we know about, open tasks, or recent decisions, or runs /brain or /brain-update. SQLite project_brain.db tracker for entities, relationships, tasks, threads, decisions, events.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project knowledge for developing and maintaining @cablate/mcp-google-map. Architecture, Google Maps API guide, GIS domain knowledge, and design decisions. Read this skill to onboard onto the project or make informed development decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatically find relevant context from knowledge graph and code relationships while coding. Detects when context would be helpful (new files, unfamiliar code, architectural decisions) and surfaces related entities, prior decisions, and code dependencies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design systems, plan implementations, review architecture decisions - Use when you need to plan a complex feature, design system architecture, or make high-level technical decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses architecture decisions, ADR compliance, and coupling. Use when evaluating design changes or validating structural decisions before merging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts a Data Protection Impact Assessment for automated decision-making and profiling systems under GDPR Article 35(3)(a), covering algorithmic transparency, meaningful human oversight, contestation mechanisms, and Art. 22 safeguards. Activate for DPIA automated decision, profiling DPIA, algorithmic impact assessment, Art. 35(3)(a), ADM risk assessment queries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides assessment of third-country adequacy decisions under GDPR Article 45 for international data transfers. Covers the current EC adequacy decisions list, adequacy assessment criteria, partial adequacy handling, and monitoring of adequacy decision reviews. Keywords: adequacy decision, Article 45, third country, adequate protection, EC adequacy list.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides compliance with Australia's Privacy Act 1988 including the 2024 reform amendments. Covers automated decision-making transparency, children's privacy code, individual rights expansion, enforcement strengthening, and the Australian Privacy Principles (APPs). Keywords: Australia Privacy Act, APPs, OAIC, automated decisions, children privacy code, privacy reform.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-driven architecture research for understanding real systems and making technical decisions. Use when doing architecture landscape studies, source-backed system archaeology, build-vs-buy or adopt/adapt/build decisions, open-source and commercial comparisons, revisiting an earlier architecture choice, or handling requests such as 架构调研, 架构选型, 竞品架构, 技术尽调, 同类方案, 开源替代, how is X built, and what should we learn from X. Do not use for small mechanical changes, market-only discovery, or detailed design after the technology direction is already fixed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。