136 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Execute autonomous multi-step research using Google Gemini Deep Research Agent. Use for: market analysis, competitive landscaping, literature reviews, technical research, due diligence. Takes 2-10 minutes but produces detailed, cited reports. Costs $2-5 per task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct comprehensive deep research on any topic using Dify-powered workflow - searches documentation, academic papers, tutorials, APIs, best practices, and returns structured analysis with insights.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user needs multi-source research with citation tracking, evidence persistence, and structured report generation. Triggers on "deep research", "comprehensive analysis", "research report", "compare X vs Y", "analyze trends", or "state of the art". Not for simple lookups, debugging, or questions answerable with 1-2 searches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operate Tongyi DeepResearch and its WebAgent family: ReAct inference setup, rollout validation, benchmark evaluation, and variant routing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operate the Deep Researcher Agent repository for autonomous deep-learning experiments, execution backends, provider/tool dispatch, GPU resources, durable progress, and research-support integrations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct deep web research using the openbrowser-ai agent: decompose a query, investigate sub-questions across multiple sources, and produce a cited markdown report plus structured JSON under local_docs/research/. Trigger when the user asks to: research a topic, do a deep dive, investigate, gather evidence, compare options, write a literature review, build a briefing, or produce a cited report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic multi-angle web research methodology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-round deep research on any GitHub repo via API.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
用 Codex CLI 子任务完成多来源深度调研并综合成带出处的报告。用于确实需要分头取证的研究，不用于单次查证或已给定材料的总结。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute autonomous multi-step research using Google Gemini Deep Research Agent. Use for: market analysis, competitive landscaping, literature reviews, technical research, due diligence. Takes 2-10 minutes but produces detailed, cited reports. Costs $2-5 per task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provider-neutral deep-research orchestration for brainstorming, technology choices, comparisons, and state-of-the-art surveys. The Research Lead makes scope and decision calls while native subagents scout, search, verify, synthesize, audit, write, and commit every research artifact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct in-depth, multi-step research on a given topic by decomposing queries, finding diverse sources, cross-referencing findings, and synthesizing a comprehensive report. Use when the user requests deep research or provides relevant inputs for this workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Advanced web search, content extraction, and site mapping through Tavily via SandBase. Use when asked for web research, URL content extraction, full article reading, news search, or site structure discovery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce an intensive, cited analytical report: executive summary, multi-angle findings, contrarian views, open questions, and full sources. Use only when the user needs rigorous synthesis of a complex topic (scientific, technical, policy, or market-analytical) that cannot be answered with a short search, and wants a formal written report, not a recommendation list. Do not use for product picks, top-N lists, quick lookups, or routine "find out about X" tasks. If the request does not clearly need this kind of report, do not use this skill. Do not use for a literature review over published papers. This skill collects evidence from the open web. A request for the literature on a biomedical, clinical, life-science, or other scientific topic — papers, studies, trials, preprints — belongs to firecrawl-research-papers, which queries Firecrawl's paper index (PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, arXiv) instead of searching websites.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs comprehensive, multi-layered research on any topic with structured analysis and synthesis of information from multiple sources. Use when the user needs thorough investigation, market research, technical deep-dives, due diligence, or comprehensive analysis on any subject.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research with scoped depth and counterevidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce an intensive, cited analytical report: executive summary, multi-angle findings, contrarian views, open questions, and full sources. Use only when the user needs rigorous synthesis of a complex topic (scientific, technical, policy, or market-analytical) that cannot be answered with a short search, and wants a formal written report, not a recommendation list. Do not use for product picks, top-N lists, quick lookups, or routine "find out about X" tasks. If the request does not clearly need this kind of report, do not use this skill. Do not use for a literature review over published papers. This skill collects evidence from the open web. A request for the literature on a biomedical, clinical, life-science, or other scientific topic — papers, studies, trials, preprints — belongs to firecrawl-research-papers, which queries Firecrawl's paper index (PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, arXiv) instead of searching websites.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run deep research on a topic. Web searches, data collection, source checking, and a structured report. Use when the user needs more than a quick answer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when the user's prompt requires (1) researching a topic across multiple sources, comparing options or alternatives, analyzing trends or history, understanding markets or industries, or reviewing literature or studies and (2) synthesizing that research into a comprehensive, narrative report. If you're planning to search the web or internal knowledge bases, consider using this skill. This skill coordinates research subagents, so use it only when you have a tool for spawning subagents (the Agent or Task tool); otherwise, research the question directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks for a literature review, academic deep dive, research report, state-of-the-art survey, topic scoping, comparative analysis of methods/papers, grant background, or any request that needs multi-source scholarly evidence with citations. Also trigger proactively when a user question clearly requires academic grounding (e.g. "what's known about X", "compare approach A vs B in the literature", "summarize the field of Y"). Runs an 8-phase (Phase 0..7), script-driven research workflow across 7 federated sources (OpenAlex, arXiv, Crossref, PubMed, DBLP, bioRxiv, Exa) with optional Semantic Scholar / Brave MCP enrichment, with deduplication, transparent ranking, dual-backend citation chasing (OpenAlex + Semantic Scholar), self-critique, and structured report output with verifiable citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert guide for autonomous deep research, iterative web search, citation verification, evidence graph synthesis, and hallucination mitigation / Panduan ahli riset mendalam otonom, pencarian web iteratif, verifikasi sitasi, dan mitigasi halusinasi.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-source deep research using firecrawl and exa MCPs. Searches the web, synthesizes findings, and delivers cited reports with source attribution. Use when the user wants thorough research on any topic with evidence and citations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert deep research output (Claude Research, ChatGPT Deep Research, Gemini, Codex — any long-form MD/Word/text) into a consulting-quality HTML report: pyramid structure, numbers promoted to KPIs/charts, comparisons turned into framework tables, citations preserved. Use when the user provides research/investigation results and says レポートにして/HTMLにまとめて/資料にして/きれいにして, mentions ディープリサーチの結果/調査結果/リサーチ結果, or asks to research a topic AND deliver a report. NEVER invents numbers or facts not present in the source (盛らない原則).
Use when starting a new project. Genesis finds real production failures from similar GitHub repos, then builds a working MVP immediately - not just documents. Two modes: fast-mvp (5 min research cap, builds right after) and deep-research (full analysis). Success = user can run the project. Triggers on: "genesis init [vision]", "I want to build X", "scaffold", "new project", "set up project", "start building", "create a tool", "make a CLI", "bootstrap", "בנה פרויקט", "צור פרויקט", "התחל פרויקט".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。