「does」の検索結果

指定したコミットやブランチなどを基準にコードの変更を確認し、開発規約への適合と仕様の実現を別々にレビューします。二つの観点の指摘を分けて報告するスキルです。

• ブランチやPRの変更レビュー
• 指定コミットやタグ以降の確認
• 文書化された開発規約との照合

会話で話し合った内容とコードベースの理解から仕様書を作り、プロジェクトのIssue管理先に公開します。課題、利用者の要望、実装・テスト方針、対象外を整理します。

• 機能の議論を仕様書にしたいとき
• 合意した要件のIssue公開
• 実装とテストの方針の文書化

まだ存在しない機能の追加を、調査・計画からテスト先行の実装、レビュー、コミットまで進めるスキル。工程を担当エージェントに分担し、計画とコミット前に承認を挟みます。

• 未実装の機能を追加したいとき
• テスト先行で新機能を実装
• 認証機能のセキュリティレビュー

Organize existing ChatGPT Pages and Space structure when the user requests changes to that structure. Do not use for ordinary chat drafts or advice; a selected Page alone does not authorize reorganization. A narrow text edit does not need this workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compliance OS — meta-orchestrator that lets compliance teams CONFIGURE which frameworks apply, COMPUTE cross-framework control overlap, SIMULATE internal audits, and CONSOLIDATE evidence across multiple frameworks. Four decisions: (1) Given a company profile, which of the 12 supported frameworks apply (ISO 27001/13485/42001/14971, EU AI Act, MDR 745, GDPR, SOC 2, FDA QSR, NIST CSF 2.0, NIS2, HIPAA)? (2) Across selected frameworks, which controls overlap and how much evidence reuses? (3) For a given framework + scope, what does a realistic mock audit produce — drawing from the 205-scenario library? (4) Across selected frameworks, what's the unified evidence checklist with reuse map? Use when standing up a multi-framework program, planning the annual audit calendar, or preparing for certification stage 1. Does NOT replace per-framework skills (it orchestrates them).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query the pre-built code-review-graph knowledge graph (Tree-sitter, whole monorepo) instead of walking call chains with Grep+Read – 2-6x cheaper, and it catches dynamic dispatch that grep misses. Use for ANY task that spans multiple files, even when the user never mentions a graph or asks for it - fixing or tracing a bug ("fix this bug", "why does X happen", "trace this"), exploring unfamiliar code ("how does X work", "who calls X", "what imports Y", "where is X used or handled"), planning or doing a refactor ("rename X", "is it safe to change or remove X", "what would break", "blast radius", "find dead code"), or reviewing changes ("review this PR", "review this branch or diff"). When you are about to Grep for a symbol's callers, callees, or importers, use this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Augment a Wren project with business context that DB schema cannot carry — enum value meanings, units (USD vs cents, ms vs sec), NULL semantics, magic sentinels (-1 = unknown), soft-delete default filters, business synonyms, time-grain / TZ conventions, cross-system identifiers, currency rules, canonical-table preferences, AND named aggregation metrics (ARR, churn, DAU, WAU, NRR) proposed as cubes. Runs in one of two modes selected at session start: `grill` (one question at a time, user-driven) or `auto-pilot` (agent infers and applies, escalates only on conflicts and high-blast-radius additions like new cubes / views / relationships). Reads everything under <project>/raw/ (PDFs, glossaries, handbooks, code, data dictionaries) and optionally samples low-cardinality columns from the live DB (grill mode), compares against the current MDL / cubes / knowledge (rules + NL→SQL pairs), then fills gaps via the ten-category gap catalog and the cube proposal flow. Confirmed findings are written back to the right sink. Use when: user says 'enrich context', 'augment my project', 'grill me on this project', 'auto-fill my context', 'agent doesn't understand our docs / enum values / units / null meanings', 'business context is missing', 'what does status=A mean', 'is this amount in USD or cents', 'we keep getting wrong aggregations', 'add cubes for ARR / DAU / churn', 'we have a handbook / glossary / data dictionary the agent should know'; or after generating an MDL and noticing the agent lacks business semantics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep the AI policy current with practice — weekly sweep of saved AIAs, triage results, and vendor reviews to find policy drift, or direct query for a proposed new AI practice. Use when user says "policy sweep", "does our AI policy cover this", "we want to start doing X — does the policy need updating", "run the policy monitor", or on a recurring schedule.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Your pathfinder for navigating unknown codebases. Investigates with precision, implements surgically, and never assumes — if it doesn't know, it says so. Maintains a .notebook/ knowledge base that grows across sessions, turning every discovery into lasting intelligence. Summons available skills, MCPs, and docs when the mission demands. Use when fixing bugs, implementing features, refactoring, investigating flows, or any development task in unfamiliar territory. Triggers on "fix this", "implement this", "how does this work", "investigate this flow", "help me with this code". Do NOT use for greenfield scaffolding, CI/CD, or infrastructure provisioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Onchain OS onboarding & guide hub — the single entry for first-time, 'what is this / how do I use it', OKX.AI, and customer-support intents; classifies the intent and routes to the right sub-flow via its Intent Routing table. Covers: (1) Onchain OS onboarding + welcome banner — 'what is onchainos', 'what is onchain os', 'what can it do', 'what can onchainos do', 'what does onchainos do', 'how do I use this', 'how do I play', 'how to use onchainos', 'how to play onchainos', 'how does onchainos work', 'how do I start', 'getting started', 'tutorial', 'onboarding', 'first time', 'I just installed', 'now what', 'what do I do now', 'where do I start', 'who are you', 'what are you', 'introduce onchainos', 'tell me about onchainos', 'I'm new'; (2) OKX.AI intro & role-registration routing (the Agent economic system — roles User / ASP / Evaluator) — 'what is OKX.AI', 'OKX.AI 是什么', 'how to use OKX.AI', 'OKX.AI 快速开始', and any spelling / spacing / casing / typo variant (OKXAI, okx ai, okx-ai, lowercase okx.ai, 啥是okxai); (3) customer support / Help Center — 'contact support', 'talk to a human', 'customer service', 'file a complaint', 'give feedback', 'report a bug / system error', 'help center', 'FAQ', 'user guide', 'something is broken'. NOT for: direct on-chain actions (swap / wallet / balance / token) or Agent task lifecycle (publish / accept / deliver / dispute) — those have their own skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when modifying `resources/workflow-schema.json` in cc-wf-studio to influence how AI agents generate workflows via the cc-workflow-ai-editor skill. Triggers include "AIが特定のノードタイプを選んでくれない", "ワークフロー生成のバイアスを調整したい", "スキーマの description を変えたい", "新しいノードタイプを追加したい", "嘘の制約がスキーマに混じっていないか確認したい". Covers what the schema actually does (instructions to AI, not runtime constraints), the design philosophy (align direction, do not prescribe rules), the build pipeline (.json → .toon auto-generated), and known bias sources to audit.

Find keywords a competitor ranks for that the user's site doesn't — the content gap, prioritized by volume and winnability. Use when asked "what does competitor.com rank for", "keyword gap vs X", "steal competitor keywords", or "why do they outrank us".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to work in a Personal CRM project (the `entity-vault` starter pack, GBrain-compatible): a typed-entity vault of people, companies, meetings, and concepts, each a dossier with a rewritable summary plus an append-only timeline. Read when the project has these folders, OR when asked to capture notes about a person or company, log a meeting, prep for an upcoming meeting, or answer who someone is and what was last said. Carries the dossier convention and entity-extraction behaviors so that guidance does not live inside template bodies or folder descriptions. Complements the platform `open-knowledge` skill; does not replace it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to work in a Software Lifecycle project (the `software-lifecycle` starter pack): proposals → decisions → specs → postmortems, plus guides. Read when the project has these folders, or when asked how this project is organized. Carries the doc lifecycle, status flows, and per-folder agent behaviors so that guidance does not live inside template bodies or folder descriptions. The five workflows — frame a proposal, write a spec, record a decision, write a postmortem, review a design — each ship as their own sibling skill in this pack. Complements the platform `open-knowledge` skill; does not replace it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to work in a Writing Pipeline project (the `writing-pipeline` starter pack): a three-stage drafting flow, ideas → drafts → published. Read when the project has these folders, OR when asked to capture an idea, start or revise a draft, review a piece before it ships, or publish it. Carries the stage flow and review behaviors so that guidance does not live inside template bodies or folder descriptions. Complements the platform `open-knowledge` skill; does not replace it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to work in a Worldbuilding project (the `worldbuilding` starter pack): a fiction encyclopedia of characters, settings, themes, factions, and lore. Read when the project has these folders, OR when asked to add a character, setting, faction, or piece of lore, or to check the world for internal consistency. Carries the auto-stub and consistency behaviors so that guidance does not live inside template bodies or folder descriptions. Complements the platform `open-knowledge` skill; does not replace it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to work in a Knowledge Base project (the `knowledge-base` starter pack). Read when the project has the three-layer source-grounded layout — `external-sources/` → `research/` → `articles/` — or when asked how this project is organized. Carries the layer model, per-folder rules, status flows, and log discipline so this guidance does NOT live inside template bodies or log.md. The three procedures live elsewhere: ingest in the platform `open-knowledge` skill, research and consolidate as their own sibling skills in this pack. Complements the platform `open-knowledge` skill; does not replace it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever a pull request is opened, reopened, or synchronized in microsoft/apm to assess whether and how the documentation corpus must change to stay truthful with the proposed code change. Activate even when the PR title or body says nothing about docs -- the skill must run on every PR to detect silent drift between code and docs. Classifies impact as no-change, in-place edit (one to a few paragraphs), or structural change (new page or TOC reshape), then orchestrates a CDO + doc-writer + python-architect + editorial-owner + growth-hacker loop to produce a patch-ready advisory. Does NOT review code quality, security, or test coverage. Does NOT auto-merge or auto-push doc edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to queue maintainer-accepted microsoft/apm issues (`status/accepted`) and fan them out through an isolated pool (default 2) of autopilot-issue-delivery-worker sessions. Any accepted type is eligible. Advisory `triage/recommended` is not authorization. Does not triage. Does not review PRs. Works in a local session, Copilot App automation, Cloud Agent, Remote Agent, or Agentic Workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user is doing hands-on NVMe-over-Fabrics storage-target work on a BlueField DPU or ConnectX NIC with DOCA STA — standing up a doca_sta DOCA Core context that accelerates the target-side NVMe-oF data path over RDMA, defining doca_sta_subsystem targets (NQN + namespaces) backed by local NVMe-PCI backend disks (doca_sta_be), checking device support via doca_sta_cap_is_supported, sizing the per-connection I/O queues, or debugging DOCA_ERROR_* from a STA call. Trigger even when the user does not say "DOCA STA" — typical implicit phrasings include "my NVMe-oF Connect never completes", "Identify Controller times out over RoCE", "16 I/O queues at depth 1024 — does this BlueField support that", "offload the nvmf target onto the DPU", or "DOCA_ERROR_IO_FAILED on an NVMe read". Refuse and route elsewhere for DOCA install, raw RDMA data movement, raw packet I/O, flow-rule programming, or initiator-side / host NVMe stack work — those belong to other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill whenever another DOCA skill says "prefer the structured tool per doca-structured-tools-contract", or when the user wants a one-shot answer that consolidates info multiple manual commands would produce — DOCA env / version / devices / capabilities / validate / host vs DPU state. Trigger even when the user does not explicitly mention "structured tool" or "doca-env --json" — typical implicit phrasings include "is there one command that tells me everything about my DOCA install", "what version is X capability available since", "every PF/VF/SF visible on this BlueField with PCIe address", "will this pipe pass validate before commit", "diff host vs DPU state", or "why does the agent give a one-line answer on host A and five commands on host B". Refuse and route elsewhere for general DOCA orientation, specific library API how-to, or install-from-scratch guidance — those belong to the per-library skill, doca-public-knowledge-map, or doca-setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user is invoking `doca_telemetry_utils` on a host with DOCA installed — discovering the diagnostic-counter schema, translating counter names to binary Data IDs, validating per-device counter support before committing a DOCA Telemetry exporter config, or reverse-resolving a captured Data ID. Trigger even when the user does not explicitly mention "doca_telemetry_utils" or "Data ID" — typical implicit phrasings include "my exporter ships but the collector sees nothing", "this metric silently drops downstream", "which counters does this BlueField expose", "translate this 0x... back to a counter name", "what do node / pcie_index / depth mean here", or "is this counter supported on this device before I commit it". Refuse and route elsewhere for developer-side collector / exporter library programming, DTS deployment, or DOCA install / repair — those belong to doca-telemetry, doca-public-knowledge-map, and doca-setup.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user is dropping below the higher-level DOCA libraries (doca-rdma / doca-eth / doca-rmax) into the raw-verbs escape hatch — managing QP / CQ / PD / MR / SRQ / AH / CC-group / Ethernet-SQ-RQ primitives inside DOCA Core, porting libibverbs code into the DOCA Core model, capability-querying a specific verb / opcode / WR flag / QP attribute via doca_verbs_query_device, or debugging DOCA_ERROR_* from doca_verbs_* calls. Trigger even when the user does not say "doca-verbs" — implicit phrasings include "raw QP attribute the task API doesn't expose", "keep my ibv_* code next to doca_* on the same QP", "IO_FAILED on WR submit", "QP state transition rejected", "attach a congestion- control group", or "porting my libibverbs code". The skill's first job is to route MOST users back UP to the higher-level library. Refuse and route elsewhere for general doca-rdma / doca-eth / doca-rmax workloads, DOCA install, Core internals, and general libibverbs theory — those belong to other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user is dealing with the DOCA environment around their workload — verifying an install is healthy, preparing the build env (pkg-config, headers, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, hugepages, devlink, representors), debugging env-class failures, deciding container-vs-bare-metal deployment shape, or reaching a DOCA install from a host that doesn't have one yet via the NGC DOCA container Stage-1 fallback. Trigger even when the user does not explicitly mention "DOCA setup" — typical implicit phrasings include "I just got a BlueField, what now", "my code is built, how do I run it", "pkg-config can't find doca-flow", "no free 2048 kB hugepages", "representor X not found", "I'm on a Mac and want to learn DOCA". Refuse and route elsewhere for library API specifics (Flow pipes, RDMA queues), the modify-a-sample first-app workflow or DOCA_ERROR_* program-side debugging, and "where is X documented" knowledge-map questions — those belong to other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。