「eu」の検索結果

リアルタイム画面やデータ配信の遅延、情報の鮮度、処理待ちを個別に測り、イベント発生から画面表示までの経路を改善して、稼働環境で結果を確かめるスキル。

• リアルタイム画面の遅延調査
• 配信データの鮮度を確認したいとき
• キューの滞留を減らしたいとき

輸出入商品の関税分類、通関書類の確認、制裁対象との照合を支援します。米国・EU・英国・アジア太平洋の貿易実務を対象に、関税優遇や税関照会への対応も整理します。

• 商品仕様から関税分類を検討したいとき
• 送り状や原産地証明を確認したいとき
• 自由貿易協定の優遇条件を検討したいとき

Internal downstream skill for ctf-sandbox-orchestrator. CTF-sandbox workflow for queues, async workers, cron jobs, delayed tasks, retry behavior, worker-only config drift, and payload-to-side-effect chains. Use when the user asks to trace a queue payload, inspect async job execution, explain worker-only behavior, follow retries or dead-letter handling, or connect an enqueued item to a later file, cache, email, or privilege-bearing side effect. Use only after `$ctf-sandbox-orchestrator` has already established sandbox assumptions and routed here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

BullMQ expert for Redis-backed job queues, background processing, and reliable async execution in Node.js/TypeScript applications. Use when: bullmq, bull queue, redis queue, background job, job queue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Forges reusable Skill packages (SKILL.md + scripts) from website exploration via browser-act — no re-exploration later. Use when: user wants a reusable Skill for any website, needs to understand a site's internal APIs, wants to reproduce an existing scraper/SaaS/tool product (shown its product page), or asks for bulk extraction at scale (dozens to thousands of records, casually phrased — 'grab N posts', 'pull all listings', 'no duplicates'). Unlike browser-act: reusable, not one-off. Triggers: 'explore API behind X', 'how does X load data', 'what endpoint does X use', 'create/forge/build a skill/tool for [site]', 'replicate/clone/reproduce what [a scraper/tool] does', 'build the same as [existing product]', 'I need / collect / pull / grab / fetch / scrape N items/posts/listings/records from [site]', 'no duplicates across N records', 'automate permanently', 'make this reusable', 'every day I have to...', 'monitor [site]', 'browser-act-skill-forge'. Human-operation automation; never refuse.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run one unattended IMPLEMENTATION iteration of the autonomous value-creation loop — steward any in-flight PR, fix interrupts (red CI / security / human bugs), or else build ONE queued `idea` issue on a branch off auto-dev and open a PR that squash-merges on green CI. Ideation lives in the next-idea skill; this skill consumes its queue. Use when the user says "次のタスク", "next task", "続きをやって", or wants autonomous progress without specifying what to do.

English LaTeX academic paper assistant for existing `.tex` projects. Use this skill whenever the user wants to compile, lint, audit, or improve an English LaTeX conference or journal paper such as IEEE, ACM, Springer, NeurIPS, or ICML submissions. Trigger even when the user only mentions one paper issue, such as bibliography errors, grammar cleanup, sentence splitting, logic review, expression polishing, translation, title optimization, figure checks, pseudocode review, algorithm block cleanup, de-AI editing, experiment-section review, table structure validation, three-line table generation, abstract structure diagnosis, or journal adaptation. Also trigger for "proofread my paper", "fix my LaTeX", "prepare for submission", "check my manuscript", "improve my writing", "three-line table", "booktabs", "check abstract", "reformat for another journal", "换投", `algorithm2e`, `algorithmicx`, `algpseudocodex`, `Require/Ensure`, or "Algorithm 1" when the user has a .tex file.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "build our social posting calendar", "set weekly slots and queue depth per channel", or "plan the evergreen recycle rotation"; produces the always-on brand calendar — pillar allocation with hero/hub/help balance and give:ask targets (all labeled Estimated starting heuristics to calibrate against own analytics, never scored rules), per-channel recurring slots with queue depth, a batching workflow, an evergreen recycle cycle with freshness re-checks, deliberate open slots for realtime/trend moments fed by trend-spotter go/skip verdicts, and first-comment/publish-order ops — cadence commitments filed to the channel registry, and no batch ships to the queue without a SHIP verdict from social-quality-auditor pre-publish mode. Not for repurposing an existing asset or the paid-amplification calendar — use content-amplifier. 社媒排期/内容日历/栏目配比/常青循环复用

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate and improve interface usability using heuristic analysis. Use when the user mentions "usability audit", "users are confused", "form usability", "navigation problems", "Nielsen heuristics", "cognitive walkthrough", or "is this easy to use". Also trigger when reviewing a design for usability issues, improving form-completion rates, or evaluating information architecture and navigation. Covers Krug's laws, Nielsen's 10 heuristics, severity ratings, dark-pattern recognition, and accessibility. For visual design fixes, see refactoring-ui. For conversion-focused audits, see cro-methodology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use TypeUI with Grok to access project design skills, brand kits, UI prompts, and layout variations through the TypeUI MCP server when creating or refining user interfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use TypeUI with OpenClaw to access project design skills, brand kits, UI prompts, and layout variations through the TypeUI MCP server when creating or refining user interfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use TypeUI with Hermes Agent to access project design skills, brand kits, UI prompts, and layout variations through the TypeUI MCP server when creating or refining user interfaces.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Für Deutsch Englisch AGB: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Schnittstellenkarte mit Zuständigkeits- und Nachweisfragen. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: deutsch-englisch-digitale-inhalte-handbuch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Für Deutsch Englisch AGB: ordnet Norm, Beweislast und Gegenargument; Ergebnis: Schnittstellenkarte mit Zuständigkeits- und Nachweisfragen. Fachgebiet: AGB-Recht-Prüfer. Route: deutsch-englisch-agb.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Source authentic, high-res PUBLIC-DOMAIN artwork from museum open-access APIs (Met, Cleveland, SMK, Rijksmuseum, NGA, Art Institute of Chicago, Getty, Smithsonian) instead of AI-generated or generic-stock imagery. The default move whenever a visual needs an aesthetic, credible image (blog heroes, decks, social cards, essay/spec figures). Verified keyless recipes + licensing rules inside.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate Euro NCAP test scenarios and variants using the ADT Euro NCAP support package. Use when creating NCAP seed scenarios, generating variants, translating between drivingScenario and RoadRunner, plotting scenario descriptors, computing NCAP scores, or exporting reports. Triggers on: ncapScenario, euroAssessment, getScenario, getScenarioDescriptor, generateVariants, ScenarioDescriptor, ScenarioDescriptorPlot, ncapScore, ncapReport, exportReport, configureVUT, assessmentTable, Euro NCAP, CCRs, CCRm, CCRb, CCFtap, CCCscp, CPNA, CPFA, CBNA, variant generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU AI Act (Regulation EU 2024/1689) compliance specialist. Use for AI system risk classification, provider/deployer obligations, GPAI model compliance, conformity assessments, bias and fairness testing, and AI governance programs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU MDR 2017/745 compliance specialist for medical device classification, technical documentation, clinical evidence, and post-market surveillance. Use for Annex VIII classification, GSPR, clinical evaluation, EUDAMED, and UDI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sanctions and export control analysis tool for Claude Desktop. Real-time individual screening across 30+ official lists (UN, EU, OFAC, OFSI, French DGT...), sectoral analysis, dual-use goods (EU Reg. 2021/821), US/China extraterritorial regimes (EAR, ITAR, FDPR, ECL), USD/SWIFT risk and jurisdictional mapping across 30+ countries. All results sourced and verified in real time — no memory-based answers. Responds in French, English, German, Spanish, Russian and Chinese. Updated 19 May 2026 (EU 20th package, UK SEUC, Cuba EO). Indicative guidance only — not legal advice.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

a skill that determines whether a given subject matter qualifies for copyright protection under EU law by applying the Cofemel two-step test (concept of work + originality), grounded in fifteen CJEU judgments (including the most recent Mio/Konektra and Calinescu) and the four EU directive provisions on originality. It argues from one of two positions: pro-rightsholder (establishing that the work is original) or pro-alleged-infringer (contesting work status or originality via the four exclusion grounds — technical function, rule-dictated outcome, sweat of the brow, idea/functionality). It includes sector-specific modules for photography, software/GUI, sporting events, databases, applied art, functional texts, derivative works/critical editions, and multimedia works.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

NIS2 Compliance Navigator — scope classification, Art. 21 gap analysis (0-4 maturity scoring), and compliance roadmap under EU Directive 2022/2555 with deep German BSIG-neu coverage and profiles for Italy, France, Netherlands, Austria, Spain. Use when: (1) User mentions "NIS2", "NIS-2", "BSIG", "BSIG-neu", "NIS2UmsuCG", "Cyberbeveiligingswet", "Loi Résilience", "NISG", "decreto legislativo 138", (2) User asks if their organization falls under NIS2 or needs a cybersecurity compliance assessment, (3) User mentions essential/important entities, Annex I/II, BSI registration, § 30 BSIG, incident reporting, management body liability, supply chain security, (4) User wants a NIS2 gap analysis, readiness assessment, or compliance roadmap, (5) User asks about NIS2 fines, enforcement, or Nachweispflicht, (6) User asks about NIS2 in any EU Member State.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recherche académique dans les bases de données de doctrine juridique française, européenne et internationale. Utiliser cette skill lorsque l'utilisateur demande de rechercher des articles de doctrine, des thèses, des ouvrages académiques, ou des travaux universitaires en droit — y compris en droit comparé. Sources principales : ISIDORE (agrégateur SHS du CNRS incluant Cairn.info, Persée, OpenEdition), HAL (archive ouverte française), OpenAlex (base ouverte mondiale 250M+ travaux), Semantic Scholar, CrossRef, Persée (OAI direct), et CORE. Couvre la doctrine juridique francophone ET internationale avec workflow bilingue intégré pour le droit comparé. Déclencher aussi pour : bibliographie commentée, état de l'art, revue de littérature juridique, recherche d'auteur, vérification de citation, analyse bibliométrique.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU Digital Regulation Legal Analysis Forge — generates a tailored expert prompt for structured legal analysis of an EU digital-regulation document, optionally executes it in-session, and always produces a plain-English explainer alongside the formal output. Handles Regulations, Directives, Commission Guidelines, EDPB Opinions, CJEU and AG judgments, national DPA decisions, codes of conduct, and draft consultations across the EU digital stack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

EU AI Act Knowledge Engine — authoritative regulatory Q&A grounded in 70 official EU source documents (including the 2026 Commission draft guidelines on Art. 6 high-risk classification — general principles, Annex I, Annex III). Answers any question about the AI Act with article-level citations from the full regulation text, Commission guidelines, EDPB/EDPS opinions, codes of practice, harmonised standards, FRIA guides, incident templates, and sector-specific guidance. This skill should be used when the user asks about the "EU AI Act", "AI Act regulation", "Regulation 2024/1689", "KI-Verordnung", asks to "explain an AI Act article", "what does Article X say", "AI Act requirements", "AI Act penalties", "AI Act timeline", "GPAI obligations", "high-risk AI", "prohibited AI practices", "AI Act and GDPR", "fundamental rights impact assessment", "AI Act standards", "AI Act national implementation", "AI literacy", "serious incident reporting", "Digital Omnibus", "AI regulatory sandbox", or any question about EU artificial intelligence regulation. Also triggers on German terms: "KI-Gesetz", "KI-Verordnung", "Hochrisiko-KI", "KI-Kompetenz", "Grundrechte-Folgenabschaetzung", "GPAI-Verhaltenskodex". For assessment workflows that produce a classification decision rather than a knowledge answer, offer to run a structured risk-tier classification in-session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。