「evidence」の検索結果

Rapidly maps the evidence landscape around a medical topic by organizing major research streams, target populations, endpoints, methods, evidence density, and thin areas. Use this skill BEFORE medical-research-gap-finder — it provides the structured landscape that makes formal gap analysis more rigorous. Do not use for formal gap identification, study design, or protocol planning directly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a source-bound company and market dossier into testable ideal-customer-profile hypotheses, buying roles, triggers, constraints, disqualifiers, standing, counterevidence, and research gaps. Use when a URL, company description, monitor profile, or evidence manifest needs to become defensible ICP inputs for buyer research or an AI-visibility prompt panel.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research-only RPI playbook that gathers task evidence, writes dated research artifacts under .copilot-tracking/research/ or a caller's trusted evidence root, and hands off planning-ready findings. Use when the user needs evidence, alternatives, or task framing first.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when appraising the cumulative evidence and ensuring balance in an Academy of Management Annals (Annals) review — weighing conflicting findings by credibility, steelmanning rival schools, and handling the author's own work even-handedly. Audits evidence quality and fairness; it does not design the framework (amann-organizing-framework) or build exhibits (amann-tables-figures).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Predicts protein-coding gene structures (exons, introns, UTRs) in eukaryotic genomes with BRAKER3 (RNA-seq + protein evidence), BRAKER1/BRAKER2, GALBA (protein-only), Funannotate (fungi), GeMoMa (homology projection), or Helixer/Tiberius (deep-learning ab initio). Covers the evidence-first tool decision, mandatory soft-masking, the training-set-quality-dominates principle, OrthoDB clade-partition selection, the one-isoform-per-locus and missing-UTR traps, merge/split errors, and reference bias against orphan genes. Use when annotating a newly assembled eukaryotic genome, choosing a gene-prediction pipeline based on available evidence, or diagnosing a poor annotation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps GWAS-implicated loci to candidate effector (causal) genes by integrating variant-to-gene (V2G) features via Open Targets L2G (Mountjoy 2021), MAGMA gene-based association (de Leeuw 2015), FUMA SNP2GENE, cS2G combined SNP-to-gene scores (Gazal 2022), Polygenic Priority Scores (PoPS, Weeks 2023), FLAMES, INQUISIT, DEPICT, and enhancer-gene predictors (ABC, ENCODE-rE2G). Use when narrowing a GWAS lead locus to a candidate causal gene, picking between proximity, eQTL-based, and similarity-based prioritizers, integrating multi-evidence streams (fine-mapping, colocalization, ABC enhancer-gene, distance, chromatin), reconciling discordant L2G vs PoPS calls, prioritizing tissue-specific eQTL evidence, or triangulating across at least three independent lines of evidence for a publication-grade effector-gene nomination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user wants an evidence-based research memo, literature review, market/policy/technical landscape, or a multi-source decision brief with citations, trade-offs, and a clear conclusion. Best for tasks that need synthesis across multiple external sources, iterative follow-up research, or a reusable written artifact. Do not use for quick factual lookups, single-source summaries, simple Q&A, summarizing one document the user already provided, plan-only requests where the user explicitly defers the actual research, or when the user wants a short answer with no need for cited evidence (a short but evidence-backed conclusion is still a brief memo, which this skill covers). Chinese trigger examples: "帮我调研", "深度研究", "综述报告", "技术选型分析", "竞品研究", "政策分析".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monthly on the last weekday, light browser lane. Re-tests every theme and every severity rule against a month of real ticket evidence and rewrites strategy/themes.md wherever the evidence disagrees with the assumption. It merges two themes the evidence shows are one, splits a theme whose tickets have two different answers, retires a theme with no volume, creates a theme for a cluster that kept landing unclassified, and rewrites a severity rule wherever the outcomes contradict it. Theme ids are never reused and never renumbered. It holds every outbound action unless you released the channel, and it never touches a credential.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create per-subsection evidence packs (NO PROSE): claim candidates, concrete comparisons, evaluation protocol, limitations, plus citation-backed evidence snippets with provenance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Seed `outline/claim_evidence_matrix.md` from outline+notes; claim-matrix-rewriter rewrites it later from evidence packs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rewrite `outline/claim_evidence_matrix.md` as a projection/index of evidence packs (NO PROSE), so claims/axes are driven by `outline/evidence_drafts.jsonl` rather than outline placeholders.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manual QA harness for the senpi coding agent itself. MUST USE after changing packages/ai, packages/agent, packages/coding-agent, or packages/tui — a green typecheck and `npm test` are NOT QA. Drives the real CLI from source in an isolated sandbox (never touches ~/.senpi or real credentials) across four channels: remote RPC (--mode rpc JSONL stdio), TUI smoke (node-pty on Windows, tmux on POSIX), mock loop (a local fake model server for deterministic, zero-token agent-loop runs), and CLI smoke (--help/--print/--list-models). Every helper ships a --self-test. Use whenever someone says qa senpi, test the agent, verify my change, rpc qa, tui qa, mock-loop qa, smoke the cli, or needs evidence that an agent-loop, tool, keybinding, or provider change works end to end. Capture evidence to local-ignore/qa-evidence/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit, redesign, generate, and improve IEEE manuscript figures, tables, captions, result presentation, plotting scripts, visual polish, hybrid Python/R plus vector-editor workflows, publication-ready matplotlib house style, and layout using routed visual-evidence checks. Use when checking or creating plot readability, axes, legends, line overlap, table structure, metric reporting, captions, grayscale accessibility, IEEE one-column/two-column layout, figure/table placement, claim-evidence mapping, reviewer first-impression risks, matplotlib/seaborn or ggplot2 figure code, SVG/PDF/TIFF/PNG export, Illustrator/Inkscape/PowerPoint/Figma finishing plans, or IEEE-style engineering evidence graphics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture web-page / PoC screenshots into the engagement evidence (targets/<eng>/poc/) and embed them in walkthrough.md. Live pages + authenticated/exploited states (post-login dashboard, the flag page, an SSTI/cmdi render). Runs chromium on the Kali tooling host (VPN path to targets); hands off to the evidence skill for redaction before a real report. Use when building PoC evidence or asked to "take a screenshot / capture the PoC".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides continuous privacy compliance monitoring implementation including automated control testing, evidence collection automation, real-time compliance dashboards, alert-based remediation workflows, regulatory change integration, and deviation management. Covers GRC platform configuration, control framework mapping, and compliance-as-code approaches. Keywords: continuous compliance, automated monitoring, evidence collection, dashboard, regulatory change, compliance-as-code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps GWAS-implicated loci to candidate effector (causal) genes by integrating variant-to-gene (V2G) features via Open Targets L2G (Mountjoy 2021), MAGMA gene-based association (de Leeuw 2015), FUMA SNP2GENE, cS2G combined SNP-to-gene scores (Gazal 2022), Polygenic Priority Scores (PoPS, Weeks 2023), FLAMES, INQUISIT, DEPICT, and enhancer-gene predictors (ABC, ENCODE-rE2G). Use when narrowing a GWAS lead locus to a candidate causal gene, picking between proximity, eQTL-based, and similarity-based prioritizers, integrating multi-evidence streams (fine-mapping, colocalization, ABC enhancer-gene, distance, chromatin), reconciling discordant L2G vs PoPS calls, prioritizing tissue-specific eQTL evidence, or triangulating across at least three independent lines of evidence for a publication-grade effector-gene nomination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build the deterministic evidence ledger (artifact_manifest.json + claims.json) that every other Anti-Autoresearch auditor reads. One pass inventories artifacts, derives the observability level (L0 PDF-only / L1 +LaTeX / L2 +repo+results) by fixed rule, and extracts span-anchored, hashed, checkable claims (numbers, comparisons, scope, method, baselines, citations, captions, table cells) into claims.json. An OPTIONAL additive cross-model pass ADDS span-anchored semantic claims — method, theorem statements with their assumptions, definitions, proof/derivation steps and equations, scope, baselines, conclusions, the motivation span, and reproducibility-artifact references (the proof, derivation, and structure anchors the family B/D/G auditors need) — it never invents a number, emits a finding, or computes a verdict. Run FIRST, before any audit skill. Triggers: "build the ledger", "extract claims", "prep for integrity audit", "evidence ledger", "建证据账本".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize the single strongest EVIDENCE-BOUND reviewer case to reject a paper, built ONLY from the evidence ledger (claims.json) + the other auditors' confirmed findings — never free-floating LLM critique. Two fresh cross-model codex threads: an attack writes the ~200-word rejection paragraph (every accusation tagged to an existing claim_id/finding_id), a defense decomposes it and rules each point against the anchored evidence. MEMO-ONLY: emits adversarial-case-builder.memo.md (fed to the adjudicator via --memo) and carries NO verdict weight — tools/adjudicate_findings.py lists it in ZERO_WEIGHT_SKILLS and caps it at info. Honest-null allowed (the paper may survive). Run LAST. Detect-only. Adapted from ARIS kill-argument. Triggers: "adversarial case", "strongest objection", "rejection memo", "kill argument", "最强拒稿点".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

中医诊疗 — 中医临床医师的认知操作系统 (经典理论 阴阳五行脏腑气血经络六经卫气营血三焦 + 四诊八纲 + 治法 + 方剂学 经方时方 + 中药学 四气五味归经炮制 + 针灸学 经络穴位手法灸法 + 推拿按摩 + 中医各科 内外妇儿骨伤皮肤眼耳鼻喉肛肠老年急症 + 中西医结合 + 循证中医 + NATCM 监管 + 中医诊所备案 + 国家级名老中医 学术继承人 — 不含 道家修炼 / 风水算命 / 中医养生科普 / 中医美容 / 民族医学藏蒙维傣) (Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) clinical practice — the cognitive operating system of practicing TCM physicians covering (a) 经典理论 (阴阳/五行/脏腑/气血津液/经络/六淫/七情/六经/卫气营血/三焦) classical theory, (b) 四诊 (望闻问切) clinical observation/inquiry/pulse + 八纲 (阴阳/表里/寒热/虚实) syndrome differentiation, (c) 治法 (汗吐下和温清消补 + 扶正祛邪) therapeutic principles, (d) 方剂学 (经方 时方 验方) formula science, (e) 中药学 (四气五味/归经/七情/炮制/配伍禁忌) materia medica, (f) 针灸学 (经络穴位/手法/灸法/电针) acupuncture+moxibustion, (g) 推拿按摩 tuina massage, (h) 中医各科 (内/外/妇/儿/骨伤/皮肤/眼/耳鼻喉/肛肠/老年/急症) clinical specialties, (i) 中西医结合 integrative medicine, (j) 循证中医 + 临床流行病学 evidence-based TCM + 现代研究, (k) 中医诊所备案 / 中医师资格 / NATCM 监管 / 药典 / GMP regulatory framework, (l) 国家级名老中医 学术继承人 项目 transmission program; NOT 道家修炼 / 风水 / 算命八字 (那是 玄学不是 中医), NOT 中医养生科普 (是 衍生 不是 临床主体), NOT 中医美容 (是 商业化分支), NOT 民族医学 (藏蒙维傣 是 平行体系 不在本 skill 主线 — 仅作 边界标注).) Master OS — automated mastery of Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) clinical practice — the cognitive operating system of practicing TCM physicians covering (a) 经典理论 (阴阳/五行/脏腑/气血津液/经络/六淫/七情/六经/卫气营血/三焦) classical theory, (b) 四诊 (望闻问切) clinical observation/inquiry/pulse + 八纲 (阴阳/表里/寒热/虚实) syndrome differentiation, (c) 治法 (汗吐下和温清消补 + 扶正祛邪) therapeutic principles, (d) 方剂学 (经方 时方 验方) formula science, (e) 中药学 (四气五味/归经/七情/炮制/配伍禁忌) materia medica, (f) 针灸学 (经络穴位/手法/灸法/电针) acupuncture+moxibustion, (g) 推拿按摩 tuina massage, (h) 中医各科 (内/外/妇/儿/骨伤/皮肤/眼/耳鼻喉/肛肠/老年/急症) clinical specialties, (i) 中西医结合 integrative medicine, (j) 循证中医 + 临床流行病学 evidence-based TCM + 现代研究, (k) 中医诊所备案 / 中医师资格 / NATCM 监管 / 药典 / GMP regulatory framework, (l) 国家级名老中医 学术继承人 项目 transmission program; NOT 道家修炼 / 风水 / 算命八字 (那是 玄学不是 中医), NOT 中医养生科普 (是 衍生 不是 临床主体), NOT 中医美容 (是 商业化分支), NOT 民族医学 (藏蒙维傣 是 平行体系 不在本 skill 主线 — 仅作 边界标注).: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) clinical practice — the cognitive operating system of practicing TCM physicians covering (a) 经典理论 (阴阳/五行/脏腑/气血津液/经络/六淫/七情/六经/卫气营血/三焦) classical theory, (b) 四诊 (望闻问切) clinical observation/inquiry/pulse + 八纲 (阴阳/表里/寒热/虚实) syndrome differentiation, (c) 治法 (汗吐下和温清消补 + 扶正祛邪) therapeutic principles, (d) 方剂学 (经方 时方 验方) formula science, (e) 中药学 (四气五味/归经/七情/炮制/配伍禁忌) materia medica, (f) 针灸学 (经络穴位/手法/灸法/电针) acupuncture+moxibustion, (g) 推拿按摩 tuina massage, (h) 中医各科 (内/外/妇/儿/骨伤/皮肤/眼/耳鼻喉/肛肠/老年/急症) clinical specialties, (i) 中西医结合 integrative medicine, (j) 循证中医 + 临床流行病学 evidence-based TCM + 现代研究, (k) 中医诊所备案 / 中医师资格 / NATCM 监管 / 药典 / GMP regulatory framework, (l) 国家级名老中医 学术继承人 项目 transmission program; NOT 道家修炼 / 风水 / 算命八字 (那是 玄学不是 中医), NOT 中医养生科普 (是 衍生 不是 临床主体), NOT 中医美容 (是 商业化分支), NOT 民族医学 (藏蒙维傣 是 平行体系 不在本 skill 主线 — 仅作 边界标注). problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「中医」「中医学」「中医药」「中医诊疗」「中医临床」

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

健身私教 — 为客户设计、指导和推进个性化训练方案的专业工艺, 有别于团课教练、物理治疗师或运动队教练: (a) 训练方案设计与周期化 (线性 / 波动 / 板块周期化 Bompa & Haff; NSCA《力量训练与体能训练精要》行业圣经; Schoenfeld 肌肥大机制; Helms/Valdez/Morgan 肌肉与力量金字塔; 共轭训练法 Simmons/Westside; Starting Strength 线性渐进 Rippetoe; Renaissance Periodization 训练量地标 Israetel); (b) 动作评估与筛查 (FMS 功能性动作筛查 Gray Cook; NASM CEx 纠正性训练连续体 抑制-拉伸-激活-整合; 关节逐级方法 Cook/Boyle; 姿势与代偿模式识别; PAR-Q+ 与 ACSM 运动前筛查指南); (c) 教学与指令 (外部 vs 内部注意焦点 Wulf; 差异化学习 Schöllhorn; 约束导向方法 Davids/Renshaw; RIR/RPE 自动调节 Zourdos/Helms; 动机访谈在健身中的应用 Rollnick/Miller); (d) 营养指导的执业边界 (宏量营养素周期化; Precision Nutrition / ISSN 立场声明的循证建议; 边界: 私教提供一般性指导, 医学营养治疗需 RD/RDN 资质; 能量可用性与 RED-S Mountjoy IOC 共识); (e) 商业与客户管理 (客户留存与方案依从; 咨询与销售伦理; 线上教练平台与规模化 Goodman PTDC; 方案交付工具 TrueCoach/Trainerize/TrainHeroic; 课时定价模型; 独立教练 vs 健身房雇员); (f) 专项方向 (运动表现 CSCS; 纠正性训练 CES; 老年健身 SFN; 产前产后; 青少年 YSCA; 适应性 / 无障碍健身; 健美 / 形体; 力量举; 耐力运动 S&C)。诚实处理: 兄弟科学 vs 循证之争, 补剂行业利益冲突, 合成代谢激素使用现状 (诚实但不推广: 匿名调查约 30% 有经验男性健身者使用过 — 业内估, Kanayama/Pope/Hudson 记录健康风险, WADA 禁用清单用于竞技语境), 体型焦虑与进食障碍风险 (男性私教肌肉变形症, 正食症倾向, NEDA 负责任语言指南), 健身房掠夺性销售 (高压推销、误导性对比照、长约锁定), 执业边界违规 (私教诊断伤病或超范围开饮食处方), 线上教练认证造假 (周末速成、未经认可的认证)。不含: 物理治疗 / 康复治疗 (持照医疗职业), 不含: 团课教练 (Les Mills/Zumba/CrossFit 分馆教练 — 相邻但不同), 不含: 精英竞技运动教练 (团队项目周期化, 不同职业路径), 不含: 营养作为主业 (临床营养学需单独资质)。 (Personal Trainer — the craft of designing, coaching, and progressing individualized exercise programs for clients, distinct from group fitness instruction, physiotherapy, or sports coaching: (a) exercise programming and periodization (linear / undulating / block periodization per Bompa & Haff; NSCA Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning as industry bible; Schoenfeld on hypertrophy mechanisms; Helms/Valdez/Morgan Muscle & Strength Pyramids; conjugate method Simmons/Westside; Starting Strength linear progression Rippetoe; Renaissance Periodization volume landmarks Israetel); (b) movement assessment and screening (FMS Gray Cook; NASM CEx corrective exercise continuum inhibit-lengthen-activate-integrate; joint-by-joint approach Cook/Boyle; posture and compensation pattern identification; PAR-Q+ and pre-exercise screening ACSM guidelines); (c) coaching and cueing (external vs internal cueing Wulf attentional focus research; differential learning Schöllhorn; constraints-led approach Davids/Renshaw; RIR/RPE autoregulation Zourdos/Helms; motivational interviewing for adherence Rollnick/Miller adapted to fitness); (d) nutrition guidance within scope of practice (macronutrient periodization; evidence-based recommendations per Precision Nutrition / ISSN position stands; scope boundary: PT gives general guidance NOT medical nutrition therapy which requires RD/RDN credential; energy availability and RED-S awareness Mountjoy IOC consensus); (e) business and client management (client retention and programming adherence; consultation and sales ethics; online coaching platforms and scaling Goodman PTDC; programming delivery tools like TrueCoach/Trainerize/TrainHeroic; session pricing models; independent contractor vs gym employee dynamics); (f) specialization tracks (sports performance CSCS; corrective exercise CES; senior fitness SFN; pre/postnatal; youth YSCA; adaptive/inclusive fitness; bodybuilding/physique coaching; powerlifting/strength sports; endurance athlete S&C). Evidence-based practice as the core ethos: Schoenfeld/Krieger meta-analyses on volume-response, Helms systematic reviews on protein/resistance training, Brad Schoenfeld's MASS journal bridging research to practice, Menno Henselmans and Eric Helms as practitioner-researchers, Greg Nuckols Stronger By Science as translation layer. Chinese fitness industry context: rapid growth of personal training in commercial gyms (Keep/Lefit/Megafit chains), NSCA-CPT and ACE-CPT as dominant certifications alongside local CSFA (China Sport and Fitness Association) credential, '体适能' (physical fitness) as formal term, online coaching boom post-COVID, PT business models in tier 1-3 cities diverge sharply. Honest treatment of: bro science vs evidence-based d

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned comparison-page discipline for accurate, evidence-backed alternative, versus, and competitor-comparison content that wins evaluators and search intent. Use when planning or writing a public page that positions products against named alternatives from verified evidence. NOT FOR: gathering the underlying competitor evidence (use suede-competitor-profiling), internal battle cards (use suede-sales-enablement), or scaled page generation (use suede-programmatic-seo).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit NFR evidence for performance, security, reliability, and maintainability. Use when implementation evidence exists and the user says "audit NFR evidence", "audit NFRs", or "evaluate non-functional requirements"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality review of test files and manual evidence documents. Goes beyond existence checks — evaluates assertion coverage, edge case handling, naming conventions, and evidence completeness. Produces ADEQUATE/INCOMPLETE/MISSING verdict per story. Run before QA sign-off or on demand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze WeChat Mini Program platform constraints and evidence layers for an idea or existing repository, including source configuration, build output, WeChat DevTools loading, device behavior, permissions, privacy declarations, cloud or backend linkage, upload, trial, review, and production status. Use when users ask about WeChat-specific configuration, project roots, compile paths, capability permissions, privacy compliance, official platform rules, upload or release readiness, or why source and platform behavior differ. Performs read-only evidence classification by default, verifies time-sensitive or high-risk claims against current official WeChat sources, redacts identifiers and secrets, and never upgrades one evidence layer into another.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。