「evidence-based」の検索結果

Project gene annotations across genomes using TOGA (Kirilenko 2023 whole-genome-alignment chain-based projection with intactness classification), CESAR 2.0 (Sharma & Hiller 2017 codon-aware exon projection), LiftOff (Shumate & Salzberg 2020 reference-based annotation transfer), Liftover (UCSC), GeMoMa (Keilwagen 2019 evidence-based projection), and Comparative Annotation Toolkit (CAT). Use when transferring annotations from a well-annotated reference to query genome(s), classifying gene-loss vs gene-intact across many genomes at scale, building Zoonomia-style comparative annotations across hundreds of mammals or birds (Kirilenko 2023), detecting pseudogenization, projecting alternative isoforms, or selecting between WGA-anchored (TOGA) vs ortholog-based (LiftOff) annotation transfer strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when tutoring a learner through MATLAB debugging, error interpretation, failed tests, incorrect outputs, array-shape problems, indexing mistakes, function argument issues, or code repair practice. Use for guided debugging sessions, debugging drills, teach-the-agent critique, and evidence-based MATLAB troubleshooting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate release readiness with evidence-based go/no-go decisions. Covers go/no-go checklists, smoke test suite design, staged rollout validation, rollback criteria and procedures, and post-deployment verification. Ensures release confidence comes from data, not feelings. Use when: "release ready," "go/no-go," "smoke test," "release checklist," "rollback plan," "staged rollout," "canary deploy." Not for: safe-release techniques (flags, canary, dark launch) applied during the rollout itself — use testing-in-production; scheduled probes that run continuously after release — use synthetic-monitoring; designing new tests from prod telemetry — use observability-driven-testing. Related: testing-in-production, qa-metrics, ci-cd-integration, ai-system-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Finds, evaluates, fills, submits, and tracks a candidate's own job applications using a verified resume, evidence-based targeting, secure local profile storage, and browser automation. Use for onboarding or migrating a job-search profile, searching active roles, assessing a posting, applying to an authorized URL or batch, recording outcomes, or reviewing application effectiveness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze one or more cycling, running, or hiking FIT/KML activity tracks, generate evidence-based single or aggregate reports, open the bundled local Ride Relief report page when the environment supports it, enrich results with user-confirmed public location context, and create shareable PNG or H.264 MP4 route stories on request. Use whenever a user wants to analyze, compare, visualize, or export .fit or .kml activities, including requests that mention a workout but do not yet include track files.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to apply the rigorous epidemiological reasoning of Julie E. Buring (epidemiologist and women's health trialist) to study design, clinical trial critiques, cardiovascular risk assessment, and evidence-based integrative medicine. Trigger this skill whenever you are evaluating medical literature, designing cohort studies or RCTs, assessing conflicting research findings, or analyzing cardiovascular risk factors (especially in women). Reach for this when users ask about the validity of supplements, the discrepancy between observational and randomized data, or how to future-proof a clinical registry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned SEO and generative-search audit discipline. Runs a nine-lane evidence-based audit: access, intent, metadata, structure, supported schema, E-E-A-T, clusters, and exact rewrite fixes. Use when a page or site needs a deep standalone SEO/AI-visibility audit with scored lanes. NOT FOR: a fast A-F launch-appeal grade (use suede-visibility-grader); conversion-path rework after the audit (use suede-site-alchemy); getting cited by ChatGPT/Perplexity/AI Overviews (use suede-ai-seo).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned B2B cold-email discipline for evidence-based personalization, subject lines, opening lines, concise bodies, one clear CTA, and bounded follow-up sequences. Use when writing or repairing outbound email to qualified prospects. NOT FOR: building or qualifying the prospect list (use suede-prospecting), lifecycle or nurture email (use suede-emails), or broader sales collateral (use suede-sales-enablement).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede-owned retention discipline for voluntary and involuntary churn: cancel flows, pause paths, evidence-based save offers, failed-payment recovery, proactive signals, and win-back design. Use when diagnosing subscriber loss or designing a bounded retention intervention. NOT FOR: lifecycle-email production (use suede-emails), pricing architecture (use suede-pricing), paywall design (use suede-paywalls), or event instrumentation (use suede-analytics).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede AI blunt A-F ship grade for a code change across correctness, security and permissions, data and state, domain truth, UX and release behavior, tests and verification, and deploy readiness, with Instant-F triggers and evidence-based grade caps on auth, payment, migration, and public-API surfaces. Use when asked to grade this, give it a letter, is this an A, how ready is this to ship, or should this merge: when the caller wants the verdict without a findings list. NOT FOR: findings, evidence, and fix briefs (use suede-code-review, or suede-code for findings plus grade); enforcing the verdict in CI (use suede-ci-gate); eval coverage for AI behavior (use suede-ai-eval).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select one target opportunity from an OST using evidence-based weighted scoring and tie-breakers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase E of a WinForms-to-Avalonia migration: verify behavioral parity against Phase A contracts, record intentional differences, validate supported environments and packaging, and make evidence-based legacy cutover decisions. Use only for an explicit migration when comparing the legacy and Avalonia implementations or when the orchestrator routes here. Do not delete legacy without the cutover checklist and explicit authorization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect and diagnose minimal-zine posters, photo restyles, editorial images, and social-card series for subject preservation, factual and text integrity, composition, paper realism, print-process coherence, color signal, anti-AI craft, platform fit, and series continuity. Use when the user asks whether an image has高级感, feels AI-generated, matches Paper Signal or gc-minimal-zine quality, needs improvement, or should be regenerated. Returns evidence-based findings and a targeted correction prompt; regenerates only when the user also asks for a fix.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map evidence-based connections between a wellbeing initiative and specific academic learning outcomes. Use when justifying wellbeing programmes, integrating SEL, or linking pastoral and academic work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Select evidence-based study strategies matched to material type, learning goal, and student habits. Use when advising students on revision techniques, homework, or independent study approaches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a focused lesson observation protocol with specific look-fors and evidence collection methods. Use when planning peer observations, coaching visits, or developmental classroom visits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Direct substantial repository work across Claude Code, Codex CLI, or Grok Build with a concise brief, parallel agents, evidence-based completion, and optional cross-CLI continuation. Use for project onboarding, multi-step implementation, agent coordination, verification planning, low-interruption setup, or deciding how another CLI should take over. Do not use it as a permission gate or mandatory workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Historical argumentation, evidence-based writing, and oral history methods. Covers thesis development for historical arguments, evidence selection and deployment, counterargument construction and rebuttal, historical writing conventions, and the methodology of oral history as both source and practice. Use when constructing historical arguments, writing analytical essays, conducting oral history interviews, or assessing the quality of historical writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Primary and secondary source analysis for historical reasoning. Covers source classification, sourcing (author/context/purpose), corroboration across multiple sources, contextualization within time and place, and bias detection. Use when evaluating historical evidence, assessing source reliability, or constructing evidence-based historical arguments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic code maturity assessment using Trail of Bits' 9-category framework. Analyzes codebase for arithmetic safety, auditing practices, access controls, complexity, decentralization, documentation, MEV risks, low-level code, and testing. Produces professional scorecard with evidence-based ratings and actionable recommendations. (project, gitignored)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate professional clinical decision support (CDS) documents for pharmaceutical and clinical research settings, including patient cohort analyses (biomarker-stratified with outcomes) and treatment recommendation reports (evidence-based guidelines with decision algorithms). Supports GRADE evidence grading, statistical analysis (hazard ratios, survival curves, waterfall plots), biomarker integration, and regulatory compliance. Outputs publication-ready LaTeX/PDF format optimized for drug development, clinical research, and evidence synthesis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when facing unknowns, debugging without a clear cause, or making architecture decisions — enforces hypothesis-driven scientific reasoning through observation, hypothesis formulation, prediction, experiment design, and evidence-based conclusion. Use when previous attempts have failed or the problem space involves uncertainty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality validation specialist covering functional, performance, and security testing to ensure production readiness through evidence-based testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds, revises, restyles, and critiques deliberate, editable Feishu / Lark whiteboards from content, references, existing SVGs, or live boards. Use for whiteboards, infographics, diagrams, system maps, timelines, decision boards, posters, and visual explainers that need factual fidelity, strong hierarchy, intentional composition, and evidence-based review rather than a generic grid of equal cards. Routes creation, revision, and critique through separate playbooks; commits to a content-and-design contract before drawing; validates deterministic SVG defects; renders and inspects the actual artifact; and uses an independent final reviewer for material deliveries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。