「exercise」の検索結果

Run an AWS Security Agent penetration test against a live web application — registers and verifies the target domain, exercises the supplied endpoints with the managed Security Agent service, and returns verified runtime findings. Use when the user asks to pentest, run a penetration test, test their app's attack surface, find runtime vulnerabilities, register or verify a target domain, or check pentest status / findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discipline for the seam between two SDKs (or two sides of one contract) that the same hand writes. The failure mode: "we own both sides" produces dirty contracts no foreign reviewer would accept. The exercise: pretend the other side is FFI, IPC, or a network protocol you cannot rewrite. Spawn an adversarial subagent profiled as the producer's maintainer; negotiate the change as a feature request, not a PR. Companion to $sdk-design. Language-agnostic — applies to a TS package + its consumer, a Rust crate + its WASM binding, two services sharing a wire format, or any other boundary the same author writes both ends of.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Facilitates deliberate skill development during AI-assisted coding. Offers interactive learning exercises after architectural work (new files, schema changes, refactors). Use when completing features, making design decisions, or when user asks to understand code better. Supports the user's stated goal of understanding design choices as learning opportunities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Supply-chain testing via package-manager dependency confusion: when internal package names resolve to attacker-controlled public registries, leading to malicious install and script execution. Use for npm/pip/gem/Maven/Composer/Docker manifest review and authorized red-team supply-chain exercises.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flip core assumptions to reveal hidden constraints and alternative approaches - "what if the opposite were true?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs a security incident from detection to closure — triage, containment, investigation, communication, and the review afterward. Use this when a compromise is suspected or confirmed, when preparing an incident response plan or running an exercise, when deciding whether something is an incident, or when a breach may trigger notification obligations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans for operating through disruption — impact analysis, recovery objectives, continuity plans, and the exercises that prove they work. Use this to run a business impact analysis, set RTO and RPO, write or test a continuity plan, prepare for a supplier or site failure, or answer a customer's resilience questionnaire.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dialogue writing and revision for screen and stage (对白/台词/潜台词) — merged from Robert McKee's Dialogue (dialogue as action, said/unsaid/unsayable, exposition as ammunition, beat = action/reaction gerunds, flaws of credibility/language/content/design, character-specific vocabulary and grammar, seven scene analyses), Richard Walter (economy, subtext, argument, no small talk, no parentheticals, silence), Neill Hicks (listening, on-the-nose exceptions, energy, five-step exercise), Lu Jun (语言要美; 典雅美/通俗美, 对话三要求 动作性/性格化/潜台词), Lajos Egri (dialogue born of three-dimensional character, escalation), Blake Snyder (cover-the-names test), and screwball-comedy dialogue conventions. Use when writing or polishing dialogue, fixing on-the-nose or expository lines, giving each character a distinct voice, converting a two-hander into a trialogue, writing comedy exchanges, or cutting speeches. Chinese-opera lyrics (戏曲唱词) are in sw-chinese-opera-banqiang, not here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A minimal, fully spec-conformant fixture skill used to exercise the happy path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks to summarize, or asks why Simulink Coverage objectives are missing, unsatisfied, or uncovered on a coverage result they already have — why specific decision, condition, MCDC, relational-boundary, or saturation/overflow outcomes weren't exercised, whether uncovered logic is dead code, or how to close the gap (a test, a coverage filter, or a design change). It reads an existing cvdata, .cvt file, sim-with-coverage output, or Simulink Test result; it never runs cvsim to collect coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run structured AI red team exercises for jailbreak resistance, data exfiltration risk, harmful output controls, and agent tool abuse resilience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walk through a live web app AS a real user to find usability + behavioural bugs that static reviews miss. REQUIRES proof of interaction (typing, clicking, sending, observing) before any verdict — a sweep that didn't interact terminates with verdict 'Incomplete'. Walks threads, exercises every element, runs the multi-pane stress matrix, visual polish sweep, component perfection checklist, automated a11y (axe-core), pragmatic performance budget (LCP/CLS/INP), scenario battery (11 scenarios), and stress recipes including the real-flavour data battery. Hard gates: console errors/warnings = 0, network 5xx = 0, layout collapse = 0, axe Critical/Serious = 0, perf budget green. Audit-the-audit meta-check rejects rushed reports. Each finding has reproduction steps, evidence path, and suspected code location. Trigger with 'ux audit', 'walkthrough', 'qa sweep', 'audit the app', 'dogfood this', 'check all pages', 'find what's broken', 'stress the UI'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exercise the delivered customer journey using real runtime or browser evidence. Use for functional acceptance testing after implementation, including failure paths.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs chaos experiments, creates failure injection frameworks, and facilitates game day exercises for distributed systems with runbooks, experiment manifests, and rollback procedures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Start (or restart) a local multi-node Temps cluster using Docker-in-Docker — one control plane + 3 worker nodes, each a privileged DinD container running its own dockerd + `temps agent`, wired with the real multi-host overlay (VXLAN, compute_cidr allocation) via `tools/dev-cluster/` in whichever checkout/worktree you run it from. Invoke when the user says "start the temps cluster", "spin up a multi-node dev cluster", "test this with multiple workers", "bring up worker nodes locally", "docker in dind cluster", or wants to verify cross-node behavior (node targeting, cluster DNS, overlay networking, node join/mTLS) that a single-node `start-temps` server cannot exercise. Distinct from `start-temps` (single-node, native binary, port-slot based) and `start-temps-ee` (single-node EE binary) — this is the only path that actually has more than one node.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flip core assumptions to reveal hidden constraints and alternative approaches - "what if the opposite were true?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates cyber exercise authorization, scope, exclusions, runtime controls, expiry, stop and restart gates. Use when planning or reviewing authorized security activity, scope drift, or unsupported execution environments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts bounded cybersecurity engagement plans with objectives, scope, exclusions, roles, authorization, runtime controls, evidence, stop criteria, and restart gates. Use when preparing an exercise or assessment plan before execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Captures redacted, provenance-aware cybersecurity observations with shared status fields, independent ground truth, and honest limitations. Use when recording exercise evidence, findings, validation results, or security-review handoffs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintains sparse, reviewable cybersecurity framework edges with versioned IDs, relation, rationale, source, and review status. Use when mapping exercise observations or procedures to NIST, ATT&CK, or another named framework.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates bounded cybersecurity exercise observations against approved scope, expected behavior, runtime controls, and redacted evidence. Use when performing safe offline validation or authorized runtime checks with explicit stop and status gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a tutorial module plan exists but each module still needs a verifiable teaching loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

创建包含 section、problem、solution 和 explainer 的练习目录结构，且能通过 lint 检查。当用户想要搭建练习框架、创建练习模板或设置新的课程章节时使用。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, scope, and execute an authorized red-team engagement — distinct from a penetration test. Covers engagement methodology, assumed-breach scenarios, ATT&CK emulation plans, rules of engagement, deconfliction with the blue team, post-engagement debriefs, and the program-level work that makes red teams actually improve defenses. Use when the user mentions 'red team,' 'red team engagement,' 'red teaming,' 'adversary emulation,' 'ATT&CK emulation,' 'assumed breach,' 'purple team exercise,' 'tabletop with technical execution,' 'red team scope,' 'rules of engagement,' 'red team RoE,' 'deconfliction,' 'red team debrief,' or wants to design or run a red-team engagement against systems with authorization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。