Generate the commit / best-case / pipeline narrative for a forecast call or a 1:1 with your manager - what's closing, what's at risk, what changed since last time. Use when the user asks "write my forecast", "forecast narrative", "prep for forecast call", "prep for my quarterly forecast call", "which deals should I commit vs. call upside", "forecast from this pipeline export", or "prep for my 1:1 with my manager".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins☆ 2.9万2026年10月12日 更新
Comprehensive methodology for auditing and exploiting TLS/SSL implementations and misconfigurations across network services and mobile applications. Covers protocol downgrade attacks including POODLE (CVE-2014-3566) against SSLv3 CBC padding, DROWN (CVE-2016-0800) cross-protocol attack leveraging SSLv2 export ciphers to decrypt TLS sessions, and FREAK (CVE-2015-0204) forcing RSA export-grade key exchange. Addresses BEAST (CVE-2011-3389) exploiting CBC IV predictability in TLS 1.0, CRIME (CVE-2012-4929) and BREACH targeting TLS-level and HTTP-level compression oracles respectively, and Heartbleed (CVE-2014-0160) for OpenSSL memory disclosure. Covers certificate validation bypass techniques for applications with improper hostname verification or chain validation, certificate pinning bypass using Frida and Objection for mobile application interception, HSTS bypass via NTP manipulation and subdomain exploitation, TLS 1.3 0-RTT replay attacks against non-idempotent endpoints, mutual TLS (mTLS) authentication attacks including client certificate theft and relay, and Certificate Transparency log monitoring for reconnaissance. Primary tooling includes testssl.sh for comprehensive TLS auditing, sslyze for Python-integrated scanning, sslscan for quick cipher enumeration, and tlsx for high-speed TLS probing at scale. Maps to CWE-295 (Improper Certificate Validation), CWE-319 (Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information), and CWE-757 (Selection of Less-Secure Algorithm During Negotiation).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SnailSploit/Claude-Red☆ 7,4752026年10月13日 更新
Build forms, validate data, and react to user input in Blazor. USE FOR adding forms, search boxes, filter panels, inline editing, data-entry UI, file uploads, validation (annotations or custom), handling form submissions, and binding input controls. Covers EditForm, built-in input components, DataAnnotationsValidator, custom validation, SSR form patterns (SupplyParameterFromForm, FormName, AntiforgeryToken, Enhance), and @bind for simple interactive controls. DO NOT USE for project scaffolding (see create-blazor-project) or prerendering issues (see support-prerendering).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
dotnet/skills☆ 5,6182026年10月13日 更新
Classical end-to-end empirical analysis workflow in the traditional Stata ecosystem — native Stata + reghdfe + ivreg2 + csdid + did_imputation + eventstudyinteract + sdid + rdrobust + rddensity + synth + synth_runner + psmatch2 + teffects + ebalance + coefplot + esttab + asdoc + binscatter. **Defaults to economics empirical-paper style** (AER / QJE / AEJ) — every run produces a publication-ready output set with a multi-column regression table (M1→M6 progressive controls/FE) as the centerpiece, plus Table 1 (descriptives), mechanism / heterogeneity / robustness tables, and event-study + coefficient + trend figures. Covers the full 8-step Stata pipeline an applied economist runs on every paper — (1) data import & cleaning (use/import, destring, misstable, duplicates, merge assert), (2) variable construction (gen/egen/winsor2/xtile/xtset with L./F./D.), (3) descriptive statistics & Table 1 (tabstat/balancetable/asdoc), (4) classical diagnostic tests (sktest/swilk/hettest/imtest/xtserial/xttest3/vif/dfuller/kpss/hausman/estat overid), (5) baseline modeling (reg/xtreg/reghdfe/ivreg2/ivregress/csdid/did_imputation/eventstudyinteract/sdid/rdrobust/synth/psmatch2/teffects/heckman/qreg/ppmlhdfe), (6) robustness battery (bacondecomp/honestdid/rwolf/ritest/wildbootstrap/oster), (7) further analysis (subgroup/triple-diff/interactions/medsem/marginsplot/binscatter by group), (8) publication-ready tables & figures (esttab/outreg2/estout/coefplot/marginsplot/rdplot/twoway combined). **Also covers two parallel domain modes that share the same 8-step scaffolding** — **Mode A — Epidemiology / public health** (target-trial emulation, IPTW + g-formula + TMLE doubly-robust triplet via `teffects ipw` / `teffects ipwra` / `teffects aipw` / `eltmle`, Mendelian randomization via `mrrobust` (IVW / Egger / weighted median) and `mregger` / `mrpresso`, KM / Cox / AFT / RMST survival via `sts` / `stcox` / `streg` / `strmst2`, E-value sensitivity via `evalue` (Linden-Mathur), principal stratification — STROBE / TRIPOD reporting), and **Mode B — ML causal inference** (DML via `ddml` / `pdslasso`, S/T/X/R/DR meta-learners via `crforest` and `ddml interactive`, causal forest via `crforest` / `cforest`, BART/BCF via `bart` / `bartCause`-style externals, CATE distribution + policy tree via `crforest`, off-policy evaluation, conformal causal externals, fairness audit, DAG learning via `pcalg` / external Python callouts). Use when the user asks for a complete Stata empirical analysis, wants a reproducible .do-file pipeline, needs a Stata counterpart to the Python StatsPAI / Full-empirical-analysis-skill, or names a specific Stata step in isolation ("run reghdfe with two-way clustering", "csdid event study", "winsor2 at 1%", "esttab to LaTeX", "coefplot with CI", "ivreg2 weak-IV test", "synth_runner placebos", "teffects psmatch balance check"). Mode A triggers on "target trial emulation Stata", "teffects ipw aipw", "eltmle", "mrrobust", "mregger weighted median", "stcox AFT survival", "strmst2", "evalue Stata", "STROBE Stata", "公共健康 Stata", "流行病学 Stata". Mode B triggers on "ddml Stata", "pdslasso", "crforest causal forest Stata", "policy tree Stata", "因果机器学习 Stata".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
brycewang-stanford/Auto-Empirical-Research-Skills☆ 4,6062026年10月12日 更新
Generates code that transforms datasets between ML schemas for model training or evaluation. Use when the user says "transform", "convert", "reformat", "change the format", or when a dataset's schema needs to change to match the target format — always use this skill for format changes rather than writing inline transformation code. Supports OpenAI chat, SageMaker SFT/DPO/RLVR/RLAIF, HuggingFace preference, Bedrock Nova, VERL, and custom JSONL formats from local files or S3.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
awslabs/agent-plugins☆ 9182026年10月10日 更新
Use when the user mentions GPT Image 2.0 or GPT Image 2.5, gpt-image-2, gpt-image-2.5, gpt_image_2_5, GPT-Image-2 prompts, the Flare / Sunburst variants, a transparent-background image, or wants to generate an image with GPT Image 2.0 or 2.5. Covers when to prefer GPT Image 2.5 over 2.0 (transparent background, xhigh/max quality, extra aspect ratios — from platform and OpenAI facts), the CLI-vs-MCP disagreement on gpt_image_2, the three-format prompt taxonomy (Format A structured JSON for UI mockups and layout-dense images; Format B dense cinematic prose for single-subject scenes; Format C auto-derive meta-prompt for theme-only concepts), per-format craft patterns, output conventions, the 6-item pre-delivery checklist, and cross-surface workflow context (companion static-ads-workflow.md for ad recreation; higgsfield-marketing-studio cross-surface-workflow.md §3 for ms_image / DTC Ads Higgsfield-native alternative).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OSideMedia/higgsfield-ai-prompt-skill☆ 7332026年9月27日 更新
Scan social platforms for top-performing content by engagement before you create anything. Use this skill when the user wants to see what content is winning in a niche, find viral content patterns, research what's working on YouTube/TikTok/X/Reddit, benchmark engagement, discover content gaps, or says "what content is working for [topic]", "show me top performing content about [keyword]", "what's trending in [niche]", "find viral content about [product]", "content research for [keyword]", "what gets views in [niche]", "engagement analysis for [topic]", "scout the competition", "what videos are getting the most views about [keyword]", "social listening for [topic]", "trending content in [niche]", "top content analysis", "what hooks work for [keyword]", "content intelligence", "find winning formats".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Affitor/affiliate-skills☆ 7092026年9月15日 更新
Build forms, validate data, and react to user input in Blazor. USE FOR adding forms, search boxes, filter panels, inline editing, data-entry UI, file uploads, validation (annotations or custom), handling form submissions, and binding input controls. Covers EditForm, built-in input components, DataAnnotationsValidator, custom validation, SSR form patterns (SupplyParameterFromForm, FormName, AntiforgeryToken, Enhance), and @bind for simple interactive controls. DO NOT USE for project scaffolding (see create-blazor-project) or prerendering issues (see support-prerendering).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
managedcode/dotnet-skills☆ 4862026年10月13日 更新
Generate waveform visualizations from audio files. Use when a user asks to create waveform images, build audio player visualizations, generate waveform data for web players, create podcast episode previews, build audio thumbnails, render waveform PNGs for social media, extract peak data as JSON, or integrate waveform generation into audio processing pipelines. Covers audiowaveform CLI, JSON/binary data output, and web player integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
TerminalSkills/skills☆ 1652026年10月4日 更新
Inspect, schema, and fill true AcroForm PDFs using sciClaw's pdf_form_inspect, pdf_form_schema, and pdf_form_fill tools. Use when: (1) checking whether a PDF is a real fillable AcroForm, (2) listing form field names, types, and choices, (3) filling a supported form from structured values, (4) preparing reviewable insurance, legal, administrative, or clinical form drafts, (5) reporting skipped fields or unused input keys after a fill. Do not use for scanned PDFs, OCR tasks, or XFA-only forms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
FDU-INS/Insurance-Skills☆ 762026年7月12日 更新
Form patterns for React: react-hook-form (most common), Formik (legacy/stable), TanStack Form (newer). Validation via zod / yup / valibot. Controlled vs uncontrolled inputs, field arrays, multi-step wizards. Use this skill to: - Wire react-hook-form with a validation schema. - Pick between controlled and uncontrolled patterns. - Build multi-step forms with state preservation. - Handle async validation (e.g., username availability). - Integrate forms with TanStack Query mutations. Do NOT use this skill for: - General state management (see react-state-management). - Routing (see react-routing). - Component conventions (see react-conventions). - Testing forms (see react-testing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AratKruglik/claude-sdlc☆ 362026年9月21日 更新
Flask web framework conventions: app factory pattern with create_app(), Blueprint registration with url_prefix, MethodView for class-based API views, Marshmallow schema validation, WTForms for HTML forms, Flask-Login for session auth, flask-jwt-extended for stateless API auth, Jinja2 template conventions, error handlers, and extension initialization. Activated automatically by flask-plugin/stack.md. Use this skill to: - Structure Flask applications with the app factory and per-feature Blueprints. - Validate JSON request data with Marshmallow and HTML forms with WTForms. - Implement session-based auth with Flask-Login or token auth with flask-jwt-extended. - Render Jinja2 templates safely or return JSON responses for API mode. - Register global error handlers for consistent error responses. Do NOT use this skill for: - SQLAlchemy ORM model patterns and Flask-Migrate — see flask-plugin:sqlalchemy-patterns. - Python language idioms — see python-foundation:python-conventions. - Testing patterns — see python-foundation:pytest-testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AratKruglik/claude-sdlc☆ 362026年9月21日 更新
Product marketing and go-to-market strategy for B2B SaaS launches and positioning. Use this skill when planning a product launch, developing positioning and messaging, analyzing competitive landscape, building customer advocacy programs, designing a customer referral program (who may accept the reward, how the introduction is made), designing a win/loss interview program, working out why we lose deals, designing GTM strategy, creating category positioning, planning analyst briefings, or deciding which country to expand into and how far to localize. Also use it for an early-stage startup where the founder is still doing the selling — running founder-led sales, setting up a design-partner program, judging whether you have product-market fit, deciding what not to do yet, deciding when to hire the first AE or first marketer, and moving upmarket to larger buyers. Also use it when your company has just acquired another (or is about to), to plan the marketing integration: what you may and may not do between signing and close, the first letter to the acquired customers, whether to keep, endorse, fold in or retire the acquired brand, merging the two marketing databases without mailing people who opted out, when to start cross-selling, and announcing a product sunset. Also use it to design a demand-generation campaign and the channel plan it runs on: one campaign with one job, the offer for buyers who are and are not in market, what each channel is for, the kill and scale rules set before launch, the follow-up sales agrees to, the yearly calendar of always-on programs and tentpole campaigns, and which channels to keep, test or stop. Also use it for brand marketing and demand creation — how much to spend on brand versus performance, what to measure when a brand campaign produces no conversion event, and how to answer "we cannot attribute it". Also triggers on: founder-led sales, founder-led GTM, design partners, design partner agreement, first customers, first 10 customers, do we have product-market fit, PMF, Sean Ellis test, very disappointed survey, pre-seed, seed stage, when to hire our first AE, first sales hire, first marketing hire, moving upmarket, going upmarket, enterprise readiness, first enterprise deal, what do enterprise buyers need before they sign, positioning, product launch, beta program, early access program, design partners, private preview, public preview, general availability, GA launch, when can we call it GA, can sales sell a beta feature, selling the roadmap, launch tier, competitive intelligence, messaging, customer advocacy, win/loss analysis, win/loss interviews, why we lose deals, closed-lost analysis, loss reason, close-reason field, competitive displacement, displace an incumbent, rip and replace, competitive takeout, switch from a competitor, win deals from a competitor, incumbent contract, renewal window, auto-renewal notice period, switching costs, EU Data Act, cloud switching rights, why do we lose to no decision, GTM, category design, ideal customer profile, ICP, what is our real ICP, who actually buys from us, refresh our ICP from closed-won deals, ICP refresh before planning, analyst briefing, G2 review, international expansion, market entry, expand into Europe, which country should we launch in next, localization, translate our site, in-country go-to-market, regional GTM, is cold email legal in Germany, brand marketing, brand awareness, brand vs performance, brand versus demand gen, demand creation, demand capture, 95-5 rule, out of market buyers, category entry points, distinctive brand assets, mental availability, brand tracking, brand health, brand lift, share of search, how do we measure brand, justify brand spend, brand budget. Also triggers on public-sector marketing: sell to government, government marketing, public sector go-to-market, federal marketing, state and local government, SLED, FedRAMP, FedRAMP marketing claims, can we say FedRAMP ready, GovRAMP, StateRAMP, VPAT, accessibility confor
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
shalintripathi/saas-marketing-agents☆ 212026年10月13日 更新
Build the executive KPI dashboard for Agentforce: adoption, deflection, latency, cost, quality — KPI definitions, data sources, CRM Analytics lenses, alert thresholds. NOT for the platform's own session tracing, Agent Analytics and health monitoring — use agentforce/agentforce-observability. NOT for scoring agent answer quality offline — use agentforce/agentforce-eval-harness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PranavNagrecha/AwesomeSalesforceSkills☆ 192026年10月4日 更新
Use when designing or reviewing Agentforce topic (renamed subagent in April 2026) structure, including topic boundaries, instruction quality, handoff rules, out-of-scope behavior, and topic-selector strategy. Triggers: 'agentforce subagents (formerly topics)', 'topic design', 'topic selector', 'agent scope boundary', 'handoff conditions'. NOT for restricting what the agent may do or say (topic Scope, action filters, abuse prevention) — use agentforce/agentforce-guardrails. NOT for the mechanics of transferring a live conversation out — Omni-Channel routing and the context package — use agentforce/agentforce-agent-handoff-patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PranavNagrecha/AwesomeSalesforceSkills☆ 192026年10月4日 更新
Use this skill when authoring INVEST-compliant Salesforce user stories from gathered requirements: shaping the As-A/I-Want/So-That stem, writing Given-When-Then acceptance criteria, sizing complexity (S/M/L/XL), splitting stories that are too large for a sprint, and emitting handoff metadata that names the next downstream agent. Trigger keywords: user story, INVEST, story splitting, story sizing, As-A I-Want So-That, story handoff, recommended_agents, backlog item shape. NOT for requirements elicitation or stakeholder interviews (use admin/requirements-gathering-for-sf). NOT for the Given-When-Then technique itself in depth (use admin/acceptance-criteria-given-when-then). NOT for UAT test case design (use admin/uat-test-case-design). NOT for backlog prioritization (use admin/moscow-prioritization-for-sf-backlog).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PranavNagrecha/AwesomeSalesforceSkills☆ 192026年10月4日 更新
Use when testing, evaluating, or building regression suites for Agentforce agents: conversation testing in Agent Builder, topic (now subagent) coverage and utterance testing, Testing API and AiEvaluationDefinition metadata, Agentforce DX CLI test runs (sf agent generate test-spec, sf agent test create/run/resume/results/list), evaluation metrics (containment rate, escalation rate, CSAT, topic activation accuracy), and post-deploy analytics via Enhanced Event Logs. Triggers: 'how do I test my Agentforce agent', 'agent routes to wrong subagent', 'write utterance tests', 'regression test after topic change', 'measure agent quality', 'agent containment rate', 'run agent tests from the CLI'. NOT for agent creation, topic design, or action contract design — use agentforce/agentforce-agent-creation, agentforce/agent-topic-design, or agentforce/agent-actions respectively.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PranavNagrecha/AwesomeSalesforceSkills☆ 192026年10月4日 更新
Configuring and running Pipeline Inspection in Sales Cloud: enabling the feature, mapping forecast categories into the inspection view, Days in Stage and other deal-change metrics, and pipeline review cadence for sales managers. Use when designing or improving how a team monitors deal health and pipeline movement. NOT for the Revenue Intelligence app, Einstein deal insights, or forecast-accuracy dashboards — use admin/revenue-intelligence-setup. NOT for forecast types, quotas, or forecast hierarchy setup — use admin/collaborative-forecasts. Keywords: pipeline review, coverage ratio, stage conversion, slippage, stale deals, days in stage, LastStageChangeInDays, LastStageChangeDate, AgeInDays, PushCount, ForecastCategoryName, enablePipelineInspection, PipelineInspMetricConfig, OpportunitySettings, review cadence, commit call.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PranavNagrecha/AwesomeSalesforceSkills☆ 192026年10月4日 更新
Eliciting, documenting and structuring requirements for a Salesforce implementation: stakeholder discovery interviews, As-Is and To-Be process mapping, and gap analysis against standard Salesforce capability. Trigger keywords: requirements gathering, user story, As-Is To-Be, gap analysis, stakeholder interview, process mapping, business requirements, fit gap. NOT for authoring the user stories themselves - use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce. NOT for scoring requirements against a specific org - use admin/fit-gap-analysis-against-org. NOT for technical design decisions - use architect/solution-design-patterns. Also covers the requirements catalogue itself (one row per requirement, MoSCoW priority, source stakeholder, downstream target) and Salesforce non-functional requirements: record volume, sharing layer, integration pattern, reporting joins, mobile/offline, and licence implication.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PranavNagrecha/AwesomeSalesforceSkills☆ 192026年10月4日 更新
Use this skill when prioritizing a Salesforce backlog with the MoSCoW method (Must / Should / Could / Won't) plus an effort + value lens, deciding what fits in the next sprint or release, and using WSJF as a tie-break when MoSCoW alone produces ties. Trigger keywords: MoSCoW prioritization, must should could won't, WSJF salesforce, prioritize salesforce stories, sprint commit, backlog grooming. NOT for story writing or splitting (use admin/user-story-writing-for-salesforce). NOT for release train planning (use agents/release-train-planner). NOT for sizing/estimation method debates — this skill assumes a sizing convention is already in place.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PranavNagrecha/AwesomeSalesforceSkills☆ 192026年10月4日 更新
Use when a Lightning record page, home page, or app page is slow to load or render — covers Experienced Page Time (EPT) analysis, component count reduction, progressive disclosure via tabs and conditional rendering, Lightning Experience Insights diagnostics, and DOM/XHR minimization strategies. Triggers: 'Lightning page is slow', 'EPT is high', 'record page takes too long to load', 'too many components on page', 'Lightning Experience Insights shows slow page', 'how to optimize Lightning page performance'. NOT for Visualforce page performance (separate concern). NOT for Apex or SOQL query optimization (use apex/apex-cpu-and-heap-optimization or data/soql-query-optimization). NOT for report or dashboard performance (use admin/report-performance-tuning).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PranavNagrecha/AwesomeSalesforceSkills☆ 192026年10月4日 更新
Router for the 61 SfSkills `integration` skill packages. INBOUND integration and the API surface itself: the Salesforce REST and SOAP APIs, Bulk API 2.0 jobs, Platform Events, CDC, Pub/Sub, Named Credentials and middleware. For calling OUT to someone else's API from Apex, use salesforce-apex instead. Use when the request mentions integration, Salesforce REST API, composite API, SOAP API, Bulk API 2.0 job, Platform Event, Change Data Capture, Pub/Sub, inbound webhook, Named Credential, OAuth, connected app, MuleSoft, Salesforce Connect, external system calling Salesforce. Finds and opens the exact skill package to read; it does not contain the guidance itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PranavNagrecha/AwesomeSalesforceSkills☆ 192026年10月4日 更新
Entry point for the SfSkills Salesforce library: 1,040 skill packages across 11 domains (admin, agentforce, apex, architect, data, devops, flow, integration, lwc, omnistudio, security), 70 run-time agents and 92 slash commands. Use for any Salesforce, Force.com or Lightning Platform question — Apex, SOQL, SOSL, triggers, Flow, LWC, sObject, custom field, permission set, profile, sharing rule, validation rule, deployment, sandbox, Agentforce, OmniStudio, org setup. This skill does not answer Salesforce questions itself; it routes to the specific skill package that does, then hands off to a domain router.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PranavNagrecha/AwesomeSalesforceSkills☆ 192026年10月4日 更新
Data structures and serialization formats for agent-to-agent communication. Covers message envelopes, structured output schemas, capability declarations, task handoff payloads, error/retry signaling, and context windows as data structures. Deep comparison of A2A protocol, MCP, OpenAI function calling, and LangChain message types. Teaches when to use rigid schemas vs free-form with validation, typed vs untyped, streaming vs batch. Activate on: "agent message format", "agent communication schema", "agent-to-agent protocol", "A2A protocol", "MCP message format", "structured output for agents", "agent interop", "interchange format", "agent serialization", "task handoff format", "capability declaration". NOT for: what agents say to each other (use agent-conversation-protocols), orchestration topology (use multi-agent-coordination), building agent infrastructure (use agentic-infrastructure-2026).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
curiositech/windags-skills☆ 132026年10月12日 更新