「gate」の検索結果

Delegate a coding task to the Z.AI ZCode CLI as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to ZCode — phrasings like "have ZCode do X", "delegate this to ZCode", "run it through ZCode", or "use ZCode to implement/fix/refactor" — or to run a queue of coding tasks through ZCode while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate a coding task to the Kimi Code CLI (`kimi`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Kimi - phrasings like "have Kimi implement X", "delegate this to Kimi", "run it through Kimi Code", or "use Kimi to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Kimi while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate a coding task to the Google Antigravity CLI (`agy`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Antigravity or agy - phrasings like "have Antigravity do X", "delegate this to agy", "run it through agy", or "use Antigravity to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through agy while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate a coding task to the Command Code CLI (`cmd`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Command Code — phrasings like "have Command Code do X", "delegate this to commandcode", "run it through cmd", or "use Command Code to implement/fix/refactor" — or to run a queue of coding tasks through Command Code while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate a coding task to Aider (`aider`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Aider - phrasings like "have Aider do X", "delegate this to aider", "run it through Aider", or "use Aider to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Aider while staying the reviewer. This includes asking Aider to drive a local or self-hosted OpenAI-compatible endpoint ("have Aider use my local model", "run Aider against llama.cpp / Ollama / vLLM / LM Studio"), which Aider reaches via `--api-base`. DO NOT USE for local-model or coding requests that do not name Aider, for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate a coding task to the Warp Agent CLI (`oz`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Warp - phrasings like "have Warp implement X", "delegate this to the Warp CLI", "run it through Warp", "use oz to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Warp while staying the reviewer. DO NOT USE for tasks small enough to do inline, when the user wants the code written directly without delegating, or for the interactive `warp` TUI (this skill drives the headless `oz agent run`, not the terminal app).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure Azure API Management as an AI Gateway for AI models, MCP tools, and agents. WHEN: semantic caching, token limit, content safety, load balancing, AI model governance, MCP rate limiting, jailbreak detection, add Azure OpenAI backend, add AI Foundry model, test AI gateway, LLM policies, configure AI backend, token metrics, AI cost control, convert API to MCP, import OpenAPI to gateway.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects and removes doublets/aggregates from flow, spectral, and mass cytometry before clustering or quantification. Covers FSC-A vs FSC-H singlet discrimination (the Area-Height non-proportionality, not a 1D area gate), FSC-W/SSC width gating, CyTOF Gaussian discrimination parameters (Center/Offset/Width/Residual/Event_length) and DNA intercalator gating, and the residual heterotypic conjugates that survive scatter gating and masquerade as double-positive populations. Use when filtering aggregates before phenotyping, choosing a doublet method for flow vs CyTOF, or diagnosing a suspicious double-positive cluster.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a generated Scenario image needs a quality check or a brand-brief compliance verdict before it ships: pass/warn/fail scoring, on-brand review against a configured brief, QA gating a batch, pricing or refreshing a stored verdict, or iterating a generation until it clears the gate. Keywords: quality gate, quality check, QA, verdict, brief compliance, on-brand, brand brief, pass fail, score, review, asset_quality_gate_run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a phased delivery orchestration plan for creative-direction-driven work: which skills run when, what locks at which gate, how handoffs occur, and how the cadence implements in the team's tools (Jira, Linear, Notion, Figma, GitHub) with AI agents via MCP and CLI. A temporal map of phases, lock points, handoff specs, gate definitions, and QA verification gates. Distinct from `creative-brief` (static project brief) and `creative-direction` (aesthetic direction). Triggers on integration orchestrator, delivery cadence, project orchestration, when does the brief lock, how to phase creative direction, design-development handoff, QA gate, agent-driven QA, and when a creative-direction project is starting, mid-flight with broken cadence, or integrating AI agents into PM workflow. Does NOT fire for project scoping (use `creative-brief`), aesthetic direction (use `creative-direction`), or general project management without a creative-direction throughline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert knowledge for Azure NAT Gateway development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, security, configuration, and deployment. Use when planning SNAT port capacity, using flow logs, deploying NAT Gateway V2, integrating Azure Firewall, or securing outbound IPs, and other Azure NAT Gateway related development tasks. Not for Azure Virtual Network (use azure-virtual-network), Azure Virtual Network Manager (use azure-virtual-network-manager), Azure Load Balancer (use azure-load-balancer), Azure Virtual WAN (use azure-virtual-wan).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert knowledge for Azure Application Gateway development including troubleshooting, best practices, decision making, architecture & design patterns, limits & quotas, security, configuration, integrations & coding patterns, and deployment. Use when configuring App Gateway v2 listeners/routing, WAF/TLS with Key Vault, AKS/AGIC, Private Link, or Containers, and other Azure Application Gateway related development tasks. Not for Azure Front Door (use azure-front-door), Azure Load Balancer (use azure-load-balancer), Azure Virtual Network (use azure-virtual-network), Azure Web Application Firewall (use azure-web-application-firewall).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Databricks Model Serving endpoint lifecycle and ops. Use when asked to: CRUD serving endpoints (CLI or MLflow Deployments client); configure traffic routing for A/B / canary deploys and zero-downtime version swaps; retrieve OpenAPI schemas; inspect logs, metrics, or permissions; manage legacy AI Gateway rate limits (not Unity Gateway); discover Foundation Model API endpoints at runtime; integrate endpoints into Databricks Apps; or stream from off-platform clients (Vercel AI SDK v6, standalone Node.js). NOT for: Unity Gateway CRUD and management (databricks-unity-gateway), training, MLflow autologging, UC registration, custom PyFunc/ResponsesAgent authoring (databricks-ml-training); Knowledge Assistants/Supervisor Agents (databricks-agent-bricks); MLflow evaluation (databricks-mlflow-evaluation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements age-gating mechanisms for online services to restrict access based on user age. Covers hard gates versus soft gates, neutral age prompts, re-verification triggers, circumvention prevention, and regulatory requirements under GDPR, COPPA, UK Online Safety Act, and DSA. Keywords: age gate, age restriction, neutral prompt, children, online services, access control.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Runs an evidence-based investigation of a bug, failure, or unexpected behavior with investigate and publishes the resulting investigation report to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants something debugged, diagnosed, or root-caused AND the findings posted to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not investigate to a local file only — use investigate. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence. Does not document an already-understood feature to Confluence — use project-documentation-to-confluence. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence. Does not publish to Jira — use work-items-to-jira.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fix ClickHouse query errors when querying AggregatingMergeTree tables that use state functions. Use when: (1) Query fails with type mismatch on AggregateFunction columns, (2) Using sum/count on columns created with sumState/countState/uniqState, (3) Creating views that JOIN with materialized views using AggregatingMergeTree, (4) Getting unexpected results from aggregate columns that show as AggregateFunction(sum, ...) type. The *State() functions store intermediate aggregate states, not final values - you must use *Merge() functions to finalize them.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Returns the universal governance spec for swarm team runs — hard rules, briefing templates, gate presentation contract, launch mechanics, and pulse setup. The canonical source: invoked by launch.md at Step 1 and by user-authored shortcut commands that cannot read launch.md directly. Per-gate constants live in swarm:gate-presentation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect and tune the skill-manifest gate — which of the 421 tonone skills keep their description in this project's context, and what that costs in tokens. Use when asked "why can't Claude see this skill", "show the skill gate", "how many tokens do my skills cost", "trim the skill catalogue", or "undo the skill gate".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guide for API Gateways, Reverse Proxies, and Service Mesh. Covers Kong, Traefik, NGINX, Cloudflare Gateway, and load balancing / Panduan ahli untuk API Gateway, Reverse Proxy, dan Service Mesh.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a new IWE skill with proper frontmatter, gates, scaffold and verification. Use when the pilot says: /skill-creator or «создай скилл <name>». The skill enforces WP Gate precondition, Routing Gate, IntegrationGate hard-check, collects parameters in 4 short steps, generates a scaffold SKILL.md from a template, shows a draft, writes files, and reminds about verify-skill.sh.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user says "minimize this ty ecosystem change", "reproduce this ecosystem result", "investigate a primer difference", "investigate a mypy_primer difference", "investigate a mypy-primer difference", or asks to reproduce, investigate, or minimize behavior changes in ty ecosystem/primer/mypy_primer/mypy-primer projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

8つの専門エージェント（市場規模分析・トレンド調査・競合インテリジェンス・投資シグナル・日本市場・ユーザー需要分析・規制調査・データ検証）が ディスカッション型でアプリ/デジタルプロダクトの市場調査を実施するスキル。 エージェント同士が対話・批判し合い、data-critic がライブモデレーターとして矛盾を検出・収束を判定する。 トライアンギュレーション（データ・方法論・調査者・理論の4種類）をディスカッションに組み込み、 確証バイアスを排除した信頼度付きレポートを出力する。 Gate 1（全員参加の合意形成）→ Gate 2（最終検証 + Devil's Advocate）の2段階ゲートで品質を担保。 コンテキストファイルで過去のセッションを引き継げる。 Use when: 市場調査をしたい、TAM/SAM/SOMを算出したい、市場の成長性を調べたい、 参入タイミングを判断したい、競合市場を分析したい、規制リスクを調べたい。 Triggers: "市場調査", "market research", "TAM", "SAM", "SOM", "市場規模", "市場分析", "market analysis", "参入", "market entry", "市場性", "market viability", "市場トレンド", "market trend"

5つの専門エージェントがディスカッション型で競合のビジネスモデル・機能・価格・弱点を網羅的に分析し、 差別化ポイントと参入戦略を導出するスキル。 エージェント同士が対話・批判し合いながら調査し、ca-data-critic がライブモデレーターとして矛盾を検出・収束を判定する。 Phase 1 で競合プロファイル・レビュー・機能をディスカッション型で調査し、 Phase 2 でポジショニング戦略家が統合。 Gate 1（中間合意形成）→ Gate 2（最終検証 + Independent Validation + Devil's Advocate）の2段階ゲートで品質を担保。 Use when: 競合を分析したい、差別化ポイントを見つけたい、 市場のプレイヤーを調べたい、ポジショニングを考えたい。 Triggers: "競合分析", "competitive analysis", "競合調査", "差別化", "ポジショニング", "competitor", "競合", "市場プレイヤー", "ライバル調査", "competitive landscape"

Design combinational logic circuits from a functional specification through gate-level implementation. Covers AND, OR, NOT, XOR, NAND, NOR gates; NAND/NOR universality conversions; and standard building blocks including multiplexers, decoders, half/full adders, and ripple-carry adders. Use when translating a Boolean function or truth table into a hardware-realizable gate network and verifying it by exhaustive simulation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。