「goal」の検索結果

タスクの目的・背景・ゴールが曖昧なとき、既存コンテキストからAIが仮想ヒアリング済みとして最適ゴールと完了チェックリストを推定し goal-spec.json に固めたいときに使う。

Durable repo-native multi-goal plans with embedded success criteria and evidence audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompose multi-step work into a revisable subgoal plan with stable step IDs, checkpointing, and plan-ahead execution. Load when a task needs explicit planning before action, subgoal decomposition, plan checkpointing, or ReCAP-style plan-ahead execution. Also triggers on "structured plan", "plan with steps", "subgoal graph", "revise the plan", "checkpoint plan", or multi-step tasks where naive one-shot execution would be fragile. Skips trivial single-step tasks. Pairs with dynamic-routing on failure. Distinct from process-decomposer (registry/triage) and problem-to-plan (doc deliverables).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Flip a problem, goal, or decision 180 degrees to find what forward thinking misses. Asks what would guarantee failure, then works backward to what must be avoided or changed. Load when the user says "invert this", "flip this problem", "what would guarantee failure", "think backward", "reverse engineer the goal", "think about it backwards", or when deep-thinking diagnoses an inversion frame. Also triggers on "what's the opposite of success here", "how would we sabotage this". Two methods: Failure Inversion and Opposite Goal. Max 2 clarifying questions before inverting. Always returns forward actions. For broader analysis, deep-thinking calls this.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[20] UNDERSTAND. Achieve complete clarity on goals, expectations, and success criteria. Use when starting new tasks, when requirements seem unclear, when scope is ambiguous, or anytime you need full understanding of what success looks like. Triggers on "clarify goal", "understand requirements", "what exactly needed", "define success", or when facing unclear expectations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executive coaching skill that helps you plan your 2026 using research-backed process goals. Guides you through discovery questions, creates outcome goals, converts them to daily behaviors, and sets up accountability systems. Use when you want to plan your year, set goals, or need a coach to help you stay focused.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create and execute Goal-Oriented Action Plans (GOAP) with precondition analysis, cost optimization, and adaptive replanning

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans and creates an AI team for a goal, with roles, a run that carries a unit budget, and bounded tasks. Use when the user asks to start, set up or staff a team, or to split a larger goal across roles. Records coordination state only; nothing is executed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A goal-like loop that decomposes work into systematic, evidence-bound ultrawork steps. Use when the user wants a goal loop or durable, checkpointed execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Goal-integrity skill. Use for backend/API/persistence, preserve/do-not-change, tests/validation, mocks, rework, multi-part requests. Emits Goal Contracts, Deviation Notices, Phase Checks, Final Audits. Skip for Q&A or trivial edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Goal-driven finance research workflow: attach a research-only objective, track criteria, and add evidence while avoiding live trading execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous agents are AI systems that can independently decompose goals, plan actions, execute tools, and self-correct without constant human guidance. The challenge isn't making them capable - it's making them reliable. Every extra decision multiplies failure probability. This skill covers agent loops (ReAct, Plan-Execute), goal decomposition, reflection patterns, and production reliability. Key insight: compounding error rates kill autonomous agents. A 95% success rate per step drops to 60% b

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a feature spec or PRD from a problem statement or feature idea. Use when turning a vague idea or user request into a structured document, scoping a feature with goals and non-goals, defining success metrics and acceptance criteria, or breaking a big ask into a phased spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Strategic product leadership toolkit for Head of Product covering OKR cascade generation, quarterly planning, competitive landscape analysis, product vision documents, and team scaling proposals. Use when creating quarterly OKR documents, defining product goals or KPIs, building product roadmaps, running competitive analysis, drafting team structure or hiring plans, aligning product strategy across engineering and design, or generating cascaded goal hierarchies from company to team level.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cascades strategy from boardroom to individual contributor. Detects and fixes misalignment between company goals and team execution. Covers strategy articulation, cascade mapping, orphan goal detection, silo identification, communication gap analysis, and realignment protocols. Use when teams are pulling in different directions, OKRs don't connect, departments optimize locally at company expense, or when user mentions alignment, strategy cascade, silo, conflicting OKRs, or strategy communication.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

把一句话的想法拆成 AI agent 能独立跑完的目标任务书。用户说「帮我给 agent 写个目标」「帮我详细拆一下这个目标」「写个任务书/brief 给 agent」「写个 goal 提示词」「让 agent 自己跑这个项目」「把活分给几个 agent 并行」时使用。先进代码库实测、必要时联网调研，再一次性提问（≤5 个），产出一份 ≤4000 字符、直接粘进 /goal 就能跑的任务书，含实测数字、白名单地界、防作弊验收和断点续跑。执行型与探索型（调研/选型/找方案）自动分流。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Dual-context skill: Personal TELOS reads and updates goals, beliefs, narratives, strategies, and more with timestamped backups; Project TELOS analyzes .md/.csv directories for dependency chains, bottlenecks, and alignment, generating reports, narrative points, or dashboards. USE WHEN Telos, life goals, projects, dependencies, update TELOS, narrative points, McKinsey report, dashboard, what am I wrong about, life frames, mental models. NOT FOR conversational constitutional review (use Interview).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Qualify the exact final diff for a LoopX-managed goal. Use when goal policy enables change_quality_qualification, before a non-trivial delivery or merge, and when producing or repairing an exact-scope quality receipt. The workflow is language-neutral, permits at most one policy-authorized safe-fix pass, and never grants merge or repository authority.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scope a feature end to end and write an implementation spec under specs/ from an accepted proposal — current-system mapping, goals/non-goals, a Decision Log for one-way-door choices, a live Open Questions backlog, and a real migration + test plan. Read when asked to write a spec, scope this feature, turn this proposal into a spec, plan the implementation, or break this into tasks. Do NOT fire on frame a proposal or write the PRD (sibling frame-a-proposal — a PRD frames a change before it is accepted; this skill starts once one is), record a decision or write the ADR (record-a-decision), write a postmortem (write-a-postmortem), or review this design (review-a-design) — those are separate skills. Complements the platform open-knowledge skill; does not replace it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Qualify the exact final diff for a LoopX-managed goal. Use when goal policy enables change_quality_qualification, before a non-trivial delivery or merge, and when producing or repairing an exact-scope quality receipt. The workflow is language-neutral, permits at most one policy-authorized safe-fix pass, and never grants merge or repository authority.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Goal-based workflow orchestration - routes tasks to specialist agents based on user goals

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A goal-like loop that decomposes work into systematic, evidence-bound ultrawork steps. Use when the user wants a goal loop or durable, checkpointed execution.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Planning a coordinated set of items toward a goal, an event, a trip, or a project, where the request only comes together as several purchases with a structure between them, and later changes to a plan you have presented. Not needed when the customer wants a single item, however carefully chosen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent research orchestration: split a research goal into parallel sub-goals, run each via headless `claude -p` subprocesses, aggregate results into a polished report file. Use for systematic web/document research, competitive or industry analysis, batch link/dataset processing, and long-form evidence synthesis. Triggers: "深度调研", "deep research", "wide research", "多 Agent 调研", "系统调研".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。