445 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
This skill uses OpenClaw's healthcheck workflow to inspect the host running the assistant, surface risky exposure, and turn the findings into a staged hardening plan. It is for operator-style audits with explicit approval gates, not a generic software listing or a replacement for OS administration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve interface resilience through better error handling, i18n support, text overflow handling, and edge case management, making interfaces robust and production-ready. Use when the user asks to harden, make production-ready, handle edge cases, add error states, or fix overflow and i18n issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply Odylith security-hardening guidance to bounded product changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill during Phase 5 formal hardening. Provides tool selection, proof harness patterns, security/purity audit expectations, and verification result interpretation for Rust (Kani), Python (hypothesis), and TypeScript (fast-check).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review owned or authorized code for security using structure-first evidence: AST/structure maps, call graphs, complexity, Source/Sink flow, and defensive findings. Use when asked for security review, vulnerability review, AST structure map review, SAST triage, Source/Sink, taint flow, parser/scanner hardening, CI/CD security, LLM/agent tool boundary review, 脆弱性レビュー, 構造マップ, セキュリティレビュー.
Stack-specific security implementation guidance (backend, frontend, database, infrastructure, operations) with auto-detection from your changes. Use when implementing a feature securely or hardening code as you write it. Trigger on "how do I secure this", "security best practices", "is this secure", "harden this". For scanning existing code use /security-verify.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Kubernetes and container security skill for cluster hardening, RBAC review, admission control (OPA Gatekeeper, Kyverno), Pod Security Standards, network policies, secrets management, runtime defense (Falco, Tetragon), image supply chain (cosign, SLSA, in-toto), and CIS benchmark compliance. Use to assess and harden clusters you operate.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stress-tests a fuzzy or vague feature idea before any PRD, spec, or ticket is written. TRIGGER when: the user has a fuzzy feature idea — one or two paragraphs, vague on users / scope / success — and wants to harden it, or says "grill / stress-test / pressure-test this idea." DO NOT TRIGGER when: the idea is already turned into a spec or PRD; bug fixes or refactors; the idea is hardened and you are ready to write the PRD → creating-prd.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits, configures, and hardens workload-level security controls for Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) applications and namespaces. Covers running cluster security audits (`audit_cluster.sh`), configuring Workload Identity Federation (impersonation, KSA/GSA binding, and pod setup), enforcing Network Policies (default-deny and Dataplane V2 logging), isolating high-risk pods inside GKE Sandbox (`gVisor`), enforcing Pod Security Standards (`restricted` labeling), and mounting Secret Manager secrets via CSI (`SecretProviderClass`). Use when auditing cluster security posture, isolating namespaces, applying pod security standards, setting up Workload Identity, or configuring network policies and secret volume mounts. Don't use for cluster-wide control plane security, RBAC hardening, Binary Authorization, Shielded Nodes, or enabling platform-level GKE add-ons (use gke-platform-security instead).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when setting up or auditing a dedicated Salesforce integration user — Salesforce Integration user license, API-only profile, permission set layering, MFA waiver, and login monitoring. NOT for creating human users, roles, or login hours — use admin/user-management. NOT for login IP ranges, session lifetime, or OAuth client-credential hardening — use security/api-only-user-hardening. Trigger keywords: service account, API-only user, run-as user, client credentials execution user, LoginHistory, REQUEST_LIMIT_EXCEEDED, integration login failure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when configuring org-wide platform settings: MFA enforcement, My Domain setup and deployment, session timeout and security settings, password policies, trusted IP ranges (Network Access), and CSP Trusted Sites. Owns these settings as deployable Settings metadata (Security.settings, MyDomain.settings, Company.settings, Language.settings) and the order in which a new org is stood up. Trigger keywords: 'MFA setup', 'My Domain', 'session settings', 'password policy', 'trusted IP ranges', 'CSP trusted sites', 'Security.settings', 'SecuritySettings metadata', 'MyDomainSettings', 'settings-meta.xml', 'enhanced domains', 'deploy org settings', 'new org setup order', 'sessionTimeout enum', 'lockSessionsToIp', 'enableAdminLoginAsAnyUser'. NOT for user-level login restrictions (use user-management), NOT for permission model design (use permission-sets-vs-profiles), NOT for security audit and hardening review (use security/org-hardening-and-baseline-config).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Router for the 49 SfSkills `security` skill packages. Platform security and compliance: org hardening, encryption, session policy, MFA, monitoring, incident response, and TROUBLESHOOTING a specific record-access denial. Designing the sharing model itself (OWD, role hierarchy, sharing rules) is salesforce-admin. Use when the request mentions security, org hardening, Shield, platform encryption, field audit trail, MFA, SSO, SAML, session policy, guest user, event monitoring, GDPR, XSS, injection, why can this one user see this record, Apex managed sharing, sharing recalculation. Finds and opens the exact skill package to read; it does not contain the guidance itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, audit, harden, review, or upgrade MCP servers and MCP Apps with revision-aware protocol profiles, explicit HTTP/deployment boundaries, capability-centered validation, bilingual reporting, and reproducible evidence. Use for MCP server architecture, JSON-RPC or Streamable HTTP bugs, security hardening, protocol-version migration, MCP Apps widget boundaries, review reconciliation, test planning, and public engineering evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hardens code against vulnerabilities. Use when handling user input, authentication, data storage, or external integrations. Use when building any feature that accepts untrusted data, manages user sessions, or interacts with third-party services.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hardens code against vulnerabilities. Use when handling user input, authentication, data storage, or external integrations. Use when building any feature that accepts untrusted data, manages user sessions, or interacts with third-party services.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve interface resilience through better error handling, i18n support, text overflow handling, and edge case management. Makes interfaces robust and production-ready. Use when the user asks to harden, make production-ready, handle edge cases, add error states, or fix overflow and i18n issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stress-tests a fuzzy or vague feature idea before any PRD, spec, or ticket is written. TRIGGER when: the user has a fuzzy feature idea — one or two paragraphs, vague on users / scope / success — and wants to harden it, or says "grill / stress-test / pressure-test this idea." DO NOT TRIGGER when: the idea is already turned into a spec or PRD; bug fixes or refactors; the idea is hardened and you are ready to write the PRD → creating-prd.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Practical security review and hardening guidance for application code in Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, and Go. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a security review or audit, wants to harden authentication (password hashing, sessions, JWT, OAuth2/OIDC, MFA), fix OWASP Top 10 issues (injection, XSS, IDOR, CSRF, SSRF, deserialization), threat-model with STRIDE, clean up secrets and .env handling, or set up dependency scanning (pip-audit, npm audit, osv-scanner, gitleaks, SBOM). Also trigger for "make this secure", "is this safe to deploy", bcrypt/argon2id, rate limiting logins, RBAC/ABAC, CSP and security headers, cookie flags, and secure-by-default coding help.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when hardening a Linux host you operate — SSH posture, a default-deny firewall baseline, and unattended security upgrades, each verified on the box rather than assumed from a config file.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, audit, harden, review, or upgrade MCP servers and MCP Apps with revision-aware protocol profiles, explicit HTTP/deployment boundaries, capability-centered validation, bilingual reporting, and reproducible evidence. Use for MCP server architecture, JSON-RPC or Streamable HTTP bugs, security hardening, protocol-version migration, MCP Apps widget boundaries, review reconciliation, test planning, and public engineering evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve interface resilience through better error handling, i18n support, text overflow handling, and edge case management. Makes interfaces robust and production-ready. Use when the user asks to harden, make production-ready, handle edge cases, add error states, or fix overflow and i18n issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve interface resilience through better error handling, i18n support, text overflow handling, and edge case management. Makes interfaces robust and production-ready. Use when the user asks to harden, make production-ready, handle edge cases, add error states, or fix overflow and i18n issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。