「iab」の検索結果

Build or update a professional-grade design system in Figma from a codebase. Use when the user wants to create variables/tokens, build component libraries, create individual components with proper variant sets and variable bindings, set up theming (light/dark modes), document foundations, or reconcile gaps between code and Figma. Also use when the user asks to create or generate any component in Figma — even a single one — since components require proper variable foundations, variant states, and design token bindings to be production-quality. This skill teaches WHAT to build and in WHAT ORDER — it complements the `figma-use` skill which teaches HOW to call the Plugin API. Both skills should be loaded together.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mendelian randomization (MR) causal inference — does an exposure, risk factor, or biomarker CAUSALLY affect a disease/outcome, using genetic variants as instrumental variables (IEU OpenGWAS / EpiGraphDB MR-EvE). Use this whenever the user asks if X causes Y, whether an observational association is actually causal or just correlation, if a biomarker/trait is a causal risk factor, wants to triangulate epidemiology against genetic evidence, or mentions Mendelian randomization, instrumental-variable analysis, two-sample MR, or genetic causal evidence — even if they never say "MR" (e.g. "is LDL cholesterol actually causal for heart disease?", "does BMI cause type 2 diabetes or just correlate?", "is CRP a causal driver of stroke?"). Covers trait-label resolution, MR effect direction/magnitude, instrument quality (MOE score), method agreement (IVW vs MR-Egger vs weighted median), bidirectional MR for reverse causation, and distinguishing causation from genetic correlation. Not for plain GWAS association lookups (use the GWAS skills) or fitting your own instruments from raw summary statistics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Download, screen, and map non-North-America auxiliary EcoSIM climate variables from global or regional atmospheric-chemistry data sources. Use when a non-US/non-NLDAS site needs annual EcoSIM precipitation chemistry variables such as PHRG, CN4RIG, CNORIG, CSORG, CCARG, CMGRG, CNARG, CKARG, or CCLRG; when deciding whether to use CAMS, EBAS, EANET, or MERRA-2; or when deriving site-specific auxiliary variables after ERA5 climate forcing has been prepared.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sort AmeriFlux BASE-BADM BIF variables from Excel or CSV files into observation, management-event, static metadata, and plotting-ready target time-series tables. Use when Codex is asked to sort AmeriFlux BIF variables into time series; organize BADM/BIF variables by date; pivot AMF *_BIF_*.xlsx files by GROUP_ID; output total LAI, leaf mass per area, above-ground biomass, canopy height, fruit yield, or total yield time series; write MATLAB readers for BIF time-series plotting; or prepare dated AmeriFlux site observations and management records for EcoSIM workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author the project's non-negotiable engineering rules — the constitution that every feature spec, plan, and implementation must satisfy. Load when the user asks to write a constitution, define project rules, set engineering invariants, write project standards, define non-negotiables, capture agent guardrails as policy, or when spec-driven-development orchestrator routes here. Also triggers on "project constitution", "engineering invariants", "non-negotiable rules", "project policy", "set our standards", "/constitution". Output: docs/constitution.md. The third strategic artifact alongside AGENTS.md (agent behavior) and product-soul (strategy).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Google SRE (Site Reliability Engineering) practices distilled from the SRE book series and real Google Brain/Meta/ByteDance production experience. Covers SLI/SLO/Error Budget design, incident response, capacity planning, toil automation, monitoring golden signals, and chaos engineering principles. USE WHEN: designing reliability targets, setting up monitoring/alerting, planning capacity, reducing operational load, building incident response runbooks, implementing chaos engineering, defining error budgets, or establishing reliability culture that balances velocity with stability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements reliability patterns including circuit breakers, retries, fallbacks, bulkheads, and SLO definitions. Provides failure mode analysis and incident response plans. Use for "SRE", "reliability", "resilience", or "failure handling".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Complete observability & reliability engineering system. Use when designing monitoring, implementing structured logging, setting up distributed tracing, building alerting systems, creating SLO/SLI frameworks, running incident response, conducting post-mortems, or auditing system reliability. Covers all three pillars (logs/metrics/traces), alert design, dashboard architecture, on-call operations, chaos engineering, and cost optimization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pythonの実行を途中で止めて変数や処理の流れを調べ、例外発生時の状態や稼働中のプロセスも確認しながら、不具合の原因を追うスキル。

• 失敗するPythonテストの変数確認
• 予想外の状態変化を追いたいとき
• 例外発生時の状態を調べたいとき

Node.jsの処理を途中で止め、変数や実行経路を調べるスキル。非同期処理の停止、不安定なテスト、メモリ増加、CPU負荷の原因調査に使えます。

• 非同期処理が止まる原因を調べたいとき
• 時々失敗するテストを調べたいとき
• 起動時や子プロセスの不具合調査

AIエージェントに任せる開発を、完了条件の定義、作業分割、実装前後の評価で進め、難易度に応じたモデル選択と費用・時間の記録まで整理するスキル。

• AIエージェントに任せる開発の計画
• 大きな変更を検証可能な作業に分けたいとき
• 実装前後の評価を比較したいとき

Node.jsの処理を途中で止め、変数や関数の呼び出し経路から不具合を調べるスキル。端末でのステップ実行、状態収集の自動化、性能調査を支援します。

• Node.jsテストの途中の状態確認
• 関数の呼び出し経路と変数の調査
• 非同期処理の停止箇所を調べたいとき

Add a browser WebCodecs bug to the Remotion Mediabunny WebCodecs bugs docs page. Use when given a Chromium, WebKit, or Firefox issue URL that should be tracked in packages/docs/docs/mediabunny/webcodecs-bugs.mdx, especially when needing to look up the issue title, filing date, reporter, and resolution state before editing the MDX table.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve factual reliability while creating or reviewing a course or supplied content. Use when the user asks to fact-check, verify accuracy, reduce hallucinations, make a reliable course, or mentions 事实性错误、知识性错误、专业知识准确性、可靠性. During creation, checks the completed pages before delivery; on existing content, returns a short evidence-backed report and lets the user choose what to fix. Not for grammar, style, or layout. Combine with deep-research when current evidence is the course's main subject.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Train reasoning and verifiable-task behavior with GRPO and reinforcement learning from verifiable rewards (RLVR). Use when task success is algorithmically checkable (math, code, tool calls, structured output), when designing GRPO reward functions, or when a GRPO run diverges or reward-hacks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conventions for SGLang environment variables — where to define, how to access, how to name, and how to deprecate. Use when adding, renaming, or reviewing any `SGLANG_*` environment variable (or migrating a legacy `SGL_*` alias), or when touching `python/sglang/srt/environ.py`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Intel CHIPSEC to assess platform firmware configuration, SPI flash write protection, BIOS lock, SMM/SMRR, and Secure Boot variable state, dump SPI flash, and triage UEFI variables for firmware-level threats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks Use when: agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous agents are AI systems that can independently decompose goals, plan actions, execute tools, and self-correct without constant human guidance. The challenge isn't making them capable - it's making them reliable. Every extra decision multiplies failure probability. This skill covers agent loops (ReAct, Plan-Execute), goal decomposition, reflection patterns, and production reliability. Key insight: compounding error rates kill autonomous agents. A 95% success rate per step drops to 60% b

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when defining, reviewing, or operating SLOs/SLIs/error budgets. Triggers on "define an SLO", "what should our SLO be", "error budget", "burn rate", "SLI", "service level objective", "Google SRE workbook", "multi-window burn-rate alert", or any reliability-target question. Ships SLO designer, error-budget calculator with multi-window burn-rate thresholds, and SLO reviewer that catches the common bugs (target too aggressive, window too short, conflicting SLOs, no SLI definition). 4 references on SLO principles + SLI design + error budget math + composition with feature-flags-architect/chaos-engineering/kubernetes-operator. NOT a generic observability skill — specifically the SLO discipline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

**MANDATORY prerequisite** — you MUST invoke this skill BEFORE every `use_figma` tool call. NEVER call `use_figma` directly without loading this skill first. Skipping it causes common, hard-to-debug failures. Trigger whenever the user wants to perform a write action or a unique read action that requires JavaScript execution in the Figma file context — e.g. create/edit/delete nodes, set up variables or tokens, build components and variants, modify auto-layout or fills, bind variables to properties, or inspect file structure programmatically.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates comprehensive production readiness reviews and assessments for GKE clusters and workloads across scalability, security, reliability, observability, backup/DR, and cost optimization. Use when asked to productionize, prepare, assess, audit, or review a GKE cluster or workload before going live to production. Don't use for deep-dive single-domain implementation (use specific domain skills like gke-workload-scaling, gke-platform-security, gke-workload-security, gke-service-networking, gke-reliability instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures best-practice alerting policies for AI agents using OpenTelemetry (OTel) metrics, generating output as Terraform (.tf) configuration files. Use when analyzing, writing, or deploying alerting policies to monitor agent latency, error rates, token usage, and quality metrics. Don't use for standard infrastructure monitoring unrelated to AI agents, or when the agent is not instrumented with OpenTelemetry (for Reliability, Cost, Safety, Security alerts). NOTE: Reliability, Cost, Safety, and Security alerts use generic OTel metrics and work across runtimes (such as Cloud Run, Vertex AI). Quality alerts rely on Vertex AI Online Monitors and are strictly bound to Vertex AI deployments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build, audit, and improve harnesses that make AI coding agents reliable: AGENTS.md/CLAUDE.md instruction files, feature/state tracking, verification gates, scope boundaries, session handoff, memory persistence, context budgets, tool-permission safety, and multi-agent coordination. Use this whenever a coding agent is unreliable across sessions — forgets context, drifts out of scope, claims "done" before tests pass, or starts each session inconsistently — or when creating or assessing AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, feature_list.json, init.sh, progress.md, or session-handoff files. Reach for it even if the user never says the word "harness."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。