「ideation」の検索結果

Research, expand, and cluster keywords for content strategy. Use when planning content topics, building keyword lists, expanding seed keywords, clustering by topic and intent, or mapping keywords to funnel stages. Triggers on "keyword research," "keyword expansion," "keyword clustering," "content topics," "what to write about," "topic ideation," "content planning," "6 circles method," "seed keywords," "keyword difficulty," "search volume," "intent mapping," "pillar content strategy," or "content calendar planning." For SEO optimization and auditing, see seo-and-aeo-strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when optimizing, auditing, or preparing to ship web animations or rendering performance work: frame loops, scroll/viewport reveals, mount/unmount transitions, canvas/WebGL lifecycles, reduced motion, lazy rendering, and deferred off-screen work. Use for jank, per-frame allocations, forced reflows, render loops, animations that do not pause off-screen, content-visibility, requestIdleCallback, analyzing Chrome DevTools performance traces for animation or rendering issues, or choosing between browser-driven CSS/WAAPI, minimal JS, phase, and Motion/GSAP. Use when the user explicitly asks about phase APIs or behavior. Do not use during exploratory animation ideation, prototyping, visual iteration, or trying variants, even when the code already imports phase; wait until the user asks for performance guidance, an audit, production implementation, ship-readiness review, or about phase itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Socratic ideation and idea routing — think through ideas before committing to plans

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Kontextspezifische Marketinghypothesen entwickeln, vorprüfen und als messbare Experimente priorisieren. Nutze diesen Skill, wenn Ideen für Kanäle, Kampagnen, Angebote oder Wachstum gesucht werden, wenn eine Ideenliste auf Risiko und Machbarkeit geprüft werden soll, oder wenn aus Vorschlägen Experimentsteckbriefe mit Metrik, Laufzeit, Budget und Stopkriterium werden sollen. Sortiert vor der Bewertung aus, was rechtlich, plattformseitig oder finanziell nicht tragbar ist, und trennt Evidenz von Vermutung. Führt keine Kampagne aus und schaltet keine Anzeigen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose problems before solving them: turn "X is broken and we don't know why" into a precise problem statement, verified root causes, solutions traced to those causes, and a rollout plan. Use whenever the user reports something failing, breaking, slowing, or recurring without a known cause: "sales dropped and we don't know why", "this keeps happening", "why does X keep failing", "find the root cause", "run a post-mortem", "5 whys"; Vietnamese "sao cứ bị vậy hoài", "tìm nguyên nhân gốc", "X đang hỏng mà không rõ vì sao". Trigger even when the user asks for solutions directly: "give me ideas to fix falling sales" is a diagnosis request. Not for open-ended ideation when nothing is broken (brainstorm-coach), understanding user needs (design-thinking), or company-level strategic bets (strategy-board).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master ideation protocol & architectural orchestrator with Modern Web Guidance. Validates design ideas and orchestrates all specialized vibes-plug skills before coding begins / Protokol ideasi utama & orkestrator arsitektur dengan Modern Web Guidance. Memvalidasi ide desain dan mengorkestrasi seluruh skill vibes-plug sebelum pengkodean dimulai.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Engineering design cycle covering requirements elicitation, specifications writing, constraint identification, iterative prototyping, and design communication. Spans the full loop from problem definition through ideation, analysis, prototyping, testing, and redesign. Includes morphological charts, TRIZ, Pugh matrices, design reviews, and the distinction between functional and non-functional requirements. Use when framing engineering problems, generating design alternatives, writing specifications, or running design reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, modifying behavior, or when users request help with ideation, marketing, and strategic planning. Explores user intent, requirements, and design before implementation using research-validated prompt patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Survey the whole tdmcp project and produce a prioritized list of NEW features it could implement — across artist controls, CLI/DX, AI/LLM integration, and TouchDesigner depth. Use whenever the user wants to brainstorm, discover, survey, list, or audit what features/tools/effects/controls/commands/prompts/capabilities tdmcp *could* add, asks 'what could we build / what's missing / what are the opportunities / ideas for the project', or wants a feature backlog or gap analysis. Also for follow-ups: re-run, refresh, update, re-survey, deepen, or re-prioritize the backlog, or survey just one surface (e.g. 'CLI ideas only'). This is the IDEATION harness — it produces a list to decide from; it does NOT build. When the user has already chosen a feature and wants it implemented/shipped/added, use tdmcp-pipeline instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scout the TouchDesigner community for what's HYPED right now — community showcases, recent tutorials, generative-AI bridges, hardware interaction trends, visual-aesthetic trends of 2025-2026 — then propose tdmcp tools that ride those trends AND are easy to build. Use whenever the user wants to brainstorm new feature ideas based on what's trending in TouchDesigner, asks for 'hype' or 'trending' features, asks 'what are people doing in TD right now / what's hot / what's hype', wants tools inspired by community trends, asks to scout TD trends/aesthetics/integrations, or says things like 'ideias hype', 'novas ideias', 'o que está em alta', 'criar ferramentas para o que está bombando', 'tendências do TouchDesigner'. Also for follow-ups: refresh, rescout one surface, re-rank under another profile, deepen a trend, or filter for buildable-easy items. This is an EXTERNAL trend ideation harness — complementary to tdmcp-feature-discovery (which is INTERNAL gap analysis). It produces `_workspace/hype-scout/HYPE_TOOL_BACKLOG.md` ranked by Hype × Build-Ease; it does NOT build. Once a feature is chosen from the backlog, hand it to tdmcp-pipeline.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conversational design ideation agent that researches trends, explores visual directions, and refines ideas through adaptive questioning — then produces a rich PRD document and auto-generates Stitch screens. Your design buddy that thinks deeply before designing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Socratic design refinement before implementation — challenges assumptions, surfaces alternatives, identifies risks before code is written

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI unconstrained creative exploration — deliberately dropping structure to let associations form freely. The one skill that inverts the standard procedure format: instead of inputs, steps, and validation, dream opens space for emergence without evaluation. Use before design work, before naming things, before choosing between approaches, or anywhere that premature structure kills the best option.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose, configure, launch, and collect bounded subagents for research and engineering decisions. Root agents and delegation-capable subagents should read this before delegating: every task requires an explicit model tier, and high-leverage work such as research ideation, round planning, plateau pivots, large research reviews, hard optimization, disputed evidence, and expensive experiment portfolios requires frontier judgment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and build LLM-powered projects from ideation through deployment. Use when starting new agent projects, choosing between LLM and traditional approaches, or structuring batch processing pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hard-gated ideation for an Arbor research run. Load at the START of every IDEATE round, before drafting any hypothesis. Enforces the PI mindset (mechanism over knob), the four-question first-principles probe, the kill-filter, and the four-line hypothesis format. Ported from Arbor's idea_drafting + first_principles_probe.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design and facilitate structured workshops using Design Thinking and Liberating Structures. Produces detailed agendas with time blocks, facilitation notes, participant materials, and retrospective templates. Use when running ideation sessions, retrospectives, planning workshops, or collaborative problem-solving.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Divergent ideation across model families — the same brainstorm, but each cognitive frame is handed to a different model (Claude sub-agent, OpenAI Codex, a cheap third via OpenCode) so the ideas diverge by frame and by model priors at once. Use for open design questions, architecture and API shape, naming, schema choices, fuzzy bugs with no known root cause, or on "multi adhd", "brainstorm with everyone", "wide ideas from all models". Skip for lookups, syntax, and anything phrased as "quick", "standard" or "canonical".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured ideation for technical problems: divergent generation, constraint framing, and convergent selection. Use when stuck on a design, naming, architecture, or feature approach and need fresh options.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-first academic research workflow for topic ideation, scholarly search, paper reading, literature and systematic reviews, study and experiment design, statistics and data analysis, scientific figures, manuscript drafting and polishing, citation checks, peer review, rebuttals, submission packages, theses, and paper-to-presentation work. Use when an agent must plan, execute, audit, write, revise, or package research while keeping claims traceable to verified sources, data, analysis, or official requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full-spectrum product research pipeline. Runs competitive analysis, technology trend scouting, user feedback analysis, and feature ideation. Triggers: on: research, competitive research, market research, feature discovery, what should we build next.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Blog strategy development including topic cluster architecture with hub-and-spoke design, audience mapping, competitive landscape analysis, AI citation surface strategy across ChatGPT/Perplexity/AI Overviews, distribution channel planning (YouTube, Reddit, review platforms for AI-citation SEO), content scoring targets, measurement framework, and content differentiation through original research and first-hand experience. Use when user says "blog strategy", "content strategy", "blog positioning", "what should I blog about", "blog topics", "content pillars", "blog ideation".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explore and debate options with fresh documentation and research before committing. Use when facing a real decision with multiple plausible approaches — library/framework choice, architecture call, API or schema design, algorithm selection, or any communication / strategy call where being wrong has cost. Enumerates relevant research domains, looks up current docs and evidence-based methods, weighs options on correctness and elegance, resists bloat. Do NOT use for divergent ideation (brainstorm), extracting user intent (elicit), or reviewing already-written code (quality-review).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Timeboxed ideation on a topic where lens-driven proposers generate structurally different ideas, blind critics cull them, and pairwise judges rank the survivors on a tournament ladder instead of 1-10 scores, evolving the leaders until the clock runs out. Use when the user wants to brainstorm, explore ideas, discover features, generate options, or think through possibilities for a specified duration. Triggers on requests like "brainstorm X for 30 minutes", "ideate on X", "spend an hour thinking about X", "what features should we build", "explore options for X". Not for executing a task over time (timeboxed-iterating) or optimizing a measurable metric (autoresearch).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。