129 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Decomposes a contextualized plan into atomic, independently executable tasks with complete embedded context, registered through the plan API. Use after SAM Stage 3 Context Integration produces the contextualized plan artifact — when the plan is ready for task generation with CLEAR ordering, CoVe checks, and dependency graphs for parallel execution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fetch and report current API syntax, changelog entries, and breaking changes for a specific library or protocol version. One research angle within a parallel technical-research set — runs independently and returns a structured cited report. Invoke when a specific library name and version are the target.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when orchestration or planning agents are producing task plans, task prompts, or TASK.md instructions that must be unambiguous, verifiable, and resistant to hallucination. Applies CLEAR (Concise, Logical, Explicit, Adaptive, Reflective) to structure and write agent task prompts, then adds CoVe (Chain of Verification) checks where accuracy risk is meaningful. Activates on draft task prompts, swarm plans, migration tasks, and multi-step plans requiring independently executable steps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Provides a pre-submission manuscript audit covering argument, numerical consistency, references and DOIs, writing, figures, CONSORT flow, pre-registration, and the replication archive. Use before paper submission or when a draft needs an adversarial, quote-grounded review with a journal-readiness checklist. Add `--codex` to run the specification independently on Claude and Codex, GPT-6 Astra, and cross-check findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a pre-submission manuscript audit covering argument, numerics, references, writing, figures, methods, preregistration, and replication readiness. Add --codex for a cross-model pass in which Codex and Claude review independently and verify each other's findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Planning specialist that breaks a VNX feature or track into small, independently-shippable PRs with dependencies and per-PR task-class routing. USE THIS when the user wants to break a feature down into PRs, sequence the work, or turn a plan into a PR queue. Delegated to by @horizon (formerly @pm — @pm still resolves via alias). Works from Horizon's tracks DB (`vnx horizon`, alias `vnx objective`); the repo FEATURE_PLAN.md is a generated generic example, not the source.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map the needs of the people you're building or exploring for, independently of solutions, using Allen's User Needs Mapping methodology. Identifies underserved needs that feed into the Opportunity Solution Tree.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce written specs and atomic PBIs that an implementation agent can execute independently. Authors specs and Linear issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Direct a claim-driven research experiment project from post-Idea intake through method realization, prioritized evidence collection, Human Gates, and Evidence Freeze. Use for scientific planning, state transitions, queues, budgets, or recovery; not for running code or independently auditing results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Independently review one Proto UI autonomous-maintenance remediation in a fresh read-only context. Use after pui-remediate produces a packet and actual diff. Classify technical-completion eligibility without making product or integration decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Record one authorized non-remediation terminal outcome in Proto UI's autonomous-maintenance state. Use after a supported no-finding result, an independently rejected finding, or a blocked mission whose terminal evidence is complete.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Independently review a Proto UI change against current authority, bounded scope, executable evidence, projections, provenance, and integration conditions. Use for pull-request review, acceptance review, pre-merge audit, or fresh-context verification. Do not use to approve one's own work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply one independently reviewable numeric Proto UI package-budget increase for an already accepted capability, using canonical cost evidence and existing development authorization. Use for standalone ceiling transactions, not feature implementation, measurement-policy changes, spending limits, publication or release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repair one independently verified Proto UI maintenance finding when governing authority or an explicit product decision fixes the expected result. Use for the bounded remediation and its evidence packet before independent review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Independently attempt to falsify one Proto UI autonomous-maintenance finding in a fresh non-mutating context. Use after pui-observe produced a candidate finding and route the result directly to remediation or closure when authority is clear.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the Codex Optimized Development, Evaluation, and Remediation (CODER) Loop with an orchestration-only coordinator, non-overlapping task-family owners, fresh independent reviewers, evidence-scoped remediation, and final coordinator acceptance. Discover and compose optional MSW, Timebox, MSL, and Codex Voice Optimizer companions as the Slopware Dev Stack without making them dependencies. Use in Codex when the user invokes the CODER Loop, asks to divide a complex change into bounded implementation families with independent reviewers, requests multi-agent implementation without overlapping ownership, requires review and repair until every blocking gap is independently rechecked, asks for the CODER tutorial or Slopware Dev Stack, or wants CODER to install or use its companions. Do not trigger for an ordinary single-agent change, a review-only request, or a non-Codex host.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break a plan, spec, or PRD into independently-grabbable issues on the project issue tracker using tracer-bullet vertical slices. Use when user wants to convert a plan into issues, create implementation tickets, or break down work into issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Break a PRD into independently-grabbable GitHub issues using tracer-bullet vertical slices. Use when user wants to convert a PRD to issues, create implementation tickets, or break down a PRD into work items.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn a feature into well-defined, independently shippable slices — whether it's an epic that needs breaking apart or a single story that needs sharpening into a job story
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when independently reviewing a research-paper draft before submission, running a mock top-conference panel, assessing readiness or accept/reject risk, or predicting reviewer concerns for venues such as CVPR, ICCV, ECCV, ICLR, NeurIPS, and AAAI. Does not draft or audit author responses after official reviews arrive.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify CoinGecko identity, discover missing stablecoin chain coverage, or populate independently verified deployments only when requested. Use for `geckoId` audits and `contracts[]` work in the Pharos stablecoin registry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a cytotechnologist — screening a gynecologic (Pap test) slide and applying Bethesda System criteria, assessing non-gynecologic specimen adequacy (FNA rapid on-site evaluation, body fluid, brushing) against the relevant reporting system, deciding whether a finding can be signed out independently or must be referred to a pathologist, or auditing screening quality metrics (ASC:SIL ratio, rescreen concordance, workload compliance). A reasoning aid, not a substitute for a certified cytotechnologist or pathologist signing out an actual case.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Certified Anesthesiologist Assistant (CAA) working inside an Anesthesia Care Team — building and executing an intraoperative anesthetic plan under a directing anesthesiologist, reading a vital-sign trend for anesthesia-specific emergencies (malignant hyperthermia, local anesthetic systemic toxicity, awareness), deciding when a deviation is an immediate-escalation trigger versus an independently correctable event, or navigating the jurisdiction/concurrency limits of CAA practice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Invoke a Rubber Duck Reviewer subagent to independently critique plans and implementations before proceeding. Use when the agent is about to implement a non-trivial plan (multi-file changes, architectural decisions, security-sensitive logic, database schema changes), after completing a self-contained unit of work (module, endpoint, feature), when stuck or facing repeated failures (same test fails 2+ times, unexpected results), or when the agent wants independent validation of assumptions and design decisions. Triggers on any non-trivial implementation task where independent critique would catch blind spots before they become costly mistakes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。