「iter」の検索結果

Runs the job-search pipeline. Adds jobs from a link or pasted posting, keeps stages and dates accurate, sets follow-ups, runs a weekly review (stale applications, next actions, funnel stats), records the exact resume version sent, and drafts networking, LinkedIn, referral, recruiter-reply, follow-up, thank-you, status-check, expedite and withdrawal messages without sending them. Use when the user says "add this job to my tracker", "I applied", "log my interview", "I got rejected", "I was ghosted", "log my offer", "track my applications", "do my weekly review", "what should I follow up on", "write a thank-you note", "message this recruiter", "ask for a referral", "withdraw my application", or wants a job-search spreadsheet. Works with a Markdown/CSV tracker or Reactive Resume MCP tools. Not for resume work (resume-tailor, resume-bullet-writer, resume-content-guide), interview prep or practice (interview-prep, mock-interview), or judging, negotiating, accepting or declining an offer (offer-negotiation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Copilot left 14 review comments on your PR — half are nits. Hours of fix → reply → resolve → re-request, and each round lands MORE comments. This skill runs loop engineering: auto-triggers Copilot Code Review via GraphQL (no @copilot mention), triages every open thread (Copilot, humans, advanced-security) with a fix / decline / escalate rubric, dispatches parallel fix sub-agents that obey the repo build/test/lint conventions, commits per iteration, replies+resolves citing the pushed SHA, then re-triggers until HEAD is reviewed with zero threads awaiting the agent's reply (remaining open threads are explicit hand-offs to the human — escalated declines, design tradeoffs). You merge a clean PR; the bot runs it. Trigger phrases: "address copilot comments", "run a copilot review loop", "fix this PR", "iterate on copilot feedback". Repo-agnostic, gh CLI + PowerShell. Full autopilot needs repo Triage/Write; external PR authors get single-iteration mode plus manual re-trigger (UI 🔄 or substantive-commit push).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive LinkedIn Sales Navigator and Recruiter through the Curviate CLI. Covers `sales-nav` (search, profile, message, lead and account lists, save-lead, save-account) and `recruiter` (projects, pipeline, talent-search, save-candidate, project jobs, applicants, message, profile, search), and what can refuse them: the LinkedIn subscription on the connected account, the Curviate seat, and the beta-operations gate. These commands carry no Curviate add-on paywall. Use when working a Sales Navigator or Recruiter seat, or when diagnosing why a premium command failed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create user stories following the 3 C's (Card, Conversation, Confirmation) and INVEST criteria with descriptions, design links, and acceptance criteria. Use when writing user stories, breaking down features into backlog items, or defining acceptance criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Daily outbound-sourcing sweep for {{greenhouse_role}}. Searches LinkedIn for candidates matching {{sourcing_criteria}}, dedupes every match against the role's Greenhouse pipeline, and drafts a personalized outreach email per new candidate to {{recruiter_review_inbox}} — capped at {{daily_cap}} per run. Never sends outreach and never writes to Greenhouse; the recruiter reviews, sends, and owns the ATS.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create, open or edit Writer documents: ODT default; DOCX for Word compatibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured multi-angle exploration running 2-8 sequential passes over the same problem, each through a different scientific lens, to surface hidden requirements and edge cases invisible from one angle; each pass yields new ISC criteria. USE WHEN iterative depth, explore deeper, multi-angle analysis, surface hidden requirements, blind spot check, what am I missing. NOT FOR scope/zoom analysis (use ApertureOscillation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write changelogs for Bifrost releases. Reads git history, bumps module versions following the core→framework→plugins→transport hierarchy, writes transports/changelog.md (enterprise-style) and per-module changelog.md files, and updates version files. Invoked with /changelog-writer or /changelog-writer <transport-version>.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add regression test cases to the Bifrost provider harness (the Postman collection run via `make run-provider-harness-test`) based on a merged PR or a GitHub issue. Fetches the PR/issue, traces the affected wire path in the codebase, checks existing harness coverage, designs cases following harness conventions, inserts them into tests/e2e/api/collections/provider-harness.json without reformatting the file, and validates via the augment and filter scripts. Invoked with /harness-test-writer <PR# | issue# | URL> or /harness-test-writer (prompts for a reference).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns decided work — a PRD, design doc, RFC, or thread — into tasks a builder can act on without guessing. Finds slices that each prove something, grounds them in the code, and writes intent, observable criteria with concrete values, the boundary, what the change disturbs, and only the decisions that are hard to reverse. Walks every surface the work exposes and sweeps the nine unwritten requirements, recording each landing as a criterion already in the source, existing behaviour, n/a, or Unresolved — never as a criterion the walk invented. Defaults to one task per source. Use when the user says "write the task", "cut this PRD into tasks", "turn this design doc into work", or "tlc-plan". Do NOT use for discovery itself or to implement — a one-line ticket is a decision; a blank wish is not.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user keeps paper notes inside an Obsidian project knowledge base and wants filesystem-first literature review, explicit agent-first Zotero ingestion, `Papers/` plus `Knowledge/` synthesis, collection-wide normalization, and a default literature canvas without Obsidian MCP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

VS-Enhanced Literature Review Strategist - Comprehensive support for multiple review methodologies Full VS 5-Phase process: Prevents Mode Collapse and presents creative search strategies Supports: Systematic Review (PRISMA 2020), Scoping Review (JBI/PRISMA-ScR), Meta-Synthesis, Realist Synthesis, Narrative Review, Rapid Review Use when: conducting any type of literature review, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, scoping reviews, finding prior research Triggers: literature review, PRISMA, systematic review, scoping review, meta-synthesis, realist synthesis, narrative review, rapid review

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screening Assistant - AI-PRISMA 6-dimension screening with Groq LLM (100x cheaper) Supports two project types with different confidence thresholds Use when: screening papers, PRISMA screening, inclusion/exclusion criteria Triggers: screen papers, PRISMA screening, inclusion criteria, exclusion criteria, AI screening

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured literature review using a parallel fleet of Librarian agents. Searches top journals, working paper repositories (NBER, SSRN, IZA), and traces citation chains from key papers. Make sure to use this skill whenever the user wants to survey existing research on a topic — not to find datasets or write a paper. Triggers include: "review the literature", "find related papers", "what's been done on X", "search for papers on", "do a lit review", "find papers about", "what papers should I cite", "who has written about this", "survey the literature", "find prior work on", or any request to locate and summarize academic publications on a topic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write comprehensive literature reviews for medical imaging AI research. Use when writing survey papers, systematic reviews, or literature analyses on topics like segmentation, detection, classification in CT, MRI, X-ray, ultrasound, or pathology imaging. Triggers on requests for "review paper", "survey", "literature review", "综述", "systematic review", or mentions of writing academic reviews on deep learning for medical imaging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user is measuring the host or DPU-CPU control-plane rate of a DOCA Flow pipeline with doca_flow_perf — picking a JSON policy from configs/, choosing the DPDK or DOCA backend, running the single-iteration smoke then the iterative eval loop, interpreting per-iteration CPU cycles and num_pushed / num_failed, or capturing the four-tuple (DOCA version, BlueField/firmware, JSON policy, worker/queue/burst config) that makes a Kops/sec number defensible. Trigger even when the user does not explicitly mention "doca-flow-perf" — typical implicit phrasings include "how many rules per second can my BlueField insert", "5-tuple hairpin rule rate", "Kops/sec for steering", "flow-perf number does not match release notes", "DPDK vs DOCA benchmark", or "rule-install variance too high". Refuse and route elsewhere for optimizing a live Flow app (doca-flow-tune), the DPA-offloaded path (doca-flow-dpa-perf), dataplane throughput or latency, or library-internal pipe semantics — those belong to other skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "plan my launch tier", "how big should this launch be", or "build a launch risk register with kill criteria"; produces a tier decision (Tier 1 flagship all-channel / Tier 2 targeted / Tier 3 changelog-level), a launch-type declaration (new-product / feature / relaunch / partnership with co-marketing split), an effort calibration matrix (tier to channel intensity and asset scope), D0/W1/M1 KPI targets (labeled Estimated), a risk register (likelihood x blast-radius, owners, mitigations, kill criteria / rollback thresholds), and a T-8w to T+4w timeline skeleton. Not for picking the launch date or window — use launch-window-planner; not for creator-channel launch campaigns — use campaign-planner. 发布分级/发布类型/风险登记册/kill criteria

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

当用户明确要求"核查/优化综述 `{主题}_review.tex` 的正文引用"、"运行 research-citation-check"，或要求使用旧名 check-review-alignment skill 时使用。通过宿主 AI 的语义理解逐条核查引用是否与文献内容吻合，只在发现致命性引用错误时对"包含引用的句子"做最小化改写，并优先复用 `research-literature-review` 的渲染脚本输出 PDF/Word，过渡期允许 fallback 到旧名 systematic-literature-review。核心原则：不为了改而改，无法确定是否为致命性错误时保留原样并在报告中警告。⚠️ 不适用：用户只是想生成系统综述正文（应使用 research-literature-review）；用户只是想新增/核对 BibTeX 条目（应使用专门的 bib 管理流程）。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up iterative design-to-code development loop with Anima SDK. Use when rapidly iterating on Figma-to-code output, comparing framework outputs, or building a local preview server for generated components. Trigger with: "anima local dev", "anima dev loop", "anima preview", "anima iteration".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates scientifically sound inclusion and exclusion criteria for Meta-Analysis based on a given title or keywords. Use when user wants to design eligibility criteria for a systematic review or meta-analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write a UK Civil Service or NHS application: behaviour statements in the Success Profiles format, a personal statement mapped to the essential criteria, and a CV in the form these schemes expect. Use when asked to write my civil service application, answer Success Profiles behaviours, write a 250-word behaviour example, write my NHS supporting information, or apply on Civil Service Jobs or NHS Jobs. Produces each behaviour statement within the word limit using a situation, task, action, result structure, a criteria-mapped personal statement, and a check against the advert's essential criteria.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when positioning an Agricultural Systems (AgSy) manuscript against the literature so it reads as a systems contribution. AgSy readers span agronomy, modelling, livestock, economics, environment, and food-system science, so the paper must engage the systems and modelling literatures they expect — not only one subfield. Stakes the contribution; it does not write the lit review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when judging whether a management/organization literature is an Academy of Management Annals (Annals)-scale review topic — mature, important, fragmented, and integrable into a new framework — rather than a narrow review. Decides fit and frames the review's animating problem; it does not gather the literature (amann-literature-synthesis) or write the proposal (amann-proposal-framing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。