「liability」の検索結果

Orchestrates comprehensive production readiness reviews and assessments for GKE clusters and workloads across scalability, security, reliability, observability, backup/DR, and cost optimization. Use when asked to productionize, prepare, assess, audit, or review a GKE cluster or workload before going live to production. Don't use for deep-dive single-domain implementation (use specific domain skills like gke-workload-scaling, gke-platform-security, gke-workload-security, gke-service-networking, gke-reliability instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configures best-practice alerting policies for AI agents using OpenTelemetry (OTel) metrics, generating output as Terraform (.tf) configuration files. Use when analyzing, writing, or deploying alerting policies to monitor agent latency, error rates, token usage, and quality metrics. Don't use for standard infrastructure monitoring unrelated to AI agents, or when the agent is not instrumented with OpenTelemetry (for Reliability, Cost, Safety, Security alerts). NOTE: Reliability, Cost, Safety, and Security alerts use generic OTel metrics and work across runtimes (such as Cloud Run, Vertex AI). Quality alerts rely on Vertex AI Online Monitors and are strictly bound to Vertex AI deployments.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces structured aviation law summaries with Bluebook citations covering U.S. and international regulatory frameworks, treaties, and case law. Use when drafting an aviation law summary, FAA/DOT/TSA compliance overview, Montreal/Warsaw Convention liability analysis, air service agreement review, accident liability synopsis, or aviation regulatory research memo.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates structured U.S. aviation-law summaries by synthesizing FAA, DOT, and TSA rules, treaties, and precedent into actionable legal analysis. Use when briefing on air traffic rights, aircraft operations, airworthiness, carrier liability, or incident/compliance exposure. Trigger: aviation law, FAA, DOT, TSA, 14 CFR, Part 121/125/135, Montreal Convention, Warsaw Convention, ICAO, route authority, code-sharing, slot allocation, accident liability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assigns confidence scores to agent outputs based on multiple factors including source quality, consistency, and reasoning depth. Produces calibrated confidence estimates. Activate on 'confidence score', 'how confident', 'certainty level', 'output confidence', 'reliability score'. NOT for validation (use dag-output-validator) or hallucination detection (use dag-hallucination-detector).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares one clause (liability, termination, confidentiality or any other) across several contracts, templates or successive versions and returns a DRAFT comparison table: verbatim clause text per document, the clause split into elements with every difference from the baseline highlighted and categorised, and neutral questions for counsel. Never says which wording is better or enforceable. Use when the user asks to "compare the liability caps across these five supplier contracts", "line up the termination clause in these three drafts", "show how the confidentiality clause changed between versions", "contrast this clause with our template" or "benchmark the indemnity wording across our customer agreements". Do not use for a whole-contract review, use contract-review-pack instead; for screening one NDA against standard positions, use nda-triage. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate and improve an existing Claude Code skill using explicit success criteria and small controlled changes. Use when the user asks to optimize a skill, reduce over-triggering or under-triggering, improve reliability, tighten instructions, or add evals for a skill. Also trigger on "スキルを改善して", "スキルを最適化して", "スキルの品質を確認して".

Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks Use when: agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an SLO (Service Level Objective) expert specializing in implementing reliability standards and error budget-based engineering practices. Design comprehensive SLO frameworks, establish meaningful SLIs, and create monitoring systems that balance reliability with feature velocity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert database administrator specializing in modern cloud databases, automation, and reliability engineering. Masters AWS/Azure/GCP database services, Infrastructure as Code, high availability, disaster recovery, performance optimization, and compliance. Handles multi-cloud strategies, container databases, and cost optimization. Use PROACTIVELY for database architecture, operations, or reliability engineering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring—where even top agents achieve less than 50% on real-world benchmarks Use when: agent testing, agent evaluation, benchmark agents, agent reliability, test agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

配送の遅延・破損・紛失・数量不足に対し、証拠収集から補償請求、運送会社との交渉までを整理し、損失額や顧客への影響に応じた対応判断を支えるスキル。

• 配送の遅延や紛失に対応したいとき
• 貨物破損の補償請求を準備したいとき
• 運送会社の料金や責任を争うとき

Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive truth scoring, code quality verification, and automatic rollback system with 0.95 accuracy threshold for ensuring high-quality agent outputs and codebase reliability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize multi-agent systems with coordinated profiling, workload distribution, and cost-aware orchestration. Use when improving agent performance, throughput, or reliability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when summarizing agent evaluations where autonomous, assisted, failed, timed-out, or invalid outcomes must remain distinct and comparable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Instrument AI agents with tracing, token metrics, latency, and cost visibility. Use for reliability and debugging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Improve factual reliability while creating or reviewing a course or supplied content. Use when the user asks to fact-check, verify accuracy, reduce hallucinations, make a reliable course, or mentions 事实性错误、知识性错误、专业知识准确性、可靠性. During creation, checks the completed pages before delivery; on existing content, returns a short evidence-backed report and lets the user choose what to fix. Not for grammar, style, or layout. Combine with deep-research when current evidence is the course's main subject.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Define and implement Service Level Indicators (SLIs) and Service Level Objectives (SLOs) with error budgets and alerting. Use when establishing reliability targets, implementing SRE practices, or measuring service performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master error handling patterns across languages including exceptions, Result types, error propagation, and graceful degradation to build resilient applications. Use when implementing error handling, designing APIs, or improving application reliability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cloud design patterns for distributed systems architecture covering 42 industry-standard patterns across reliability, performance, messaging, security, and deployment categories. Use when designing, reviewing, or implementing distributed system architectures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieve and apply OpenViking Experience memories through the Agent runtime's generic OpenViking search and read tools. Use before or during executable, multi-step, or tool-based work such as coding, file or data changes, configuration, deployment, workflow execution, and failure recovery when prior operational guidance could improve reliability. Do not use for casual chat or simple factual questions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master advanced prompt engineering techniques to maximize LLM performance, reliability, and controllability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous agents are AI systems that can independently decompose goals, plan actions, execute tools, and self-correct without constant human guidance. The challenge isn't making them capable - it's making them reliable. Every extra decision multiplies failure probability. This skill covers agent loops (ReAct, Plan-Execute), goal decomposition, reflection patterns, and production reliability. Key insight: compounding error rates kill autonomous agents. A 95% success rate per step drops to 60% b

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。