2,870 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
LLM Operations -- RAG, embeddings, vector databases, fine-tuning, prompt engineering avancado, custos de LLM, evals de qualidade e arquiteturas de IA para producao.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug inference clients that use an attached provider and its native endpoint, including hosted APIs and host-local Ollama, vLLM, SGLang, TRT-LLM, LM Studio, or NIM. Use for provider attachment, endpoint policy, credential substitution, topology, and migration from the removed managed inference endpoint. Trigger keywords - debug inference, managed inference endpoint, local inference, ollama, lm studio, vllm, sglang, trtllm, NIM, inference failing, model server unreachable, credential_endpoint_mismatch, host.openshell.internal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Benchmark Jetson LLM/VLM serving performance across vLLM, llama.cpp, and Ollama with structured JSON output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when building or maintaining a personal LLM-powered knowledge base. Triggers: ingesting sources into a wiki, querying wiki knowledge, linting wiki quality, 'add to wiki', 'what do I know about', or any mention of 'LLM wiki' or 'Karpathy wiki'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configures and runs LLM evaluation using Promptfoo framework. Use when setting up prompt testing, creating evaluation configs (promptfooconfig.yaml), writing Python custom assertions, implementing llm-rubric for LLM-as-judge, or managing few-shot examples in prompts. Triggers on keywords like "promptfoo", "eval", "LLM evaluation", "prompt testing", or "model comparison".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploy and manage vLLM for high-throughput LLM inference. Configure continuous batching, tensor parallelism, quantization, and OpenAI-compatible API endpoints for production LLM serving.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
E-commerce warehouse and inventory optimization advisor. Analyzes inventory health, calculates safety stock and reorder points, performs ABC analysis, evaluates fulfillment costs, and provides actionable recommendations for improving efficiency. Supports all major fulfillment models: Self-fulfillment, Amazon FBA/FBM, Walmart WFS, 3PL, Shopify Fulfillment, TikTok Shop, Dropshipping, and Hybrid setups. No API key required. Use when: (1) reducing stockouts or overstock, (2) calculating safety stock levels, (3) optimizing warehouse costs, (4) improving Amazon IPI score, (5) analyzing inventory KPIs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze current trends and challenges in Japanese NLP for a topic. Surveys the existing awesome-japanese-nlp-resources dataset and augments it with up-to-the-minute web research to produce a combined trend + issue report. Use only when the user explicitly wants a trend/landscape report, a challenges/limitations report, or a general research overview of a Japanese NLP topic (this combines the bundled dataset with live web research). Trigger phrases include '日本語LLMの最新トレンド', '〜の動向をまとめて', '最近の日本語NLPの流れ', '日本語LLMの課題', '〜の問題点・限界', '未解決の論点', 'trend report on Japanese embeddings', 'latest Japanese speech models', 'challenges in Japanese NER', 'limitations of Japanese embeddings'. For a simple lookup use the search skill; this one runs web research.
Search all Japanese NLP resources (libraries, models, datasets, tutorials, dictionaries, Hugging Face). Accepts keywords or natural language questions in any language. Use whenever the user asks which Japanese NLP resource to use, or wants to find one: tokenizers / morphological analyzers, BERT or LLM models, embeddings, NER, text classification, datasets / corpora, dictionaries, tutorials, or Hugging Face models. Trigger phrases include '日本語の形態素解析ライブラリ', 'おすすめの日本語tokenizer', '日本語BERTモデル', '日本語の感情分析データセット', '日本語LLM 一覧', 'which Japanese embedding model', 'Japanese NER library'.
Answer Engine Optimization (AEO): optimize content to be cited by LLMs (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini) in their answers. Use when designing content for LLM citation, auditing citability, or structuring Q&A schema.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
This skill should be used when the user asks to "estimate LLM costs", "count tokens in prompts", "optimize prompt token usage", "compare model pricing", or "reduce LLM API costs".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LLM and ML model deployment for inference. Use when serving models in production, building AI APIs, or optimizing inference. Covers vLLM (LLM serving), TensorRT-LLM (GPU optimization), Ollama (local), BentoML (ML deployment), Triton (multi-model), LangChain (orchestration), LlamaIndex (RAG), and streaming patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decomposed, multi-criteria metric design for LLM pipelines. The metric IS the model — change the metric and the optimizer changes behavior. Decompose by default; bool during compile, float during eval; calibrate against human; mitigate judge bias. Search keywords: LLM-as-judge, llm as judge, eval metric, evaluation score, scoring function, rubric, RAGAS, G-Eval, judge bias, verbosity bias, how to evaluate LLM output.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Cross-engine decision rubric for self-hosting or recommending an LLM serving stack. Picks among vLLM, SGLang, TensorRT-LLM, TGI, llama.cpp, Ollama, and MLX as a function of (hardware × workload × constraint), not "which is fastest". Activates whenever a coder-agent must choose, defend, or migrate a serving runtime.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Neutral, framework-agnostic decision tree for project kickoff: "which agent / RAG / LLM framework should I reach for?" Synthesizes the ecosystem sections of 7 landmark-project SOPs (LangGraph, LlamaIndex, DSPy, CrewAI, vLLM, Aider, Dify) into one layered rubric. Core stance: frameworks are LAYERS, not competitors — a real project usually combines DSPy (compile) + LlamaIndex (retrieve) + LangGraph (orchestrate) + vLLM (serve), and you choose ONE per layer, not one to rule all. Use when starting any LLM/agent/RAG project, or whenever the "which framework?" question is asked. Deliberately neutral — unlike vendor docs and the LangChain-biased `framework-selection` on skill.sh, this skill has no horse in the race.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit applications for AI prompt injection, agent security, and LLM permission boundary vulnerabilities. Use when the user mentions 'prompt injection,' 'LLM security,' 'AI security,' 'jailbreak,' 'indirect prompt injection,' 'prompt leaking,' 'AI red team,' 'LLM vulnerabilities,' 'AI input validation,' 'system prompt extraction,' 'agent security,' 'MCP security,' 'AI permissions,' 'AI privilege escalation,' or needs to secure any application with AI features, AI agents, or LLM integrations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when polishing, diagnosing, tailoring, or exporting resumes for LLM, RAG, Agent, Agentic RL, post-training, pretraining, AIGC, search/ranking, multimodal, AI backend, or LLM algorithm internships from raw resume text, a materials folder, and/or a target job description. Audits evidence, maps JD fit, enforces truth boundaries, writes polished and targeted resumes, generates interviewer-style grilling questions, answer cards, evidence-upgrade plans, and optional open-source project recommendations without fabricating experience.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coordinates credit monitoring and identity theft protection services for individuals affected by a data breach. Covers vendor selection criteria, enrollment logistics, coverage duration (12-24 months), identity theft insurance options, communication to affected individuals, and enrollment rate tracking. Keywords: credit monitoring, identity protection, breach response, Experian, enrollment, identity theft insurance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and adapt monkey patches in vllm_metax/patch/ against a target upstream revision. Decide whether to retain, update, migrate, or remove each patch; maintain patch headers and explanations; validate changes and record evidence. Use only for compatibility work on this directory, not standalone attention backend, model, kernel, or other adaptations elsewhere in vllm_metax.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review and adapt MetaX attention backends, MLA, sparse indexers, cache layouts, and their kernel wrappers against a target vLLM revision and the actually installed MetaX component APIs. Verify dispatch, supported configurations, and GPU numerical behavior. Use for attention adaptations outside vllm_metax/patch/; do not apply monkey-patch headers or patch audit requirements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review and adapt vllm_metax/registry registrations, quantization configurations, CustomOps and kernel dispatch against a target vLLM revision and installed MetaX APIs. Verify registration, inherited state, weight layouts and actual backend selection. Use for registry compatibility work, not standalone attention algorithms or monkey patches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Half-Quadratic Quantization for LLMs without calibration data. Use when quantizing models to 4/3/2-bit precision without needing calibration datasets, for fast quantization workflows, or when deploying with vLLM or HuggingFace Transformers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Production-grade Python and AI engineering standards. Use for ANY Python work — FastAPI services, LangChain/LangGraph agents, RAG pipelines, LLM API integrations, document processing, or data scripts — whether writing new code, reviewing, refactoring, or debugging. Enforces typed Pydantic boundaries, structured errors and logging, LLM call timeouts/retries/output validation, secret management, async correctness, and tested code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. The quality of an MCP server is measured by how well it enables LLMs to accomplish real-world tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。