「methodology」の検索結果

Consult this skill BEFORE proposing a fix to any CLI gap or schema gap that touches evidence, trust magnitude, evidence types, evidence grades, the TM formula, or star-level promotion gates. Also read it whenever an issue mentions citations, stars, commits, contributors, views, reviewers, percentile, arxiv, github-stars-own, repo-own, social-signal, benchmark-result, peer-review, self-attestation, fusion-recipe, verifier-attestation, or proxy-containment — those are the 10 canonical evidence types and the raw inputs that feed their formulas. Also read it when asked whether a skill qualifies for a given star level (0★–6★): the Star Bar and promotion gates live in `META.md`, not in the TM methodology page. Reading both prevents proposing a calibration that satisfies the TM grade threshold but violates a Star Bar installability or link requirement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Post-mortem analysis of a PhysicsIntern workspace run (Claude Code, Pi, Codex, or OpenCode host). Reconstructs the trajectory from the session record — JSONL file(s) for Claude/Pi/Codex, the SQLite store for OpenCode — audits methodology adherence against the workspace's own CLAUDE.md / AGENTS.md and skill/agent prompts, checks commit discipline and flag dispositions, and assesses substantive quality. Produces a thorough evidence-anchored markdown report. Use after a workspace has been worked on to identify what went well, where the methodology slipped, and what prompts to improve.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measures and improves the quality of AI models and agents on Google Cloud using the Eval Quality Flywheel methodology. Use when evaluating an agent or model, building an eval dataset, picking or writing evaluation metrics, analyzing failures, comparing results before and after a fix, or when guidance is needed on Agent Platform eval methodology — including dataset schema, LLM-as-judge scoring, and common failure causes. For fine-tuning, use agent-platform-tuning. For general production deployment, use agent-platform-deploy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Eliciting and documenting a sales process before it is built in Salesforce: stage sequencing, entry/exit criteria per stage, win/loss analysis requirements, and stage transition rules. Trigger keywords: sales process design, stage discovery, entry criteria, exit criteria, stage gate, win/loss categorisation, sales methodology, pipeline stages, opportunity stage mapping, stage ladder, probability ladder, forecast category mapping, required fields per stage, stage swim lane, discovery workshop, handoff brief. NOT for configuring OpportunityStage, Sales Processes or Path in Setup — use admin/opportunity-management. NOT for cross-functional swim-lane maps — use admin/process-flow-as-is-to-be.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Core statistical methodology and pedagogical approach for all Inquiro analyses. Always loaded to maintain teaching quality and reproducibility standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Application of Six Sigma quality methodology to AI agent process improvement and reliability

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GOMS cognitive modeling methodology for analyzing human-computer interaction task performance

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cognitive Systems Engineering design methodology for joint cognitive systems and human-centered automation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Integration of BDI agent architecture with soft systems methodology for complex organizational problem-solving

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Methodology for eliciting expert knowledge about cognitive processes, decisions, and mental models in complex tasks

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic methodology for eliciting, representing, and operationalizing expert cognitive skills—pattern recognition, situation assessment, mental simulation—from practitioners without requiring research training. Bridges academic rigor and practical usability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct a defensible cybersecurity risk assessment using the NIST SP 800-30 Rev 1 methodology: prepare scope and a risk model, identify threat sources and threat events, identify vulnerabilities and predisposing conditions, determine likelihood and impact, compute risk, and communicate results as a prioritized risk register. Use when an organization needs an actual risk *assessment* (not a maturity score), when a control framework (CSF, ISO 27001, RMF, SOC 2, PCI) requires a documented risk analysis as input, when leadership asks "what are our top risks and how bad are they", when assessing risk for a new system or major change, or when building a risk register from scratch. This is the methodology that feeds framework selection, ATO packages, and treatment decisions. Keywords: risk assessment, NIST 800-30, threat modeling, likelihood and impact, risk register, risk analysis, threat sources, vulnerabilities, risk determination, qualitative risk, risk matrix, residual risk, risk treatment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepare a defense-contractor environment for CMMC Level 2 certification: scope CUI and FCI, implement the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements across 14 families, compute the SPRS score with the DoD Assessment Methodology, manage a compliant POA&M, and ready the organization for a C3PAO assessment. Use when an organization handles Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) under a DoD contract, when a contract carries DFARS clause 252.204-7012/7019/7020/7021, when preparing for or responding to a CMMC assessment, when computing or improving an SPRS score, when building a System Security Plan or POA&M for 800-171, or when scoping which systems are in the CUI boundary. Keywords: CMMC, CMMC Level 2, NIST 800-171, SP 800-171 Rev 2, CUI, FCI, SPRS, DFARS 7012, C3PAO, POA&M, System Security Plan, DoD Assessment Methodology, 110 controls, defense industrial base, DIB, FedRAMP equivalency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

KPI体系設計とOKR策定支援スキル。ビジネス目標に整合したKPI設計、バランススコアカード、OKRフレームワーク、 ダッシュボード設計を提供。SMART原則、リーディング/ラギング指標の選定を支援。 Use when designing KPI frameworks, implementing OKR methodology, or creating performance measurement systems. Triggers: "KPI design", "OKR", "performance metrics", "balanced scorecard", "dashboard design", "measurement framework".

This skill should be used when the user asks to "follow red team methodology", "perform bug bounty hunting", "automate reconnaissance", "hunt for XSS vulnerabilities", "enumerate subdomains", or needs security researcher techniques and tool configurations from top bug bounty hunters.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "learn ethical hacking", "understand penetration testing lifecycle", "perform reconnaissance", "conduct security scanning", "exploit vulnerabilities", or "write penetration test reports". It provides comprehensive ethical hacking methodology and techniques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ペネトレーションテストを対話的に実行するスキル。認可確認(Authorization Gate)→カテゴリ選択（Methodology, Reconnaissance, Scanning, VulnerabilityScanning, WebAppTesting, APITesting, PasswordAttacks, Exploitation, PrivilegeEscalation, ActiveDirectory, PostExploitation, WirelessAttacks, NetworkAttacks, SocialEngineering, CloudPentesting, MobileAppTesting, ContainerK8s, BinaryExploitation, OWASPTop10, Reporting, EmailSecurity, DatabaseAttacks, VPNRemoteAccess の全23カテゴリ）→ツール選択→コマンド実行→発見記録(Finding)→レポート生成をステップバイステップで進行。スコープ/除外チェック・ガードレール付き。「ペンテスト実行」「pentest」「侵入テスト」「脆弱性診断」「セキュリティテスト」「pentest executor」で発火。

Use this skill to track recent and upcoming SMS methodology changes from FMCSA. Covers proposed rule changes, comment periods, and implementation timelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks about FMCSA Compliance Safety Accountability (CSA) program scoring — the seven BASIC categories, BASIC Severity Indicator (BSI), peer percentiles, intervention thresholds, how violations age out, SMS Methodology, ISS (Inspection Selection System), what "alert" status means, Safety Measurement System mechanics, or DataQ disputes. Cite SMS Methodology v3.20.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SPARC (Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement, Completion) comprehensive development methodology with multi-agent orchestration

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deep-dive offensive methodology for dependency confusion and namespace attacks across all major package ecosystems. Covers npm scope confusion exploiting the gap between public and private scoped packages and .npmrc misconfigurations where registry mappings fail to pin internal scopes exclusively. Addresses PyPI namespace attacks through --extra-index-url resolution ordering, NuGet feed priority exploitation when multiple package sources are configured without clear directives, Maven and Gradle repository ordering where artifact resolution traverses repositories sequentially, Go module proxy abuse through GOPROXY misconfiguration, Ruby gems namespace squatting, and Docker image tag confusion with unqualified image references. Provides complete proof-of-concept methodology using safe callbacks including DNS canary via interactsh or Burp Collaborator and HTTP beacon with no destructive payload. Covers reconnaissance techniques for discovering internal package names through GitHub repository analysis, error ...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-cutting methodology for the CVE-hunting pipeline (ported from find-cve-agent): when a bug is design-vs-real, false-positive avoidance, version checking before reporting, responsible disclosure norms, acceptance-rate expectations per vuln class, vulnerability chaining playbook, known false-positive patterns, maintainer-response patterns, secure-pattern reference (what NOT to flag), and a self-criticism checklist to run before claiming a finding. Use this alongside the cve-hunter/cve-exploiter/cve-validator agents and the /cve-hunt pipeline — load it whenever judging if a finding is real, worth reporting, or already fixed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "learn ethical hacking", "understand penetration testing lifecycle", "perform reconnaissance", "conduct security scanning", "exploit vulnerabilities", or "write penetration test reports". It provides comprehensive ethical hacking methodology and techniques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cognitive Systems Engineering design methodology for joint cognitive systems and human-centered automation

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。