「oop」の検索結果

Adversarial project planning workflow. Explores the problem space, drafts tickets in batches, then runs sequential adversarial loops — a mandatory UX loop ("should we build this?"), zero or more discretionary specialist loops (security, performance) for projects with architectural implications in those domains, and a mandatory implementer loop ("could we build this?") — to find gaps before implementation. Creates well-specified, batch-tagged tickets upstream only after every applicable loop signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate implementation work to a dedicated implementer subagent, then review its diff, send it back to iterate, gate on the full test suite, and ship it as a PR. Use this whenever the user wants a separate model to write code, mentions handing off / delegating implementation, asks to work through a plan or spec unit-by-unit with a subagent doing the coding, or wants a review-and-merge loop wrapped around delegated output — and also when resuming such a loop ("keep going", "next unit", "继续下一个"). It encodes constraints that are expensive to rediscover: the implementer self-reports success, must not run the full test suite by default, must not touch git, and its report is a claim rather than evidence. Cursor port of implementation-loop. This loop expects an approved plan or an equivalently precise spec; settle an unsolved high-level goal into a plan first, using the cursor-engineering-mode skill (it ships in this same plugin).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track Two / internal innovation system for running small, fast experiments outside the core business. Runs in three modes — Diagnostic for designing the full Protoloop from scratch (intake channels, loop structure, team, exit paths), Review for running the monthly heartbeat meeting (loop-by-loop decisions, forward-loading, portfolio health), and Alert Triggers for defining tripwires that protect, feed, and maintain momentum in the system. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about innovation pipelines, intrapreneurship, Track Two strategy, experimentation systems, handling ideas that don't fit the core business, or building systematic exploration alongside exploitation. Based on 20 years of practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a bounded, provider-neutral SDD Composy correction loop on one approved task (EXECUTE, QA, EVIDENCE, REVIEW, VERIFY; at most 3 iterations) with explicit approval, safe-stop guards, and fresh verification. Use to continue an approved TASK autonomously — 'rodar o loop na TASK-003', 'continuar a task até passar', 'start a loop on task 4'. Do NOT use for the host's recurring loop runner, for fleets (sdd-fleet), or for a task without human approval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent fallback for CEngineServiceMgr_DeactivateLoop (auto-generated, category: func). Locate CEngineServiceMgr::DeactivateLoop in the CS2 engine module via IDA Pro MCP and emit a fresh, minimal-unique artifact. The deterministic preprocessor could not resolve this symbol on the current gamever - your job is the re-sign. Trigger: CEngineServiceMgr_DeactivateLoop, CEngineServiceMgr::DeactivateLoop

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent fallback for CEngineServiceMgr__MainLoop (auto-generated, category: func). Locate CEngineServiceMgr::_MainLoop in the CS2 engine module via IDA Pro MCP and emit a fresh, minimal-unique artifact. The deterministic preprocessor could not resolve this symbol on the current gamever - your job is the re-sign. Trigger: CEngineServiceMgr__MainLoop, CEngineServiceMgr::_MainLoop

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent fallback for CEngineServiceMgr_GetActiveLoopClientServerMode (auto-generated, category: func). Locate CEngineServiceMgr_GetActiveLoopClientServerMode in the CS2 engine module via IDA Pro MCP and emit a fresh, minimal-unique artifact. The deterministic preprocessor could not resolve this symbol on the current gamever - your job is the re-sign. Trigger: CEngineServiceMgr_GetActiveLoopClientServerMode, CEngineServiceMgr_GetActiveLoopClientServerMode

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous iterative experimentation loop for any programming task. Guides the user through defining goals, measurable metrics, and scope constraints, then runs an autonomous loop of code changes, testing, measuring, and keeping/discarding results. Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch. USE FOR: autonomous improvement, iterative optimization, experiment loop, auto research, performance tuning, automated experimentation, hill climbing, try things automatically, optimize code, run experiments, autonomous coding loop. DO NOT USE FOR: one-shot tasks, simple bug fixes, code review, or tasks without a measurable metric.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Identify growth loops (flywheels) for sustainable traction. Evaluates 5 loop types: Viral, Usage, Collaboration, User-Generated, and Referral. Use when designing growth mechanisms, building product-led traction, or understanding how growth loops work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PUA cancel loop alias for Codex. Codex subcommand mapping for Claude Code /pua:cancel-loop style usage; invoke with $pua-cancel-loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PUA Loop alias for Codex. Codex subcommand mapping for Claude Code /pua:loop style usage; invoke with $pua-loop.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate or analyze LoopX-managed benchmark experiments through benchmark-toolkit, including trajectory-based effectiveness and efficiency diagnosis, matched comparisons, run selection and integrity. Solving an assigned task under an existing runner does not by itself select this skill. Excludes casual benchmark discussion and ordinary software microbenchmarks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operate an explicitly activated LoopX Material Lifecycle for a connected project. Use for material-store inventory, lossless migration, candidate/archive transitions, exact-read-backed ranking, ranked-entry rebuilds, bounded Explore intake, owner-gated apply, rollback, and audit. Do not use for ordinary one-off reading or research when the project has not activated Material Lifecycle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when LoopX must manage a multi-PR or multi-MR delivery program across one or more repositories: inventory current change requests, reconcile new/merged/closed or retargeted work, preserve requirement and dependency priorities, maintain a roadmap document, or monitor material lifecycle/check/review changes over time. Use provider-neutral snapshots and one grouped continuous monitor; do not use for deep per-PR code review, approval, commenting, or merge actions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Qualify the exact final diff for a LoopX-managed goal. Use when goal policy enables change_quality_qualification, before a non-trivial delivery or merge, and when producing or repairing an exact-scope quality receipt. The workflow is language-neutral, permits at most one policy-authorized safe-fix pass, and never grants merge or repository authority.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect authorized LoopX Goals, Todos and deliveries to explain progress, identify owner decisions and delegate intent to the right worker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose demonstrated CPU, command latency, allocation or IO regressions in an owned process with controlled measurements and language-appropriate profilers. Route benchmark effectiveness, score growth and trajectory efficiency to loopx-benchmark; profiling does not qualify a budget or grant execution authority.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured error handling in Golang with samber/oops — error builders, stack traces, error codes, error context, error wrapping, error attributes, user-facing vs developer messages, panic recovery, and logger integration. Apply when using or adopting samber/oops, or when the codebase already imports github.com/samber/oops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect chromatin loops and point interactions from Hi-C data using cooltools, chromosight, and HiCCUPS-like methods. Identify CTCF-mediated loops and enhancer-promoter contacts. Use when detecting chromatin loops from Hi-C data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Superloopy's lightweight strict-evidence loop for Codex tasks that need durable progress, criteria, and artifact-backed completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use only after explicit Codex `$superloopy:i-have-adhd` or Claude Code `/superloopy:i-have-adhd` invocation, or when a qualifying leading `loopy`/`루피` task receives Superloopy's non-diagnostic ADHD-friendly output overlay. Do not activate from typos, fragmented writing, urgency, grammar, language proficiency, or ordinary discussion of ADHD, attention, focus, accessibility, or cognitive load.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shared loop-engineering reference for COG skills - the agent loop, deterministic verifiers, termination conditions, in-loop context management, and named patterns. Invoke when designing or debugging a skill that iterates (search-verify-retry, scan-until-dry, fetch-retry-gate).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run one task through the V-model verification loop: CP-2 plan → CP-3 build → CP-3v component verify → CP-4 integration verify (full lane) → CP-5 acceptance. The worker never grades its own homework; evidence rows trace back to AC-n. Opt-in: invoke with /closed-loop or by asking for the closed loop, proper verification, or an evidence trail. Ordinary work does not run this.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect growth loops in the business and model each loop's amplification by script. "what growth loops do we have"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。