「propagation」の検索結果

Maintain injected credential authenticators, method-isolated caching, request-context propagation, and the pure-Go SQLite API-key plugin. Excludes interactive portal password authentication and identity-store provisioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Nature-style remote-sensing manuscript reviewer skill for evaluating Earth-observation products, retrievals, machine-learning maps, validation design, uncertainty propagation, spatial transferability and claim-scope calibration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Instrument applications with OpenTelemetry for distributed tracing, including auto and manual instrumentation, context propagation, sampling strategies, and integration with Jaeger or Tempo. Use when debugging latency issues in distributed systems, understanding request flow across microservices, correlating traces with logs and metrics for root cause analysis, measuring end-to-end latency, or migrating from legacy tracing systems to OpenTelemetry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement layered collective defense using alarm signaling, role mobilization, and proportional response. Covers threat detection, alert propagation, immune response patterns, escalation tiers, and post-incident recovery for distributed systems and organizations. Use when designing defense-in-depth where no single guardian covers all threats, building incident response that scales with severity, or when current defense is over-reactive to every alert or under-reactive to genuine threats.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Modern C# idioms for any .NET project (C# 10+, .NET 6+): nullable reference types, records, readonly structs, primary constructors, pattern matching, async/await with CancellationToken, IDisposable/IAsyncDisposable, file-scoped namespaces, var usage, naming conventions (PascalCase members, _camelCase fields, I-prefixed interfaces), and class design rules. Apply whenever the project is a .NET 6+ project. Stack-agnostic — referenced by every .NET plugin in the marketplace. Use this skill to: - Write self-documenting immutable value types with records and readonly structs. - Handle nullable reference types explicitly to eliminate NullReferenceException at compile time. - Implement async/await correctly with CancellationToken propagation and ConfigureAwait(false) in libraries. - Dispose unmanaged resources correctly via IDisposable / IAsyncDisposable and using statements. - Apply C# pattern matching (switch expressions, property patterns, list patterns) for cleaner branching logic. Do NOT use this skill for: - Framework-specific idioms (ASP.NET Core controllers, minimal APIs, EF Core — those live in aspnet-core-plugin skills). - Build tooling (dotnet CLI, NuGet, csproj) — see csharp-foundation:dotnet-tooling. - Testing patterns — see csharp-foundation:dotnet-testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automate a professional LinkedIn presence end-to-end using Claude: daily posting with pillar calendar, engagement with anti-detection rules, DM triage, reporting, and growth tracking. Use when the user wants to automate LinkedIn, manage a profile with AI, create a content strategy, or set up engagement automation. Triggers on: "automate my LinkedIn", "LinkedIn automation", "automated LinkedIn", "LinkedIn bot", "LinkedIn scheduling", "LinkedIn AI management", "LinkedIn content calendar", "LinkedIn engagement strategy", "build a LinkedIn presence", "can Claude manage my LinkedIn", "how do I automate my LinkedIn", or any request involving systematic LinkedIn content creation, audience growth, or profile management. Covers: identity/TOV setup, pillar calendar, post creation, engagement rules, anti-detection, scheduled task creation, and weekly reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a Go design spec before implementation begins - dispatch a subagent that checks a design doc for completeness, consistency, and idiomatic Go (simplicity, small consumer-defined interfaces, explicit wrapped errors, context propagation). Use when a user has a Go spec to review, asks "is this spec ready?", or is about to implement from a written design. Distilled from spf13/go-skills and adapted to this repo's conventions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classify a proposed code change as Leaf Node or Core Code to decide how much AI usage and review rigor is appropriate. Use this skill whenever the user asks "is this leaf or core", "what kind of change is this", "should I vibe code this", "can AI write this", "how rigorous should the review be", or before starting any non-trivial change. Also useful as a sub-step inside other workflows (planning, PR prep, code review) when classification matters. Asks 6 diagnostic questions about propagation range, change frequency, tech-debt tolerance, examples, failure cost, and review intensity, then outputs a clear classification with the recommended approach. Trigger even when the user describes a change without explicitly asking for classification — the answer changes how they should proceed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares Go applications to work effectively with AI coding agents. Use when setting up a new Go project or retrofitting an existing one to ensure: structured JSON logging (slog/Zap/ZeroLog/Logrus), machine-readable command output, thorough golangci-lint configuration, non-interactive CLI design with --yes flags, structured error handling with meaningful exit codes, proper context.Context propagation, graceful shutdown, health check endpoints, and a standardized Makefile. Triggers when a user asks to make their Go app "agent-ready," "AI-friendly," wants to improve agent tooling/observability in a Go project, or needs to audit an existing Go project against agent-readiness best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Email consent management in Marketing Cloud: configuring Subscription Centers, building Preference Centers on CloudPages, enforcing CAN-SPAM and GDPR requirements, and handling opt-out propagation. Trigger keywords: unsubscribe handling, CAN-SPAM compliance, GDPR consent tracking, publication lists, subscription center, preference center, opt-out, double opt-in, Privacy Center, MC consent. NOT for subscriber key and suppression lists — use data/subscriber-data-management. NOT for the CRM consent data model or MC-to-CRM sync — use architect/marketing-consent-architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality control for pooled CRISPR screens covering library representation, Gini index, log-skew, replicate Pearson and Spearman concordance, essentialome precision-recall AUC against CEGv2 (Hart 2017), Cas9 cut-toxicity diagnostics, copy-number amplicon detection (Aguirre 2016 / Munoz 2016), bottleneck propagation through plasmid pool, infection, selection, and endpoint stages, MOI verification, and DepMap-style screen-quality scoring. Use when assessing screen quality before hit calling, deciding whether to repeat or rescue a screen, diagnosing low-confidence hits, choosing between MAGeCK / BAGEL2 / Chronos based on quality grade, picking a normalization strategy from QC signatures, or evaluating whether an in-vivo screen retained adequate library complexity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implementing distributed tracing with W3C Trace Context — the byte-precise `traceparent` and `tracestate` header formats, OpenTelemetry's W3CTraceContextPropagator as the modern default (replacing X-B3-* and X-Datadog-*), head vs tail sampling, and HTTP→SQL trace propagation via sqlcommenter. Grounded in the W3C REC and OpenTelemetry specs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs root cause analysis on DAG execution failures. Traces failure propagation, identifies systemic issues, and generates actionable remediation guidance. Activate on 'failure analysis', 'root cause', 'why did it fail', 'debug failure', 'error investigation'. NOT for execution tracing (use dag-execution-tracer) or performance issues (use dag-performance-profiler).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Building resilient distributed systems with circuit breakers, retries with full-jitter exponential backoff, retry budgets (per-request 3-attempt + per-client 10% ratio per Google SRE), deadline propagation, and the cascading-failure math (4 layers × 3 retries = 64x amplification). Grounded in Resilience4j, Microsoft Cloud Patterns, AWS Architecture Blog (Marc Brooker), and Google SRE Book.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level seismology covering earthquake seismology, seismic wave propagation, seismometer instrumentation, earthquake source parameters, seismic hazard, and induced seismicity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level acoustics knowledge. Use when working with sound waves, acoustic propagation, resonance, standing waves, Doppler effect, room acoustics, ultrasound, noise control, musical acoustics, or architectural acoustics. Also use when the user mentions 'sound wave', 'decibel', 'frequency', 'resonance', 'standing wave', 'Doppler effect', 'acoustic impedance', 'reverberation', 'ultrasound', 'noise control', 'harmonics', or 'sound intensity'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Skill Management] Use when shared protocol checklists change and need propagation across skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Discipline for repairing a false claim once it has propagated: select what depends on it, produce a replacement, and accept with an expiring verdict. Trigger when: - A claim, citation, premise, or documented fact is found wrong and its downstream consequences must be traced and fixed. - A refutation, a failed re-run, a retracted external source, or a human correction lands against something already closed or already promoted. - Prompt contains: /remediation, remediation, retraction, false claim, propagated error, scrub, correction propagation, born-false, became-false, currency verdict, impeachment queue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NASA Probabilistic Risk Assessment Procedures Guide (NASA/SP-2011-3421, 2nd ed.). Use for quantitative PRA of aerospace and safety-critical systems: the risk triplet and scenario logic stack (MLD, ESD, event trees, fault trees, minimal cut sets), Bayesian data collection and parameter estimation, aleatory/epistemic uncertainty modeling and common-cause failure (Alpha Factor, beta-factor, CCBE), human reliability analysis (THERP, CREAM, NARA, SPAR-H), context-based software risk (CSRM), physics-based and structural/phenomenological models (stress-strength, limit states, FORM/SORM, NASGRO, range safety), uncertainty propagation and importance measures (F-V, RAW, Birnbaum, DIM), and launch-abort modeling with worked PRA examples. This is the QUANTITATIVE engine beneath NASA's risk doctrine — for the qualitative RIDM/CRM decision framework use the nasa-risk pack. Thin on programme management, organisational risk governance, and non-aerospace regulatory contexts; aerospace-focused and anchored to the 2011 second edition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master error handling patterns across languages including exceptions, Result types, error propagation, and graceful degradation to build resilient applications. Use when implementing error handling, designing APIs, or improving application reliability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-scan decision types, collect downstream references, classify contradictions, and write propagation scan report

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Present and apply contradiction fixes one-by-one, flag assumptions, run consistency checks, and write propagation record

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Master error handling patterns across languages including exceptions, Result types, error propagation, and graceful degradation to build resilient applications. Use when implementing error handling, designing APIs, or improving application reliability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic methodology for verifying that IA, BE, and FE specification layers are mutually consistent. Covers coverage matrices, field mapping checks, error code propagation, access control consistency, and data contract drift detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。