「reasoning」の検索結果

Brainstorms and debates approaches, then drives toward an actionable decision. Use whenever someone needs a thinking partner for a decision they're facing: 'discuss', 'debate', 'brainstorm', 'weigh options', 'tradeoffs', 'should I do X or Y', 'help me decide', 'I'm torn between', 'sanity check my thinking', or 'what do you think about'. The user must be asking for help reasoning through a choice — not asking to build, fix, evaluate, plan, or modify something (even if the topic involves this skill itself). Picks the right decision lens, surfaces tradeoffs and blind spots, pushes back when reasoning is genuinely weak, and never implements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement ReasoningBank adaptive learning with AgentDB's 150x faster vector database. Includes trajectory tracking, verdict judgment, memory distillation, and pattern recognition. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing decision-making, or implementing experience replay systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement adaptive learning with ReasoningBank for pattern recognition, strategy optimization, and continuous improvement. Use when building self-learning agents, optimizing workflows, or implementing meta-cognitive systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Vercel AI Elements for workflow UI components. Use when building chat interfaces, displaying tool execution, showing reasoning/thinking, or creating job queues. Triggers on ai-elements, Queue, Confirmation, Tool, Reasoning, Shimmer, Loader, Message, Conversation, PromptInput.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Amazon Bedrock Automated Reasoning for mathematical verification of AI responses against formal policy rules with up to 99% accuracy. Use when validating healthcare protocols, financial compliance, legal regulations, insurance policies, or any domain requiring deterministic verification of AI-generated content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guide for integrating Large Language Models (LLMs), Model Context Protocol (MCP v1.x), hybrid reasoning models, RAG architecture, vector databases, and AI agents / Panduan ahli untuk integrasi LLM, Model Context Protocol (MCP), model hybrid reasoning, arsitektur RAG, vector database, dan agen AI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Symbolic manipulation, equation solving, and algebraic structures for mathematical reasoning. Covers distributive law, factoring, completing the square, linear through polynomial equation solving, systems of equations (substitution, elimination, Gaussian elimination, matrix methods), algebraic structures (groups, rings, fields), modular arithmetic, polynomial theory, and inequalities. Use when solving equations, simplifying expressions, working with algebraic structures, or performing symbolic manipulation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spatial reasoning, coordinate geometry, transformations, and trigonometry for geometric problem solving. Covers Euclidean geometry (points, lines, angles, congruence, similarity), triangle geometry (Pythagorean theorem, laws of sines and cosines), circle geometry (tangent lines, inscribed angles, power of a point), coordinate geometry (distance, midpoint, slope, conic sections), transformations as functions (rotation, reflection, translation, dilation), trigonometry (unit circle, identities, inverse functions), and geometric proof techniques. Use when reasoning about shapes, angles, spatial relationships, coordinate problems, or trigonometric computations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Causal reasoning in historical analysis. Covers distinguishing immediate from underlying causes, tracing chains of causation across time scales, identifying unintended consequences, and applying counterfactual reasoning to assess causal significance. Use when analyzing why historical events occurred, evaluating the relative weight of causes, or assessing whether outcomes were inevitable or contingent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Recognition and mitigation of systematic reasoning errors documented in the heuristics and biases tradition. Covers confirmation bias, availability, anchoring, representativeness, framing effects, hindsight bias, overconfidence, and motivated reasoning. Each bias is presented with its mechanism, diagnostic signal, and structured mitigation. Use when you suspect your own or another reasoner's conclusions may be shaped by systematic cognitive distortion rather than evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creative reasoning framework for ill-defined problems where conventional solutions are suboptimal. Use when the problem has ambiguous goals, vast solution space, no single correct answer, or requires innovation. Implements three paradigms — combinational (novel combinations of familiar ideas), exploratory (expand solution space boundaries), transformative (alter fundamental constraints). Do not use for well-defined problems, mathematical puzzles, or tasks requiring convergent reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced multi-agent reasoning system for complex questions requiring maximum accuracy. Uses adaptive technique selection, adversarial validation, multi-agent debate, and deep analysis. Trigger phrases "ai board", "expert panel", "deep analysis", "maximum accuracy", "thorough reasoning". Use for critical medical decisions, theological questions, philosophical analysis, complex technical problems, high-stakes decisions, or any question requiring 95%+ confidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you want to improve response quality through meta-cognitive reasoning. Applies 15+ reasoning methods to reconsider and refine initial outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exposes Claude's reasoning chain as an auditable, decomposable artifact. Quick mode (default) gives assumption inventory + weakest-link in 2 stages. Full mode (--full) adds decision branching, confidence decomposition, and falsification conditions. Triggers on "왜 그렇게 생각해", "reasoning", "근거", "show your work", "어떻게 그 결론이", "trace", "판단 근거", "why do you think that".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply WIT (Writing Is Thinking) as a human–LLM collaborative scientific reasoning skill for scientific question formulation, finding-driven research planning, next-experiment selection, Results or Discussion review, claim–evidence and reviewer stress tests, manuscript logic audits, deadline closure, and researcher growth. Use when the user invokes WIT or asks for these question-driven scientific reasoning workflows; do not use for generic copyediting, summarization, or literature search alone.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sustained neutral pattern recognition across systems without urgency or intervention. Maps naturalist field study methodology to AI reasoning: framing the observation target, witnessing with sustained attention, recording patterns, categorizing findings, generating hypotheses, and archiving a pattern library for future reference. Use when a system's behavior is unclear and action would be premature, when debugging an unknown root cause, when a codebase change needs its effects witnessed before further changes, or when auditing own reasoning patterns for biases or recurring errors.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Log a bias-log / vipassana observation to the memex store the moment a reasoning pattern surfaces, mid-session or at close. Use when you catch a bias in your own reasoning (anchoring, confirmation, trust-the-summary), when a pace tell or verification gap appears, or when meditate/observe produces a reflection worth persisting across sessions. Primary path pipes the body to `memex add` over stdin (`--title` required) then runs the `meditate-vipassana` extractor to make it queryable; secondary path appends a numbered bullet to `docs/OBSERVATIONS.md`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI situational awareness — internal threat detection for hallucination risk, scope creep, and context degradation. Maps Cooper color codes to reasoning states and OODA loop to real-time decisions. Use during any task where reasoning quality matters, when operating in unfamiliar territory, after detecting early warning signs such as an uncertain fact or suspicious tool result, or before high-stakes output like irreversible changes or architectural decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Codex CLIと相談するスキル。 ユーザーが「codexと相談して」「codexに聞いて」「codexにレビューしてもらって」と言った時に使用する。 現在の会話コンテキストに基づいてCodex CLIにプロンプトを送り、結果を要約して報告する。 「codexはAstraで」「effortはhighで」のようにCodexのmodelやreasoning effortを指定された時は、そのmodelとeffortで実行する。

Agentic workflow patterns for autonomous LLM reasoning. Use when building ReAct agents, implementing reasoning loops, or creating LLMs that plan and execute multi-step tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the Fable-derived 10-stage OBSERVE, OBSERVE, LISTEN, THINK, CONNECT, CONNECT, FEEL, ACCEPT, CREATE, GROW loop to consequential or ambiguous reasoning and decisions. Use for think this through, deep think, architecture review, postmortem, tradeoff analysis, or challenges to assumptions. This is a reasoning review, not a deterministic vault health check or repair workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adaptive learning for moflo agents via ReasoningBank: trajectory storage, verdict judgment, memory distillation, consolidation, and MMR retrieval. Use when building agents that should improve from experience across runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Abductive reasoning about causes. Takes a phenomenon, separates observations from interpretations, then spawns diagnosticians applying different reasoning lenses (technical, human-factors, process, incentive-structure, environmental, temporal, measurement-artifact, statistical) in isolation. Orchestrator evaluates candidate causes for fit-against-evidence, calibrates confidence honestly, and reports leading candidate(s) with distinguishing evidence needed. Produces feedback only — no code, no tickets, no artifacts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a problem requires structured step-by-step reasoning before acting. Prevents jumping to conclusions or guessing root causes without evidence. Triggers on complex debugging, multi-step analysis, hypothesis verification, or when mk:fix invokes diagnosis phase. NOT for being stuck on approach (too many implementations, forced assumptions, innovation block) — use mk:problem-solving instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。