404 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Stage, format, lint, test, review, smoke test, and re-run itself until stable. Use when the user asks to "polish code", "refine code", "iterate on code quality", "review loop", "clean up, test, and review loop", or "run the polish loop".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decides hand-vs-compiler for loop transforms (unrolling, SIMD, fusion, branchless). Use when reviewing/authoring a hot loop or tempted to hand-optimize one.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage persistent coding sessions across Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity (agy), Cursor, and OpenCode engines. Use when orchestrating multi-engine coding agents, starting/sending/stopping sessions, running multi-agent council collaborations, cross-session messaging, ultraplan deep planning, ultrareview parallel code review, autoloop autonomous workspace iteration, ultraapp building deployable web apps from a structured Q&A interview, switching models/tools at runtime, exposing the orchestrator's 69 tools as an MCP server to Hermes Agent / Claude Desktop / Cursor / Cline / Continue / Zed / Windsurf / Goose, or running as an Agent Client Protocol (ACP) agent that Zed / JetBrains / Neovim / Emacs / VS Code / dsh can drive directly. Triggers on "start a session", "send to session", "run council", "ultraplan", "ultrareview", "autoloop", "ultraapp", "Forge tab", "build a web app", "one-click app", "AppSpec", "autonomous iteration", "iterate until goal", "deep paper review", "auto research", "switch model", "multi-agent", "coding session", "session inbox", "cursor agent", "opencode", "mcp server", "clawo-mcp", "hermes mcp", "model context protocol", "ultracode", "dynamic workflow", "fanout", "fan-out", "best-of-N", "steer turn", "interrupt turn", "fork thread", "rollback turns", "acp", "agent client protocol", "clawo acp", "zed agent", "jetbrains agent", "external agent", "dsh subagent", "deepseek harness".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Default Looper review method for implementation and spec PRs. Read before reviewing. Covers correctness, tests, concurrency, contracts, and comment quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Herdr loops for one open GitHub issue (resolve→review→fix) or an existing PR (review→lazy fixer) until CLEAN. Don't use for plain resolution without review, review-only/no-fix requests, backlog automation, or merging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user says 'send this to my client', 'get feedback on this page', 'send a review link', 'what did the client say', or 'work through the review notes'. Sends a Murmur review link, reads the notes reviewers pin to the page, replies, applies each change on a duplicate, and resolves every note with the snapshot of the change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews audio DSP code for numerical correctness. Use when the user asks to review, audit, or check DSP code for correctness issues — filters, feedback loops, fixed-point arithmetic, accumulation loops, or any numeric computation in audio code. Trigger on "check this filter for NaN", "why does my reverb blow up?", "is this numerically stable?", "why do I hear DC in my output?". Pairs with audio-dsp-review (realtime safety); this skill covers numeric correctness. Flag issues proactively.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Manage persistent coding sessions across Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity (agy), Grok Build, and OpenCode engines. Use when orchestrating multi-engine coding agents, starting/sending/stopping sessions, running multi-agent council collaborations, cross-session messaging, ultraplan deep planning, ultrareview parallel code review, autoloop autonomous workspace iteration, ultraapp building deployable web apps from a structured Q&A interview, switching models/tools at runtime, exposing the orchestrator's 78 tools as an MCP server to Hermes Agent / Claude Desktop / Cursor / Cline / Continue / Zed / Windsurf / Goose, or running as an Agent Client Protocol (ACP) agent that Zed / JetBrains / Neovim / Emacs / VS Code / dsh can drive directly. Triggers on "start a session", "send to session", "run council", "ultraplan", "ultrareview", "autoloop", "ultraapp", "Forge tab", "build a web app", "one-click app", "AppSpec", "autonomous iteration", "iterate until goal", "auto research", "switch model", "hand off a session", "session handoff", "switch engine", "continue on codex", "continue on claude", "move this session to another engine", "multi-agent coding", "coding session", "session inbox", "grok session", "grok build", "opencode", "mcp server", "clawo-mcp", "hermes mcp", "model context protocol", "ultracode", "dynamic workflow", "fanout", "fan-out", "best-of-N", "steer turn", "interrupt turn", "fork thread", "rollback turns", "acp", "agent client protocol", "clawo acp", "zed agent", "jetbrains agent", "external agent", "dsh subagent", "deepseek harness", "clawo runs", "run ledger", "session cost", "coding-agent token usage", "spend cap", "budget limit", "maxBudgetUsd", "durable workflow", "resume a run", "verify a coding run", "acceptance contract", "evidence bundle", "did the agent's tests actually pass", "protected tests", "agent edited the tests", "human gate", "repair loop", "clawo workflow", "clawo verify", "clawo solve", "clawo fanout", "fix and verify", "solve from the terminal".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delegate implementation to Codex, grok, or cursor-agent, then review the diff, send it back to iterate, gate on the full test suite, and ship it as a PR. Use this whenever the user wants Codex, the grok 后端, or cursor-agent to write code, mentions handing off / delegating implementation to one of those backends, asks to work through a plan or spec unit-by-unit with an implementation backend doing the coding, or wants a review-and-merge loop wrapped around delegated output — and also when resuming such a loop ("keep going", "next unit", "继续下一个"). It encodes constraints that are expensive to rediscover: the implementer runs in the real environment behind backend-specific git and publication boundaries, must not be pointed at a full test suite by default, and its self-report is a claim rather than evidence. This loop expects an approved plan or an equivalently precise spec; settle an unsolved high-level goal into a plan first, using the engineering-mode skill when it is installed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
レビュー専用サブエージェント(fable-reviewer・opus-reviewer等)を起動する反復レビュー・ループが共有する起動契約と手順の正本。Agentツールでの同期起動、2ラウンド目以降の同一エージェント継続、レビュー指示文の追加要件、失敗の扱い、1ラウンドを回して結末を出すまでの流れを定義する。内部専用でユーザーが直接使うものではない。
Track Two / internal innovation system for running small, fast experiments outside the core business. Runs in three modes — Diagnostic for designing the full Protoloop from scratch (intake channels, loop structure, team, exit paths), Review for running the monthly heartbeat meeting (loop-by-loop decisions, forward-loading, portfolio health), and Alert Triggers for defining tripwires that protect, feed, and maintain momentum in the system. Updates company-context.md after every run. Triggers on questions about innovation pipelines, intrapreneurship, Track Two strategy, experimentation systems, handling ideas that don't fit the core business, or building systematic exploration alongside exploitation. Based on 20 years of practice by Eterdis (eterdis.com).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a bounded, provider-neutral SDD Composy correction loop on one approved task (EXECUTE, QA, EVIDENCE, REVIEW, VERIFY; at most 3 iterations) with explicit approval, safe-stop guards, and fresh verification. Use to continue an approved TASK autonomously — 'rodar o loop na TASK-003', 'continuar a task até passar', 'start a loop on task 4'. Do NOT use for the host's recurring loop runner, for fleets (sdd-fleet), or for a task without human approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user hands over a GitHub issue to be delivered end to end — 'resolver a issue #42', 'loop na issue 42', 'deliver issue https://github.com/o/r/issues/42' — or when an Orca worker preamble dispatches `feat-loop #N`. Turns the issue into a plan, executes it, reviews the result and runs at most 2 fix cycles until APPROVED, then opens a pull request that closes the issue. Never merges. Do NOT use without an issue (feat-feature / feat-quick), to only plan (feat-feature), to only review (feat-review) or to execute an existing plan (feat-exec).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
PyTorchのモデルや学習コードを作成・点検し、データ読み込み、実験の再現性、学習状態の保存、GPUメモリや処理速度の改善を支援するスキル。
設計書や要件書から、最初から最後まで動く小さな機能単位を計画し、ひな形作成、生成と評価の反復、レビューと承認を経て動く最小限の製品を組み立てるスキル。
Djangoの公開や変更提案の前に、環境・コード品質・データベース変更・テスト・脆弱性・設定を順に検証し、段階別の合否と修正すべき問題をレポートにまとめます。
When the user wants to create, optimize, or analyze a referral program, affiliate program, or word-of-mouth strategy. Also use when the user mentions 'referral,' 'affiliate,' 'ambassador,' 'word of mouth,' 'viral loop,' 'refer a friend,' 'partner program,' 'referral incentive,' 'how to get referrals,' 'customers referring customers,' 'affiliate payout,' 'get more reviews,' 'G2 reviews,' 'review campaign,' or 'respond to a bad review.' Use this whenever someone wants existing users or partners to bring in new customers. For launch-specific virality, see launch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Take a PR from review to merged — run the repo's code-review skill on it in a loop (review, fix, re-review) until nothing is left to fix, applying ALL fixes on the PR branch, wait for CI green, then squash-merge. Use when asked to "ship it", "ship PR
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Runs a bounded spec-build-review development loop with explicit scope, stop conditions, and human approval gates for risky or ambiguous work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous iterative experimentation loop for any programming task. Guides the user through defining goals, measurable metrics, and scope constraints, then runs an autonomous loop of code changes, testing, measuring, and keeping/discarding results. Inspired by Karpathy's autoresearch. USE FOR: autonomous improvement, iterative optimization, experiment loop, auto research, performance tuning, automated experimentation, hill climbing, try things automatically, optimize code, run experiments, autonomous coding loop. DO NOT USE FOR: one-shot tasks, simple bug fixes, code review, or tasks without a measurable metric.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage open pull requests for CI status, review comments, and merge readiness. Use in PR babysitter loops. Respects project review norms and required checks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when asked to review a PR, run a code review loop, or invoke the ralph reviewer against a pull request number or GitHub URL
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Harden a plan with independent Claude/Codex review, then optionally build and cross-inspect it. Start in either Claude Code or Codex: the host plans and the other provider reviews. Use for claudex this plan, claudex-loop, or the legacy crucible trigger; not for trivial edits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up iterative design-to-code development loop with Anima SDK. Use when rapidly iterating on Figma-to-code output, comparing framework outputs, or building a local preview server for generated components. Trigger with: "anima local dev", "anima dev loop", "anima preview", "anima iteration".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。