376 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when main results pass result-to-claim (`claim_supported = yes` or `partial`) and ablation studies are needed for paper submission. A secondary Codex agent designs ablations from a reviewer's perspective; the local executor reviews feasibility and implements.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds security-focused full-stack web applications by implementing integrated frontend and backend components with layered security at every level. Covers the complete stack from database to UI, enforcing auth, input validation, output encoding, and parameterized queries across all layers. Use when implementing features across frontend and backend, building REST APIs with corresponding UI, connecting frontend components to backend endpoints, creating end-to-end data flows from database to UI, or implementing CRUD operations with UI forms. Distinct from frontend-only, backend-only, or API-only skills in that it simultaneously addresses all three perspectives—Frontend, Backend, and Security—within a single implementation workflow. Invoke for full-stack feature work, web app development, authenticated API routes with views, microservices, real-time features, monorepo architecture, or technology selection decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Have the Claude and GPT partners critique each other's answers across a configurable number of rounds (default 1) before converging on a synthesis. Use when the user wants the two perspectives stress-tested against each other, not just shown side by side.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quickly determine whether a processing activity needs a PIA, a mandatory GDPR DPIA, or can proceed — surfaces privacy policy conflicts and routes to the right next step. Use when the user asks "does this need a PIA", "triage this feature", "privacy check on X", "is this okay from a privacy perspective", or describes a new data processing activity, product feature, or vendor relationship.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build crafted, highly detailed, interactive isometric SVG figures that explain a technical idea as a real physical object (a test rig, a dial gauge, a cabinet of drawers, a plotter, a lock), with many small precise solid parts, four-tone shading, correct painter's order, a framed card with title, hint and live readout, and calm eased motion. Use this whenever someone wants an isometric illustration, an explanatory diagram or figure for docs, a blog post, a landing page or an article, a "Linear-style" or "premium" technical drawing, an interactive explainer, or an SVG that shows how a system, algorithm or component works, even if they never say "isometric". Works framework-free (TypeScript/JS that writes SVG and HTML) and in React/Next.js, and can add realistic WebGL shaders (fire, exhaust, water, caustics, lamp light) that live inside the drawing in the same isometric perspective. Also publishes a finished figure to the Anatomy community gallery when asked.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive lateral movement tradecraft for authorized red team engagements covering credential-based movement (pass-the-hash, pass-the-ticket, overpass-the-hash), NTLM relay attacks (ntlmrelayx with PetitPotam, DFSCoerce, PrinterBug coercion), remote execution protocols (WMI, WinRM, DCOM, PsExec and alternatives), RDP session hijacking, and network pivoting through tunneling tools (chisel, ligolo-ng, SSH tunnels, SOCKS proxies). Provides operator-ready command sequences for mimikatz, crackmapexec/netexec, impacket suite, and evil-winrm with emphasis on OPSEC considerations, SMB signing bypass, and detection evasion. Maps to MITRE ATT&CK T1021 (Remote Services), T1550 (Use Alternate Authentication Material), and sub-techniques. Includes defender-perspective detection guidance for blue team awareness and a rapid engagement cheatsheet for common lateral movement scenarios encountered during internal penetration tests and assumed-breach exercises.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Anti-forensics and evidence destruction techniques for red team operators conducting authorized engagements. Covers log clearing on Windows (wevtutil, Clear-EventLog, ETW provider patching) and Linux (journal truncation, utmp/wtmp binary editing, syslog manipulation), timestamp manipulation via Timestomp and SetMACE to defeat timeline analysis, filesystem-level anti-forensics including NTFS Alternate Data Streams for payload hiding and secure deletion with sdelete/shred, memory artifact removal to counter live forensics, disk artifact manipulation targeting MFT entries and USN journal records, network forensics evasion through encrypted C2 channels and DNS-over-HTTPS tunneling, and anti-VM/sandbox detection to avoid dynamic analysis environments. Tools: Timestomp, wevtutil, sdelete, shred, MimiPenguin, Invoke-Phant0m. Aligns to MITRE ATT&CK T1070 (Indicator Removal), T1027 (Obfuscated Files or Information), T1497 (Virtualization/Sandbox Evasion). Each technique includes the forensic artifact it targets, the destruction or manipulation method, and the defender perspective so operators understand detection gaps they must account for.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-perspective review of a feature plan or requirements doc before development begins. Evaluates from strategy, design/UX, and engineering angles to catch gaps early.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a question, decision, plan, tradeoff, or claim needs a rigorous verdict and one perspective is not enough. Spawns a panel of 3 to 5 subagent jurors that form independent blind opinions, deliberate anonymously under an anti-anchoring and anti-sycophancy protocol, and return one committed verdict with confidence, preserved dissent, and a concrete next action. Domain-agnostic across engineering, architecture, data, product, hiring, strategy, vendor choice, build-vs-buy, and research design. Trigger phrases include "convene a jury", "have agents debate and decide", "get a panel to decide", "multi-agent decision", "stress-test this and decide", "monte um juri", "tribunal de agentes", "painel para decidir". Do NOT use to only critique without deciding (use the-fool for that), to build a plan or write the solution itself, or for simple factual lookups.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a real 3D WebGL object with geometric mesh depth, physically based material, directional and ambient lighting, perspective camera, subtle rotation, and floating motion. Use when a page needs a faceted 3D hero object or product-like visual with real lighting instead of CSS transform tricks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a perspective WebGL background grid with fading lines, subtle particle haze, slow forward drift, and gentle camera parallax.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build an ultra-realistic open ocean in Three.js with a deep-water Gerstner spectrum shaded per pixel from analytic derivatives, each wave faded at its own pixel footprint, plus Fresnel sky-cube and planar reflections, subsurface light through the crests, HDR sun glitter, Jacobian lace foam, a Kelvin wake, hull foam, buoyancy queries and aerial perspective into the sky's horizon haze. Use for seas, oceans, sunset or daylight water, sun glitter paths, ship or boat scenes, wakes, coastal flyovers and any 3D scene with a moving camera and a water horizon. Includes the approved water from Pirate Ship Sunset as a reusable module and demo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate design from a UX perspective, assessing visual hierarchy, information architecture, emotional resonance, cognitive load, and overall quality with quantitative scoring, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Use when the user asks to review, critique, evaluate, or give feedback on a design or component.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delegate focused coding, research, review, or verification work to a bounded DevSpace subagent. Use when a task benefits from separate context, a specialist perspective, or a follow-up with the same worker.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints. Output: optimized detailed outline ready for systematic writing (use with academic-paper-composer skill).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, and Socratic guided modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Codex-only team orchestration: run a named team of cooperating Codex workers with durable, script-managed state. MUST USE when the user asks Codex to create, run, coordinate, inspect, archive, or delete a team of agents/threads/sessions, or to work on something as a team in parallel. FIRST inspects the active tool surface (checking tool_search for deferred tools) and tells the user the route: native MultiAgentV2 agents (flat spawn_agent with task_name) when available, Codex App threads as the fallback, or a plain-subagent split when neither set exists. The main session is always the leader; members are defined by a concrete part, ownership area, or perspective - never a vague job role; a bundled cross-platform script writes the .omo/teams state plus an auto-generated member field manual. Use a team when the work is not perfectly isolated but parallelizing helps; use plain subagents when scope is perfectly isolated or the goal is ambiguous. Triggers: team mode, teammode, make a team, run as a team, team of agents, coordinate threads, parallel Codex threads, archive the team.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured clarification workflow for underspecified requirements. Use before planning to resolve ambiguities through coverage-based questioning. Records answers in spec clarifications section.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive geospatial science skill covering remote sensing, GIS, spatial analysis, machine learning for earth observation, and 30+ scientific domains. Supports satellite imagery processing (Sentinel, Landsat, MODIS, SAR, hyperspectral), vector and raster data operations, spatial statistics, point cloud processing, network analysis, and 7 programming languages (Python, R, Julia, JavaScript, C++, Java, Go) with 500+ code examples. Use for remote sensing workflows, GIS analysis, spatial ML, Earth observation data processing, terrain analysis, hydrological modeling, marine spatial analysis, atmospheric science, and any geospatial computation task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Minimal compatibility wrapper for vibe Dialectic Mode (multi-perspective design analysis).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
YOLO mode. Spawns 4 parallel C-suite agents (CEO, CTO, CFO, COO). Each analyzes the business from their perspective using ALL available data. Produces unfiltered Hard Truths report. After user types YOLO, autonomously runs the business for a day using /loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convene an AI executive board of directors (CEO, CFO, COO, CLO, CISO sub-agent personas) to vet a business idea, product concept, new service offering, M&A target, or operational initiative — and deliver an integrated board memo with a Go/No-Go recommendation. Use this skill whenever the user wants an idea vetted, stress-tested, or reviewed from multiple executive perspectives; asks to "present this to the board," "run this by the boardroom," "vet this idea," "poke holes in this plan," or "prep me for a board meeting"; or shares a business plan, pitch, proposal, or initiative document and asks for structured executive feedback. Also trigger when the user asks for a Go/No-Go decision, risk review across finance/legal/security/operations, or preparation for presenting an initiative to real leadership.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze a startup from three perspectives — VC investor, job applicant, and CEO/founder — covering market, traction, unit economics, team, defensibility, runway, equity value, culture, and competitive position, with a verdict for each. Use this skill whenever the user wants to evaluate a startup or private tech company: due diligence, whether to invest in it or join it, weighing a startup job offer, company health, outlook, or competitive position, or open-ended asks such as "what do you think of [company]" or "research [company] for me".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Spatial depth design with isometric views, vanishing points, and layered elements that guide attention through 3D-like realism.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。