「rubric」の検索結果

Universal quality bar and final audit rubric for any agent system prompt. Activate this whenever you are unsure which archetype skill applies, or as a final review pass before writing the system prompt. It defines the required run contract, completion criteria, fallback paths, response format, and anti-patterns every produced agent prompt must satisfy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "design interview processes", "create hiring pipelines", "calibrate interview loops", "generate interview questions", "design competency matrices", "analyze interviewer bias", "create scoring rubrics", "build question banks", or "optimize hiring systems". Use for designing role-specific interview loops, competency assessments, and hiring calibration systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user wants to build, launch, grade, or schedule a Claude Managed Agent (CMA) in their own Anthropic account — "build me an agent", "launch this as a managed agent", "run this on a schedule", "grade my agent against a rubric", "set up a nightly worker". Reads the per-session goal (./my-agent/goal.json), routes deterministically to one of five phase sub-skills (interview → stage-launch → grade-iterate → run-without-you → wrap-up) via goal_router.py, and compiles the goal+phase into an execution shape (single-pass workflow / bounded grade→iterate loop / recurring cron deployment loop) via loop_compiler.py. Forks context so heavy intake (build sheets, payloads, eval cases) stays out of the parent thread. All launches are emitted as BYOK curl the user runs with their own key; no tool makes API calls. Inspired by anthropics/launch-your-agent (Apache-2.0). Distinct from engineering/agent-harness (generic domain loop) and engineering/write-a-skill (authors Claude Code skills, not CMAs).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate skill files for structural compliance and behavioral correctness. Four modes: static linter, spec, category rubric, audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scores an inbound application against the role's written rubric with supporting quotes as evidence, writes a structured screen back to {{applications_source}}, and proposes interview slots on {{hiring_manager_calendar}} for strong matches. Never advances or rejects a candidate — every decision stays with the hiring manager.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to read, write, and curate project memory in `memory/` — the project brain. Load this skill whenever you (or the harness-reflector agent) need to add, update, or reorganize what this project knows about itself. Defines the rubric for what belongs in memory, the file structure, and the change-request flow for landing memory edits on `main`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assertion-first AI eval framework aligned to Anthropic's 'Demystifying evals for AI agents' — typed deterministic asserts + a forced-structured LLM judge over an input→assert case schema, pass^k/pass@k, capability vs regression suites, subscription-billed. USE WHEN eval, evaluate, benchmark, regression test, assertion, assert, llm-rubric, judge, pass@k, pass^k, grade output, compare prompts/models, test agent. NOT FOR scientific-method framing (use Science), property/mutation testing of code (use Hardening), or live UI verification (use Interceptor).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used for advanced LLM evaluation: LLM-as-judge systems, direct scoring, pairwise comparison, rubric calibration, evaluator bias mitigation, confidence scoring, and automated quality assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when building agent evaluation systems: deterministic checks, regression suites, multi-dimensional rubrics, quality gates, production monitoring, baseline comparison, and outcome measurement for agent pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes, refactors, and evaluates prompts for LLMs — generating optimized prompt templates, structured output schemas, evaluation rubrics, and test suites. Use when designing prompts for new LLM applications, refactoring existing prompts for better accuracy or token efficiency, implementing chain-of-thought or few-shot learning, creating system prompts with personas and guardrails, building JSON/function-calling schemas, or developing prompt evaluation frameworks to measure and improve model performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

多视角对抗式审查。full/lean 模式在已部署 reviewer agents 时并行 spawn；缺失/异常 agents 或 spawn 失败时自动降级 solo，参考文件不可读时使用内置 rubric fallback。触发方式：/story-review、/审查、「审查一下」「帮我审一下」。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic code maturity assessment using Trail of Bits' 9-category framework. Analyzes codebase for arithmetic safety, auditing practices, access controls, complexity, decentralization, documentation, MEV risks, low-level code, and testing, then produces a scorecard with evidence-based ratings and a priority-ordered roadmap. Use when assessing or scoring the maturity of a smart contract or blockchain codebase, producing a maturity scorecard or evaluation, or judging how mature, well-tested, or well-documented such a project is against a rubric.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design custom metric packs for plugin-eval so teams can add local evaluation rubrics that emit schema-compatible checks and metrics. Use when the user wants their own evaluation criteria or visualizations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Jev to select among available tools, skills or agents, or evaluate outputs against explicit rubrics. Use when the user requests Jev or a bounded decision would help; not for open-ended writing or research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Light carved wood in a dark room in three.js, with procedural grain and pores, one warm key through a window, soft shadows that touch, light shafts, background rays and dust, then score the render out of 10 on an anchored rubric with a runnable headless scorecard and iterate until each item reaches the target. Use for oiled timber, kumiko, joinery and workshop scenes; wood that reads flat, plastic or washed out; volumetrics that lift the blacks; "score this out of 10"; or "get the lighting to 8".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Internet Court adapter for GenLayer Intelligent Contract supervision. Use to specify agent-performance rubrics, evidence schemas, decision outputs, and ERC-7710 connector expectations, while delegating actual GenLayer contract writing, linting, testing, deployment, and CLI interaction to the official GenLayer skills at https://skills.genlayer.com/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate bounded independent candidates, score them against a frozen rubric, and verify the selected result with a proof log.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scaffolds eval.yaml evaluation specs for skills, custom agents, and redistributable gh-aw workflow packages in the dotnet/skills repository. Use when creating skill or workflow-package tests, writing evaluation stimuli, defining graders and rubrics, sizing an eval for statistical power, or setting up test fixture files. Handles the Vally eval.yaml schema, fixture organization, and overfitting avoidance. Do not use for running or debugging existing evals (use improve-skill-quality) nor for skills authoring (use create-skill).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive OSINT methodology for external red-team operations and authorized attack-surface assessments. Covers the 5-stage recon pipeline (seed discovery, asset expansion, enrichment, exposure analysis, reporting), asset-graph discipline with 29 asset types, severity rubric (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW/INFO), confidence upgrade workflows, time budgeting, asset-level triage rules, scale-based tactics, identity-fabric mapping (Entra/Okta/ADFS/Google/SAML/M365 Teams+SharePoint+OAuth), API and auth-map methodology, JavaScript deep analysis, mobile attack surface, cloud attack surface, breach×identity correlation, detectability tagging, detection-aware probing (back-off, persona rotation), read-only validator discipline, WAF/CDN bypass + origin discovery, vulnerability prioritization (CVE/EPSS/KEV), phishing infrastructure planning + pretext development, bug bounty submission templates, client deliverable templates with risk translation, threat-actor investigation (incl. RU/CN pivots), cryptocurrency tracing, image/video forensics, chronolocation. Use when planning or executing reconnaissance against authorized targets, mapping an organization's external attack surface, investigating a person/entity, tracing crypto flows, geolocating media, or performing attribution work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate a topic against preserved sources and write a draft-status research article under `research/` in a Knowledge Base project (the `knowledge-base` starter pack). Read when asked to research a topic, compare options, synthesize sources, gather evidence, or extend an existing research doc. Carries the full procedure: scan existing coverage, agree a research rubric, capture every source verbatim before analyzing, write the article incrementally so a crash never loses work, cite every claim, and link it back into the graph. Does not promote findings to canonical knowledge — that is the sibling `consolidate-notes` skill, after a decision lands.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Authoring and running behavioral evals for a shopping or merchant agent, covering the case shape, authoring rules, code graders and judges, the run pattern, and poisoned fixtures. Load when writing eval cases or rubrics or deciding how a suite runs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

维护者专用的短剧 know-how 学习、验证与生命周期治理。仅在维护者明确要求从其当前会话提供的授权只读文本源学习完整短剧项目链，并把私有观察逐步转成去标识、去复刻、经盲测与独立审查的公共 reference、rubric 或 synthetic fixture 候选时使用；不用于普通创作、公开运行时取数、媒体生成或粗略数据分析。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

FAIR-aligned exposure quantification: turns a pile of recon findings into a defensible 0-100 + A-F org risk score (Likelihood x Impact, three ownership-aware factors: exposure/threat/impact), an ownership + proof demotion cap so unproven or weakly-owned findings can't inflate the number, a $-denominated FAIR loss-magnitude estimate (IBM/Ponemon per-record cost bands, cross-source record dedup, threat-factor annualization), attack-path amplification (curated red-team chain catalog + generic graph-walk engine, with a kill-chain vs shared-fate honesty gate), and a board-ready one-pager deliverable (hero $ + letter grade + top-3 findings + top attack path + the ask). Extends osint-methodology's severity rubric and client deliverable templates with quantification. Passive analysis only -- operates on findings already collected, no target traffic, no API keys. Use when asked to score risk, quantify exposure, estimate breach cost, build a board report, translate technical findings to dollars, or explain why a grade or dollar figure came out the way it did.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive OSINT methodology for external red-team operations and authorized attack-surface assessments. Covers the 6-stage recon pipeline (seed → asset expansion → enrichment → exposure analysis → convergence → operator-armed active validation) with connector-resilience and stage-vs-gating discipline, asset-graph discipline, severity rubric, confidence upgrade workflows, time budgeting, identity-fabric mapping, breach×identity correlation with per-person identity dossiers, detectability tagging, detection-aware probing, WAF/CDN bypass, vulnerability prioritization, phishing infrastructure planning, bug bounty submission, and client deliverable templates. Use when planning or executing reconnaissance against authorized targets, mapping an organization's external attack surface, investigating a person/entity, or producing client deliverables.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。