「sanity」の検索結果

Visualises RNA-modification data with transcript-feature metagene plots (Guitar GuitarPlot; MetaPlotR; deepTools computeMatrix scale-regions), peak-centred heatmaps (ComplexHeatmap; deepTools plotHeatmap), IP-vs-input paired browser tracks (log2 IP/input bigWig via deepTools bamCompare; pyGenomeTracks; Gviz; IGV/UCSC track hubs), DRACH sequence-logo plots (ggseqlogo; MEME), feature-distribution stacked bars, and volcano/MA plots for differential modification. Establishes stop-codon enrichment in the metagene plot as the biological QC anchor for any MeRIP dataset (Dominissini 2012; Meyer 2012). Use when producing the canonical metagene plot with stop-codon enrichment as a QC anchor, building paired IP/input genome-browser tracks at single-locus resolution, plotting peak-centred heatmaps clustered by condition, summarising peak distribution across transcript features, generating DRACH motif logos as sanity checks, rendering volcano plots of differential m6A, or reproducing the stop-codon enrichment plot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Derive an execution roadmap from a project's vision/spec docs by first principles, then diff that fresh derivation against the existing roadmap to prove the task ORDER is correct. Use this whenever the user wants to review, validate, re-derive, or sanity-check an execution roadmap or delivery plan; asks whether the tasks/epics are "in the right order"; suspects a task is scheduled before its prerequisite (a producer-after-consumer / dependency-inversion error like "OpenAPI after the web client that consumes it", OR a cross-cutting inherited default like observability/auth/tenancy scheduled after the feature work that inherits it — a seam-after-consumer error); wants to find missing tasks, circular dependencies, or over-fragmented epics; or wants to compact a plan to raise velocity. Also trigger on "review the roadmap", "re-derive the plan from the spec", "is this the right build order", "check the dependency graph of our epics", "which task should come first". It reads the vision + spec corpus, decomposes actors → use-cases → modules → epics → typed tasks, identifies cross-cutting inherited-default seams, builds a real dependency graph with hard + soft (seam) edges (deterministic helper), breaks cycles, topologically orders, compacts, and emits a derived roadmap PLUS a delta report against the current one — it never blindly overwrites a hand-crafted roadmap.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for Fermi estimation, or when a rough number is needed fast: "roughly how many...", "ballpark the cost", "estimate capacity or market size", "is this even feasible?". Decomposes, uses ranges and sanity-checks. Skip when exact data is available or a precise calculation is wanted.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for critical thinking, or when the user wants a claim, plan or decision checked for weak spots: "is this right?", "what am I missing?", "poke holes", "sanity check", "devil's advocate", "red team this". Skip for execution-only tasks and wording edits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a throwaway prototype to flush out a design before committing to it. Routes between two branches — a runnable terminal app for state/business-logic questions, or several radically different UI variations toggleable from one route. Use when the user wants to prototype, sanity-check a data model or state machine, mock up a UI, explore design options, or says "prototype this", "let me play with it", "try a few designs".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review local git changes before opening a PR or merging. First review all local tracked and untracked files; if none exist, review the current branch against a requested base branch or the Git Town parent branch. Use zero to three review subagents only when risk, diff size, language specificity, or uncertainty justifies the token cost, then report high-confidence bugs, regressions, risky assumptions, and missing tests. Use when the user asks for code review, local review, branch sanity check, pre-PR review, or review of work-in-progress changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The persona of Da Ai Xian Zun (大爱仙尊) - Gu Yue Fang Yuan from the novel Reverend Insanity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

从对标账号导入 script + 数据 → 拆 pattern + 派生 base rubric 信号 → 写到 benchmark.md / script_patterns.md / rubric_notes.md。**这是工具最早期信号的来源**——cold-start 用户没自己历史时全靠对标，发过历史的用户也建议至少 1 个对标做 sanity check。触发词："学这个账号"/"拆这几个对标视频"/"learn from"/"导入对标账号"/"找对标"。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Before creating a GitHub issue or epic, search for an existing related one and force a reuse / replace / new decision — so the issue-first flow can't silently mint a duplicate. The create-time half of the dedup gate (the pickup-time half is /issue-sanity-check). Use whenever you're about to open an issue/epic, or run /issue-dedup. Backed by a hard PreToolUse hook on issue_write create.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Throwaway design probe for logic, state models, UI variations, and affordances before production work. Use when the user wants to prototype, sanity-check a model, make something playable, compare UI directions, or explore a design before ln-spec/ln-plan/ln-scope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Teststrategie-Berater für Softwareprojekte — wählt die richtigen Teststufen (Unit/Integration/System/Abnahme), Testarten (funktional, nicht-funktional, änderungsbezogen) und Testentwurfsverfahren (Äquivalenzklassen, Grenzwerte, Entscheidungstabellen, explorativ) für die jeweilige Situation und SDLC-/CI-Phase, inkl. Testpyramide, CI/CD-Gates, Shift-Left und Best Practices. Nutze diesen Skill IMMER, wenn Tests geschrieben, geplant, priorisiert oder bewertet werden sollen — bei "schreibe Tests", "Teststrategie", "Testplan", "Testkonzept", "was/wie soll ich testen", "welche Tests fehlen", "Testabdeckung verbessern", "QA aufsetzen", Fragen zu Regression/Smoke/Sanity/Last/Stress/Security-Tests oder beim Einrichten einer Test-Pipeline — auch wenn "Test" nur beiläufig fällt. Abgrenzung — für die TDD-Schleife selbst superpowers:test-driven-development, für Bug-Diagnose bugfix-protocol, für systematische Bug-Suche bugsweep nutzen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reads a purchase order extract (spreadsheet, CSV or pasted table) and returns a DRAFT question sheet for the buyer: possible split orders, round amounts, amounts just under an approval threshold, first-seen or near-duplicate vendors, duplicate orders and missing or self approvals, each a neutral question naming the PO numbers, never a finding. Use when the user asks to "review these purchase orders", "screen the PO log", "spot anomalies in this spend extract", "sanity-check the PO register" or "prepare buyer questions before the audit". Do not use for an expense claim or travel request checked against policy, use expense-policy-precheck instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "set up conversion values so tROAS optimizes profit not orders", "map margin onto my purchase value", "build value rules for lead / phone / signup conversions", or "stop bidding to revenue when I care about profit"; defines and QAs the conversion VALUE model — per-conversion values, margin/net-value adjustment, static-vs-dynamic value rules, proxy values for non-revenue actions, and a value-vs-count sanity check — as a value-model spec plus a pre-launch value QA sheet. Not for whether the tag fires or UTMs are clean — use conversion-signal-qa; not for cross-platform double-count de-dup — use attribution-reconciler; not for scoring R1/R2 — that is a scored veto in ad-account-auditor. 付费广告转化价值建模/利润出价/价值规则QA

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-driven Flutter E2E testing via VM Service CLI. Control running Flutter apps in debug mode for smoke tests, regression checks, exploratory testing, and UI automation. Trigger when user mentions E2E testing, UI automation, smoke tests, integration testing, test automation, controlling Flutter apps, VM Service interaction, debugging UI flows, automated regression testing, CI sanity checks, or testing native dialogs/permissions/WebViews. Supports stateful named instances or stateless direct URI connections. Ideal for rapid test feedback, AI agent workflows, element discovery, screenshot capture, log collection, and scriptable UI interactions (tap, scroll, enterText). Use for troubleshooting flaky tests, automating repetitive manual tests, verifying app behavior after merges, or setting up automated QA pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question. Use when the user wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, or explore what a UI should look like.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a throwaway prototype to answer a design question, as UI variations or a state-model walkthrough. Use when the user types /prototype, wants to sanity-check whether a state model or logic feels right, wants to explore what a UI should look like, or as the prototype step of the web design flow with brainstorm or grill before the final plan goes to plan-canvas (annotate the running prototype with the plan-canvas annotation tool).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

self-review step of mspec workflow — sanity-check all artifacts via subagent

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates an end-to-end MeRIP-seq / m6A-seq analysis from raw FASTQ to differential m6A peak calls and metagene plots, chaining fastp adapter trimming, STAR splice-aware alignment (NO deduplication for non-UMI MeRIP), deepTools replicate-concordance + IP-enrichment QC, PreSeq saturation curves, exomePeak2 (transcript-aware Poisson GLM) peak calling, optional MACS3 broad-peak cross-check, DRACH motif confirmation as a sanity check (NOT a per-peak filter), exomePeak2 differential calling via the four-BAM-vector interface (bam_ip + bam_input control; bam_treated_ip + bam_treated_input treatment), ChIPseeker annotation, and the canonical Guitar metagene with stop-codon enrichment as the biological QC anchor. Use when running a complete MeRIP analysis from raw reads, when chaining the constituent epitranscriptomics skills (merip-preprocessing -> m6a-peak-calling -> m6a-differential -> modification-visualization), or when wrapping the pipeline in Snakemake / Nextflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses the quality and completeness of a genome annotation with BUSCO (conserved single-copy ortholog recovery), OMArk (proteome completeness, consistency, and contamination), CheckM2 (prokaryotic completeness/contamination), and a gene-set sanity panel (gene count, mono-exonic fraction, protein-length distribution, mRNA:gene ratio, coding density). Covers the assembly-BUSCO-vs-proteome-BUSCO diagnostic, what BUSCO-Duplicated really means, why gene count is a vanity metric, and the QC of transferred annotations. Use when judging whether an annotation is good enough to publish or submit, diagnosing a suspect annotation, or comparing annotation completeness across pipelines.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Visualises RNA-modification data with transcript-feature metagene plots (Guitar GuitarPlot with 5'UTR / CDS / 3'UTR scaling; MetaPlotR; deepTools `computeMatrix scale-regions`), peak-centred heatmaps (ComplexHeatmap; deepTools plotHeatmap), IP-vs-input paired browser tracks (bigWig of log2 IP/input via deepTools `bamCompare`; ggcoverage; pyGenomeTracks; Gviz; IGV / UCSC track hubs), DRACH sequence-logo plots (ggseqlogo; MEME), 5'UTR / CDS / 3'UTR stacked-bar feature-distribution summaries, and volcano / MA plots for differential modification. Establishes stop-codon enrichment in the metagene plot as the biological QC anchor for any MeRIP dataset (Dominissini 2012 *Nature* 485:201; Meyer 2012 *Cell* 149:1635 — concurrent founding papers from different labs both showed this independently). Use when producing the canonical metagene plot with stop-codon enrichment as a QC anchor, building paired IP/input genome-browser tracks at single-locus resolution, plotting peak-centred heatmaps clustered by condition, summarising peak distribution across transcript features for figure 1, generating DRACH motif logos as sanity checks on the peak set, rendering volcano plots of differential m6A, or reproducing the Dominissini 2012 / Meyer 2012 stop-codon enrichment plot.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a throwaway prototype to flesh out a design before committing to it. Routes between two branches — a runnable terminal app for state/business-logic questions, or several radically different UI variations toggleable from one route. Use when the user wants to prototype, sanity-check a data model or state machine, mock up a UI, explore design options, or says "prototype this", "let me play with it", "try a few designs".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hard readiness gate before implementation begins — cross-checks the constitution, feature spec, plan, and tasks for consistency, traceability, and unresolved ambiguity. Returns PASS or FAIL with specific findings. Load when the spec-driven-development orchestrator routes /analyze, when the user asks to cross-check spec vs plan, audit traceability, verify spec readiness, gate-check before implementation, or says "is this spec implementation-ready", "trace requirements to tasks", "/analyze", "spec sanity check", "spec readiness gate", "spec consistency check". Output: docs/reviews/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>-spec-crosscheck.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。