「sop」の検索結果

Decision protocol for managing the context/session state of an AI coding tool: when to /clear, when to keep context, and how to detect "context bleed" — the failure mode where stale conversation history biases the model against the current task. Surfaces a discipline that Aider (/clear), Claude Code (/clear), CrewAI (memory=False, re-instantiate), and LangGraph (new thread_id, subgraph isolation) all encode separately but none name as a skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decomposed, multi-criteria metric design for LLM pipelines. The metric IS the model — change the metric and the optimizer changes behavior. Decompose by default; bool during compile, float during eval; calibrate against human; mitigate judge bias. Search keywords: LLM-as-judge, llm as judge, eval metric, evaluation score, scoring function, rubric, RAGAS, G-Eval, judge bias, verbosity bias, how to evaluate LLM output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coder-agent working-file budget discipline: keep the editable working set (files you /add into writable context) under ~25k tokens, separate "read" from "edit", delegate breadth to a read-only repo-map, and drop files once edited. Use when an LLM coder-agent edits multiple files, when the working set must stay focused, or when the model starts editing the wrong file / missing targets because too much context dilutes attention. Search keywords: context window full, agent edits wrong file, too much context, /add /drop files, working file budget, context dilution, lost in the middle.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adds and tunes a reranker stage for RAG using the retrieve-wide, rerank-narrow pattern. Use when relevant documents appear in the initial top-N but are buried by noise, top-1 precision or MRR is low despite adequate recall, or too many marginal chunks consume context. Covers cross-encoder, API, and local rerankers; N-to-k selection; and latency/cost tradeoffs. Do not use when retrieval recall itself is failing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decide where to enforce structured LM output (constrain at decode time with Outlines vs validate-and-retry with Instructor vs grammar with Guidance) and which failure stance to take (Assert/hard-fail vs Suggest/soft-retry). Use when an LM's output is parsed or typed by downstream code and you must pick one enforcement library plus its failure handling, when malformed output is burning tokens on retries, or when choosing between decode-time vs validation-time constraints for local vs API models.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-engine decision rubric for self-hosting or recommending an LLM serving stack. Picks among vLLM, SGLang, TensorRT-LLM, TGI, llama.cpp, Ollama, and MLX as a function of (hardware × workload × constraint), not "which is fastest". Activates whenever a coder-agent must choose, defend, or migrate a serving runtime.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Tool skill for declaring reducers on LangGraph state keys so parallel writes merge instead of crashing. Activates whenever a coder agent designs a StateGraph with parallel branches, fan-out via Send, multi-agent topologies, or whenever a run raises `InvalidUpdateError: At key '<k>': Can receive only one value per step`. Encodes the rule "every state key is single-writer or has a reducer — nothing in between."

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision protocol for building, debugging, and operating LangGraph-based agent systems. Activates when a coder agent is asked to design a stateful LLM workflow, add human-in-the-loop, choose a multi-agent pattern (supervisor / swarm / hierarchical), pick a checkpoint backend, or migrate a fragile chain into a durable graph. LangGraph is positioned by its maintainers as a "low-level orchestration framework for building, managing, and deploying long-running, stateful agents" — this skill encodes the *when* and *why*, not the API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Universal discipline for any LM-driven loop — agent retries, plan-act-observe, multi-agent handoffs, optimiser passes, test-fix cycles. Encodes the one rule every framework documents quietly and every team relearns expensively: the LM in the loop is NEVER a reliable terminator. Termination must be provided by an explicit counter + exit predicate + stagnation signal + escalation path that live OUTSIDE the LM's control. This is a tool- level, framework-agnostic skill. It maps onto LangGraph (recursion_limit + state counter + interrupt), CrewAI (max_iter + max_rpm + human_input), Claude / OpenAI SDKs (max_iterations + tool_use_budget), DSPy (declared evaluation budget), Aider (REPL + explicit retry cap), and AutoGen (max_consecutive_auto_reply). Search keywords: infinite loop, recursion limit, recursion_limit, GraphRecursionError, max iterations, max_iter, agent stuck, agent won't stop, runaway agent, ReAct loop not terminating, agent repeating itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision protocol for wiring a verify-then-fix loop around a code-editing LLM agent. The agent edits → runs lint/test → reads the output → fixes → re-runs, bounded by an iteration cap and an escalation rule. Activates whenever a coder agent has a verifiable success criterion (exit code, type-checker output, failing assertion) and the user wants the agent to converge to "green" on its own. Framework-agnostic — wraps Aider's `--auto-lint`/`--auto-test`, an OpenHands SWE-Bench loop, a manual LangGraph cycle, or Claude Code's bash tool just the same.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and govern a 50-200 example domain-specific held-out benchmark sampled from real traffic. Distinct from public benchmarks (MMLU/HumanEval/GSM8K via lm-evaluation-harness) which measure GENERAL capability. Only a held-out domain set predicts whether THIS system works on YOUR data. Collect real examples, label, hold out (never train/prompt on it), size 50-200, version it, refresh on drift.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision protocol for the map-reduce / dynamic fan-out pattern in LM pipelines — "given list L, run f(item) for each item in parallel, then combine". Activates when the coder agent is about to process N items with N LM calls (per-doc summarize, per-query retrieve, per-candidate rank, parallel tool fan-out). Encodes the *when*, *how many at once*, *what to do when one fails*, and *how to reduce* — not the API of any single framework. Cross-framework: LangGraph `Send`, CrewAI parallel tasks / Flow, `asyncio.gather`, `ThreadPoolExecutor`, LlamaIndex batch retrieval.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project-kickoff rubric for the self-host vs managed-cloud decision — when is running your own inference engine / LLM platform worth the ops cost vs paying per-token for a managed API? Decide on two axes — VOLUME (a cost-crossover slider) and COMPLIANCE (a hard gate). Use at kickoff when choosing where to run inference, or when cost / data-residency pressure forces a re-evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-framework enhancement overlay for choosing a multi-agent topology BEFORE writing any agent. A binary-question rubric — is single-agent + tools enough? do agents need to know about each other? does the output need one voice? — maps the answer to single-agent / supervisor / swarm / sequential / hierarchical. Activates when a coder agent is tempted to "split the work into roles" or reaches for a multi-agent framework. Encodes the *selection rubric* that the per-framework skills assume but never surface. Search keywords: when to use multi-agent, single vs multi agent, do I need multiple agents, supervisor vs swarm, multi-agent vs single agent, agent team design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision protocol for making side-effectful agent tools idempotent — so when an LLM tool call is retried (timeout, framework resume, user re-run, model duplicate emit), the second call is a no-op instead of a double-send. The load-bearing premise: the LM cannot promise it'll call exactly once; the tool must promise the second call is safe. Framework-agnostic — applies to LangGraph node bodies that re-run on resume, MCP tools, OpenAI tool-calling retries, CrewAI delegated tool invocations, and direct HTTP wrappers. Search keywords: duplicate email sent, charged twice, exactly-once, idempotency key, tool called twice, retry side effect, double-send, at-least-once delivery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pick an LM output format per (task x consumer x model) rather than by reflex: different formats carry different cognitive load (e.g. code-in-JSON makes the same model write worse code than plain-text+diff, while asking for prose when you need a typed object fails the other way). Use when designing or debugging an LM's output schema, choosing between plain text / diff / JSON / tool-call / grammar-constrained output, or when a model's quality drops after wrapping its output in a structured format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs multiscale chunking for RAG by embedding small units for retrieval precision and returning larger context for synthesis. Use when fixed-size chunks either lose surrounding context or dilute relevance in long documents, manuals, filings, or codebases. Covers sentence-window and parent-child or auto-merging strategies, base chunk sizing, and evaluation. Do not use when a single chunk scale already meets retrieval and generation needs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A 5-minute gate the coder runs at project kickoff (and again whenever the repo shape changes). Classifies the workspace into Greenfield / Brownfield-large / Mid-size-familiar / Library-SDK, then maps the state to an agent strategy (autonomy, context primitive, tool choice). Use BEFORE picking Cursor vs Claude Code vs Aider, BEFORE turning on repo-map, BEFORE writing the first prompt. Skip only if the same repo was gated within the last day and nothing changed. Search keywords: greenfield vs brownfield, new project vs existing codebase, project setup strategy, legacy codebase agent, where to start a coding agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Routes heterogeneous queries to the appropriate index, tool, or answering engine before retrieval. Use when one endpoint serves multiple handlers, such as summary, vector retrieval, text-to-SQL, or tools, and query types require different paths. Covers LLM, semantic, and rule-based routers, confidence thresholds, fallbacks, and framework mappings. Do not use when one handler serves all queries or branching is fixed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Screens biomedical / life-science papers for signs of data fabrication, image manipulation, and statistical anomalies, using the detection techniques distilled from the field's canonical exposure platforms (PubPeer, Data Colada, Science Integrity Digest, For Better Science) and tools (ImageTwin/Proofig, statcheck, GRIM/GRIMMER, Problematic Paper Screener, Seek & Blastn). Use when asked to check a paper/figure for image duplication, blot splicing, impossible statistics, paper-mill or tortured-phrase signals, research integrity, or "is this data faked"; or when a user shares a figure, Western blot, supplementary dataset, or DOI and asks whether it looks manipulated. Reports observable anomalies as questions for clarification — it never accuses anyone of fraud.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision rubric for when an LM agent should write-and-run code (Program-of-Thought / code interpreter) versus reason in natural language: classify each step as deterministic- computable (emit + execute code, feed the result back) vs judgment (stay in prose). Use when designing or debugging an agent step that does arithmetic/parsing/data transforms, when prose reasoning hallucinates a computation (under-coding), or when a sandbox round- trip is wasted on a judgment task (over-coding). Search keywords: code interpreter, agent does math wrong, calculator hallucination, when to run code vs reason, program of thought, PoT, tool vs reasoning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The compile-readiness gate for prompt auto-optimization. Decide whether you have earned the right to run an optimizer (DSPy MIPROv2 / GEPA / BootstrapFewShot) before spending compute. Two preconditions only — a real metric, and enough examples for the optimizer you picked. Garbage metric in, garbage prompt out. Pick the optimizer by data scale; GEPA inverts the scale assumption (~10 examples + textual feedback).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate luxury and premium aesthetic video prompts for Seedance 2.0 on Higgsfield. Use for luxury brand content, premium product showcases, high-end lifestyle, minimalist aesthetic, elegant brand videos, or any content requiring sophisticated visual treatment. Triggers on luxury, premium, high-end, elegant, minimalist, sophisticated, exclusive, refined, designer, couture, bespoke.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a process walkthrough -- meeting transcript, screen-recording transcript, rough notes, or a folder of scattered how-to docs -- into a clean standard operating procedure: numbered steps, roles, decision points, exceptions, and a consistent template across your whole SOP library.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。