Read git log since initial scaffold + last 3 progress notes, draft feature additions to a SEPARATE suggestions file so feature_list.json stays immutable
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
188 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Read git log since initial scaffold + last 3 progress notes, draft feature additions to a SEPARATE suggestions file so feature_list.json stays immutable
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full brand naming workflow for founders, agencies, and businesses. Use this skill whenever the user says "help me name this brand", "brand naming", "I need a name for", "name ideas for", "what should I call my brand/company/product", "naming a startup", "brand name suggestions", "help with naming", or shares a brand brief and asks for name options. Also triggers when the user shares existing name options and asks for feedback, evaluation, ranking, or scoring of those names. Auto-detects whether to run the full generation workflow or the evaluation workflow based on what the user provides. Always use this skill for any brand or product naming task — even if the user just casually mentions needing a name.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Process and implement code review feedback systematically. Use when user provides reviewer comments, PR feedback, code review notes, or asks to implement suggestions from reviews.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks what GSD commands exist or how to use GSD. Outputs the complete GSD command reference verbatim, with no project analysis, status, or next-step suggestions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Four-layer citation verification for academic papers. Scans LaTeX/BibTeX files, verifies every citation via WebSearch and Google Scholar, generates verification report with fix suggestions. Triggers on "verify citations", "check references", "citation verification", "prevent fake citations", "引用验证".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Code simplification suggestions — clarity, unnecessary complexity, redundant abstractions. Advisory only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects duplicate boilerplate, copy-paste tests, and structural maintainability issues across .NET test suites. Use when the user asks to reduce repetition, consolidate similar test methods, convert copy-paste tests to data-driven parameterized tests, suggest a better test structure, or identify refactoring opportunities. Identifies repeated construction, assertion patterns, copy-paste methods convertible to DataRow/Theory/TestCase, redundant setup/teardown, and shared infrastructure. Produces an analysis report with concrete before/after suggestions. Works with MSTest, xUnit, NUnit, and TUnit. DO NOT USE FOR: writing new tests (use writing-mstest-tests), reviewing test quality or anti-patterns (use test-anti-patterns), or deep mock auditing (use exp-mock-usage-analysis).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verifies review feedback with technical rigor, not blind agreement. Use when receiving review before implementing suggestions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interpret third-party feedback by running parallel internal and peer interpretations to surface intent, correctness concerns, and ambiguities. Use when the user asks to "interpret feedback", "interpret comments", "what does this feedback mean", "clarify reviewer intent", "understand this review", or "interpret these suggestions".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Critically assess external feedback (code reviews, AI reviewers, PR comments) and decide which suggestions to apply using adversarial verification. Use when the user asks to "evaluate findings", "assess review comments", "triage review feedback", "evaluate review output", or "filter false positives".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply findings by making the suggested code changes. Applies accepted verdicts, escalates ambiguous findings to the user, and offers to note genuine improvements for later. Use when the user asks to "apply findings", "apply fixes", "apply suggestions", "apply accepted findings", "fix the findings", or "apply the review results".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Keeps a change scoped to what was asked. Flags extra features, refactors, and 'while we are here' edits, and moves them to a suggestions list instead of the diff. Use when a request is small and the agent is about to expand it, when a PRD grows beyond its problem statement, or when the user says 'just do what I asked'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help authors learn from exemplary ICLR, ICML, and NeurIPS papers through source-linked manuscript comparisons, concrete writing and experiment suggestions, and guided reflection. Use for research storytelling, contribution framing, paper comparison, figure planning, or research retrospectives. Not an acceptance predictor or a routine grammar/citation formatter.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Drive a PR to an approved code review by looping OCR's multi-agent review and address steps. Runs /ocr:review then /ocr:address repeatedly until the review verdict is APPROVE, then one final /ocr:address for leftover suggestions, posting every review and every address round to the GitHub PR as comments. Use when the user asks to 'review and address in a loop', 'iterate review until approved', 'auto review-and-fix this PR', 'loop /ocr:review and /ocr:address', or to take a changeset all the way to a clean APPROVE with the default reviewer team. Wraps the /ocr:review (.ocr/commands/review.md) and /ocr:address (.ocr/commands/address.md) skills; needs a feature branch with an open GitHub PR and the gh CLI for posting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when receiving critical feedback on an analysis or manuscript, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or methodologically questionable - requires verification, not performative agreement or blind changes
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert long text into Slack-optimized format with emojis, bullets, code blocks, and threading suggestions
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create shot lists for highlight videos. Timestamp key plays, music cue suggestions, pacing. Platform-specific cuts for TikTok, YouTube.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reads a contract and generates redline suggestions with replacement language. Identifies unfavorable terms, missing protections, ambiguous language, liability exposure, IP risks, termination traps, and auto-renewal gotchas. Produces a contract-review.md with clause-by-clause analysis, risk ratings, tracked changes format, and negotiation talking points. Use when the user wants redline markup, contract markup, or suggested contract edits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Address PR reviewer feedback by evaluating comments, proposing fixes, and executing after user approval. Use when the user wants to handle review comments on an existing PR, address PR feedback, fix PR comments, respond to reviewer suggestions, or process code review feedback. Triggers on "address PR feedback", "handle review comments", "fix PR comments", "respond to PR review", "process reviewer feedback", or when given a PR number/URL with intent to address its comments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate thumbnail concepts and ideas for YouTube, TikTok, and other video platforms. Creates detailed visual briefs with composition, text, colors, and emotion suggestions. Use when planning thumbnails, improving CTR, or briefing designers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structure compelling presentations with clear narratives and visual suggestions
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive portfolio analysis using Alpaca MCP Server integration to fetch holdings and positions, then analyze asset allocation, risk metrics, individual stock positions, diversification, and generate rebalancing recommendations. Use when user requests portfolio review, position analysis, risk assessment, performance evaluation, or rebalancing suggestions for their brokerage account.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。