「survey」の検索結果

Evaluate survey data pipelines and research methodology. Analyzes response bias detection (speeders, straight-liners, bots), statistical significance testing (t-test, chi-square, ANOVA with Bonferroni correction), sentiment and theme extraction from open-ended responses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain SESSION-STATE.md, the durable within-session memory that survives context compaction. Use when a constraint, settled decision, existing-infrastructure (survey) finding, or open thread must persist across a long session so it is not re-derived or re-litigated. Triggers on /state, "remember this for the session", "record this constraint/decision", or after surveying what already exists. For cross-session/personal memory use .claude/memory/ on Claude or native memories on Codex; for repo-derivable facts, do not record at all.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-powered conversion rate optimization: landing page audits, CRO scoring, survey segmentation, and lead magnet generation. Use when asked to audit a landing page, run a CRO analysis, segment survey responses, or generate lead magnets. For content quality scoring see content-ops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose what kind of knowledge to transfer between teacher and student models: response, feature, or relational, and decide among offline, online, self, or cross-modal distillation schemes. Best for distillation strategy selection, capacity-gap diagnosis, and transfer planning. Activate on "knowledge distillation", "teacher-student", "soft labels", "feature distillation", "online distillation", or "cross-modal transfer". NOT for generic compression checklists or unrelated training work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prices research, tests, surveys, dashboards and experiments before running them, by computing how much the result would raise expected utility - which is zero whenever no outcome would change the decision. Use when someone proposes an A/B test, user survey, market study, competitor analysis, analytics build, consultant, pilot, or "let's gather more data", and when deciding how large a study needs to be.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesises training survey responses and manager notes into a DRAFT training needs report by role: coded needs with record counts per role (n of N), the evidence type behind each count, anonymised quotes cited to record codes, disagreements between what staff report and what managers observe, gaps where a role is under-represented or a required skill has no evidence, and follow-up questions to settle before any course is designed. Never rates an individual, ranks a team or turns a count into a competence verdict. Use when the user asks to "analyse this training survey", "what training do our teams need", "summarise the manager feedback on skills gaps", "build a training needs analysis by role" or "which roles have the biggest skill gaps". Do not use for turning an agreed need into a course, use course-outline-builder instead; for exit interviews, use exit-interview-synthesis. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesises a batch of customer feedback (survey answers, reviews, ticket and chat comments) into a DRAFT themed report: coded themes with record counts and shares, anonymised verbatim quotes cited to record codes, contradictions and unverified claims, and the follow-up questions to answer next. Produces no sentiment score or percentage positive as fact; ratings appear only as distributions with n. Use when the user asks to "theme this feedback", "what are customers saying", "summarise these survey answers", "analyse these reviews", "find the top complaints in these comments" or "code this voice of the customer data". Do not use for exit interviews, use exit-interview-synthesis instead; for sorting a live queue and drafting replies, use ticket-triage-pack; for project retrospectives, use lessons-learned-synthesis. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consolidate the five tdmcp surveyor reports into one prioritized FEATURE_BACKLOG.md — dedupe cross-surface overlaps, reconcile every candidate against the roadmap (NEW vs planned vs extension), rank by a selectable impact×effort weighting profile into P0/P1/P2 (high-confidence first), and emit per-surface tables + a recommended-next shortlist that hands straight to the build pipeline. Use when a td-synthesizer agent is consolidating surveys during the feature-discovery harness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract structured fields from property survey documents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate ideas that don't sound logical, then validate them with cheap behavioural experiments — Rory Sutherland's 'the opposite of a good idea can be a good idea' plus revealed-preference testing. Use when the obvious/logical solution is saturated and the user wants genuinely different options, asks 'what's a creative/unconventional angle', 'how do we stand out', 'should we run a test/experiment', 'how do we know what people actually want', or is about to trust a survey/focus group. Covers deliberate inversion of the obvious move, why stated preferences lie, and designing small reversible experiments that watch behaviour. Inspired by Rory Sutherland's *Alchemy*. Routed to from psycho-logic. 日本語の相談（「競合と同じ案しか出ない」「アンケートは好評なのに売れない」「思い切った案を安く試したい」）にも使う。中文咨询（“只能想出和竞品一样的方案”“问卷好评却卖不动”）也适用。

研究文書（概要/梗概/アブストラクト・研究論文・卒業論文）を種別自動判別し、研究の骨子・グローバル一貫性・当てどころ・関連研究・説明不足・弱点・体裁の各面から一括レビューして教員向け統合1ファイルに集約するメタスキル。framing-check(骨子＋一貫性)・aim-check(当てどころ)・articulation-check(5W)・weakness-analyze(弱点)・lit-survey(関連研究)で検出し、shepherd で内容面を整形、format-check(概要は --fixed で紙面配分)で体裁を見る。--student で student-comment に渡し学生向け1枚も生成。論文・概要・卒論・中間発表予稿を「レビューして」「総合的に見て」と言われたときに使う。旧 abstract-review / paper-review / thesis-review / review を統合。

確立された文脈をもとに理論的方向性を議論して方針を深め，確定した方針を .claude/context.md に反映する．「方針はこれでいい？」「仮説を整理したい」「実験設計どう思う？」など，実装ではなく理論・方向性を議論したいときに使う．文脈の初期作成は /groundwork:survey を使う．

A field-biology capstone on urban pollinator decline — the survey design, the data, the contribution, and the caveats. Built as a decision-grade coursework defense deck for faculty reviewers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn messy user research notes, interviews, support tickets, surveys, and product context into an evidence-backed decision room: a single HTML artifact with an evidence ledger, theme map, confidence heatmap, opportunity matrix, decision memo, and experiment queue. Use when teams need to move from qualitative signals to product or design decisions without fabricating certainty.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user wants a systematic literature review, survey, or synthesis across multiple academic papers on a topic. Also covers annotated bibliographies and cross-paper comparisons. Searches arXiv and outputs reports in APA, IEEE, or BibTeX format. Not for single-paper tasks — use academic-paper-review for reviewing one paper.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to reduce churn, build cancellation flows, set up save offers, recover failed payments, or implement retention strategies. Also use when the user mentions 'churn,' 'cancel flow,' 'offboarding,' 'save offer,' 'dunning,' 'failed payment recovery,' 'win-back,' 'retention,' 'exit survey,' 'pause subscription,' 'involuntary churn,' 'people keep canceling,' 'churn rate is too high,' 'how do I keep users,' or 'customers are leaving.' Use this whenever someone is losing subscribers or wants to build systems to prevent it. For post-cancel win-back email sequences, see emails. For in-app upgrade paywalls, see paywalls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guided statistical analysis for research data - test selection, assumption checking, effect sizes, power analysis, Bayesian alternatives, and APA-formatted reporting. Use whenever a user wants to compare groups, test a hypothesis, analyze experimental or survey data, check statistical assumptions, compute required sample sizes, or write up results - even if they never name a specific test. Covers t-tests, ANOVA, chi-square, correlation, regression, non-parametric and Bayesian methods. For low-level model APIs, see the statsmodels and pymc skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to optimize any form that is NOT signup/registration — including lead capture forms, contact forms, demo request forms, application forms, survey forms, or checkout forms. Also use when the user mentions "form optimization," "lead form conversions," "form friction," "form fields," "form completion rate," or "contact form." For signup/registration forms, see signup-flow-cro. For popups containing forms, see popup-cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill to create fillable Word forms (.docx) with real Content Controls (SDT) + legacy FormField checkboxes + MERGEFIELD mail-merge placeholders + document protection. Trigger on: 'fillable form', 'form fields', 'content controls', 'SDT', 'word form', 'fill in', 'only editable fields', 'protect document', 'onboarding form', 'HR intake', 'survey template', 'contract / SOW template', 'mail-merge template', 'compliance checklist', 'medical intake questionnaire'. Output is a single .docx where specific fields are editable and the rest is locked. This skill is INDEPENDENT, not a scene layer on docx — payload is `w:sdt` + `w:ffData` + `w:fldChar` + `documentProtection`, none of which docx base skill covers. Do NOT trigger for regular reports, letters, memos, academic papers, pitch decks, or any document with no user-fillable fields — route those to officecli-docx or its scene layers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, conduct, and synthesize user research. Trigger with "user research plan", "interview guide", "usability test", "survey design", "research questions", or when the user needs help with any aspect of understanding their users through research.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up your bio-research environment and explore available tools. Use when first getting oriented with the plugin, checking which literature, drug-discovery, or visualization MCP servers are connected, or surveying available analysis skills before starting a new project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Synthesize user research into themes, insights, and recommendations. Use when you have interview transcripts, survey results, usability test notes, support tickets, or NPS responses that need to be distilled into patterns, user segments, and prioritized next steps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to optimize any form that is NOT signup/registration — including lead capture forms, contact forms, demo request forms, application forms, survey forms, or checkout forms. Also use when the user mentions "form optimization," "lead form conversions," "form friction," "form fields," "form completion rate," or "contact form." For signup/registration forms, see signup-flow-cro. For popups containing forms, see popup-cro.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing or revisiting product pricing — selecting a pricing model (subscription seat-based, usage-based, value-based, freemium, or hybrid), running Van Westendorp Price Sensitivity Meter analysis on WTP survey data, or designing Good/Better/Best packaging tiers. Recommends a model and a price range with trade-offs, never a single number. For Commercial leads, Product Marketing, and CMOs at the pricing-design moment — not deal-by-deal discounting, not brand positioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。