「technology」の検索結果

Technology-agnostic prompt generator that creates customizable AI prompts for scanning codebases and identifying high-quality code exemplars. Supports multiple programming languages (.NET, Java, JavaScript, TypeScript, React, Angular, Python) with configurable analysis depth, categorization methods, and documentation formats to establish coding standards and maintain consistency across development teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive project architecture blueprint generator that analyzes codebases to create detailed architectural documentation. Automatically detects technology stacks and architectural patterns, generates visual diagrams, documents implementation patterns, and provides extensible blueprints for maintaining architectural consistency and guiding new development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plants Canarytokens-based decoy artifacts (honey credentials, DNS tokens, web-bug URLs, AWS keys, documents, kubeconfigs) using Thinkst's open-source Canarytokens project and alerts via email or webhook when a token is touched. Use for high-fidelity intrusion detection in low-telemetry areas like file shares or credential stores, or to catch credential dumping and data-theft staging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert database architect specializing in data layer design from scratch, technology selection, schema modeling, and scalable database architectures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Web accessibility specialist for WCAG compliance, ARIA implementation, and inclusive design. Use when auditing websites for accessibility issues, implementing WCAG 2.1 AA/AAA standards, testing with screen readers, or ensuring ADA compliance. Expert in semantic HTML, keyboard navigation, and assistive technology compatibility.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

An uncompromising Academic Research Engineer. Operates with absolute scientific rigor, objective criticism, and zero flair. Focuses on theoretical correctness, formal verification, and optimal implementation across any required technology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explore vague or ambitious ideas into a right-sized requirements-only unified plan. Use when the user wants to brainstorm or scope what to build. Not for executing already-specified work. Use ce-pov for a verdict on adopting a named external technology.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing new high-level system architecture, reviewing existing designs, or making architectural decisions. Invoke to create architecture diagrams, write Architecture Decision Records (ADRs), evaluate technology trade-offs, design component interactions, and plan for scalability. Use for system design, architecture review, microservices structuring, ADR authoring, scalability planning, and infrastructure pattern selection — distinct from code-level design patterns or database-only design tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds security-focused full-stack web applications by implementing integrated frontend and backend components with layered security at every level. Covers the complete stack from database to UI, enforcing auth, input validation, output encoding, and parameterized queries across all layers. Use when implementing features across frontend and backend, building REST APIs with corresponding UI, connecting frontend components to backend endpoints, creating end-to-end data flows from database to UI, or implementing CRUD operations with UI forms. Distinct from frontend-only, backend-only, or API-only skills in that it simultaneously addresses all three perspectives—Frontend, Backend, and Security—within a single implementation workflow. Invoke for full-stack feature work, web app development, authenticated API routes with views, microservices, real-time features, monorepo architecture, or technology selection decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technology-agnostic guidance for modular systems: bounded contexts, clear boundaries, composability, state isolation, explicit contracts, failure containment, scaffolding workflows, split/merge criteria, sub-units inside a context, and compliance review signals. Use when designing or reviewing module structure, service boundaries, package layout, cross-cutting dependencies, "how should we split this?", modularity assessments, coupling between domains, greenfield context design, or architecture discussions without assuming a specific framework, language, or repository layout. Do NOT use for executing the full Patterns 1–5 repo decomposition pipeline or per-pattern inventories (use modular-decomposition), phased extraction roadmaps as the main deliverable (use decomposition-planning-roadmap), or end-to-end legacy migration strategy (use legacy-migration-planner).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build or extend a playable isometric action RPG in Three.js, React, or similar web technology. Use for game-loop architecture, camera and movement, zones, combat integration, content data, progression, saves, or production-ready vertical slices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research technology and advanced-manufacturing investments using Serenity-inspired supply-chain bottleneck analysis. Use for theme scans, company thesis challenges, candidate comparisons, or learning this method. Prioritize A-shares unless another market is requested. Return research priorities, dated evidence, profit implications, and conditions that would change the judgment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate this skill for ANY future-oriented question. Triggers include: "Will [X]?", "Who will win [X]?", "What happens to [X]?", "Can [X] succeed?", "What's the future of X?", foresight analysis, scenario planning, STEEEP analysis, futures cone, prediction requests, or any question about a future outcome. Year is NOT required — the engine infers the horizon. Also activate when the user says "predict", "forecast", "what are the odds", "scenario analysis", or asks about competitive races, technology adoption, geopolitical shifts, or market dominance. REQUIRES web search to be enabled — if web search is unavailable, tell the user before proceeding.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Activate this agent for any future-oriented question that requires deep quantitative analysis, historical precedents, and structured scenario planning. Triggers include: "Will [X]?", "Who will win [X]?", "What happens to [X]?", prediction requests with high stakes, foresight analysis, STEEEP scenario planning, futures cone, competitive race analysis, technology adoption curves, geopolitical shifts, or any question about a future outcome that deserves rigorous multi-step analysis. This agent runs a 12-step deterministic pipeline: Claude handles intelligence, Python handles all arithmetic. Year is NOT required — the engine infers the horizon. REQUIRES: Bash tool + Python 3.x. Not compatible with claude.ai web (use Soft Predict Future instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Transform the agent into a Cloud Solution Architect following Azure Architecture Center best practices. Use when designing cloud architectures, reviewing system designs, selecting architecture styles, applying cloud design patterns, making technology choices, or conducting Well-Architected Framework reviews.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Understand Microsoft technologies by querying official documentation. Use whenever the user asks how something works, wants tutorials, needs configuration options, limits, quotas, or best practices for any Microsoft technology (Azure, .NET, M365, Windows, Power Platform, etc.)—even if they don't mention "docs." If the question is about understanding a concept rather than writing code, this is the right skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit an existing interface against WCAG, producing findings with severity ratings and remediation steps. Use when you have a design or build to assess now. Not for planning future sessions with assistive-technology users — use `accessibility-test-plan` (prototyping-testing).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Entry P1 category router for reconnaissance and methodology. Use when mapping scope, drawing an attack surface from one application, discovering assets, fingerprinting technology, building endpoint inventory, and choosing the first high-value security testing path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconnaissance and methodology playbook. Use when mapping assets, discovering endpoints, fingerprinting technology, and building a structured testing plan for a new target.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Organize business and technology teams for fast flow using Skelton & Pais's "Team Topologies". Use when the user mentions "team topologies", "Conway's law", "platform team", "stream-aligned team", "team boundaries", "cognitive load", "how should we split teams", "who owns this service", "team dependencies", or "reorg". Also trigger when reorganizing engineering teams, aligning team and service boundaries, splitting a monolith and deciding ownership, reducing cross-team handoffs, or designing an internal platform. Covers the four team types, three interaction modes, the inverse Conway maneuver, and fracture planes. For bounded contexts, see domain-driven-design. For dependency direction in code, see clean-architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct preliminary research on a topic and generate research outline. For academic research, benchmark research, technology selection, etc.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The CIO's remit — running the technology the company works on, service quality, IT spend, and the boundary with product engineering. Use this to set IT priorities, decide what IT owns versus engineering, structure IT spend or an IT roadmap, judge whether to build, buy or outsource, or work out why IT is seen as a cost center rather than an enabler.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structures partnerships that change what the business can do — technology integrations, channel and reseller arrangements, joint ventures, and OEM relationships. Use this to evaluate or structure a strategic partnership, decide between partnering and building, negotiate commercial terms of an alliance, or diagnose a partnership that is signed but not producing. For audience-borrowing partnerships, use `marketing:partnership-marketing`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plans under genuine uncertainty — building scenarios, identifying which assumptions are load-bearing, setting early-warning indicators, and stress-testing a plan against futures rather than forecasting one. Use this when a decision depends on something unknowable, when a plan assumes conditions that may not hold, before a large irreversible commitment, or when a market, regulatory, or technology shift could invalidate the strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。