196 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Guide developers through capturing diagnostic artifacts to diagnose production .NET performance issues. Use when the user needs help choosing diagnostic tools, collecting performance data, or understanding tool trade-offs across different environments (Windows/Linux, .NET Framework/modern .NET, container/non-container).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track and document analytical assumptions and decisions. Use when making analytical choices, documenting trade-offs, ensuring transparency, or creating audit trails for analytical work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Python framework for single- and multi-objective optimization with evolutionary algorithms. Define vectorized objectives and constraints; solve with NSGA-II, NSGA-III, MOEA/D, GAs, or differential evolution. Analyze Pareto fronts, visualize trade-offs, customize operators and callbacks. For engineering design, hyperparameter search, and conflicting objectives. Alternatives: scipy.optimize (single-objective, gradient), platypus, jMetalPy (Java).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Selects and routes to the right architecture paradigm. Use when choosing patterns for a new system or comparing trade-offs before making architecture decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architectural decision-making framework. Requirements analysis, trade-off evaluation, ADR documentation. Use when making architecture decisions or analyzing system design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Researches an open-ended question — options, possible solutions, prior art, trade-offs, or how something works — and produces a durable, evidence-backed, adversarially-validated report that recommends an option without committing the team to any artifact. Use when you want to research approaches, weigh options, survey prior art or the state of the art, or understand how something works before committing to a direction. Does not diagnose a bug, failure, or root cause — use investigate. Does not specify a feature — use plan-a-feature. Does not create or update a coding standard — use coding-standard. Does not compare two concrete artifacts for gaps — use gap-analysis. Does not assess an existing module's architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the reasoning style of Daphne Koller (machine learning pioneer, co-founder of Coursera, founder and CEO of Insitro). Use this skill whenever you encounter problems involving AI and machine learning in biology, drug discovery, interdisciplinary collaboration, data generation vs. data mining, or transitioning from academia to industry. Trigger this skill when advising on career trade-offs, building cross-functional teams (especially bridging engineers and domain experts), designing data pipelines, evaluating causality vs. correlation, or applying AI to physical systems ('where bits meet atoms'). Channel her focus on fit-for-purpose data, pragmatism, and disproportionate leverage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the reasoning, architectural principles, and AI philosophy of Christopher Manning (natural language processing expert, Stanford University, director of Stanford AI Lab). Use this skill whenever you are discussing natural language processing, LLM architecture, AI research strategy, cognitive science, or the evolution of machine learning. Trigger this skill for questions about AGI timelines, academic vs. industry research trade-offs, linguistic structure in neural networks, modularity in AI design, or evaluating true intelligence versus mere memorization. Channel his pragmatic focus on domain science, adaptability, and competing on ideas rather than raw compute.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Documentation-first project planning that produces implementation-ready blueprints and single-shot coding agent prompts. Generates 4 interconnected docs — SPECIFICATION.md, IMPLEMENTATION.md, TASKS.md, BRANDING.md — plus a self-contained PROMPT.md for autonomous execution by any coding agent. Includes interactive tech stack selection, design pattern recommendations, and architecture decisions with trade-off analysis. Trigger when user wants to: plan a project, create specs, architect a system, break work into tasks, choose a tech stack, get design pattern advice, generate a coding agent prompt, or do documentation-first development. Phrases: "plan my project", "spec this out", "architect", "help me plan", "what stack should I use", "generate a prompt", "break this into tasks", "project docs", "I want to build X".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Proposes secure remediation strategies for detected security vulnerabilities including buffer overflows, injection risks, insecure deserialization, improper authentication, and unsafe cryptographic usage. Provides recommended security checks, safer API alternatives, design-level changes, code examples, trade-off analysis, and prioritized remediation plans. Does NOT automatically modify code unless explicitly requested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Recommends appropriate software design patterns based on problem descriptions, requirements, or code scenarios. Use when designing software architecture, refactoring code, solving common design problems, or choosing between design approaches. Analyzes the problem context and suggests suitable creational, structural, behavioral, architectural, or concurrency patterns with implementation guidance and trade-off analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Converges an underspecified request into a typed IntentSpec before planning or acting. Use when the user asks to implement, add, change, refactor, fix, migrate, configure, handle, triage, sort out, look into or decide something and the request leaves decisions open (which objects, which approach, what happens on failure, which trade-off), contradicts itself, admits two readings, or rests on an approach its sources may rule out — in a codebase, a ticket queue, a research brief or a runbook — or when the user says "clarify the intent", "what do you need from me", or invokes intent-router. Looks up what its sources hold (code, history, decision records, a ticket log, an order record, the policy in force) before asking; asks only preference or irreversible questions, one at a time, with a recommended default; halts instead of guessing; checks the delivered work against the spec. Silent on a fully stated task its sources do not contradict. Not for explaining existing state ("what does X do", "why is Y slow").
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Agroecologist. Use when a task calls for Agroecologist judgment. Reasons from socio-ecological farm systems, functional diversity, soil-biology-mediated fertility, and yield-service trade-offs through mother-baby and mixed-model trials, N/P/C mass balances, PLFA/amplicon and pollinator surveys, and NDVI/FRAGSTATS landscape analysis, while treating edge-effect and plot-size artifacts, weather-year confounding, surface-only soil carbon, and ignored labor/tenure adoption constraints as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert AI Researcher. Use when a task calls for AI Researcher judgment. Reasons from data generating processes, inductive biases, and compute-data-algorithm trade-offs through train/val/test discipline, seed sweeps, ablation ladders, and standards like NeurIPS reproducibility checklists, model cards, and lm-eval-harness, while treating data leakage (Kapoor & Narayanan taxonomy), benchmark contamination, spurious correlations, and reward-model overoptimization as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grounded in first principles, rigorously examine and refine a user's plan, task, decision, goal, strategy, proposal, or idea through structured, progressively deeper questioning, in order to bridge the gap between the User and the Agent. Use when the user explicitly requests grilling, challenge, pressure-testing, cross-examination, red-team review, pre-mortem analysis, or a decision audit. The goal is to uncover unclear objectives, hidden assumptions, contradictions, weak evidence, missing information, overlooked constraints, dependencies, risks, trade-offs, failure modes, and misalignment between intended outcomes and likely real-world results. Begin by establishing a shared understanding of the user's actual intent, goals, constraints, and success criteria. Ask focused, high-leverage questions rather than broad or repetitive ones. Adapt each question based on previous answers, probing deeper where uncertainty, unsupported assumptions, or strategic weaknesses remain. Regularly summarize the current understanding of the user's intent and position to confirm alignment, expose misunderstandings, and refine the problem or goal definition. Distinguish facts, assumptions, hypotheses, and unknowns. Challenge reasoning rigorously while remaining constructive, respectful, and solution-oriented. Continue until the reasoning is internally coherent, evidence-aware, constraint-conscious, risk-assessed, and translated into a clearer, more actionable goal, decision, or plan. Ultimately, achieving the super-alignment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce and interpret PCA, t-SNE, UMAP, and PHATE plots for high-dimensional omics data with rigor about which method preserves what (variance, local structure, manifold, transitions), hyperparameter sensitivity, and the well-documented limits of 2D embeddings. Covers PCA biplot/scree/loadings, t-SNE PCA initialization (Kobak-Berens 2019), UMAP n_neighbors/min_dist trade-offs, and the Chari-Pachter 2023 critique. Use when visualizing high-dimensional data — bulk PCA, single-cell embeddings, multi-omics integration projections.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Align preprocessed CLIP-seq reads (eCLIP, iCLIP, iCLIP2, PAR-CLIP) to genome with STAR or bowtie2 using crosslink-preserving parameters, choosing between unique-mapper-only and multi-mapper-aware alignment for repeat-binding RBPs, deciding STAR vs HISAT2 memory trade-offs, and applying ENCODE-compatible filters. Use when turning preprocessed CLIP FASTQ into a deduplicated, MAPQ-filtered BAM ready for peak calling or crosslink-site detection.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bulk-query Ensembl BioMart (and other BioMart instances) for cross-database ID mapping, gene/transcript/exon coordinates, and ortholog tables. Use when batch-converting Ensembl IDs to other namespaces (HGNC, RefSeq, UniProt, Entrez), pulling gene coordinate tables for thousands of genes, building ortholog wide-tables across species, or replacing slow Ensembl REST loops with one-shot bulk export. Encodes BioMart's XML query format, R biomaRt vs Python pybiomart trade-off, mart-vs-dataset hierarchy, and the URL endpoint that's BioMart-specific (separate from rest.ensembl.org).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guidance for choosing the right protein binder design tool. Use this skill when: (1) Deciding between BoltzGen, BindCraft, or RFdiffusion, (2) Planning a binder design campaign, (3) Understanding trade-offs between different approaches, (4) Selecting tools for specific target types. For specific tool parameters, use the individual tool skills (boltzgen, bindcraft, rfdiffusion, etc.).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Binder design tool selection and workflow routing guidance. Use this skill when: (1) Deciding between BoltzGen, BindCraft, or RFdiffusion, (2) Planning a binder design campaign, (3) Understanding trade-offs between different approaches, (4) Selecting tools for specific target types. For specific tool parameters, use the individual tool skills (boltzgen, bindcraft, rfdiffusion, etc.).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define a set of actionable design principles that guide decision-making and resolve trade-offs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Determine technologies needed to build the product, making build/buy/integrate decisions during PRD v0.5 Red Team Review. Handles both greenfield and brownfield contexts. Triggers on requests to select tech stack, evaluate technologies, make build vs. buy decisions, discover existing assets, or when user asks "what technologies?", "select tech stack", "build or buy?", "what do we reuse?", "existing stack", "technical decisions", "what tools do we need?", "evaluate solutions". Consumes FEA- (features), SCR- (screens), RISK- (constraints). Outputs TECH- entries with decisions, rationale, and trade-offs. Feeds v0.6 Architecture Design.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides a founder from real decisions to a short set of written company values that people can act on: collects incidents, tests each candidate value, writes it as a trade-off with behaviors and a story, and wires it into hiring, feedback and promotion. Use when someone asks to "define our company values", "write a values document", "our values are generic, fix them", "turn our values into interview questions", "what should our culture be before we hire", or wants to check whether the team lives the values it has. Produces VALUES.md, an evidence log and an interview kit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
半导体芯片制造工艺 (Semiconductor Process Engineering / 半导体芯片制造工艺 — 以「物理化学极限 + 良率经济双重约束」为特征的集成电路前道/后道制造工艺认知操作系统：从「器件架构与微缩路线（planar→FinFET→GAA nanosheet→CFET、等效微缩 DTCO/STCO、背面供电 BSPDN）→ 工艺整合（FEOL/MOL/BEOL 模块协同、PDK、流片 tape-out）→ 单元工艺（光刻 litho（DUV 浸没式 193i / EUV 13.5nm / 多重曝光 SADP-SAQP / OPC / mask）、刻蚀 etch（RIE/ICP/原子层刻蚀 ALE）、薄膜沉积 depo（CVD/PECVD/LPCVD/ALD/PVD/外延 epi/电镀 Cu）、掺杂 doping（离子注入 ion implant / 退火 RTA-laser anneal）、CMP 化学机械抛光、清洗 cleaning）→ 量测检测 metrology（CD-SEM / OCD / overlay / 椭偏 ellipsometry / 缺陷检测 defect inspection / e-beam）→ 良率工程 yield（缺陷密度 / SPC 统计过程控制 / FDC / APC / DOE 实验设计 / 良率爬坡 yield ramp）→ 先进封装 advanced packaging（2.5D/3D、CoWoS、HBM、混合键合 hybrid bonding、chiplet、TSV）」的完整器件-工艺-良率-量产决策链。覆盖 (a) 第一性张力 — **物理/化学/材料的硬约束（量子隧穿、短沟道效应、RC 延迟、热预算、缺陷物理、ppb 级污染控制）⇄ 良率/成本/产能的经济约束（每片晶圆成本、良率是主经济指标、D0 缺陷密度、wafer-per-hour、折旧）**；**持续微缩/摩尔定律（dimensional + equivalent scaling、节点路线图 N5/N3/N2/A16/A14、high-NA EUV）⇄ 物理极限/微缩放缓（原子尺度、漏电、功耗墙、成本墙、'摩尔定律已死'之争）**；**协同优化/整合（DTCO 设计-工艺协同、STCO 系统-工艺协同、模块间 trade-off）⇄ 单模块极致优化（单一 unit process 工艺窗口）**；**工艺配方的 tacit 手艺（process recipe 调试、工艺窗口、缺陷根因分析、量产 ramp 的经验）⇄ 可建模/可仿真/数据驱动（TCAD 仿真、ML 良率分析、APC/FDC、数字孪生）**；**性能-功耗-面积-成本 PPAC 四角权衡 ⇄ 良率/可制造性 DFM 优先**；**自主可控/国产替代（卡脖子、EUV 出口管制、设备/材料/EDA 国产化、SMIC/长江存储/长鑫/中微/北方华创/上海微电子）⇄ 全球高度分工（ASML 光刻垄断、AMAT/Lam/TEL/KLA 设备、TSMC/Samsung/Intel 代工、全球供应链）**。(b) 核心工作流 / pipeline（最标准、最易蒸高质量 + CLI 化）— 新节点/新工艺导入：器件目标与 PPAC 定义 → 工艺整合方案与 PDK → 单元工艺开发与配方调试（DOE 找工艺窗口）→ 量测建立与 SPC → 良率爬坡（缺陷分类 + 根因分析 + 工艺改善）→ 量产移交与持续改善。具体单元工艺 SOP：光刻（曝光条件 / OPC / overlay 控制 / 多重曝光分解）、刻蚀（选择比 / profile / loading effect / ALE）、沉积（台阶覆盖 / 应力 / 均匀性）、CMP（去除速率 / 碟形 dishing / 侵蚀 erosion）、量测与缺陷分析、良率分析与 FA 失效分析。(c) 工具栈 — 设备（光刻 ASML/上海微电子 SMEE；刻蚀+沉积 AMAT/Lam/TEL/中微 AMEC/北方华创 Naura；离子注入 AMAT/Axcelis；CMP AMAT/荏原 Ebara；量测检测 KLA/AMAT/中科飞测/上海精测）、EDA/TCAD/仿真（Synopsys Sentaurus/Silvaco/Coventor SEMulator3D、OPC Calibre/Synopsys）、良率与制造软件（SPC、MES、FDC/APC、缺陷分析 yield management、PWS）、材料（光刻胶 photoresist、CMP 浆料 slurry、特气、靶材、掩膜 mask blank）。(d) 知识正典 — 半导体工艺 canon 横跨器件物理与制造工程：核心教材（Plummer/Deal/Griffin《Silicon VLSI Technology》、Sze《Physics of Semiconductor Devices》《VLSI Technology》、Wolf & Tauber《Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era》、Campbell《Fabrication Engineering at the Micro and Nanoscale》、May & Spanos《Fundamentals of Semiconductor Manufacturing and Process Control》、Quirk & Serda《Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology》、肖国勇/施敏中文教材）、路线图（ITRS/IRDS、IEEE 国际器件与系统路线图）、顶会论文（IEDM、Symposium on VLSI Technology、IRPS 可靠性、SPIE Advanced Lithography、ISSCC、DAC）、行业分析（SemiAnalysis、TechInsights、IC Knowledge）。(e) figures/流派 — 学术与器件奠基（Gordon Moore 摩尔、Robert Dennard 登纳德微缩、胡正明 Chenming Hu FinFET/UTB-SOI 发明人 UC Berkeley、刘明 Tsu-Jae King Liu Berkeley、Krishna Saraswat Stanford、Mark Bohr Intel 工艺架构）、产业领袖与工艺大师（张忠谋 Morris Chang TSMC、林本坚 Burn-Jeng Lin 浸没式光刻、Martin van den Brink ASML、米玉杰/梁孟松 SMIC/三星工艺、Mark Liu/魏哲家 TSMC）、行业分析师（Dylan Patel SemiAnalysis、Scotten Jones IC Knowledge、TechInsights 拆解、Handel Jones）、科普与拆解（Asianometry、The Chip Letter、半导体行业观察）。流派分歧：等效微缩派 vs 摩尔定律已死派、前道微缩 vs 先进封装 chiplet 异构集成、dimensional scaling vs DTCO 协同优化、IDM vs 纯代工 foundry 模式、自主可控/国产替代路线 vs 全球分工。(f) 行业话术/黑话 — 制程节点 node / 流片 tape-out / 工艺窗口 process window / 良率 yield / 缺陷密度 D0 / 关键尺寸 CD / 套刻 overlay / 掩膜 reticle-mask / 光刻胶 PR / 浸没式 immersion / EUV/DUV / 多重曝光 multi-patterning SADP-SAQP / OPC / 刻蚀选择比 selectivity / profile / loading effect / 原子层刻蚀 ALE / 台阶覆盖 step coverage / 外延 epi / 离子注入 implant / 退火 anneal / RTA / CMP / dishing-erosion / FEOL-MOL-BEOL / FinFET / GAA / 纳米片 nanosheet / CFET / 背面供电 BSPDN / high-NA / PPAC / DTCO-STCO / DFM / SPC / FDC-APC / DOE / WAT-PCM / 良率爬坡 yield ramp / FA 失效分析 / particle 颗粒 / 洁净室 cleanroom-级别 / 12寸-8寸 wafer / chiplet / CoWoS / HBM / 混合键合 hybrid bonding / TSV / PDK / 等效微缩. (g) 争议/批判 — 「摩尔定律是否已死 vs 等效微缩继续」、「节点命名营销化（N3/N2 ≠ 物理 3nm/2nm，gate pitch/metal pitch 才是真尺度）」、「前道微缩 vs 先进封装异构集成谁是未来」、「自主可控/国产替代的现实（EUV 卡脖子、设备/材料/EDA 国产化进度、出口管制 entity list、良率与成熟度差距）」、「良率/成本/性能三角权衡」、「人才稀缺与工艺 know-how 的 tacit 性」、「中国大基金/产能扩张是否过剩」、「制裁与技术封锁」。(h) 大量隐性工艺手艺（process recipe 调试与工艺窗口寻找、缺陷根因分析与 FA、量产良率爬坡的经验判
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。