1,103 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Systematic competitor tracking that feeds positioning, battlecards, and roadmap decisions. Use when analyzing competitors, building battlecards, tracking market moves, conducting win/loss analysis, or updating positioning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map, measure and improve business processes — SIPOC and swimlane capture, cycle-time and bottleneck analysis, handoff diagnosis, and a payback-ranked improvement backlog. Use when a process is slow, error-prone, or crosses too many teams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert blueprint for performance profiling and optimization (frame drops, memory leaks, draw calls) using Godot Profiler, object pooling, visibility culling, and bottleneck identification. Use when diagnosing lag, optimizing for target FPS, or reducing memory usage. Keywords profiling, Godot Profiler, bottleneck, object pooling, VisibleOnScreenNotifier, draw calls, MultiMesh.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive performance analysis, bottleneck detection, and optimization recommendations for Claude Flow swarms
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A股/港股/美股通用"卡脖子"选股技能。应用 Serenity（@aleabitoreddit）的供应链瓶颈理论， 对任意板块/产业链进行结构化分析，寻找"一旦断货整个产业就停工"的瓶颈环节， 并筛选该环节中具备技术壁垒和资本信号的小盘股。 触发词：分析XX板块、找XX卡脖子、serenity分析、A股/美股/港股瓶颈产业链 EN triggers: analyze [sector] choke points / find bottlenecks in [industry] JP triggers: [セクター] のボトルネックを分析 KR triggers: [산업] 의 병목 지점 분석 适用板块示例：电力、光模块、医疗器械、半导体设备、军工、新能源车等任意板块； 港美股示例：InP衬底（AXTI）、CPO激光器（AAOI）、AI算力链（NVDA/TSM） 数据源：三级数据获取策略（智能体自带财经工具 → 本技能内置脚本 → 网络检索）， 不依赖任何特定平台，Claude Code / Codex / 通用智能体均可直接使用。 行情/估值支持 A股+港股+美股；研报/两融/筹码等深度数据仅A股。 ⚠️ 注意：本技能不预测大盘走势，不适用于纯题材炒作无实质产业逻辑的小票。
Diagnose MSBuild build performance bottlenecks using binary log analysis. USE FOR: identifying why builds are slow by analyzing binlog performance summaries, detecting ResolveAssemblyReference (RAR) taking >5s, Roslyn analyzers consuming >30% of Csc time, single targets dominating >50% of build time, node utilization below 80%, excessive Copy tasks, NuGet restore running every build. Covers timeline analysis, Target/Task Performance Summary interpretation, and 7 common bottleneck categories. Use after build-perf-baseline has established measurements. DO NOT USE FOR: establishing initial baselines (use build-perf-baseline first), fixing incremental build issues (use incremental-build), parallelism tuning (use build-parallelism), non-MSBuild build systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to refactor Java code based on trusted profiling analysis findings — including reviewing repository-owned or maintainer-sanitized docs/profiling-problem-analysis and docs/profiling-solutions files, identifying specific performance bottlenecks, and implementing targeted code changes to address CPU, memory, or threading issues. This should trigger for requests such as Refactor the code with profiling; Apply profiling; Optimize hot path; Reduce allocations found in profiling; Fix CPU bottlenecks from profiling analysis. Part of Plinth Toolkit
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Align on the shape of a change through an interview, then implement it. Escalates open product decisions and settles the implementation shape in conversation. Use when the user asks to "discuss this change", "align on this change first", "ask me questions first", "interview me then implement", "agree on the approach before coding", or wants the shape of a single change settled before any code is written.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive performance analysis, bottleneck detection, and optimization recommendations for Claude Flow swarms
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze C++ build performance using vcperf.exe and ETL traces. Use this skill when the user wants to profile a build, understand compile bottlenecks, identify expensive headers or templates, generate JSON analysis reports, or interpret vcperf output. Covers tracing workflows, the /jsonAnalysis flag, reading the resulting JSON schema, and actionable remediation strategies for each bottleneck category.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search and record project memory (Discussions, journal, ADRs). Use before re-investigating anything. Do not use for settled battles; see failure-archaeology.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Chronicles settled battles, reverts, and dead ends. Use when a fix echoes a past failure. Do not use for live triage; use night-market-debugging-playbook.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implement bounded, idempotency-aware API throttling, backoff, and retry handling for 429 and transient 5xx responses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automated enforcement of GDPR Article 5(1)(e) storage limitation principle. Covers TTL-based deletion, retention policy engines, archival workflows, legal hold exemptions, and lifecycle automation. Includes technical implementation patterns for automated data expiry and defensible deletion across distributed systems.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interact with Xiaohongshu (小红书, RED, Little Red Book) — search notes, read note details, view comments, browse user profiles and posts, get home feed. Use this skill whenever the user mentions Xiaohongshu, 小红书, RED, RedNote, Little Red Book, wants to search for lifestyle/beauty/travel content, read XHS discussions, look up XHS users, or browse trending notes. Also trigger when the user pastes a xiaohongshu.com URL (e.g. xiaohongshu.com/explore/noteid) or mentions an XHS note ID.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Profile programs at the function/method level to identify performance hotspots, bottlenecks, and optimization opportunities. Records execution time, memory usage, and call frequency for each interval. Generates actionable recommendations and visualizations. Use when users need to (1) analyze program performance, (2) identify slow functions or bottlenecks, (3) optimize execution time or memory usage, (4) profile Python, Java, or C/C++ programs with test cases or workload scenarios, or (5) generate performance reports with flame graphs and recommendations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research your competitors and build an interactive battlecard. Outputs an HTML artifact with clickable competitor cards and a comparison matrix. Trigger with "competitive intel", "research competitors", "how do we compare to [competitor]", "battlecard for [competitor]", or "what's new with [competitor]".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create sales-ready competitive battlecards comparing your product against a specific competitor — positioning, feature comparison, objection handling, and win/loss patterns. Use when preparing sales teams, creating competitive materials, or responding to 'why not competitor X?'
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performance optimization mindset - knowing when to optimize, how to measure, where bottlenecks hide, and when "fast enough" is the right answerUse when "slow, performance, optimize, profiling, benchmark, latency, throughput, cache, n+1, bottleneck, memory leak, too slow, speed up, response time, performance, optimization, profiling, caching, latency, throughput, big-o, benchmarking" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expertise in F2P economics, virtual currencies, and ethical monetization strategiesUse when "game monetization, F2P economy, in-app purchase, IAP strategy, battle pass design, loot box, gacha system, virtual currency, player LTV, whale monetization, game economy balance, premium currency, season pass, daily rewards, pay to win, ethical monetization, monetization, f2p, free-to-play, iap, in-app-purchase, battle-pass, season-pass, gacha, loot-box, virtual-economy, game-economy, ltv, arpu, retention, whales, pricing, microtransactions" mentioned.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and implement caching layers for APIs and web applications using Redis or Memcached. Use when you need to reduce database load, improve response times, or handle traffic spikes. Covers cache-aside, write-through, and write-behind patterns, TTL strategies, cache invalidation, and stampede prevention. Trigger words: cache, Redis, Memcached, TTL, cache invalidation, response time, throughput, rate limiting.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
AI.MD v4 — The Complete AI-Native Conversion System workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Convert human-written CLAUDE.md into AI-native structured-label format. Battle-tested across 4 models. Same rules, fewer tokens, higher compliance and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
管理咨询 (管理咨询 (Management Consulting) — 战略与管理咨询的职业认知操作系统，从业者/咨询顾问/想入行者/采购咨询服务的客户视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 假设驱动 (hypothesis-driven / answer-first / Day-1 answer) 的「先有答案再验证」⇄ 数据驱动 (data-led / bottom-up) 的「先穷尽事实再归纳」，这行的核心张力是「先射箭再画靶 vs 先画靶再射箭」，资深人偏 top-down 假设树减少 boil-the-ocean，但要时刻防 confirmation bias; 以及更深层的张力 — 「卖洞见 (insight / so-what) vs 卖工时 (analysis / 体力)」，「客户影响 (client impact / 落地) vs 智识严谨 (intellectual rigor / 漂亮 deck)」; (b) 方法论正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量) — MECE (相互独立完全穷尽)、issue tree / logic tree (问题树/逻辑树)、hypothesis-driven problem solving (假设驱动)、Pyramid Principle (Minto 金字塔原理: SCQA 情境-冲突-疑问-回答 + 结论先行 + 自上而下 + 归纳/演绎)、80/20 (帕累托/抓大放小)、so-what (所以呢/洞见提炼)、storyline (故事线/ghost deck 鬼影稿)、driver tree / profit tree、2x2 矩阵、value chain、frameworks (Porter 五力/3C/4P/7S/BCG 矩阵/价值链) 既是脚手架也是陷阱 (套框架 vs 真洞见); (c) 行业结构 — MBB (McKinsey/BCG/Bain 战略三巨头) vs Big Four 咨询臂 (Deloitte/PwC Strategy&/EY-Parthenon/KPMG) vs 精品战略所 (Oliver Wyman/Kearney/Roland Berger/L.E.K./Arthur D. Little) vs 专业/职能 boutique (运营/数字化/PE 尽调); up-or-out (非升即走)、leverage model (杠杆模型: 1 个合伙人带多个 EM/咨询师/分析师的金字塔)、partner/principal/EM(项目经理)/associate(咨询师)/analyst(分析师) 职级; (d) 项目交付模型 (the case/study/engagement) — 提案/SOW (scope of work)、problem definition (问题定义/真问题 vs 表象问题)、workplan (工作计划)、hypothesis tree (假设树)、analysis (分析/建模)、synthesis (综合)、recommendation (建议)、implementation (落地); 客户管理 (steering committee 指导委员会、stakeholder 利益相关方、对齐); (e) 产出物 — the deck (PPT 幻灯片是咨询的母语)、executive summary、action title (行动标题/每页一句话结论)、ghost deck (先搭骨架后填数据)、Excel 财务模型、framework 图; (f) 职业/招聘 — case interview 生态 (案例面试: Victor Cheng LOMS/Case in Point/market sizing 市场估算/估算题/fit 行为面)、网申-笔试-案例面、up-or-out、exit options (退出路径: PE/VC/corp dev 企业发展/战略岗/创业/industry); (g) 争议/批判 — 咨询的价值之辩 (「借你的表告诉你时间」「frameworks 是剧场表演 vs 真洞见」Matthew Stewart《The Management Myth》)、McKinsey 的丑闻 (Purdue 阿片类/独裁政府/ICE/利益冲突, Bogdanich & Forsythe《When McKinsey Comes to Town》)、咨询 vs 自建战略部、generalist 通才 vs specialist 专才之争、AI/GenAI 对初级分析师工作的冲击; (h) 流派 — 战略经典 (Porter 定位学派/五力 vs 资源基础观 RBV vs 蓝海战略 Kim&Mauborgne vs 颠覆式创新 Christensen vs Mintzberg 应急战略批判 planning school); 三巨头气质分野 (McKinsey 事实驱动/CEO 信任/通才, BCG 概念/思想领导力/经验曲线/增长-份额矩阵, Bain 结果导向/NPS 净推荐值/PE 关系/与客户深度绑定)。不含: 投行 M&A/财务顾问 (估值/承销超出范畴)、纯 IT 实施/系统集成 (SI 人力外包)、纯审计/税务、纯人力 RPO/猎头、内部战略部 only (虽相关但本 skill 聚焦专业服务咨询的外部视角)。) Master OS — automated mastery of 管理咨询 (Management Consulting) — 战略与管理咨询的职业认知操作系统，从业者/咨询顾问/想入行者/采购咨询服务的客户视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 假设驱动 (hypothesis-driven / answer-first / Day-1 answer) 的「先有答案再验证」⇄ 数据驱动 (data-led / bottom-up) 的「先穷尽事实再归纳」，这行的核心张力是「先射箭再画靶 vs 先画靶再射箭」，资深人偏 top-down 假设树减少 boil-the-ocean，但要时刻防 confirmation bias; 以及更深层的张力 — 「卖洞见 (insight / so-what) vs 卖工时 (analysis / 体力)」，「客户影响 (client impact / 落地) vs 智识严谨 (intellectual rigor / 漂亮 deck)」; (b) 方法论正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量) — MECE (相互独立完全穷尽)、issue tree / logic tree (问题树/逻辑树)、hypothesis-driven problem solving (假设驱动)、Pyramid Principle (Minto 金字塔原理: SCQA 情境-冲突-疑问-回答 + 结论先行 + 自上而下 + 归纳/演绎)、80/20 (帕累托/抓大放小)、so-what (所以呢/洞见提炼)、storyline (故事线/ghost deck 鬼影稿)、driver tree / profit tree、2x2 矩阵、value chain、frameworks (Porter 五力/3C/4P/7S/BCG 矩阵/价值链) 既是脚手架也是陷阱 (套框架 vs 真洞见); (c) 行业结构 — MBB (McKinsey/BCG/Bain 战略三巨头) vs Big Four 咨询臂 (Deloitte/PwC Strategy&/EY-Parthenon/KPMG) vs 精品战略所 (Oliver Wyman/Kearney/Roland Berger/L.E.K./Arthur D. Little) vs 专业/职能 boutique (运营/数字化/PE 尽调); up-or-out (非升即走)、leverage model (杠杆模型: 1 个合伙人带多个 EM/咨询师/分析师的金字塔)、partner/principal/EM(项目经理)/associate(咨询师)/analyst(分析师) 职级; (d) 项目交付模型 (the case/study/engagement) — 提案/SOW (scope of work)、problem definition (问题定义/真问题 vs 表象问题)、workplan (工作计划)、hypothesis tree (假设树)、analysis (分析/建模)、synthesis (综合)、recommendation (建议)、implementation (落地); 客户管理 (steering committee 指导委员会、stakeholder 利益相关方、对齐); (e) 产出物 — the deck (PPT 幻灯片是咨询的母语)、executive summary、action title (行动标题/每页一句话结论)、ghost deck (先搭骨架后填数据)、Excel 财务模型、framework 图; (f) 职业/招聘 — case interview 生态 (案例面试: Victor Cheng LOMS/Case in Point/market sizing 市场估算/估算题/fit 行为面)、网申-笔试-案例面、up-or-out、exit options (退出路径: PE/VC/corp dev 企业发展/战略岗/创业/industry); (g) 争议/批判 — 咨询的
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive performance analysis, bottleneck detection, and optimization recommendations for Claude Flow swarms
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。