「ux writing」の検索結果

Write and optimize prompts for AI-generated outcomes across text and image models. Use when crafting prompts for LLMs (Claude, GPT, Gemini), image generators (Midjourney, DALL-E, Stable Diffusion, Imagen, Flux), or video generators (Veo, Runway). Covers prompt structure, style keywords, negative prompts, chain-of-thought, few-shot examples, iterative refinement, and domain-specific patterns for marketing, code, and creative writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architect a feature with the Carmack Council before writing code. Use when explicitly asked to plan a feature, do a "council plan", "carmack plan", or invoke /council-plan. Carmack's philosophy chairs a council of domain experts — Troy Hunt (security), Martin Fowler (refactoring), Kent C. Dodds (frontend), Matteo Collina (Node.js), Brandur Leach (Postgres), Vercel Performance, Simon Willison (LLM pipeline), Karri Saarinen (UI quality), Vitaly Friedman (UX quality). Interactive feature discovery followed by parallel subagent dispatch. Produces a sequenced, attributed implementation plan with no code. Stack: Next.js App Router / React / TypeScript / tRPC / Prisma / Neon / Clerk.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing loadable kernel modules: Kbuild, module parameters, proc and sysfs entries, char devices, or ftrace debugging. Not for driver architecture: use device-drivers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing or debugging Linux drivers: platform, I2C/SPI, device-tree, char-device, IRQ, DMA, regmap, PM, sysfs, udev, NACK, -EREMOTEIO, or probe failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing an SELinux or AppArmor policy, a seccomp-bpf filter, enabling CET, PAC, or BTI, or triaging a kernel CVE. Not for KASAN report analysis: use kernel-debugging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Редактирует русский текст по инфостилю Ильяхова. Убирает стоп-слова, штампы, канцеляризмы, голословные утверждения. Заменяет конкретикой: фактами, цифрами, пользой. Адаптирует строгость под контекст: UI, лендинги, email, статьи, саппорт. Вызывай, когда пользователь просит отредактировать, улучшить, вычистить или проверить русский текст. Also triggers on: edit Russian text, improve copy, review UX writing, fix marketing text, rewrite landing page, clean up email.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The measurement surface for ALL Pulp DSP and audio-pipeline work — read it BEFORE writing or gating DSP, not only when something already sounds wrong. Covers the C++ harness (signal generators, metrics, assertions, RenderScenario, contracts), the offline Audio Doctor (magnitude/frequency response, THD/THD+N, phase/group delay), and their Python sibling the Audio Quality Lab (tools/audio/quality-lab — null residual + alignment, LTAS log-spectral distance, spectral flux/centroid, HNR, Theil-Sen drift slope, Kaiser-sinc resampling, license-guarded corpus, regression-net ratchet). TRIGGER on AUTHORING work — "build/design an oscillator/filter/synth/effect", "add a DSP module", "what should the acceptance gate be", "how do I measure aliasing / anti-aliasing / alias floor", "null against a reference", "is this DSP correct", "choose a tolerance", "golden/regression corpus for audio", "measure drift or jitter", "A/B two renders" — AND on DEBUGGING work — "is there sound / no audio / I hear nothing", "does this filter/compressor/synth/delay produce the right signal", "prove the DSP / prove the contract", "measure the frequency response", "what's the THD / is it distorting", "what's the group delay / phase response / measured latency", "magnitude response curve", "render a test tone and assert", "audio regression", "64-frame works but 128 is silent", "sample-rate change pitch-shifted it", "describe what's in this buffer", "audio doctor", "compare before/after a DSP refactor". Reach for this BEFORE hand-rolling any FFT, null test, alias measurement, pitch tracker, or golden-render script — most of it already exists in one of the two lanes. Test/tool layer over HeadlessHost — deterministic, no audio device, no speakers. Off the realtime thread entirely.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assistant-behavior design skill for approximating a Claude-like analytical, careful, conversational style without claiming to be Claude or Anthropic. Use when the user asks to duplicate, emulate, adapt, or recreate a Claude-style "mythos" or persona for prompts, agent specs, writing style, reasoning discipline, safety posture, or UX behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, mock up, build and review terminal UIs — full-screen TUIs, interactive CLIs and pickers, and plugin panels or popups inside a host (herdr, tmux, Neovim, k9s, lazygit). Use when designing, reviewing (from code, a live capture or a screenshot) or redesigning a TUI's layout, keybindings, states or colors, including requests that name a known TUI (lazygit, k9s, btop, yazi, helix, fzf); writing terminal mockups; building or fixing one in Ink, Textual, Bubble Tea, Ratatui or gum; mapping a color scheme (Catppuccin, Dracula, Nord, Gruvbox, Tokyo Night, Rosé Pine…) onto a TUI's theme; fixing misaligned glyphs, flicker, NO_COLOR, exit codes, signals, pipes or a broken terminal after exit; suspend or $EDITOR handoff; or profiling a slow TUI. Not for web or native GUIs, terminal-emulator, editor or shell-prompt themes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI design language for production-grade UI — 10 commands covering typography, color, motion, layout, and UX writing quality

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan the UX and UI for a feature before writing code. Runs a structured discovery interview, then produces a design brief that guides implementation. Use during the planning phase to establish design direction, constraints, and strategy before any code is written.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Translate an image brief into provider-specific prompt grammar per model. Use when writing or refining an image-generation prompt for Ideogram, Flux, Gemini, GPT Image 2, or Recraft.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reading or writing Zig files (.zig, build.zig, build.zig.zon).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When a bug or regression is reported, the FIRST step — before fixing — is to research how and when it was introduced (git archaeology), then record that finding on the tracking issue/PR. Use the moment a bug, error, broken build, or "this used to work" is reported, before writing a fix. Produces a first-bad-commit (or "not a code regression") note you paste onto the issue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verified lookup pack for crouton's schema→CRUD generation domain — the fieldsFile JSON format, the complete field-type catalog with aliases, the naming contract, the exact artifact list one generate run produces, the seed/default-layout pipeline, dialect defaults, and rollback semantics. Use when writing or reviewing a collection schema, when asking "what field types exist / what does `crouton config` actually generate / where did this file name come from / why did I get a pg schema", when a generated file's name or path doesn't match the docs, or when removing/regenerating a collection. Trigger phrases — "what field types are supported", "schema JSON format", "what files does crouton generate", "naming convention for collections", "rollback a collection", "dialect default". The generation WORKFLOW (steps + sign-off gates) lives in the `crouton` skill — this is the reference it doesn't carry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Propose the test(s) FIRST and get a human to sign off on the behaviour before writing the code — the test analog of /schema-review and /ui-proposal. For hand-written LOGIC in packages/* (apps opt-in, pocs exempt). Renders the proposed failing test as a reviewable contract, holds for lgtm/approve, then you write the code to make it green. Use when an agent is about to implement packages/* logic, or when asked to "write the test first", "TDD this", "agree on the test", run /test-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create AI-powered social media content for TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Twitter/X. Generate: images, videos, reels, shorts, thumbnails, captions, hashtags. Tools: FLUX, Veo, Seedance, Wan, Kokoro TTS, Claude for copywriting. Use for: content creators, social media managers, influencers, bra...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with VueUse composables - provides reactive utilities for state, browser APIs, sensors, network, animations. Check VueUse before writing custom composables - most patterns already implemented.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing unit/integration tests for Vite projects - provides Vitest configuration, test APIs, mocking patterns, and coverage setup

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when editing .vue files, creating Vue 3 components, writing composables, or testing Vue code - provides Composition API patterns, props/emits best practices, VueUse integration, and reactive destructuring guidance

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview the user deeply about a plan, probing technical implementation, UI/UX, risks, tradeoffs, and missing decisions before writing or refining a spec. Use when the user says "interview me" or asks to be questioned about a plan.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manual testing + bug filing for Enterprise / SaaS products. Parses a Feishu test doc (scope + repo + bitable URL), observes staging via claude-in-chrome, captures DOM/console/network/screenshot evidence, then dual-tracks each finding — Feishu Bitable record (with attachments) + GitHub issue (<REPO>#<ISSUE_NUMBER> format — English-primary, Chinese collapsed, R2-hosted screenshots, matching type label). Enforces dedup across bitable + GitHub issues + PRs, and mandatory P0/P1/P2 priority prompt when unclear. Trigger whenever the user says "test and report", "test and report side-by-side", "start system testing", "experience staging", "collaborate on bug filing", "collect feedback", a shared Feishu testing doc, a bitable URL + finding, or any UX/bug needing both bitable + GitHub tracking. Do NOT use for writing product code, PR review, CI debugging, or general "how do I use this product" questions — those go to normal dev / PR-review / support flows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert Bash help for writing, debugging, and optimizing safe, portable shell one-liners and scripts on macOS/Linux. Use when users ask for Bash or POSIX sh commands, script reviews, ShellCheck fixes, quoting/pipeline issues, process/file automation, or converting requirements into shell scripts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。