440 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
STRIDE + OWASP-based security audit with optional auto-fix. Scans code for vulnerabilities, categorizes by severity, and can iteratively fix findings using vc-autoresearch pattern.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit agent harness health: Claude/Codex agent parity, skill registry consistency, README.md sync, and protocol file wiring. Use when agents, skills, README.md, or development-protocol files move, split, or drift.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when publishing harness improvements to the remote kit repo. Diffs managed files, shows what changed, bumps version, and pushes. Counterpart to vc-update (pull).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
模拟 CentOS Linux 7 终端行为（含 Synopsys VCS/UVM 环境），仅输出代码块结果，不进行解释。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maintain classic ASP.NET applications on .NET Framework, including Web Forms, older MVC, and legacy hosting patterns, while planning realistic modernization boundaries. USE FOR: working in Web Forms, legacy MVC, or classic ASP.NET applications; reviewing old IIS-centric configuration and lifecycle behavior; planning migration toward ASP.NET Core. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
GATK Best Practices for germline SNP/indel calling from WGS/WES BAMs. Per-sample HaplotypeCaller GVCFs, GenomicsDBImport, GenotypeGVCFs joint calling, VQSR or hard filters. Requires BWA-MEM2-aligned, markdup, BQSR BAMs. Use DeepVariant for a faster DL alternative; GATK is the NIH/ENCODE standard.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
CLI for VCF/BCF: filter, merge, annotate, query, normalize, compute stats. Core post-variant-calling: quality filtering, multi-sample merging, rsID annotation, genotype extraction. Samtools companion in HTSlib. Use GATK for complex indel realignment during calling; use VCFtools for population genetics stats.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze C++ build performance using vcperf.exe and ETL traces. Use this skill when the user wants to profile a build, understand compile bottlenecks, identify expensive headers or templates, generate JSON analysis reports, or interpret vcperf output. Covers tracing workflows, the /jsonAnalysis flag, reading the resulting JSON schema, and actionable remediation strategies for each bottleneck category.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Queries ClinVar for variant pathogenicity classifications, ClinGen VCEP curations, and somatic-vs-germline interpretations via REST API, weekly VCF, or bulk XML. Use when determining clinical significance, triangulating conflicting interpretations, or aggregating evidence against the ACMG/AMP framework with ClinGen SVI specifications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define reproducible development environments with Dev Containers. Use when a user asks to standardize dev environments, set up VS Code remote containers, create reproducible dev setups, or onboard developers faster.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pieter Levels (@levelsio) 视角. 海外 indie hacker / solo builder 极致代表 — Nomad List + Photo AI + Interior AI + Remote OK 多产品 portfolio, 单人 $250K+/月 MRR, 零员工. 把"用 AI agent 赚钱"从"融资 + 招人 + scale 到 unicorn"的 VC 操作系统, 翻成"audience first + ship daily + stay solo + $10K MRR = 自由"的 indie 操作系统. 用途: 当用户问"我应该融资吗" / "AI 产品怎么 0→$1M ARR" / "1 个人能做多大" / "build in public 还有用吗" / "我应该招人吗" 时, 用 Pieter 视角先反问"你要的到底是 freedom 还是 valuation" — 如果是前者, 那 path 跟 VC 派完全相反. 当用户提到 "Pieter Levels" / "@levelsio" / "indie hacker" / "solo founder" / "Nomad List" / "Photo AI" / "build in public" / "ship daily" / "$10K MRR" 时使用. 即使用户只是说 "我想做个 SaaS 副业" / "怎么 bootstrap" 也应触发.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
风险投资人 / 早期投资判断(GP + Principal — Deal sourcing / 尽调 / 估值与 term sheet / 投后服务 / 退出 + LP 关系与 fundraising — 涵盖 US 美元基金 + 国内 RMB / 美元基金) (Venture capital / early-stage investor — 风险投资人(GP / Partner / Principal)的早期投资判断与基金运营实战) Master OS — automated mastery of Venture capital / early-stage investor — 风险投资人(GP / Partner / Principal)的早期投资判断与基金运营实战: top builders' mental models, tool stack, current workflows, jargon, and where to keep up. Trigger this skill when the user works on Venture capital / early-stage investor — 风险投资人(GP / Partner / Principal)的早期投资判断与基金运营实战 problems and wants industry-grade thinking, tool selection, or workflow guidance. 触发词：「VC」「venture capital」「风险投资」「early stage」「天使投资」
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
管理咨询 (管理咨询 (Management Consulting) — 战略与管理咨询的职业认知操作系统，从业者/咨询顾问/想入行者/采购咨询服务的客户视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 假设驱动 (hypothesis-driven / answer-first / Day-1 answer) 的「先有答案再验证」⇄ 数据驱动 (data-led / bottom-up) 的「先穷尽事实再归纳」，这行的核心张力是「先射箭再画靶 vs 先画靶再射箭」，资深人偏 top-down 假设树减少 boil-the-ocean，但要时刻防 confirmation bias; 以及更深层的张力 — 「卖洞见 (insight / so-what) vs 卖工时 (analysis / 体力)」，「客户影响 (client impact / 落地) vs 智识严谨 (intellectual rigor / 漂亮 deck)」; (b) 方法论正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量) — MECE (相互独立完全穷尽)、issue tree / logic tree (问题树/逻辑树)、hypothesis-driven problem solving (假设驱动)、Pyramid Principle (Minto 金字塔原理: SCQA 情境-冲突-疑问-回答 + 结论先行 + 自上而下 + 归纳/演绎)、80/20 (帕累托/抓大放小)、so-what (所以呢/洞见提炼)、storyline (故事线/ghost deck 鬼影稿)、driver tree / profit tree、2x2 矩阵、value chain、frameworks (Porter 五力/3C/4P/7S/BCG 矩阵/价值链) 既是脚手架也是陷阱 (套框架 vs 真洞见); (c) 行业结构 — MBB (McKinsey/BCG/Bain 战略三巨头) vs Big Four 咨询臂 (Deloitte/PwC Strategy&/EY-Parthenon/KPMG) vs 精品战略所 (Oliver Wyman/Kearney/Roland Berger/L.E.K./Arthur D. Little) vs 专业/职能 boutique (运营/数字化/PE 尽调); up-or-out (非升即走)、leverage model (杠杆模型: 1 个合伙人带多个 EM/咨询师/分析师的金字塔)、partner/principal/EM(项目经理)/associate(咨询师)/analyst(分析师) 职级; (d) 项目交付模型 (the case/study/engagement) — 提案/SOW (scope of work)、problem definition (问题定义/真问题 vs 表象问题)、workplan (工作计划)、hypothesis tree (假设树)、analysis (分析/建模)、synthesis (综合)、recommendation (建议)、implementation (落地); 客户管理 (steering committee 指导委员会、stakeholder 利益相关方、对齐); (e) 产出物 — the deck (PPT 幻灯片是咨询的母语)、executive summary、action title (行动标题/每页一句话结论)、ghost deck (先搭骨架后填数据)、Excel 财务模型、framework 图; (f) 职业/招聘 — case interview 生态 (案例面试: Victor Cheng LOMS/Case in Point/market sizing 市场估算/估算题/fit 行为面)、网申-笔试-案例面、up-or-out、exit options (退出路径: PE/VC/corp dev 企业发展/战略岗/创业/industry); (g) 争议/批判 — 咨询的价值之辩 (「借你的表告诉你时间」「frameworks 是剧场表演 vs 真洞见」Matthew Stewart《The Management Myth》)、McKinsey 的丑闻 (Purdue 阿片类/独裁政府/ICE/利益冲突, Bogdanich & Forsythe《When McKinsey Comes to Town》)、咨询 vs 自建战略部、generalist 通才 vs specialist 专才之争、AI/GenAI 对初级分析师工作的冲击; (h) 流派 — 战略经典 (Porter 定位学派/五力 vs 资源基础观 RBV vs 蓝海战略 Kim&Mauborgne vs 颠覆式创新 Christensen vs Mintzberg 应急战略批判 planning school); 三巨头气质分野 (McKinsey 事实驱动/CEO 信任/通才, BCG 概念/思想领导力/经验曲线/增长-份额矩阵, Bain 结果导向/NPS 净推荐值/PE 关系/与客户深度绑定)。不含: 投行 M&A/财务顾问 (估值/承销超出范畴)、纯 IT 实施/系统集成 (SI 人力外包)、纯审计/税务、纯人力 RPO/猎头、内部战略部 only (虽相关但本 skill 聚焦专业服务咨询的外部视角)。) Master OS — automated mastery of 管理咨询 (Management Consulting) — 战略与管理咨询的职业认知操作系统，从业者/咨询顾问/想入行者/采购咨询服务的客户视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 假设驱动 (hypothesis-driven / answer-first / Day-1 answer) 的「先有答案再验证」⇄ 数据驱动 (data-led / bottom-up) 的「先穷尽事实再归纳」，这行的核心张力是「先射箭再画靶 vs 先画靶再射箭」，资深人偏 top-down 假设树减少 boil-the-ocean，但要时刻防 confirmation bias; 以及更深层的张力 — 「卖洞见 (insight / so-what) vs 卖工时 (analysis / 体力)」，「客户影响 (client impact / 落地) vs 智识严谨 (intellectual rigor / 漂亮 deck)」; (b) 方法论正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量) — MECE (相互独立完全穷尽)、issue tree / logic tree (问题树/逻辑树)、hypothesis-driven problem solving (假设驱动)、Pyramid Principle (Minto 金字塔原理: SCQA 情境-冲突-疑问-回答 + 结论先行 + 自上而下 + 归纳/演绎)、80/20 (帕累托/抓大放小)、so-what (所以呢/洞见提炼)、storyline (故事线/ghost deck 鬼影稿)、driver tree / profit tree、2x2 矩阵、value chain、frameworks (Porter 五力/3C/4P/7S/BCG 矩阵/价值链) 既是脚手架也是陷阱 (套框架 vs 真洞见); (c) 行业结构 — MBB (McKinsey/BCG/Bain 战略三巨头) vs Big Four 咨询臂 (Deloitte/PwC Strategy&/EY-Parthenon/KPMG) vs 精品战略所 (Oliver Wyman/Kearney/Roland Berger/L.E.K./Arthur D. Little) vs 专业/职能 boutique (运营/数字化/PE 尽调); up-or-out (非升即走)、leverage model (杠杆模型: 1 个合伙人带多个 EM/咨询师/分析师的金字塔)、partner/principal/EM(项目经理)/associate(咨询师)/analyst(分析师) 职级; (d) 项目交付模型 (the case/study/engagement) — 提案/SOW (scope of work)、problem definition (问题定义/真问题 vs 表象问题)、workplan (工作计划)、hypothesis tree (假设树)、analysis (分析/建模)、synthesis (综合)、recommendation (建议)、implementation (落地); 客户管理 (steering committee 指导委员会、stakeholder 利益相关方、对齐); (e) 产出物 — the deck (PPT 幻灯片是咨询的母语)、executive summary、action title (行动标题/每页一句话结论)、ghost deck (先搭骨架后填数据)、Excel 财务模型、framework 图; (f) 职业/招聘 — case interview 生态 (案例面试: Victor Cheng LOMS/Case in Point/market sizing 市场估算/估算题/fit 行为面)、网申-笔试-案例面、up-or-out、exit options (退出路径: PE/VC/corp dev 企业发展/战略岗/创业/industry); (g) 争议/批判 — 咨询的
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
飞书视频会议：让机器人代当前用户加入/离开正在进行的会议，并读取会议期间的实时事件（参会人加入与离开、发言、聊天、屏幕共享等）。1. 用户提供 9 位会议号、要求代为入会或离会时使用 +meeting-join / +meeting-leave——会真实产生入会/离会记录。2. 会议进行中用户想知道“谁加入了”“谁离开了”“谁在发言”“有人共享屏幕吗”等会中动态时，机器人入会后用 +meeting-events 读取事件时间线。3. 典型场景：参会机器人、会中助手、代为旁听、代为参会。前提：机器人只能读到它自己参会过且仍在进行中的会议的事件；查询已结束会议的参会名单、纪要或逐字稿请使用 lark-vc 技能。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use whenever the user wants to find, shortlist, vet, or enrich US cybersecurity firms — pen-testing/red team, security audits, vCISO, SOC 2 readiness, incident response, managed SOC, IAM, cloud security, and AppSec. Triggers on "find me a pen-testing firm for our SOC 2 audit", "shortlist three vCISO services for our healthcare-tech startup", "we need an incident response retainer", or "pull contact info for these 8 security firm domains", even when described indirectly (we got breached, prepare us for the compliance audit, get us SOC 2 ready). Drives the ServiceGraph API (api.servicegraph.co) — a 100k+ US firm catalog filterable by industry, services, location, size, ratings. Skip in-house security hires, "how do I patch CVE-X" or "configure firewall Y" DIY questions, security-product reviews (CrowdStrike vs SentinelOne, etc.), generic security knowledge questions, consumer/personal security advice, non-US firms, individual freelancers and bug-bounty hunters.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Simulates a realistic VC Investment Committee: three partner archetypes debate a startup's merits, concerns, and deal terms, scored across 28 dimensions. Use when the user asks to simulate an IC, or how partners would debate their startup, and gives a deck, a company description, or a specific fund. A full run takes about 15–20 minutes, so for a passing question such as 'would a VC fund us?' or 'are we fundable?', answer briefly in chat and offer the simulation instead of starting it. When it runs, partners' views come from the scored simulation, never improvised.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
JUnit 5, Mockito, AssertJ, and Testcontainers patterns for any JVM project. Covers test structure, parameterised tests, mocking discipline, fluent assertions, and integration testing with real containers. Stack-agnostic — referenced by every Java plugin in the marketplace. Use this skill to: - Write clear, maintainable unit tests with JUnit 5. - Mock dependencies with Mockito without overusing mocks. - Write expressive assertions with AssertJ. - Spin up real infrastructure (DBs, message brokers) with Testcontainers for integration tests. Do NOT use this skill for: - Spring-specific test slices (@SpringBootTest, @WebMvcTest, @DataJpaTest — those are in spring-boot-plugin skills). - Framework-specific mocking utilities (MockMvc, WebTestClient).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Commit changes with govctl integration — check work item status, update journal or notes, and run govctl check
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when routing adversary findings in Phase 4. Provides routing logic, iteration limit enforcement, and escalation protocols.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Phase 4 (feedback routing) after an adversarial review FAIL. Routes adversary findings to the earliest affected phase, checks iteration limits, and escalates to human if limits are exceeded.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill during Phase 6 convergence checks. Provides four-dimensional convergence analysis, hallucination detection, and duplicate finding identification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill during Phase 5 formal hardening. Provides tool selection, proof harness patterns, security/purity audit expectations, and verification result interpretation for Rust (Kani), Python (hypothesis), and TypeScript (fast-check).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when writing Phase 1b verification architecture documents. Provides purity boundary mapping, proof obligation design, and tier assignment guidance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Architect escalation approval — extend iteration limit for a phase that has hit its cap. Records the approval decision in state and allows the blocked transition to proceed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。