「architect」の検索結果

Develop evidence-backed structural and architectural security hardening proposals from vulnerability disclosures, supplied findings, incident or assessment documents, source code, or a completed Codex Security scan. Use when a user asks for systemic improvements, alternatives beyond per-finding patches, before-and-after security architecture views, engineering tradeoff analysis, or an implementation-ready plan for a selected hardening option. Also use automatically after a Codex Security scan with reportable findings when the top-level scan workflow requests final-report hardening guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

在 wiki/cbb/ 搜索可复用 Common Building Block（sync-fifo / 2ff-sync / clock-gate 等），返回匹配模板路径。bba-architect 在 MAS 中识别复用组件时调用。触发场景：(1) bba-architect 拆分子模块识别 CBB；(2) 显式 /bb-search-cbb。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting a new project. Genesis finds real production failures from similar GitHub repos, then builds a working MVP immediately - not just documents. Two modes: fast-mvp (5 min research cap, builds right after) and deep-research (full analysis). Success = user can run the project. Triggers on: "genesis init [vision]", "I want to build X", "scaffold", "new project", "set up project", "start building", "create a tool", "make a CLI", "bootstrap", "בנה פרויקט", "צור פרויקט", "התחל פרויקט".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create or update an ADR under `docs/ADR/` for architectural decisions, dependency changes, data-model changes, or cross-cutting policy shifts. Use when the user asks to write, update, or document an ADR, record a design decision, capture architecture trade-offs, or justify a repo-wide technical policy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs implementation blueprints for features using exploration findings and architectural best practices (converted from agent)

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build custom AI agents in Claude Code from a user's problem statement. This skill analyzes the user's use case, asks smart clarifying questions, researches the internet for similar agents (GitHub repos, blogs, Claude Code community patterns), and then architects and builds production-ready Claude Code agents — including subagents, skills, hooks, slash commands, MCP integrations, and CLAUDE.md configuration. Use this skill whenever the user wants to create an agent, build an automation workflow, set up a Claude Code subagent, design a multi-agent system, or says things like 'build me an agent for...', 'automate this with Claude Code', 'I want a subagent that...', 'help me create a workflow', 'set up an agent pipeline', or any variation of wanting Claude Code to do something specialized. Also trigger when the user mentions agent architecture, agent SDK, agentic workflows, or task delegation in Claude Code — even if they don't use the word 'agent' explicitly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SPARC (Specification, Pseudocode, Architecture, Refinement, Completion) comprehensive development methodology with multi-agent orchestration

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security architecture and threat modeling. OWASP Top 10 2025 analysis, OWASP Agentic AI Top 10 (ASI01-ASI10), AI/LLM security patterns, supply chain security, modern API authentication (OAuth 2.1, DPoP, Passkeys/WebAuthn), vulnerability assessment, and security review for code and infrastructure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decision matrix for selecting multi-agent topologies (Supervisor, Swarm, Hierarchical, Conductor) with token economics, failure modes, and escalation paths

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates architecture, database, and system diagrams using Mermaid syntax. Creates visual representations of system architecture, database schemas, component relationships, data flows, and standalone HTML exports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive Android development expert covering Jetpack Compose, Kotlin coroutines/Flow, Architecture Components, Hilt DI, Navigation, testing, performance, Material Design 3, and modern Android patterns (MVI, Clean Architecture).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

N-round opposing-stance debates for trade-off analysis. Assigns pro/con roles to agents, runs structured debate rounds with quality scoring, and produces a moderator synthesis with confidence-rated recommendation. Generalizable to architecture, technology, security, and design decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Phase 2 of 5 — collaborative system design plus change-footprint mapping; outputs an ARCH doc for generate-tasks. Use only when the user asks to run Phase 2, plan the architecture, or design the solution — never trigger automatically from a design question.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AWS の構成図を draw.io の XML（.drawio）で描く。公式の AWS4 アイコンを使い、タイトルや凡例や番号バッジのような装飾を足さず、どのサービスがどこにあって何とつながっているかだけで読める図にする。AWS 構成図、アーキテクチャ図、インフラ構成図、ネットワーク構成図、VPC の図を描いてほしいとき、draw.io で AWS の図を作りたいとき、既存の構成図を直したいときは必ずこの Skill を使う。Use this whenever the user asks for an AWS architecture diagram, cloud infrastructure diagram, VPC diagram, or a draw.io file of AWS resources, even if they don't say "draw.io". Mermaid、PlantUML、Python の diagrams ライブラリなど、ほかの形式を指定されたときは使わない。Do not use it when the user explicitly asks for Mermaid, PlantUML, or the Python diagrams library.

Design human-visible, machine-readable website layers for AI assistants, RAG, and agentic search. Use this skill when the user asks for llms.txt, LLM discovery plans, visible TLDR or direct-answer blocks, source trails, entity pages, markdown alternates, AI crawler policy, topic-to-URL maps, assistant-readable public content, or LLM-friendly architecture that must preserve canonical SEO strategy without hidden bot-only facts or duplicate story bodies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate SEO, LLM-readable site architecture, UX, content, monitoring, security, and external authority work as a task-plan-driven sequence. Use this skill when the user asks to plan, execute, validate, or route multi-skill website growth work; asks what to do next across semantic core, URL structure, internal linking, schema, llms.txt, UX journeys, analytics, citation monitoring, or white-hat link placement; or wants a central architect that preserves evidence, alarms, handoffs, and tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generates a structured Project Brief — a comprehensive markdown document that extracts goals, architecture, knowledge file inventory, Custom Instructions summary, Memory contents, current state, ecosystem position, and key decisions from a Claude Project. Briefs serve as uploadable context documents: add one to any other Project for immediate deep awareness of the source Project's purpose, architecture, and progress. Use when user says "create a brief," "brief this project," "extract project context," "generate a project summary for another project," "I need to share this project's context," "prepare this project for cross-project reference," or "document this project." Also use when the user is preparing to work across Projects and needs portable context. Do NOT use for session handoffs, project audits, or Memory optimization (use rootnode-session-handoff, rootnode-project-audit, or rootnode-memory-optimization respectively, if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates and scores Claude prompts and system prompts using a six-dimension Scorecard with anchored 1-5 rubrics. Trigger on: "review my prompt," "score this prompt," "rate my prompt," "evaluate this prompt," "improve my prompt," "what's wrong with my prompt." Also trigger on: "why isn't my prompt working," "my prompt produces bad output," "help me fix this prompt," "is this prompt any good." Scorecard covers Objective Clarity, Context Specificity, Reasoning Fit, Output Precision, Behavioral Calibration, and Architectural Efficiency, plus a five-question Output Evaluation Rubric for assessing actual output. Also use when the user pastes a system prompt and asks for feedback. Activate whenever structured quality assessment of a single prompt is the primary need. Do NOT use for project-level audits involving Custom Instructions architecture, knowledge file organization, or multi-file Project structure (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized software engineering prompt methodology for Claude. Use when building prompts for system design, code review, incident response, security analysis, API design, architecture decisions, RFCs, ADRs, runbooks, or technical leadership. Trigger on: "build a prompt for code review," "system design prompt," "SRE prompt," "security review prompt," "incident response prompt," "API design prompt," "architecture decision prompt," "RFC prompt," "runbook prompt." Provides 11 tested approaches across identity, reasoning, and output for engineering analysis. Do NOT use for general coding help, writing code, or debugging — this builds prompts that shape engineering analysis, not code itself. Do NOT use for evaluating existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

コードベースのアーキテクチャを 6 つの専門エージェントチーム（Claude 5体 + Codex 1体）で 多角的に分析し、リスク・デグレしやすい箇所・改善ポイントを洗い出すスキル。 パフォーマンス、スケーラビリティ、信頼性、セキュリティ、運用、DX、データ整合性、依存関係の 8 観点を 5 グループに分担し、さらに Codex がクロスカットレビュアーとして横断分析する。 エージェント同士が反論・補足・自由な議論を行い、合意形成した結果をレポートとして出力する。 どのプロジェクトでも使える汎用スキル。 Use when: アーキテクチャを分析したい、リファクタリング前にリスクを把握したい、 デグレしやすい箇所を知りたい、コードの健全性を確認したい、大きめの実装前に注意点を洗い出したい、 技術的負債を可視化したい、コードベースの品質を監査したい。 Triggers: "arch review", "アーキテクチャ分析", "アーキテクチャレビュー", "リスク分析", "コード監査", "codebase audit", "技術的負債", "デグレしやすい", "architecture analysis", "risk analysis", "コードの健全性", "品質チェック", "実装前の確認"

複数の実装アプローチを並列チームで設計・議論し、比較して最適な計画を選ぶスキル。 各アプローチに専門グループ（architect, critic, risk-analyst）が付き、グループ内で議論して計画を洗練する。 「どのアプローチがいいか比較したい」「複数の実装方法を検討したい」「計画を並べて比べたい」 「実装方針を複数出して」「アプローチを比較」「どっちがいいか調べて」と言われた時に使用。 実装タスクで迷いがある時、設計の選択肢が複数ある時にも積極的に使う。

Multi-phase deep codebase review with severity ratings and structured output. Covers architecture, security, code quality, and UX/accessibility in a single coordinated pass. Produces a prioritized findings table suitable for direct conversion to GitHub issues via the create-github-issues skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Separate expensive observation from cheap decision-making in autonomous agent loops using a two-clock architecture. A fast clock accumulates data into a digest file; a slow clock reads the digest and acts only when something is pending. Idle cycles cost nothing because the action clock returns immediately after reading an empty digest. Use when building autonomous agents that must observe continuously but can only afford to act occasionally, when API or LLM costs dominate and most cycles have nothing to do, when designing cron-based agent architectures with observation and action phases, or when an existing heartbeat loop is too expensive because it calls the LLM on every tick.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a plugin or adapter for a CLI tool using the abstract base class pattern. Covers defining the contract (static fields, required methods), choosing an installation strategy (symlink, copy, append-to-file), implementing detection, install/uninstall with idempotency, listing, auditing, and registering the plugin. Use when adding support for a new framework to a CLI installer, building a plugin system for any multi-target tool, or extending an existing adapter architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。