958 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Implement an accepted change in bounded dependency-ordered increments when the user requests implementation and the scope benefits from multiple coherent slices; do not trigger merely because work touches multiple files, changes behavior, or is over an arbitrary line count.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repair one concrete reproducible build, typecheck, lint, test, packaging, or CI failure with a bounded root-cause-first loop; do not trigger for runtime bugs without a failing gate, broad test strategy, dependency/toolchain migration, or generic implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Creates comprehensive post-incident documents with timeline, root cause analysis, contributing factors, action items, and ownership. Follows SRE best practices for blameless postmortems. Use for "postmortem", "incident review", "RCA", or "post-incident".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses LLM output failures including hallucinations, constraint violations, format errors, and reasoning issues. Provides root cause classification, prompt fixes, tool improvements, and new test cases. Use for "debugging AI", "fixing prompts", "quality issues", or "output errors".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses and fixes flaky tests by identifying root causes (timing issues, shared state, randomness, network dependencies) and provides stabilization strategies. Use for "flaky tests", "test stability", "intermittent failures", or "test debugging".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identifies API latency hotspots and bottlenecks with profiling tools, slow endpoint detection, suspected causes, and fix roadmap. Use for "latency profiling", "performance bottlenecks", "slow APIs", or "backend performance".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a Claude Code session loops, drifts from scope, claims a fix that CI rejects, hits context, PATH, or permission walls, or fails in a way another retry will not solve and a root cause diagnosis is needed instead.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
External recon for software supply-chain attack surface — package-namespace squatting candidates, dependency-confusion vulnerabilities, GitHub Actions injection openings, container image registry exposure, SBOM mining, internal-package-name leakage, and CI/CD configuration exposure. Reconnaissance and identification ONLY — actual package publishing / typosquat attacks are EXTERNAL-OFFENSIVE and require explicit written sign-off because they can affect the entire npm/PyPI ecosystem. Use when the target has a public GitHub org, when their build artifacts/SBOMs are reachable, when their docker images are on Docker Hub/GHCR, or when you find internal package names in their JS bundles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill BEFORE capturing any screenshot, exporting any HAR, or attaching any evidence to a bug-bounty submission. It catches the most common evidence-hygiene mistakes that cause cookies to leak, PII to be shared without consent, or screenshots to be unsuitable for triage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Red-team operator discipline — the mindset corrections that separate offensive testing from defensive WAPT. Built from authorized red-team work where conservative defaults caused multiple findings to be missed and one to be incorrectly retracted. Use at the START of any red-team engagement and again whenever feeling stuck or considering 'stopping' on a defended target. The single most important skill to load when scope is 'external red team' not 'bug bounty / WAPT'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Complete reference for 26 web2 bug classes with root causes, detection patterns, bypass tables, exploit techniques, and real paid examples. Covers IDOR, auth bypass, XSS, SSRF (11 IP bypass techniques), SQLi, business logic, race conditions, OAuth/OIDC, file upload (10 bypass techniques), GraphQL, LLM/AI (ASI01-ASI10 agentic framework), API misconfig (mass assignment, JWT attacks, prototype pollution, CORS), ATO taxonomy (9 paths), SSTI (Jinja2/Twig/Freemarker/ERB/Spring), subdomain takeover, cloud/infra misconfigs, HTTP smuggling (CL.TE/TE.CL/H2.CL), cache poisoning, MFA bypass (7 patterns), SAML attacks (XSW/comment injection/signature stripping), error disclosure / debug endpoints (stack trace regex per framework, chain templates), CSS injection (attribute-selector exfiltration, opacity clickjacking, @import). LFI / file inclusion -> RCE (php://filter source disclosure, iconv filter-chain RCE with no upload, log/environ poisoning, .user.ini/.htaccess auto_prepend, data:// + expect:// wrappers, session inclusion, traversal bypass table). Insecure deserialization (PHP __wakeup bypass / phar:// POP chains, Java ysoserial CommonsCollections gadgets + magic bytes, Python pickle __reduce__ + signed-cookie forgery, Node node-serialize). Dependency confusion / supply chain (internal package-name discovery, unclaimed-name confirmation, callback-only PoC, npm/pip/Maven/RubyGems variants). Use when hunting a specific vuln class or studying what makes bugs pay.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) where crafted input causes catastrophic backtracking in regex patterns applied to user-controlled strings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Control and interact with a live browser session on any scraped page — click buttons, fill forms, navigate flows, and extract data using natural language prompts or code. Use when the user needs to interact with a webpage beyond simple scraping: logging into a site, submitting forms, clicking through pagination, handling infinite scroll, navigating multi-step checkout or wizard flows, or when a regular scrape failed because content is behind JavaScript interaction. Also useful for authenticated scraping via profiles. Triggers on "interact", "click", "fill out the form", "log in to", "sign in", "submit", "paginated", "next page", "infinite scroll", "interact with the page", "navigate to", "open a session", or "scrape failed".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Requires OFOX_API_KEY — create one at https://app.ofox.ai. Turn a portrait plus a short script into a clip of one person speaking those words to camera. You supply the text and the model generates the voice — audio cannot be uploaded, measured. Defaults to alibaba/wan-3.0-prime rather than this repo's usual seedance-2.5, because seedance-2.5 refuses a real person's photo at submission. Use when a user has a face and some words and wants the face to say them, e.g. "make this headshot read my intro", "a spokesperson clip from this portrait", "have her say this line to camera", "use this avatar to read the announcement". Do not use for a scene between two or more people (see seedance-short-drama), a polished brand or product ad (see seedance-ad-creative), a handheld creator clip (see ugc-ads), or when the words still have to be pulled out of an article and no particular face is required (see explainer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep bug analysis to break the fix-forget-repeat cycle. Analyzes root cause category, why fixes failed, prevention mechanisms, and captures knowledge into specs. Use after fixing a bug to prevent the same class of bugs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit or design server-side indexes, directories, reputations, or aggregates that are DERIVED from traffic a platform witnesses (chain heads, run verdicts, heartbeats, publish activity) so that consent gates the derivation, not merely the read: no shadow index over non-consenting principals, post-consent-only evidence windows, retention bounds and delete-propagation into derived rows, activity-oracle threat modeling, and audit-logged ranking discretion. Use when building a capability directory / whois from witnessed activity, a reputation ledger from settled outcomes, vitals aggregation across tenants, or any "the yellow pages can't lie because they index signatures" feature. Keywords: shadow index, derived index, consent gates derivation, activity oracle, phone book not a log, delist propagation, ranking weight audit, k-anonymous aggregate, subpoena surface. NOT for the consent-screen UX and scope-ladder mechanics themselves (use local-first-tenancy-boundary), reputation scoring math and Sybil economics (use agent-identity-continuity-reputation), or discovery-layer architecture L1/L2/L3 (use agent-discovery-directories-guilds).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs or reviews provenance-bound DAG attempt traces, coverage gaps, cancellation, and unknown-effect reconciliation. NOT for claiming execution completeness, deployment monitoring, or root-cause proof.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigates DAG incidents with a precise top event, timeline, competing hypotheses, barriers, propagation, and bounded recovery. NOT for automated root-cause classification, trace collection, or performance profiling.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Naturalistic causal reasoning for failures and disputed attribution. Use when postmortems or root-cause debates need reframing. NOT for causal inference, fault trees, or fully observed failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Naturalistic causal reasoning for failures and disputed attribution. Use when postmortems or root-cause debates need reframing. NOT for causal inference, fault trees, or fully observed failures.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a compliance-ladder design (C0-C6) and transcript-fidelity ladder (T0-T5) plus their adapter conformance fixtures — Codex, Claude Code, Cloudflare, Ollama/LM Studio, custom stdio/HTTP agents — for the two failure modes that make a C-badge or T-fidelity label a lie: the ladder disagreeing with itself across doc/schema/ui/probe surfaces, and a level being reachable by self-report because no daemon-witnessed negative probe actually tries to forge it. Use when designing or freezing a compliance ladder, wiring an adapter conformance probe suite, deciding whether a numeric C-badge or T-label is safe to ship, or investigating a self-attestation or observed-to-controlled bypass risk. NOT for auditing a cryptographic protocol or whitepaper for adversarial soundness (`redteam-review`), writing TLA+/formal invariants for a daemon monitor (`runtime-verification-for-agents`), or agent identity, successor linkage, and reputation across restarts (`agent-identity-continuity-reputation`).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Undo a haircut trim. Puts back the skills, commands, subagents, MCP servers, hooks, plugins and files that haircut parked into a dated bag, using the receipt it wrote at the time. Use this skill whenever the user says undo the cleanup, undo the haircut, put my config back, restore what was trimmed, I need that MCP server again, that skill is gone and I want it back, roll the trim back, what is in the bag, or which files were moved. Use it also when something stopped working right after a config cleanup and they suspect the cleanup caused it, and whenever they ask how to reverse a config cleanup they regret.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。