1,247 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Performs critical code reviews using REVIEW.md guidelines. Evaluates code quality, architecture, testing, and domain-specific concerns (legal faithfulness, cross-law references, engine safety). Use after completing significant code changes or before merging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimizes Atlassian Forge apps to reduce platform consumption and avoid unnecessary costs using Atlassian's "Optimise Forge platform costs" guidance. Use when the user asks to optimize Forge app costs, reduce Forge invocations, lower GB-seconds, reduce storage or log usage, tune memory, replace polling, improve scheduled triggers, reduce KVS writes, move work to the frontend, use bridge APIs, batch API calls, add caching, or evaluate Forge Remote trade-offs. By default, perform an audit first and offer to make the recommended changes after presenting the audit. Only modify files immediately when the user explicitly asks the agent to implement or apply optimizations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate and act on code-review feedback with technical judgment. Use before applying external suggestions, especially when feedback is ambiguous, broad, or may conflict with repository constraints, and carry confirmed corrections to relevant consumers without widening scope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate and phase MCP adoption with a bias toward the smallest set of integrations that materially improve engineering work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate and tier suppliers using a weighted scorecard per SCOR DS Supplier Management practices. Score Quality, Delivery, Cost, Responsiveness, and Sustainability. Classify suppliers as Strategic, Preferred, Approved, or Conditional. Use during vendor reviews or procurement decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) occurs when user input is embedded directly into a template engine (Jinja2, Twig, Freemarker, Pebble, Velocity, Smarty, Mako) and evaluated, enabling remote code execution. Detect via math expressions `{{7*7}}` returning `49`, or `${7*7}`, `<%= 7*7 %>`. Leads to full RCE via template sandbox escape, Python `__class__.__mro__` traversal, and Java reflection chains. Tools: tplmap, Burp Suite.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SSTI playbook. Use when template expressions, server-side rendering, preview features, or templating engines may evaluate attacker-controlled content.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects authentication and biometric bypass vulnerabilities in mobile apps (Android/iOS). Trigger on: BiometricPrompt, LocalAuthentication, LAContext, evaluatePolicy, CryptoObject, Android Keystore, Secure Enclave, kSecAccessControlBiometryCurrentSet, userAuthenticationValidityDurationSeconds, confirmCredentials, biometric fallback, PIN bypass, passive authentication, enrolled biometrics detection, Frida hook auth, jailbreak bypass, TouchID, FaceID, fingerprint. Covers MASVS-AUTH-1/2/3.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expression Language injection playbook. Use when Java EL, SpEL, OGNL, or MVEL expressions may evaluate attacker-controlled input in Spring, Struts2, Confluence, or similar frameworks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this agent when you need to review UniProt annotation rules (ARBA, UniRule) for quality, biological accuracy, and GO annotation appropriateness. This agent performs comprehensive analysis of rule condition sets, evaluates literature support, assesses taxonomic scope, and recommends curation actions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate and review GO-CAM (Gene Ontology Causal Activity Model) activities / annotons — molecular-function typing, has-input, causal relations, complexes, evidence — and check their consistency with gene annotation reviews. Use when reviewing cached GO-CAMs under gocams/, filling a GoCamReview YAML (gocams/<id>/<id>-review.yaml), or grounding a module in GO-CAM models.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Operate a logged-in Miaoshou ERP workflow for TikTok Shop Malaysia product discovery, product screening, profit estimation, listing preparation, and reviewed publishing. Use when the user asks to search or select products in 妙手 ERP, evaluate low-price traffic products, prepare Malaysian TikTok Shop listings, move products into the TikTok collection box, or publish approved listings. Prefer browser operation through the user's existing login; never store credentials or call undocumented private endpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fierce autonomous internal co-founder. Bounded web research for evidence-backed improvements. Structured idea formulation with self-critique filter that rejects ideas not serving the goal. Auto-implements high-confidence aligned improvements, proposes medium-confidence ideas for approval. Evaluates viral coefficient, AI search visibility (GEO), and solo SaaS economics. Considers higher pursuits: employing disabled people, spiritual tech investigation, 99% wealth donation ethos.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
QA-test a website or web app and return a 1-5 quality score (5 = flawless, 1 = broken) with evidence. Use when the user wants to test, QA, evaluate, score, or "check how good" a site, page, flow, or app — including a local dev server (e.g. "qa test localhost:5173", "does the checkout work?", "rate this landing page"). Drives a real Browser Use cloud browser, tunneling localhost automatically.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage the Gaia issue backlog and skill-batch intake queue. Use this skill when someone asks to: "triage issues", "clean up the issue tracker", "review the backlog", "close stale issues", "process the intake queue", "review skill-batches", "evaluate draft skill proposals", "approve or reject pending skills", "is this issue still valid?", "what's clogging the backlog?", "run a triage pass", or /gaia-triage. Covers two workstreams: (1) GitHub issue lifecycle — identifying resolved, stale, or need-more-info issues and acting on them via gh CLI; (2) skill-batch intake — evaluating draft proposals in registry-for-review/skill-batches/ and routing them toward promotion or rejection. This is the gatekeeping step before new skills enter the canonical registry; and (3) a cross-repo triage sweep — sizing, P0-P4 prioritization, umbrella/epic synthesis, and assignment across every gaia-research org repo, on the one headquarters tracker.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Quality review of test files and manual evidence documents. Goes beyond existence checks — evaluates assertion coverage, edge case handling, naming conventions, and evidence completeness. Produces ADEQUATE/INCOMPLETE/MISSING verdict per story. Run before QA sign-off or on demand.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read all open bugs in production/qa/bugs/, re-evaluate priority vs. severity, assign to sprints, surface systemic trends, and produce a triage report. Run at sprint start or when the bug count grows enough to need re-prioritization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up LLM-as-judge evaluation for ORC workflows
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate ENCODE experiment quality using standard metrics and audit flags. Use when the user asks about data quality, wants to filter for high-quality experiments, needs to interpret quality metrics (FRiP, NSC, RSC, NRF, IDR, TSS enrichment, fragment size), wants to understand ENCODE audit warnings, needs to compare quality across experiments, or is deciding whether data is usable for their analysis. Also use when the user mentions QC, quality control, or data filtering.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate architecture and module boundaries for volatility-based decomposition using Juval Lowy's framework (from "Righting Software", building on Parnas 1972). Use when reviewing module splits, service boundaries, new abstractions, or any decomposition decision. Trigger on phrases like "where should this boundary be", "how to split this", "module boundaries", "encapsulate change", "volatility", or references to Lowy, Parnas, or "Righting Software". Complements /hickey (interleaved concerns) with a different lens (change encapsulation).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate code (especially LLM-generated) for structural simplicity using Rich Hickey's "Simple Made Easy" framework. Use this skill whenever reviewing a PR, diff, or code snippet for accidental complexity — particularly when the code was generated by an AI coding assistant and line-by-line review isn't feasible. Also use when the user asks about complecting, simplicity vs. easiness, structural coupling, or concept deduplication. Trigger on phrases like "is this simple", "does this complect", "review for complexity", "structural analysis", or any reference to Hickey, Simple Made Easy, or grey-box review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing new high-level system architecture, reviewing existing designs, or making architectural decisions. Invoke to create architecture diagrams, write Architecture Decision Records (ADRs), evaluate technology trade-offs, design component interactions, and plan for scalability. Use for system design, architecture review, microservices structuring, ADR authoring, scalability planning, and infrastructure pattern selection — distinct from code-level design patterns or database-only design tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate AI agents rigorously — task benchmarks, success criteria, failure taxonomy, cost/latency tracking, and regression testing. Use when you need to know whether an agent actually works, not whether it demos well.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for any product or shopping question: find, reverse image search, shopping Instagram/Facebook/Marketplace links, buy, compare, or evaluate real products with prices, images, and product page URLs, including buying or browsing Facebook Marketplace listings. Use when presenting shopping search results from any source. For shopping intent, load this skill first before any other skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。