2,695 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when the user asks to "audit an email program" or "is this campaign safe to send"; runs a typed 20-item SEND profile with authentication, consent, opt-out, and claim veto checks on own evidence. Not for building deliverability setup — use deliverability-qa; not for designing lifecycle flows — use email-sequence-designer. 邮件质量审计/EQS评分/发送前放行
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "register this claim", "log our current offers", or "where is the proof for this figure"; curates claim wording, evidence, disclosures, terms, review dates, and live offers through the append-only claims event stream. Not for scoring claim vetoes — use the relevant auditor; not for writing ad copy — use ad-creative-builder. 广告声明台账/优惠信息登记/证据溯源
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "optimize entity presence", reconcile an entity identity, or update canonical Knowledge Graph facts; audits and maintains machine-facing identity, sameAs, schema, disambiguation, and AI-recognition evidence through the entities registry. Not for page-level AI-citation readiness - use geo-content-optimizer; not for human-facing brand canon - use narrative-registry. 实体注册/知识图谱
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks to "run a deliverability pre-flight before I send", "check my SPF/DKIM/DMARC/BIMI", "why am I landing in spam / promotions", or "score my sender reputation and list hygiene"; runs the ONE-TIME pre-send SEND S1 authentication pre-flight and builds the SEND S (Sender-integrity / Deliverability) evidence read — DNS + DMARC-RUA auth, domain/IP reputation, inbox placement, content/link/render, and point-in-time bounce/complaint hygiene — using Pass/Partial/Fail/Unknown/N/A states and scoring only at complete applicable coverage. Not for the recurring hygiene trend — use list-hygiene-monitor; not for final EQS or veto verdicts — use email-quality-auditor; not for segments/suppression lists — use list-segment-builder. 邮件送达率预检/SPF DKIM DMARC认证/发件域声誉
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) for better page experience using field and lab evidence. Use when asked to "improve Core Web Vitals", "fix LCP", "reduce CLS", "optimize INP", "page experience optimization", or "fix layout shifts".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an evidence-led web quality audit covering performance, accessibility, SEO, best practices, and agentic browsing. Use when asked to "audit my site", "review web quality", "run lighthouse audit", "check page quality", or "optimize my website".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design content structure, hierarchy, labelling, and the navigation model. Use when organising what exists. For the UI that exposes it use `navigation-patterns` (interaction-design); for user-generated grouping evidence use `card-sort-analysis` (design-research).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Craft a portfolio case study with narrative arc, process evidence, and outcomes. Use when telling a project's story to an external audience. For an internal stakeholder deck, use `presentation-deck`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyse open or closed card sort results into a proposed grouping and label set. Use after running a sort study. For turning that evidence into a full structure, use `information-architecture` (ux-strategy).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Advocate for design quality, scope, and timeline with partners and leadership using evidence and shared goals. Use in the conversation itself. For the commercial vocabulary behind it, use `business-design` (ux-strategy).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs a full AWS Well-Architected Framework review evaluating every framework question across all pillars discovered from the live AWS documentation by analyzing code, IaC, and configurations to produce evidence-backed findings with Eisenhower-prioritized remediation. Supports full reviews (every framework best practice with BP ID citations), quick reviews (question-level), pillar-scoped reviews, score-mode reviews (a maturity scorecard with per-pillar scores and filtered findings), and lens-specific reviews using lenses discovered from the live AWS documentation. Triggers on mentions of Well-Architected review, WA review, WAR, pillar assessment, architecture review across pillars, workload assessment, cloud readiness evaluation, or a Well-Architected score, grade, or scorecard request. Does not apply to single-pillar deep-dives, learning WA concepts, ADRs, or migration readiness assessments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an evidence-based production-readiness review for an Attio integration across identity, scopes, data ownership, retries, webhooks, observability, rollback, and support. Use when preparing to enable production Attio traffic. Trigger with "Attio production checklist", "Attio go-live", or "review Attio release".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a Python project's installed dependencies for known CVEs by wrapping pip-audit (PyPA's official vulnerability auditor) and emitting findings in the canonical penetration-tester schema. Detects vulnerable direct AND transitive packages, normalizes pip-audit's severity output via OSV severity bands, falls back to pip list --outdated when pip-audit isn't installed, and supports requirements.txt, pyproject.toml (PEP 621), Pipfile.lock, and poetry.lock as input sources. Use when: pre-merge gate on a Python project, post-incident sweep after a PyPI compromise (e.g. ctx, request-toolbelt typosquats, ultralytics 8.3.42 compromise), SOC2 evidence collection, or inheriting an unfamiliar Python codebase. Threshold: any HIGH or CRITICAL CVE in the resolved dependency tree. MODERATE / LOW reported informationally. Trigger with: "audit python deps", "pip vulnerability scan", "check pypi packages for CVEs", "pip-audit run".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze and improve Attio integration latency and throughput from measured query shape, pagination, concurrency, retry, and cache evidence while preserving correctness. Use when Attio requests are slow or queues are backing up. Trigger with "Attio performance", "speed up Attio sync", or "Attio query tuning".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a Node.js project's installed npm dependency tree for known CVEs by wrapping the npm audit JSON output and emitting findings in the canonical penetration-tester schema. Detects direct AND transitive vulnerabilities, normalizes npm's severity scale (info/low/moderate/ high/critical) to the shared Severity enum, and parses both v1 and v2 audit output formats so the skill works against npm 6 and npm 7+ lockfiles. Use when: pre-merge gate on a Node project, post-incident sweep after a transitive package compromise (e.g. event-stream, ua-parser, node-ipc, color.js), SOC2 vendor-management evidence collection, or auditing an inherited or acquired Node codebase. Threshold: any HIGH or CRITICAL CVE in the resolved dependency tree. MODERATE / LOW reported informationally. Trigger with: "audit npm deps", "npm vulnerability scan", "check node packages for CVEs", "npm audit".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Migrate legacy AssemblyAI Streaming v2 and LeMUR integrations to Streaming v3 and LLM Gateway with parity evidence. Use when removing deprecated contracts. Trigger with "migrate AssemblyAI", "LeMUR migration", or "Streaming v3 upgrade".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze and design an AssemblyAI architecture spanning pre-recorded jobs, Streaming v3, LLM Gateway, callbacks, queues, retention, and audit evidence. Use when performing system design or review. Trigger with "AssemblyAI architecture" or "design AssemblyAI pipeline".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a bounded CI contract gate for an Attio integration using fixtures, schema checks, and an optional read-only smoke request. Use when Attio changes need pull-request evidence without mutating CRM data. Trigger with "Attio CI", "test Attio integration", or "Attio pull request gate".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and execute a staged deployment for an external Attio REST integration with secret injection, contract tests, read-only smoke evidence, canary writes, and rollback. Use when releasing Attio-backed services. Trigger with "deploy Attio integration", "Attio rollout", or "Attio release plan".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Collect AppFolio API debug evidence for support tickets. Trigger: "appfolio debug".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Collect Apple Notes automation debug evidence for troubleshooting. Trigger: "apple notes debug".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Collect Apify debug evidence for support tickets and troubleshooting. Use when an Actor run has failed, is stuck, or produced empty output and you need to gather run metadata, logs, dataset samples, and environment info before opening a support ticket. Trigger with "apify debug", "apify support bundle", "collect apify logs", "apify diagnostic", "apify run failed why".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Collect Apollo.io debug evidence for support. Use when preparing support tickets, documenting issues, or gathering diagnostic information for Apollo problems. Trigger with phrases like "apollo debug", "apollo support bundle", "collect apollo diagnostics", "apollo troubleshooting info".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Collect Anima SDK debug evidence for support tickets and troubleshooting. Use when filing Anima support requests, debugging code generation issues, or collecting diagnostic data for the Anima team. Trigger with: "anima debug bundle", "anima support ticket", "anima diagnostics".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。