「findings」の検索結果

Generate a formatted PDF compliance audit document with findings, risk ratings, remediation recommendations, and sign-off sections.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit agent configuration files for security vulnerabilities and misconfigurations. Covers settings.json, .mcp.json, .codex/config.toml, AGENTS.md, hooks, plugin manifests, and relay config. Classify findings as P0 or P1.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a health check on an existing project: dependency audit, security scan, test runner detection, CI/CD evaluation, and missing configuration analysis. Maps the three execution gates (pre/in/post) from /10x-bootstrapper to an assessment framework for existing codebases. Reads optional context/foundation/stack-assessment.md from /10x-stack-assess to focus checks on identified gaps. Writes context/foundation/health-check.md with findings, prioritized fixes, and an agent-readiness verdict. Use when the user has an existing project and wants to verify its health before working with an agent. Trigger phrases: "health check", "check my project", "audit my project", "is my project healthy", "sprawdź projekt", "audyt projektu", "health-check", "project health". Use AFTER /10x-stack-assess (brownfield chain), BEFORE agent onboarding (m1-l4).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits Convex performance for reads, subscriptions, write contention, and function limits. Use for slow features, insights findings, OCC conflicts, or read amplification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run convex-doctor static analysis, interpret findings, and fix issues across security, performance, correctness, schema, and architecture categories. Use when running convex-doctor, fixing convex-doctor warnings or errors, improving the convex-doctor score, or when asked about Convex code quality, static analysis, or linting Convex functions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independent, traceable code review of one SDD Composy task in review_required against its approved PRD, stories, TechSpec, evidence, and project rules, with stable findings and severities. Use when a task passed QA and evidence — 'revisar a TASK-003', 'code review da task', 'review this task's diff'. Do NOT use for code review outside an SDD workspace (use the host code review), for QA (sdd-qa), or for verification (sdd-verify).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design authorized, bounded, reproducible security checks without turning scanner findings into penetration-test permission.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review requirements, coverage, results, evidence, and findings without changing the product or recorded state.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute an explicitly authorized exploratory charter and record notes, findings, evidence, and follow-up without claiming false coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants a code review of an explicit range or set of files — correctness, security, performance, conventions, tests — with stable findings (CR-nnn, BLOCKER..INFO) and rule citations — 'revisar os últimos commits', 'code review da feature X', 'review base..HEAD'. Plans a REPORT-mode review (no code changes, no commit). Do NOT use to fix code (feat-feature / feat-quick), to write tests (feat-test) or for UI/UX design critique.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review, repair and steward the nightly Codex debt-sweep PR (branch codex/daily-debt/<date>). Judges every commit GOOD / REPAIR / REVERT, triages the bot review findings through /fix, lands one round-1 commit, files follow-up issues, then stewards the PR itself with a 3-round ceiling. Run by the 08:00 UTC cloud routine; also '/debt-review', '/debt-review 1789'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates legacy AEM (6.x, AMS, on-prem) to AEM as a Cloud Service migration using BPA CSV or cache, CAM/MCP target discovery, and one-pattern-per-session workflow. Use for BPA/CAM findings, Cloud Service blockers, or fixes for scheduler, ResourceChangeListener, replication, EventListener, OSGi EventHandler, DAM AssetManager, HTL data-sly-test lint. OSGi configs → Cloud Manager — scan ui.config, .cfg.json, secrets, $[secret:]/$[env:] — agent follows references/osgi-cfg-json-cloud-manager.md when prompted. Transformation steps live in the best-practices skill—read it and the right references/ modules before editing code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hard readiness gate before implementation begins — cross-checks the constitution, feature spec, plan, and tasks for consistency, traceability, and unresolved ambiguity. Returns PASS or FAIL with specific findings. Load when the spec-driven-development orchestrator routes /analyze, when the user asks to cross-check spec vs plan, audit traceability, verify spec readiness, gate-check before implementation, or says "is this spec implementation-ready", "trace requirements to tasks", "/analyze", "spec sanity check", "spec readiness gate", "spec consistency check". Output: docs/reviews/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>-spec-crosscheck.md.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract actionable skill knowledge from academic papers and research articles, assess credibility, run security checks, and either improve existing skills or create new ones. Load when the user asks to learn from a paper, extract insights from a research paper, turn a paper into a skill, apply paper findings to skills, read this paper and improve my skills, or process a research article. Also triggers on "skill from paper", "learn from this paper", "paper to skill", "extract from this research", "apply this paper", or when the user uploads or links to an academic PDF or paper URL.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract actionable patterns, architecture decisions, code conventions, and skill-relevant insights from GitHub/GitLab repositories. Assess repo credibility, run the full security scan pipeline, and apply findings to existing skills, new skills, or the current project. Load when the user asks to learn from a repo, extract patterns from a codebase, study a repository, or analyze a repo for reusable techniques. Also triggers on "learn from this repo", "learn from this repository", "what can we learn from this codebase", "extract patterns from this repo", "study this repo".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract actionable insights from blog posts, web articles, and practitioner content - assess credibility, run security checks, and either improve existing skills or apply to the current project. Load when the user asks to learn from an article, extract insights from a blog post, apply a practitioner's findings, or process engineering blog content. Also triggers on "learn from this article", "learn from this blog post", "extract insights from this post", "what can we learn from this article", "apply this article", or when the user links to a blog, Medium, Substack, dev.to, or engineering blog post.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit UI, docs, or prose for AI-generated tells in design and copy, then fix approved findings. Use when the user says de-slop, slop check, "looks AI-generated", or wants copy humanized.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Searches and explores Burp Suite project files (.burp) from the command line. Use when searching response headers or bodies with regex patterns, extracting security audit findings, dumping proxy history or site map data, or analyzing HTTP traffic captured in a Burp project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks about International Fuel Tax Agreement (IFTA) compliance — quarterly returns, jurisdiction reporting, fuel + miles reconciliation, IFTA-100/101 forms, base jurisdiction selection, IFTA license + decals, recordkeeping requirements, common IFTA audit findings, or how to handle non-IFTA jurisdictions. Cite IFTA Articles of Agreement.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when your carrier is selected for an IFTA audit. Covers what records to produce, how the audit is conducted, and common findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks how to interpret a DOT medical examiner's findings — what restrictions mean (corrective lenses, hearing aid, no insulin, etc.), what conditions trigger short-term vs 24-month certificates, vision/hearing thresholds, blood pressure categories, sleep apnea screening, when to seek an exemption program, and how to handle a downgrade or denial. Cite 49 CFR 391.41-49 and the FMCSA Medical Examiner Handbook.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks about FMCSA's Crash Preventability Determination Program (CPDP) — how to dispute that a crash was non-preventable, eligible crash types, evidence requirements, how preventability findings affect SMS scoring + safety ratings, the difference between "preventability" and "fault," and the National Crash Preventability Program. Cite FMCSA CPDP guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill if you're a new motor carrier expecting your first FMCSA safety audit. Covers what to expect, focus areas, and common findings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run convex-doctor static analysis, interpret findings, and fix issues across security, performance, correctness, schema, and architecture categories. Use when running convex-doctor, fixing convex-doctor warnings or errors, improving the convex-doctor score, or when asked about Convex code quality, static analysis, or linting Convex functions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。