本文へ移動
cccskills

「guard」の検索結果

962 件 ・ 関連度順

概要と使いどころ

Classify + announce the target Convex deployment before any deployment-affecting command; fresh explicit consent for prod actions; session read-only mode.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

waynesutton/waynesutton-ai22026年9月8日 更新

Implement state machines with AASM for workflow management. Covers state transitions, guards, callbacks, and testing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MikeCheng1208/BattleTree22026年7月22日 更新

Autonomous DevSecOps & FinOps Guardrails. Orchestrates Gemini 3 Flash to audit Linux Kernel patches, Terraform cost drifts, and K8s compliance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MMEHDI0606/ai-agent-foundation-template22026年5月21日 更新

Design spec with 98 rules for building CLI tools that AI agents can safely use. Covers structured JSON output, error handling, input contracts, safety guardrails, exit codes, and agent self-description.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MMEHDI0606/ai-agent-foundation-template22026年5月21日 更新

Remove refusal behaviors from open-weight LLMs using OBLITERATUS — mechanistic interpretability techniques (diff-in-means, SVD, whitened SVD, LEACE, SAE decomposition, etc.) to excise guardrails while preserving reasoning. 9 CLI methods, 28 analysis modules, 116 model presets across 5 compute tiers, tournament evaluation, and telemetry-driven recommendations. Use when a user wants to uncensor, abliterate, or remove refusal from an LLM.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ibragimov-oasis/vibe-coder22026年6月24日 更新

Decide whether a request is scope creep — "is this in scope", "is this scope creep", "should I push back on this client request", "draft a boundary reply". Returns in-scope, creep or grey-zone with a suggested reply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DrNabeelKhan/maxim22026年9月17日 更新

Author and run unattended autonomous workflows — "workflow", "unattended", "run on a schedule", "automate this overnight", "set up an autonomous", "dry-run". Mandatory budget guards, a separate verification gate, idempotency, and dry-run on by default.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DrNabeelKhan/maxim22026年9月17日 更新

Block writes through filesystem junctions and symlinks — file write through .mxm-system or .claude junction, git commit through a junction, delete through a junction. Enforces the junction read-only rule so the real repo stays the source of truth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DrNabeelKhan/maxim22026年9月17日 更新

Knowledge and guardrails for the mise + fnox + infisical secrets toolchain, covering secret injection, secret providers, and env var hygiene.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

jcasnellie69/homelab-config22026年10月12日 更新

Prevents duplicate external actions (posts, replies, sends, transfers, deploys). Check before acting, record after. Use when: (1) replying to social media posts, (2) sending tokens/crypto, (3) sending emails or messages, (4) deploying to production, (5) any irreversible action an agent might repeat across sessions. Built by an AI agent who double-replied on X and double-sent airdrops.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Lord1Egypt/awesome-skill-forge22026年6月10日 更新

Use after building a feature — explore it in a real browser to find what nobody predicted, then turn each finding into a deterministic test that guards it forever. Covers the agentic pass, what to generate vs hand-write, and how to skip honestly when a capability is missing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aryannema/vigyan-site-os22026年10月2日 更新

Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) are tamper-resistant physical devices that safeguard cryptographic keys and perform cryptographic operations in a hardened environment. Keys stored in an HSM never lea

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

aniket2348823/Vul-Agent22026年6月9日 更新

Migrates TypeScript projects to strict mode incrementally with type guards, utility types, and best practices. Use when users request "TypeScript strict", "strict mode migration", "type safety", "strict TypeScript", or "ts-strict".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sathishssj3/Stereix-Engine22026年10月4日 更新

Establishes git workflow guardrails including conventional commits, commit message hooks, branch naming conventions, PR templates, and code review processes. Provides hook configurations, workflow templates, and emergency bypass instructions. Use when users request "setup git hooks", "enforce commit conventions", "add PR templates", or "standardize git workflow".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

sathishssj3/Stereix-Engine22026年10月4日 更新

Use when automating research session rituals in Claude Code with hooks, such as session-start context injection, daily research logging, session-end persistence, or pre-commit guards that block secrets and unverified citations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OnourImpram/claude-code-for-social-scientists22026年9月6日 更新

Command and Control framework deployment, configuration, and operational tradecraft for red team engagements. Covers Cobalt Strike (malleable C2 profiles, Beacon types HTTP/HTTPS/DNS/SMB, Beacon Object Files for in-memory execution, sleep and jitter tuning, named pipe pivoting), Sliver (implant generation across mTLS/WireGuard/DNS transport, operator multiplayer mode, armory extensions), Mythic (agent ecosystem with Apollo/Poseidon/Medusa, C2 profile configuration, translation containers), Havoc (Demon agent with sleep obfuscation via Ekko/Zilean, indirect syscalls, dotnet inline execution), Metasploit (msfvenom payload generation, multi/handler staging, Meterpreter post-exploitation modules), redirector architecture using Apache mod_rewrite and Nginx, domain fronting through CDN providers, DNS-based C2 for restrictive network egress, and TLS certificate management for infrastructure OPSEC. Tools: Cobalt Strike, Sliver, Mythic, Havoc, Metasploit Framework. Aligns to MITRE ATT&CK T1071 (Application Layer P...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ajtazer/heckit22026年10月7日 更新

Cloud security attack methodology covering AWS, Azure, and GCP. Includes credential harvesting (IMDS, ~/.aws, env vars, leaked CI secrets, instance roles), enumeration with cloud-specific tools (pacu, ScoutSuite, Prowler, ROADtools, gcp_enum), privilege escalation paths (IAM PassRole, AssumeRole chains, Lambda/Functions privilege flips, Azure Owner-on-self, GCP serviceAccountTokenCreator), persistence techniques (IAM user/key creation, AAD app registration, GCP svc account key creation, EventBridge/Logic Apps backdoors), data exfiltration (S3/Blob/GCS, snapshot share, RDS/CosmosDB/Cloud SQL exfil), cloud-native lateral movement (cross-account assume, Azure AD multi-tenant, GCP project hierarchy), serverless attacks (Lambda env vars, layer hijack, Step Functions), Kubernetes-on-cloud (EKS/AKS/GKE-specific paths to node and AWS metadata), and CSPM evasion (CloudTrail blind spots, GuardDuty mute, Sentinel rule shaping). Use when the engagement scope is cloud accounts, when you've stolen cloud credentials, or...

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ajtazer/heckit22026年10月7日 更新

Automated security auditing for OpenClaw projects. Scans for hardcoded secrets (API keys, tokens) and container vulnerabilities (CVEs) using Trivy. Provides structured reports to help maintain a clean and secure codebase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

johnalbertini14-glitch/openclaw-skills22026年2月26日 更新

Design, build, deploy, and operate production AI agent systems — single agents, multi-agent teams, and autonomous swarms. Complete methodology from agent architecture through orchestration, memory systems, safety guardrails, and operational excellence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

johnalbertini14-glitch/openclaw-skills22026年2月26日 更新

Secure the path from an inbound event (webhook, email, SMS, GitHub comment, file, cron) to an agent spawn in the Port Daddy fleet. Use when wiring trigger sources to agents, reviewing the io-wiring registry, adding a trust/permission gate, hardening output sinks (SSRF/path traversal), scoping tools by provenance, or proving the spawn path is safe against prompt-injection → tool-abuse. Encodes ADR-0093 and the red-team threat model. NOT for generic Coast Guard sandboxing (ADR-0050), the macaroon push-grant gate alone (ADR-0053), or non-fleet code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Designs and audits data retention and file compaction for an embedded SQLite datastore in a long-lived service — a unified retention registry (one declared policy per table), TTL / absolute-age / row-count-cap policies, a fail-loud coverage guard, WAL/checkpoint tuning, and auto_vacuum/incremental-vacuum so pruning actually shrinks the file. Use when a SQLite DB grows unbounded, a table has an index but no DELETE, a pruned DB never shrinks on disk, metrics are stored as raw events forever, or a new table needs bounding. Keywords retention policy, TTL, reaper, prune, VACUUM, auto_vacuum, incremental_vacuum, WAL checkpoint, freelist, DB bloat, row cap, per-tenant quota. NOT for Postgres/MySQL/server-DB partitioning or TTL, log-line rate-limiting/sampling, backup/replication, schema migrations, or query-performance indexing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Great Expectations, dbt tests, anomaly detection, and data contracts for data quality. Activate on: data quality, data validation, Great Expectations, data contract, anomaly detection, SLA, freshness check, schema validation. NOT for: dbt model structure (use dbt-analytics-engineer), schema evolution (use schema-evolution-manager).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

OpenLineage, DataHub, Marquez for data lineage tracking and impact analysis. Activate on: data lineage, OpenLineage, DataHub, Marquez, impact analysis, data catalog, column lineage, data discovery. NOT for: data quality validation (use data-quality-guardian), dbt documentation (use dbt-analytics-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新

Produces a narrow-interval quality signal for a WinDAGs skill that a third party can verify without inspecting model weights or method internals. The mechanism is attribution-kNN over a tamper-evident outcome log (task→skills→accept/reject store), combined with a conformal-prediction calibration certificate that provides a formal coverage guarantee. Thompson/Beta sampling is explicitly rejected as a category error: it produces a selection signal for stationary i.i.d. rewards, not an attestation signal for context-dependent LLM output quality. The resulting bundle — outcome-log Merkle root + conformal threshold + optional TEE guardrail signature — constitutes a "narrow-interval trust" credential: verifiable, bounded, and internals-opaque.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

curiositech/port-daddy22026年10月12日 更新