「iter」の検索結果

Submit compact EpiGraphDB API requests for ontology, literature, MR, gene-drug, and support-path evidence. Use when a user wants concise EpiGraphDB summaries

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mirror an iOS Simulator into the Codex in-app browser and render SwiftUI previews from importable Swift packages in that simulator with hot reload. Use when a user wants to watch or interact with an iOS app in the browser, see a SwiftUI preview outside Xcode Canvas, iterate live on a preview, or capture browser-visible simulator proof.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, critique, route, and implement Gantt charts and schedule visualizations. Use when the user mentions Gantt charts, project schedules, roadmaps with task spans, milestones, dependencies, predecessors, critical path, baselines, WBS, resource plans, capacity timelines, MS Project, Primavera P6, Jira Advanced Roadmaps, GitHub Projects, Smartsheet, monday.com, Asana, ClickUp, Azure DevOps iterations, or importing/exporting project-management data for a timeline chart.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create user stories with Mike Cohn format and Gherkin acceptance criteria. Use when turning user needs into development-ready work with clear outcomes and testable conditions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build a structured PRD that connects problem, users, solution, and success criteria. Use when turning discovery notes into an engineering-ready document for a major initiative.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decode an incoming message into a structured breakdown separating the literal ask from the job-to-be-done. Use when a loaded Slack ping, email, mandate, or escalation needs a reply.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate Excalidraw diagrams from natural language descriptions. Outputs .excalidraw JSON files openable in Excalidraw. Use when asked to "create a diagram", "make a flowchart", "visualize a process", "draw a system architecture", "create a mind map", "generate an Excalidraw file", "draw an ER diagram", "create a sequence diagram", or "make a class diagram". Supports flowcharts, relationship diagrams, mind maps, architecture, DFD, swimlane, class, sequence, and ER diagrams. Can use icon libraries (AWS, GCP, etc.) when set up. Do NOT use for code architecture analysis (use the architecture skills), Mermaid diagram rendering (use mermaid-studio), or non-visual documentation (use docs-writer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spec-driven feature work that freezes obligations instead of the plan: one human-reviewed plan with EARS criteria, path, entities, interface and one-way doors, then proof-backed checks, then build, then an independent Verifier. Use when the user says "tlc-spec-lean", "plan feature", "specify feature", "write the checks", "build this plan", or "verify work". Do NOT use for standalone design documents unattached to a feature, architecture decomposition analysis, or work that already has a task list or checklist to execute.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Technology-agnostic guidance for modular systems: bounded contexts, clear boundaries, composability, state isolation, explicit contracts, failure containment, scaffolding workflows, split/merge criteria, sub-units inside a context, and compliance review signals. Use when designing or reviewing module structure, service boundaries, package layout, cross-cutting dependencies, "how should we split this?", modularity assessments, coupling between domains, greenfield context design, or architecture discussions without assuming a specific framework, language, or repository layout. Do NOT use for executing the full Patterns 1–5 repo decomposition pipeline or per-pattern inventories (use modular-decomposition), phased extraction roadmaps as the main deliverable (use decomposition-planning-roadmap), or end-to-end legacy migration strategy (use legacy-migration-planner).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, review, and edit documentation files with consistent structure, tone, and technical accuracy. Use when creating docs, reviewing markdown files, writing READMEs, updating `/docs` directories, or when user says "write documentation", "review this doc", "improve this README", "create a guide", or "edit markdown". Do NOT use for code comments, inline JSDoc, or API reference generation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scores how completely an implementation fulfills a PRD/spec, case by case, and produces a single comparable final grade. Invoke only when explicitly named (e.g. run spec-driven-eval); do not auto-trigger. Use when benchmarking spec-driven implementations, grading acceptance criteria, evaluating whether a feature was 100% implemented, comparing multiple implementations of the same PRD, or auditing implementation and test coverage (unit and e2e) against product requirements. Do NOT use for planning or building features (use tlc-spec-driven), writing PRDs, or general code review unrelated to a spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Creates comprehensive Technical Design Documents (TDD) with mandatory and optional sections through interactive discovery. Use when user asks to "write a design doc", "create a TDD", "technical spec", "architecture document", "RFC", "design proposal", or needs to document a technical decision before implementation. Do NOT use for README files, API docs, or general documentation (use docs-writer instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous senior-operator mode for AI agents that resolve tasks end to end without babysitting and never create new problems. The agent verifies every claim against real evidence (web search dated to the current month and year, the codebase, and available tools, MCPs, and CLIs); it never guesses, never fakes confidence, and never claims something is done without proof. It stays silent and keeps working, interrupting the user only on three stops, namely a destructive or irreversible action, a dead-end with no evidence after exhausting sources, or genuine ambiguity that changes the outcome. Output is short, literal, and human. Use when the user says "not-your-babysitter", "nanny mode", "work autonomously", "stop babysitting", or "no hand-holding", or wants an agent that solves problems on its own, especially hands-on engineering and operational tasks. Do not use when the user explicitly wants a tutorial, a verbose walkthrough, or open-ended brainstorming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep a Linear issue aligned with implementation evidence, acceptance criteria, code review, and deployment state while avoiding premature completion claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Score work out of 10 against a clear rubric, then improve it round by round until every item reaches the target score the user named (for example "get it to 8 out of 10", "bring everything under 6 up to 6+"). Covers anchored rubrics, measurable criteria, independent or blind judging, before/after scorecards, and honest reporting of anything still short. Use whenever the user asks to score, rate, grade or judge something out of 10, names a target score, or asks "what would make this a 9?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need design-first, spec-driven, skimmable prompts for UI generation. Covers prompt structure, constraints, variations, typography/spacing rules, and iteration workflow for consistent UI outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply a prompt-agnostic execution and verification loop to any substantial task while preserving the original request. Use when the user asks to fan out work, use subagents or independent reviewers, loop until done, benchmark against references, apply a harsh critic, compare candidates blind, improve an existing prompt with verification, or continue until explicit quality gates pass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Light carved wood in a dark room in three.js, with procedural grain and pores, one warm key through a window, soft shadows that touch, light shafts, background rays and dust, then score the render out of 10 on an anchored rubric with a runnable headless scorecard and iterate until each item reaches the target. Use for oiled timber, kumiko, joinery and workshop scenes; wood that reads flat, plastic or washed out; volumetrics that lift the blacks; "score this out of 10"; or "get the lighting to 8".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Solana vault management via GLAM Protocol. Triggers: glam, glam-cli, glam-sdk, vault create/manage, tokenized vault, share class, DeFi vault, treasury, asset management, access control, delegate permissions, Jupiter swap, Kamino lending/borrow/vaults/farms, staking (Marinade/native/SPL/Sanctum/LST), cross-chain USDC (CCTP), timelock, subscription/redemption, NAV pricing, token transfer. Supports CLI and TypeScript SDK.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ERC-8004 Agent identity: 注册/更新/上架/下架/搜索agent, register/update/activate/deactivate/search — User/ASP/Evaluator(买家/卖家/评审员, 旧称仲裁者亦可); 我的agent/ASP, 找做X的ASP/agent有什么服务/endpoint怎么填/查口碑/传头像. + Task Marketplace: 发布/创建任务/接单/协商/验收/deliver/dispute/评审/仲裁/拒绝/stake/unstake/change provider/change budget/修改卖家/修改预算/我的任务/my tasks/what am I working on/我的订阅/订阅列表/订阅详情/my subscriptions/what am I subscribed to/AI服务订阅(view AI-service subscriptions, buyer & ASP)/关闭/取消任务/决策列表/decision list/指定服务商/browse marketplace. + task watch: 监听任务进展/历史消息/未读消息/未决策/outstanding decisions. + device routing: 设备列表/我登录了哪些设备/device list, 本设备或指定设备订阅消息开关. + okx-a2a missing/uninitialized. Match by meaning. MUST ACTIVATE on inbound envelopes: (1) {agentId, message:{source:"system", event, jobId,...}} system event; (2) {msgType:"a2a-agent-chat", jobId, sender:{role},...} agent-to-agent task chat (sender.role = COUNTERPARTY, not you); (3) literal "Read the okx-ai skill" (or legacy "Read the okx-agent-task skill") in the envelope.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Single-agent mission orchestrator. Decomposes a mission into tasks, spawns one worker per task using the default model, verifies exit criteria, and chains tasks with retry. No critic pattern — each worker self-verifies. Simple, fast, works with any model config.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous iteration loop: modify, verify, keep/discard against any metric

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write JavaScript code in n8n Code nodes. Use when writing JavaScript in n8n, using $input/$json/$node syntax, making HTTP requests with this.helpers / the $helpers global, working with dates using DateTime, troubleshooting Code node errors, choosing between Code node modes, or doing any custom data transformation in n8n. Always use this skill when a workflow needs a Code node — whether for data aggregation, filtering, API calls, format conversion, batch processing logic, or any custom JavaScript. Covers SplitInBatches loop patterns, cross-iteration data, pairedItem, and real-world production patterns. Also use when asked why a Code node or workflow is slow, which execution mode is faster, or how to cut per-item overhead on large datasets. EXCEPTION — for the AI-agent-callable Custom Code Tool (@n8n/n8n-nodes-langchain.toolCode, a tool attached to an AI Agent), use the n8n-code-tool skill instead; it has a different runtime contract.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。