「multiple」の検索結果

Finds the cause of a hard bug by running several read-only subagents in parallel, each attacking it from a different angle (change history, code path, data and state, environment, reproduction), then checking their evidence, ranking the hypotheses and naming the one experiment that would confirm the leader. It diagnoses and does not fix. Use when someone says "hunt this bug with multiple agents", "swarm on this regression", "investigate in parallel", "find the root cause", or when a failure is intermittent, crosses components, or has resisted a first look.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create ZIP and TAR archives programmatically with Archiver — bundle files, directories, and streams into compressed archives with progress tracking. Use when tasks involve generating downloadable bundles, backing up directories, creating deployment packages, or building export features that zip multiple files together.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Process multiple documents in bulk with parallel execution. Use when a user asks to batch process files, convert many documents at once, run parallel file operations, bulk rename, bulk transform, or process a directory of files concurrently. Covers parallel execution, error handling, and progress tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build globally distributed apps with Azure Cosmos DB. Work with multiple data models (document, key-value, graph), configure global replication with tunable consistency levels, manage throughput with RU/s, and query with SQL API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Version REST and GraphQL APIs. Use when a user asks to version an API, handle breaking changes, implement API deprecation, manage multiple API versions, or design an API evolution strategy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate multiple AI agents working together on complex tasks — routing, handoffs, consensus, memory sharing, and quality gates. Use when tasks involve building multi-agent systems, coordinating specialist agents in a pipeline, implementing agent-to-agent communication, designing swarm architectures, setting up agent orchestration frameworks, or building autonomous agent teams with supervision and quality control. Covers hierarchical, mesh, and pipeline topologies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate structured research briefs from RSS feeds and web sources on any topic. Synthesizes multiple sources into actionable analysis with key findings, data points, expert perspectives, and content angles.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when training models across multiple GPUs or nodes, handling large models that don't fit in memory, or optimizing training throughput - covers DDP, FSDP, DeepSpeed ZeRO, model/data parallelism, and gradient checkpointingUse when ", " mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The orchestration layer for AI-native creative production. This skill coordinates multiple AI tools—video, image, audio, digital humans, effects—into cohesive campaigns, productions, and creative systems. As AI tools proliferate, the challenge shifts from "can we create this?" to "how do we orchestrate these capabilities into something coherent?" The AI Creative Director thinks in systems, not tools. In pipelines, not one-offs. In brand consistency across AI-generated assets. This is where creative vision meets technical orchestration. The AI Creative Director doesn't just use AI tools—they compose them into creative instruments that produce at scales and speeds previously impossible. Use when "AI creative director, orchestrate AI, AI campaign, multi-tool, AI workflow, AI pipeline, coordinate AI, AI production, AI creative system, full AI production, AI at scale, orchestration, creative-direction, ai-production, workflow, pipeline, multi-tool, scale, quality-control" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The systematic discipline of reviewing AI-generated and human-written marketing content for quality, accuracy, consistency, and effectiveness. This isn't proofreading—it's strategic quality control that catches issues before they damage brand, waste spend, or miss opportunities. In an era where AI can generate content at scale, QA becomes the bottleneck— and the moat. Speed without quality is just fast failure. Every piece of content is a brand promise, and QA ensures that promise is kept. Content QA operates at multiple levels: tactical (spelling, grammar), strategic (message alignment), technical (platform compliance), and brand (voice, tone). The best QA catches what the creator couldn't see because they were too close. Use when "review content, QA, quality check, proofread, check copy, content review, brand compliance, verify content, fact check, review before publish, content approval, final review, qa, content-review, quality-assurance, brand-compliance, proofreading, content-quality, review" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track multiple domains and keywords across runs using the DataForSEO SERP API. Saves a local watchlist of domains + their target keywords, then re-runs live rank checks on demand and surfaces any position changes (gains, losses, drops) since the last check.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Researches real projects, papers, and documented failures before proposing a new feature, architecture, or technology choice. Use for design decisions with multiple valid approaches, not for implementing an existing spec or fixing a known bug.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Brand Reputation Monitoring workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Scrape reviews, ratings, and brand mentions from multiple platforms using Apify Actors and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Accessibility (a11y) workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Audit and improve web accessibility following WCAG 2.1 guidelines. Use when asked to "improve accessibility", "a11y audit", "WCAG compliance", "screen reader support", "keyboard navigation", or "make accessible". Do NOT use for SEO (use seo), performance (use core-web-vitals), or comprehensive site audits covering multiple areas (use web-quality-audit) and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate debugging across multiple services. Use when a senior developer needs to trace a distributed issue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Skill-aware orchestration with context routing. Decomposes complex tasks into skill-typed subtasks, extracts targeted context subsets, executes subagents in parallel, and synthesizes results. Self-answers trivial lookups inline. No SDK dependency — uses raw HTTP via httpx. Use when tasks require multiple analytical perspectives, when context is large and subtasks only need portions, or when orchestrating-chat-agents spawns too many redundant subagents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Systematic research methodology for building comprehensive, current knowledge on any topic. Requires web_search tool. Use when questions require thorough investigation, recent developments post-cutoff, synthesis across multiple sources, or when Claude's knowledge may be outdated or incomplete. Triggered by "Research", "Investigate", "What's current on", "Latest info on", complex queries needing validation, or technical topics with recent changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Preprocesses photographed sheets of many business cards — slicing each into overlapping high-resolution tiles and de-glaring them with container tooling (OpenCV/ImageMagick) — then reads every card via cheap parallel temperature-0 API calls (Haiku or Sonnet) using a distilled extraction prompt, and writes deduped contact fields to a CSV. Use when a user has photos or scans holding multiple business cards per image, mentions glare or unreadable cards, batch card transcription, contact extraction, or wants to read many cards without an expensive in-conversation pass. Triggers on 'business cards', 'card scan', 'extract contacts', 'read these cards', 'card glare', 'too many cards per photo'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-conversation methodology for iterative stateful work with context accumulation. Use when users request work that spans multiple sessions (research, debugging, refactoring, feature development), need to build on past progress, explicitly mention iterative work, work logs, project knowledge, or cross-conversation learning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maintain a structured task list for the current session. Use proactively when a request requires 3+ distinct steps, the user provides multiple items, or complex work benefits from explicit progress tracking. Storage persists via Muninn config across container death. Adapted from Claude Code's TodoWrite tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guidance for asking clarifying questions when user requests are ambiguous, have multiple valid approaches, or require critical decisions. Use when implementation choices exist that could significantly affect outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate progressive disclosure indexes for GitHub repositories to use as Claude project knowledge. Use when setting up projects referencing external documentation, creating searchable indexes of technical blogs or knowledge bases, combining multiple repos into one index, or when user mentions "index", "github repo", "project knowledge", or "documentation reference".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Securely manages API credentials for multiple providers (Anthropic Claude, Google Gemini, GitHub). Use when skills need to access stored API keys for external service invocations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Convenes expert panels for problem-solving. Use when user mentions panel, experts, multiple perspectives, MECE, DMAIC, RAPID, Six Sigma, root cause analysis, strategic decisions, process improvement, or asks for philosophers/ancients (Socratic, Aristotelian, Stoic method experts).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。