「protocol」の検索結果

Blockchain USDC payments via APay — pay services, manage budgets, open streaming channels, and handle x402 protocol.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Connect AI agents to the 2020117 decentralized network. Register, post to timeline, trade compute via NIP-90 DVM jobs (text generation, translation, summarization, image/video/speech), pay with Lightning, build reputation through Nostr zaps and Web of Trust. Use when building or operating AI agents that need to communicate, exchange capabilities, or transact on an open protocol.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services. Covers design principles, architecture, implementation patterns, and evaluation-driven development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) review rules for code reviews: find the same knowledge — a rule, a constant, a parser, a validation, a protocol detail — implemented in several places that must change together, and tell it apart from code that merely looks alike. Use when reviewing a diff, a pull request or recent changes for duplication, on "DRY review", "is this duplicated", "copy-paste check", or when a review checklist asks for DRY. Pair it with the solid skill for design and with owasp-asvs for security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply GEODE's measured architecture, module and symbol naming, Python type/class, persisted schema, test, site, and versioning conventions. Use when adding or moving modules, choosing dataclass/Pydantic/Protocol/ABC forms, naming classes or files, designing stored data, reviewing convention compliance, or deciding compatibility and release version treatment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Protocol for agents to write structured outputs that survive session resets and are findable by the orchestrator.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

共享 Ascend NPU 上的**性能验收标准**：判定"某优化到底有没有效、有多少效"，并规定 **只有验收态结果才能写入总览表**。分双态：**探索态**（平时特性分析：不展开、 允许少步/单次，产物必须标 `[探索]`、不得进总览表）vs **验收态**（入库：同窗 ≥N 复现、按 window-ab-protocol 口径出数）。当用户问"这个优化有多少收益 / 是否有效 / 要不要采纳 / 为什么变慢了""A-B 一下""同窗对比""测 3 次取平均""把数据对齐到同一窗口" "数字对不对""是不是我眼花了"，或需要在多卡共享机器上给出性能结论、刷新优化总览报表、 复核别人给的加速比时使用；即使用户只说"帮我确认下这个改动值不值"也应触发。 核心口径：同窗 A/B 是唯一权威（跨窗口绝对值不可比）、A/B/A 漂移校正、窗口内自带基线、 三次证明（HTTP 200 + 字节数 + 日志行）、产物 md5 与关键张量 dump 双证据、噪声地板内 不下结论、profiling 三张表统一到同一窗口；并覆盖 md5 门禁的盲区（忠实度对照）、 共享机器纪律与门控回退纪律。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts board-adopted charters establishing Audit and Compensation Committees for U.S. corporations, covering composition, independence, delegated powers, meeting protocol, reporting, and annual review. Adapts for public (SEC/SOX/exchange) or private governance regimes. Use when creating or refreshing committee charters, preparing for IPO governance readiness, onboarding directors, or conducting governance cleanup. Trigger keywords: audit committee charter, compensation committee charter, board governance, SOX compliance, Rule 10A-3, exchange-standard committees.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational decision frameworks: triage, escalation, case management, billing ops. Use for 'how to handle X cases', 'build triage', 'escalation protocol'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-pass structural code review with adversarial analysis, scope-aware dispatch, adversarial persona passes, and forced-finding protocol. Supports input modes: branch diff (default), PR number (#123), commit hash, pending changes (--pending). Use when asked to "review this PR", "code review", "pre-landing review", "check my diff", or "review #123". Proactively suggest when the user is about to merge or land code changes. NOT for behavioral verification against a running build (see mk:evaluate); NOT for post-implementation simplification (see mk:simplify).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Target a specific Google Chrome user profile for browser automation via CDP. Discovers installed profiles from the Chrome Local State file, launches Chrome with the requested profile attached to a debug port, and connects agent-browser via `agent-browser connect <port>`. Use when "automate using my Work/Personal Chrome", "open site with my saved session", or "use Chrome profile named <name>". NOT for headless scraping without an existing user profile (use mk:agent-browser directly); NOT for importing cookies only (use agent-browser --auto-connect state save).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational decision frameworks: triage, escalation, case management, billing ops. Use for 'how to handle X cases', 'build triage', 'escalation protocol'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers - discover, analyze, and execute tools/prompts/resources from configured MCP servers. Use when working with MCP integrations, need to discover available MCP capabilities, filter MCP tools for specific tasks, execute MCP tools programmatically, access MCP prompts/resources, or implement MCP client functionality. Supports intelligent tool selection, multi-server management, and context-efficient capability discovery.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive reference for inter-process communication mechanisms -- every way processes can talk on a computer. Covers sockets (TCP, UDP, Unix domain), WebSockets, SSE, pipes (named/anonymous), shared memory (mmap, shm_open), message queues, signals, D-Bus, XPC (macOS), gRPC, REST, stdin/stdout, file-based coordination, and clipboard. Performance benchmarks, platform availability, and code examples for each. Special focus on which IPC works best for AI agent coordination. Activate on: "IPC", "inter-process communication", "process communication", "how do I talk between processes", "Unix socket vs TCP", "shared memory", "named pipe", "WebSocket vs SSE", "gRPC vs REST", "agent coordination IPC", "XPC service", "message passing", "stdout pipe", "D-Bus", "mmap". NOT for: distributed systems design (use distributed-systems), network protocol design (use networking), message queue infrastructure like Kafka (use data-pipeline-engineer).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies game theory to multi-agent coordination protocols with advisory claims, repeated interactions, daemon-mediated correlation, and deviation penalties. Use for Nash equilibrium checks, folk-theorem cooperation analysis, correlated-equilibrium routing, and price-of-anarchy audits in strategic agent systems. NOT for consumer pricing, card-game strategy, or general microeconomics outside agent coordination.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert in cluttering -- the lesser-known fluency disorder characterized by rapid/irregular speech rate, excessive disfluencies, and frequent ADHD comorbidity. Covers differential diagnosis from stuttering, assessment protocols, therapy approaches (rate control, self-monitoring, pragmatic awareness), technology-assisted intervention, and AI tools for people who clutter. Activate on 'cluttering', 'rapid speech disorder', 'speech rate too fast', 'speech disfluency not stuttering', 'disorganized speech', 'ADHD speech problems', 'cluttering vs stuttering', 'speech intelligibility', 'mazed speech', 'telescoping words'. NOT for stuttering-only treatment (overlap is common but they are distinct), hearing disorders, or voice disorders (pitch, resonance).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

AI-powered calendar management and agent-based scheduling coordination. Covers calendar APIs (Google Calendar, CalDAV/iCal), AI scheduling assistants (Reclaim, Clockwise, Motion, Cal.com), building custom calendar agents with MCP, multi-calendar merging, timezone management, focus block protection, meeting fatigue detection, and agent-to-agent meeting negotiation protocols. Activate on: "calendar agent", "AI scheduling", "calendar coordination", "meeting scheduling", "calendar API", "focus time protection", "calendar optimization", "Google Calendar MCP", "Reclaim", "Clockwise", "Motion", "Cal.com", "smart scheduling", "calendar-aware agent", "timezone scheduling", "agent negotiation meetings". NOT for: manual calendar UI component design (use form-validation-architect), project management scheduling or Gantt charts (use project-management-guru-adhd), general time-tracking or pomodoro apps (use adhd-daily-planner for time-awareness), building the agent itself from scratch (use agent-creator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose multi-agent architectures using environment-first analysis, coordination pressure, commitment tuning, and knowledge levels. Use for autonomy design, protocol choice, and coordination failures. NOT for single-agent planning, centralized schedulers, or prompt-only swarms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs alchemical free-energy calculations including relative binding free energy (RBFE / FEP+) and absolute binding free energy (ABFE) via OpenFE, FEP+, GROMACS, AMBER pmemd, and OpenMM with explicit lambda scheduling, soft-core potentials, MBAR/BAR analysis, cycle-closure validation, and protocol-appropriate enhanced sampling. Compares ML alternatives (Boltz-2 affinity, DeepDock). Use when ranking analogs by binding affinity beyond docking accuracy, performing prospective lead optimization, or validating SAR predictions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extracts cfDNA fragmentomics features (DELFI genome-wide short/long ratios, WPS nucleosome positioning, Griffin GC-corrected accessibility profiles, end-motifs/MDS, OCF) for cancer detection and tissue-of-origin from plasma WGS. Centers on the nuclease-footprint reframe (every feature re-reads one nucleosome object), the mandatory GC correction, and the cross-protocol non-comparability that breaks naive classifiers. Runs FinaleToolkit (real CLI/Python, MIT) and the Griffin Snakemake pipeline; DELFI is a method, not a package. Use when deriving fragment-based signal from cfDNA, choosing a feature family for detection vs subtyping, or diagnosing why a fragmentomic model failed validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes single-cell pooled CRISPR screens (Perturb-seq, CROP-seq, Perturb-CITE-seq, ECCITE-seq, multiome) where each cell carries an sgRNA and a scRNA-seq / surface-protein / chromatin readout. Covers experimental design (direct-capture Perturb-seq Dixit 2016 vs CROP-seq 3'UTR-barcoded Datlinger 2017 vs ECCITE-seq vs Multiome), MOI for sgRNA assignment, escaper-cell filtering (Mixscape, Papalexi 2021), SCEPTRE NB GLM + permutation for low-MOI (Barry 2024 Genome Biol 25:124), the Pertpy framework, factor decomposition, genome-scale Perturb-seq (Replogle 2022 Cell, 2.5M cells), and per-perturbation single-cell DE. Use when running a single-cell CRISPR screen, choosing direct-capture vs CROP-seq architecture, filtering escaper cells, performing single-cell DE, integrating Perturb-seq with pathway analysis, scaling to GW CRISPRi via Replogle protocol, or analyzing multi-omics screens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Preprocess CLIP-seq reads (eCLIP, iCLIP, iCLIP2, iCLIP3, irCLIP, PAR-CLIP, FLASH) with protocol-specific UMI extraction, adapter trimming, length filtering, and post-alignment PCR-duplicate collapse. Use when raw CLIP FASTQ must be turned into deduplicated, crosslink-preserving BAM input for peak calling; choosing between two-pass and single-pass adapter trimming; deciding minimum read length; or mapping UMI patterns to specific eCLIP/iCLIP/iCLIP2/iCLIP3 library preps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Computes sample size and power for clinical trials including continuous, binary, and time-to-event endpoints; superiority, non-inferiority, and equivalence designs; FDA 2016 non-inferiority margin selection with M1/M2 framework; Schoenfeld 1981 and Lakatos 1988 for survival; Schuirmann TOST and 80-125% bioequivalence; minimum clinically important difference (MCID) vs δ distinction. Use when justifying trial size in protocol or SAP per CONSORT 2025 item 16a.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。